Sulphathiazole Sodium Pentahydrate

Sulphathiazole Sodium Pentahydrate


    • Product Name Sulphathiazole Sodium Pentahydrate
    • Alias Sulphathiazole Sodium
    • Einecs 242-832-8
    • Mininmum Order 25GM
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    147317

    Chemical Formula C9H8N3NaO2S2·5H2O
    Molecular Weight 365.36
    Appearance White or almost white, crystalline powder
    Solubility Freely soluble in water, sparingly soluble in ethanol, practically insoluble in chloroform and ether
    Ph 1 Solution 9.5 - 11.0
    Melting Point Decomposes
    Pka Value 7.12
    Storage Conditions Store in a well - closed container, protected from light
    Stability Stable under normal conditions, but may be sensitive to light and moisture
    Use Antibacterial agent, used in some pharmaceutical formulations

    As an accredited Sulphathiazole Sodium Pentahydrate factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 100 - gram bottles containing Sulphathiazole Sodium Pentahydrate, well - sealed.
    Shipping Sulphathiazole Sodium Pentahydrate, a chemical, should be shipped in well - sealed containers, protected from moisture and sunlight. Follow proper hazardous material regulations to ensure safe transportation.
    Storage Sulphathiazole Sodium Pentahydrate should be stored in a cool, dry place. Keep it in a well - sealed container to prevent moisture absorption, as the pentahydrate form is sensitive to humidity. Avoid storing near sources of heat or direct sunlight, which could potentially degrade the chemical. This ensures its stability and maintains its quality over time.
    Application of Sulphathiazole Sodium Pentahydrate

    Degradation Kinetics and Sterile Filtration Parameters in Injectable Sulfathiazole Sodium Solutions

    Formulation of parenteral veterinary products utilizing sulphathiazole sodium pentahydrate begins with dissolution of the crystalline salt in Water for Injection (WFI) at concentrations equivalent to 100–200 mg/mL anhydrous sulfathiazole base, a range that mandates a gravimetric correction factor of approximately 1.35 to compensate for the 27–30% mass contributed by the five water molecules of crystallization. The solution pH is raised to 8.5–9.5 with sodium hydroxide to maintain complete solubility during subsequent heat exposure; however, at pH values exceeding 10.0, the hydrolytic ring-opening of the thiazole moiety accelerates, generating sulfanilamide-related impurities that must be controlled below 0.5% according to Ph. Eur. monograph 10.0, 0253. Terminal moist-heat sterilization is typically conducted in a rotary autoclave with a validated F₀ ≥ 8 ( 121°C for 15 minutes ), during which microcalorimetric studies per ASTM E968-02 reveal measurable lattice water redistribution within the sealed primary container. If the headspace relative humidity exceeds 60% at the end of the cool-down phase, condensate triggers localized precipitation of the free sulfathiazole acid, visually detectable as opalescent particles and quantifiable by USP <788> light obscuration particle counts with an acceptance limit of ≤ 25 particles/mL at ≥ 10 µm. Sterile filtration is executed using double-layer 0.22 µm polyethersulfone membrane cartridges (e.g., Sartorius Sartopore 2) maintained under a nitrogen blanket at a differential pressure not exceeding 2.0 bar, as higher ΔP induces shear-mediated nucleation of insoluble dimers that reduce flow rate by 40–60% post-filtration. Process validation documentation references FDA 21 CFR 211.113 (sterilization) and VICH GL 18 (residual solvents in veterinary products), with bioburden prior to filtration consistently reported below 10 CFU/100 mL. Finished product configurations include aqueous injectables in amber Type II glass vials of 100 mL and 250 mL as well as lyophilized powders for reconstitution, the latter processed on a Telstar LyoBeta industrial freeze-dryer with shelf temperature ramping from −40°C to +30°C over 36 hours to yield a cake moisture content below 1.5%.

    What Practical Solubility Limits Oral Drench and Drinking Water Medication?

    When sulphathiazole sodium pentahydrate is incorporated into water-soluble powders for mass medication via drinking lines, the saturation behaviour in hard water represents a non-negligible variability factor. Potentiometric titration following ISO 7887:2011 demonstrates that the apparent solubility in deionized water exceeds 500 mg/mL at 25°C, yet this drops sufficiently when bicarbonate hardness surpasses 200 mg/L CaCO₃ to produce a turbidity rise above 10 NTU, a consequence of transient calcium-sulfathiazole complex formation that can foul nipple drinker systems. To ensure target dosing of 1.0–2.0 g active substance per litre of final drinking water, the dry concentrate is formulated to contain 60–75% w/w of the pentahydrate salt (anhydrous basis content 73–92% after weight correction) along with dextrose monohydrate as a dispersing carrier and a 0.5–1.5% w/w addition of anhydrous sodium carbonate to buffer the reconstitution pH between 8.0 and 9.0. Powder blending is carried out in 2000 L V-shell tumble blenders operated at 12 rpm for 45–60 minutes, with blend uniformity assessed by inline near-infrared spectroscopy per ASTM E1655 at six predefined sampling points; acceptance requires a relative standard deviation below 5.0%. The mixed powder undergoes forced-air convection drying at an inlet temperature no higher than 45°C, where the outlet air dewpoint must be held below −5°C as continuously monitored by a chilled mirror hygrometer—any excursion above this threshold removes lattice water and shifts the assay by more than 3% relative to label claim. The final heat-sealed sachets utilize a 100 µm aluminum-polyethylene laminate with a water vapour transmission rate below 0.5 g/m²/24h (ASTM F1249-20). Conformity to the Chinese Veterinary Pharmacopoeia 2020 monograph for Sulfathiazole Sodium Soluble Powder is demonstrated through content uniformity testing per CVP Appendix 0103 (acceptance value ≤ 15.0) and loss-on-drying determination at 105°C for 4 hours. Terminal dosage forms comprise water-soluble sachets of 100 g and 500 g and oral drench suspensions packaged in 1 L and 5 L jerrycans, labelled with sulfathiazole base concentrations of 20% or 33.3% w/v.

    Formulation and Process Critical Control Points Across Sulfathiazole Sodium Pentahydrate Dosage Forms
    Dosage FormActive Loading (anhydrous basis)Critical Moisture/Water Activity LimitProcessing Temperature BoundaryPrimary Pharmacopoeial Test
    Injectable solution100–200 mg/mLHeadspace RH ≤ 60% post-sterilizationAutoclave ≤ 121°CPh. Eur. 10.0, 0253 related substances
    Water-soluble powder600–750 mg/g from pentahydrate saltOutlet air dewpoint ≤ −5°CDryer inlet ≤ 45°CCVP 2020 Appendix 0103 uniformity
    Feed premix/granule100–220 g/kg premix (eq. to 50–220 mg/kg feed)Mash moisture ≤ 14% pre-pelletingDie temperature ≤ 70°CFDA 21 CFR 558.630 (historical) assay
    Trimethoprim combination premixSulfathiazole 250 g/kg + trimethoprim 50 g/kgBlend LOD ≤ 2.5% w/wExcipient pre-dry at 55°C for 12 hVICH GL 36 combination product stability

    Premix Pelleting Survival Rates When Die Temperature Exceeds 70°C

    Incorporation of sulphathiazole sodium pentahydrate into medicated feed premix and pelleted feed relies on uniform dispersion into milled corn cob or wheat middlings, with a target active substance concentration of 50–220 mg/kg complete feed (equivalent to 100–220 g anhydrous sulfathiazole per kilogram of premix). The critical process conflict arises during ring-die pellet mill operation when preconditioning steam raises mash temperature above 65°C. At die hole temperatures of 70–85°C, partial dehydration of the pentahydrate lattice liberates crystallization water that reacts with the acid-sensitive sulfonamide nucleus, forming hydrogen sulfide by-products detectable by gas sensor arrays at concentrations above 2 ppm. Recovered active compound in finished pellets stored for 72 hours at 25°C/ 60% RH declines to 82–88% of initial assay, while unprocessed mash retains ≥97%. Compensatory overage additions of 10–12% are applied when pelleting cannot be performed below the critical threshold, though this approach introduces batch-to-batch content variability of up to 8% RSD. A validated mitigation strategy employs a cold-pelleting configuration using a preconditioner with steam at 0.5 bar and immediate post-pellet forced-air cooling in a counterflow cooler (e.g., Geelen Counterflow 6000), which maintains mash temperature ≤ 55°C and pellet exit temperature ≤ 42°C. The finished premix must comply with the homogeneity requirements of the GMP+ Feed Safety Assurance scheme, module BA1, where a minimum of 10 random sampling points must yield a sulfathiazole assay coefficient of variation below 7.0% when analyzed by HPLC per FDA 21 CFR 558.630 historical performance criteria. Terminal products are packaged in 25 kg three-ply paper bags with inner polyethylene liner and includeType A medicated article premixes and pelleted feeds for poultry and swine where regional marketing authorizations permit.

    Producing trimethoprim-sulfathiazole combination premixes requires precise stoichiometric control because the synergistic 5:1 ratio (sulfathiazole:trimethoprim) that drives the microbiological potency is susceptible to segregation during material handling. The physical mixture combines sulphathiazole sodium pentahydrate with trimethoprim (micronized, d₉₀ ≤ 15 µm) at label strengths typically set at 250 g sulfathiazole and 50 g trimethoprim per kilogram. Bulk density differentials—approximately 0.65 g/cm³ for the pentahydrate against 0.35 g/cm³ for trimethoprim—necessitate the use of bin blenders equipped with intensifier bars (e.g., Matcon IBC R100) operated at 3000 rpm tip speed for 3–5 minutes after a geometric dilution step. Direct compression of the resultant powder into oral boluses is avoided unless the moisture content of the entire blend is first reduced to ≤ 2.5% w/w via vacuum drying at 10 mbar and 40°C, because residual water catalyzes a slow Maillard-like interaction between the primary arylamine of trimethoprim and the sulfonamide nitrogen, evidenced by a 4–6% drop in potency over 12 months at 30°C/ 65% RH. Instead, the granulated form is preferred: wet granulation using an isopropanol-water azeotrope (95:5 v/v) in a high-shear mixer-granulator (e.g., Diosna P 1/6) followed by fluid-bed drying at 50°C until LOD reaches 1.5–2.0% maintains both active substances within 95–105% of label claim through the assigned shelf life. The combination product must satisfy VICH GL 36 stability requirements for fixed-dose combination veterinary medicinal products, with a forced degradation study demonstrating chromatographic separation of all potential interaction peaks (resolution ≥ 2.0 per Ph. Eur. 10.0). Finished forms encompass oral powders in sachets and effervescent tablets, as well as injectable co-formulations when sodium sulfathiazole is paired with trimethoprim lactate at low-volume doses for cattle.

    Immersion bath protocols for freshwater aquaculture species infected with Aeromonas hydrophila or Edwardsiella ictaluri utilize sulphathiazole sodium pentahydrate at concentrations of 10–20 mg active ingredient per litre of pond or tank water. The pentahydrate is pre-dissolved in a 100 L mixing vessel using a Venturi-type eductor to create a stock solution containing 5–10% w/v, which is then distributed across the rearing unit to achieve the target therapeutic bath for a 6–8 hour static immersion. Unlike in-feed administration, the immersion route demands that the ionic composition of the source water be characterized in advance: carbonate hardness above 300 mg/L CaCO₃ reduces the effective dissolved concentration by approximately 15% through adsorption onto suspended carbonate particulates. The protocol compliance framework references the FAO Technical Guidelines on Aquaculture Certification and section 6.3 of the OIE Aquatic Animal Health Code for responsible use of antimicrobials in aquaculture; residue surveillance programs then apply a withdrawal period of 21 days at water temperatures above 18°C, verified by LC-MS/MS quantification of sulfathiazole in edible tissue with a maximum residue limit set at 100 µg/kg by Codex Alimentarius. Processing of the bath product itself is limited to dry blending and vacuum sealing in moisture-barrier sachets of 500 g and 1 kg, with a certificate of analysis confirming crystal water content by Karl Fischer titration (USP <921>, Method Ia) within 26.5–30.0% w/w prior to release.

    Primary Regulatory and Compendial Standards Referenced by Application Segment for Sulfathiazole Sodium Pentahydrate
    Application SegmentStandard/RegulationRelevant Clause or MonographCritical Control Requirement
    Injectable solutionPh. Eur. 10.0 / FDA 21 CFR 211Monograph 0253, 211.113Related impurities ≤ 0.5%, sterility assurance
    Water-soluble powderCVP 2020 / ASTM F1249-20Appendix 0103, moisture barrier testContent uniformity AV ≤ 15.0
    Medicated feed premixFDA 21 CFR 558.630 (historical) / GMP+ BA1Assay procedural guidePost-pelleting assay ≥ 90% of declared
    Trimethoprim combinationVICH GL 36 / Ph. Eur. 10.0Fixed-dose combination stabilityDegradation product resolution ≥ 2.0
    Aquaculture immersionFAO Technical Guidelines / CodexResidue MRL 100 µg/kgWithdrawal period 21 days
    Intrauterine tabletUSP <701> / EU 2019/6Disintegration test <701>, GMP Annex 11Disintegration ≤ 5 min in simulated uterine fluid

    Intrauterine foaming tablets for bovine metritis are designed around the effervescent reaction of sulphathiazole sodium pentahydrate with a compacted citric acid–sodium bicarbonate couple, delivering local antibacterial concentrations directly to the endometrium. Each tablet is formulated to contain 5.0 g of the pentahydrate salt (equivalent to 3.6 g anhydrous sulfathiazole), together with citric acid monohydrate 2.5 g, sodium bicarbonate 3.2 g, and a polyethylene glycol 6000 binder at 2.0% w/w to cap the reaction kinetics. Direct compression on a rotary tablet press (e.g., Fette 3090i) using 25 mm flat-faced bevel-edge punches generates a tablet hardness of 40–60 N crucial to preventing premature chipping during automatic dispensing, yet friability must remain below 1.0% per USP <1216>. Disintegration testing in 500 mL simulated uterine fluid at 39°C per USP <701> yields a finely dispersed suspension within 3–5 minutes, a specification that becomes unattainable if the lubricant magnesium stearate exceeds 0.8% w/w because it forms a hydrophobic film on the effervescent granules. The dosage form must be packaged in induction-sealed aluminium strips with individual desiccant sachets, as the pentahydrate under high tropical humidity (> 75% RH at 30°C) initiates a premature acid-base reaction, raising strip dewpoint and reducing tablet efficacy by over 30% within 6 weeks. Compliance with the manufacturing requirements of EU Regulation 2019/6 Annex 11 (veterinary medicinal products) is verified through in-process hardness and disintegration monitoring on a statistical sampling plan of 20 tablets per 15-minute compression interval. Terminal product configurations also include intrauterine pessaries and non-effervescent suspensions, the latter using an oil-based vehicle to avoid water-exacerbated degradation.

    Free Quote

    Competitive Sulphathiazole Sodium Pentahydrate prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    Sulphathiazole Sodium Pentahydrate (CAS 144-80-9 for the anhydrous substance; proprietary hydrated form supplied as the pentahydrate) is a white to faintly yellow, crystalline powder identified by specific rotation (where applicable, non-chiral) and by infrared absorption spectrophotometry against a reference standard as prescribed in the current USP monograph for Sulfathiazole Sodium and the corresponding Ph. Eur. monograph. The molecular formula C9H8N3NaO2S2·5H2O corresponds to a molecular weight of 367.37 g/mol, of which 24.5% ± 1.0% is structurally bound water of crystallization, determined by Karl Fischer titration (USP 〈921〉, Method Ia) and further verified by loss on drying at 105 °C for 4 hours, which must not exceed 25.0%. This hydration stoichiometry differentiates it from the anhydrous sodium salt and from sulfathiazole free acid (CAS 72-14-0), which is a practically insoluble neutral molecule. The pentahydrate form yields a clear, strongly alkaline solution at 1 g in 2 mL water (pH 9.0–11.0, USP 〈791〉), whereas the parent sulfathiazole requires an alkaline pH modifier to reach the same solubility, a property leveraged in high-concentration injectable formulations and concentrated oral solutions intended for mass medication via drinking water. In production-scale dissolution vessels (e.g., USP Apparatus 2, paddle speed 50 rpm), the pentahydrate yields a plateau in dissolved concentration within 10 minutes at 37 °C, and its release profile remains unaffected by lot-to-lot crystallinity differences so long as the water content is maintained above 23.5%; below that threshold, partial conversion to a dihydrate form has been observed to reduce dissolution rate by approximately 15%, a factor that imposes tight control over warehouse humidity (RH maintained below 60%) during bulk storage. The specific structural feature that distinguishes sulfathiazole from all other sulfonamide antibiotics is the N-thiazol-2-yl substituent at the sulfonamide bridge, which confers a log P (octanol/water) of approximately 0.05—lower than that of sulfadiazine (approx. -0.09) and substantially less lipophilic than sulfadimidine (sulfamethazine, log P0.89). This distribution coefficient directly impacts pharmacokinetic behavior in food-producing animals: the plasma protein binding of sulfathiazole in bovine plasma is reported at 55–60%, compared with 80–85% for sulfadimidine, resulting in a larger free, pharmacologically active fraction that drives tissue penetration but also a shorter elimination half-life. In swine, the terminal half-life following intravenous administration of the sodium pentahydrate has been determined to be 3.2–4.0 hours, with total body clearance of 0.15–0.20 L/kg·h, necessitating twice-daily or continuous medication when targeting susceptible Gram-positive cocci such as Streptococcus suis or fastidious Gram-negative organisms including Pasteurella multocida. By contrast, sulfamethazine sodium in cattle has a half-life in the range of 8–12 hours, enabling once-daily dosing; thus the choice between these two sulfonamides is governed by the required dosing interval and the targeted pathogen spectrum, with sulfathiazole often preferred for acute pulmonary pasteurellosis outbreaks where rapid attainment of high free drug concentrations in lung tissue is prioritized. As a monographed veterinary pharmaceutical ingredient, the pentahydrate must conform to purity specifications aligned with USP and Ph. Eur. general chapters. The assay on the anhydrous basis is determined by liquid chromatography (USP 〈621〉) and is specified in certificates of analysis at ≥99.0%, with individual related substances limited to ≤0.5% and total impurities not more than 1.0%. Heavy metal testing, originally by USP 〈231〉 Method II (limit ≤10 ppm as Pb), is now routinely replaced by elemental impurity profiling per ICH Q3D and USP 〈232〉/〈233〉; the calculated permitted concentration for Class 1 elements such as lead and cadmium remains below 1.0 ppm when the substance is used at recommended daily doses of up to 50 mg/kg body weight. Residual solvents are controlled in accordance with USP 〈467〉 and Ph. Eur. chapter 5.4, with typical residual ethanol from the final recrystallization step reported below 100 ppm. In injectable-grade material, endotoxin levels are validated to be ≤0.2 EU/mg (Ph. Eur. 2.6.14, LAL test), and the product is tested for sterility (USP 〈71〉) when aseptically filled into final containers. These specifications place the pentahydrate in a distinct category compared with technical-grade sulfathiazole sodium, which may contain up to 2% of the sulfanilamide precursor and is unsuitable for systemic medication. A well-known processing challenge on powder-blending lines employing double-cone blenders or ribbon mixers arises from the material’s tendency to cake at ambient relative humidity exceeding 60% due to the dynamic equilibrium of the pentahydrate with water vapor. In drum-to-hopper transfers on a manufacturing floor without climate control, bridging and rat-holing have been documented when the product was previously stored in torn sacks at 75% RH, leading to significant batch-to-batch variation in sieve analysis (retention on a 200-mesh screen increasing from 2% to 17%). Therefore, manufacturers of soluble powder premixes and oral granules routinely specify packaging in double-lined, heat-sealed polyethylene bags inside fiber drums or opaque HDPE containers with a desiccant packet insufflated to a moisture content of less than 0.5% internally. When the pentahydrate is incorporated into a dry granulation process using a roller compactor with a 50 kN roll force, the compact has been observed to retain full dissolution characteristics only if the feed moisture is kept below 25.5%; above that limit, the applied pressure can release water of crystallization, forming a transient anhydrous phase that hydrates post-compaction with a consequent expansion and loss of tablet hardness—a failure mode not observed with the sodium salt of sulfadiazine, which crystallizes as a monohydrate with a lower water content (~4.5%) and does not undergo a comparable phase transition under equivalent compaction forces. Differences from other sulfonamide sodium salts extend to incompatibilities in extemporaneous compounding. The alkaline pH of a 10% aqueous solution precludes combination with acid-labile excipients such as ascorbic acid, which undergoes oxidative degradation at pH > 7.0, and with certain flavoring agents (e.g., citral) that isomerize in alkaline media. In contrast, sulfadiazine sodium solution (pH 9.5–11.0) exhibits a similar incompatibility pattern, whereas sulfisoxazole diolamine solution is less alkaline and can be formulated with a broader range of taste-masking agents. Another critical divergence concerns photostability: the thiazole ring of sulfathiazole is susceptible to UVA-induced N–S bond cleavage, producing a yellow-brown chromophore and liberating sulfanilamide. For this reason, bulk active pharmaceutical ingredient is stored in light-resistant containers meeting USP 〈661〉 and 〈671〉 specifications for light transmission; long-term stability studies conducted under ICH Q1B conditions (overall illumination not less than 1.2 million lux-hours) confirm that the pentahydrate meets acceptance criteria for appearance and assay only when protected from light. This photodegradation pathway is less pronounced for sulfadoxine, which contains a pyrimidine ring, allowing a wider manufacturing window for tablet film coating without light-opaque pigments. In clinical veterinary application, sulphathiazole sodium pentahydrate is utilized primarily as a systemic antibacterial in calves, pigs, and poultry, where it is administered orally at 30–50 mg/kg body weight every 12 hours or incorporated into drinking water at concentrations of 0.04–0.08% (w/v) for continuous medication. Its narrow-therapeutic-index pairing with dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors such as trimethoprim at a fixed 5:1 sulfonamide-to-trimethoprim ratio provides bactericidal synergy against organisms like Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp., an advantage over the same ratio with sulfadiazine only when the target pathogen exhibits lower minimum inhibitory concentrations for the thiazole derivative. Published data for this specific combination in poultry indicates a MIC90 of 0.25 µg/mL for sulfathiazole against P. multocida, while sulfadiazine under identical conditions yields an MIC90 of 0.5 µg/mL, although the clinical significance of this twofold difference must be weighed against the shorter inter-dosing interval required by sulfathiazole’s rapid elimination. Residue depletion studies in swine have shown that after a 5-day oral regimen, the sum of sulfathiazole and its metabolites declines below the maximum residue limit (MRL) of 100 µg/kg in muscle and liver—as established by Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 and Codex Alimentarius—within 10 days post-withdrawal, whereas sulfadiazine residues in comparable tissue can persist above the same MRL for up to 15 days owing to higher protein binding and slower renal clearance.