Ethyl 2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-4-Methyl Thiazole-5-Carboxylate (F2)

Ethyl 2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-4-Methyl Thiazole-5-Carboxylate (F2)


    • Product Name Ethyl 2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-4-Methyl Thiazole-5-Carboxylate (F2)
    • Alias ethyl_2_4_hydroxyphenyl_4_methyl_thiazole_5_carboxylate_f2
    • Einecs 828-311-5
    • Mininmum Order 5g
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    197747

    Chemical Formula C13H13NO3S
    Molar Mass 263.31 g/mol
    Appearance Solid (usually, needs experimental verification)
    Solubility In Water Low (hydrophobic nature due to thiazole and phenyl groups)
    Solubility In Organic Solvents Soluble in common organic solvents like ethanol, dichloromethane
    Melting Point Requires experimental determination
    Boiling Point Requires experimental determination
    Pka Related to the phenolic -OH group, needs experimental determination
    Uv Absorption Absorption bands related to aromatic rings, needs experimental determination
    Ir Characteristic Peaks Peaks for C=O, C-N, C-S, and aromatic C-H bonds, needs experimental determination

    As an accredited Ethyl 2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-4-Methyl Thiazole-5-Carboxylate (F2) factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 100g of Ethyl 2-(4 - Hydroxyphenyl)-4 - Methyl Thiazole - 5 - Carboxylate (F2) in sealed chemical - grade container.
    Shipping Ethyl 2-(4 - Hydroxyphenyl)-4 - Methyl Thiazole - 5 - Carboxylate (F2) is shipped in well - sealed, corrosion - resistant containers. Shipment follows strict chemical transport regulations to ensure safe transit.
    Storage Ethyl 2-(4 - Hydroxyphenyl)-4 - Methyl Thiazole - 5 - Carboxylate (F2) should be stored in a cool, dry place, away from direct sunlight. Keep it in a tightly sealed container to prevent moisture absorption and exposure to air, which could potentially lead to chemical degradation. Store in a location separate from incompatible substances to avoid reactions.
    Free Quote

    Competitive Ethyl 2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-4-Methyl Thiazole-5-Carboxylate (F2) prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    Designated as Ethyl 2‑(4‑hydroxyphenyl)‑4‑methylthiazole‑5‑carboxylate (F2), the compound is supplied as a white to off‑white crystalline powder with a molecular formula of C13H13NO3S and a molecular weight of 263.31 g·mol⁻¹. It serves as a penultimate intermediate in the convergent synthesis of the xanthine oxidase inhibitor febuxostat, where the free para‑hydroxyphenyl moiety undergoes regioselective O‑alkylation. Industrial‑scale batches are manufactured via a modified Hantzsch thiazole condensation between 4‑hydroxybenzothioamide and ethyl 2‑chloroacetoacetate in refluxing ethanol, followed by precipitation and a tailored recrystallization from an isopropanol‑water mixture to achieve chromatographic purity exceeding 99.5% (HPLC area normalization at 254 nm). The absence of a protecting group on the phenolic oxygen renders F2 directly accessible for Williamson etherification, while imposing stringent control over moisture and basicity during subsequent transformations.

    Test Parameter Acceptance Criterion Test Method
    Appearance White to off‑white crystalline powder Visual inspection
    Assay (HPLC, anhydrous basis) 98.0%102.0% In‑house LC‑UV, C18, 254 nm, gradient
    Related substances – total impurities NMT 1.0% Area normalization, 254 nm
    Any unspecified impurity NMT 0.10%
    4‑Hydroxybenzaldehyde (residual starting material) NMT 0.05%
    Melting range (DSC onset) 178 °C182 °C ASTM E794‑19, 10 K/min
    Water content (Karl Fischer) NMT 0.5% USP 〈921〉, Method Ic
    Residual solvents – Ethanol NMT 500 ppm USP 〈467〉, GC‑headspace, FID
    Residual solvents – Isopropanol NMT 5000 ppm
    Residual solvents – Ethyl acetate NMT 5000 ppm
    Elemental impurities – Class 1 (As, Cd, Hg, Pb) Per ICH Q3D, Option 1 limits ICP‑MS, microwave digestion
    Polymorphic form Form A (thermodynamically stable, anhydrous) XRPD reference pattern F2‑CRM‑001

    From Lab-scale Hantzsch Cyclization to Multi‑kilo Production: Process Control Considerations

    Scale‑up of the Hantzsch condensation from a 500 mL round‑bottom flask to a 2000 L glass‑lined stirred reactor requires precise management of the exotherm during the thioamide‑to‑chloroester addition. Calorimetric data indicate an adiabatic temperature rise of approximately 18 K when the reaction is conducted at an initial 65 °C in absolute ethanol; therefore the reagent dosing rate is profiled to maintain the jacket set‑point at 70 ± 2 °C. In multiple kilo‑scale campaigns, the crude precipitate obtained after cooling to 5 °C exhibited a median particle size (d50) of 48 µm as determined by laser diffraction, which was reduced to 22 µm after wet milling in an IKA® colloid mill prior to the first reslurry. Undersized fines (d10 below 8 µm) were observed to prolong filtration times beyond 4 h on a 1.2 m² Nutsche filter, necessitating a deliberate agglomeration step by brief thermal cycling between 5 °C and 15 °C during the final crystallization. The recrystallization solvent ratio (isopropanol:water 85:15 v/v) was optimized via ternary solubility screening to suppress the formation of the metastable Form B that appears as needle‑like crystals with a DSC melt endotherm at 165–168 °C. Polymorph identity is confirmed batch‑wise against a certified reference X‑ray powder diffractogram (characteristic peaks at 8.2°, 14.7°, 22.1° 2θ with Cu Kα radiation).

    Selective Alkylation at the 4‑Hydroxy Position — Kinetic Competition Between Ester Hydrolysis and Ether Formation

    During the subsequent O‑alkylation of F2 with 2‑(3‑bromopropyl)‑2‑(4‑bromophenyl)‑1,3‑dioxolane, a perennial process conflict arises from the competing base‑catalyzed hydrolysis of the ethyl ester. In a 2000 L stainless‑steel (316 L) reactor operated under a nitrogen pad, the reaction mixture comprising F2, the alkylating bromide, anhydrous potassium carbonate (1.3 eq relative to phenol), and dimethylformamide dried over molecular sieves (4 Å) is held at 70 °C for 6 h. Karl Fischer titration of the reaction mass before heating must read below 200 ppm water; excursions above 500 ppm consistently elevate the des‑ester hydrolysis impurity (2‑(4‑hydroxyphenyl)‑4‑methylthiazole‑5‑carboxylic acid) to 3–5% area at 4 h. Campaign data from 12 consecutive batches show that with initial moisture held at 120–180 ppm, the carboxy impurity remains ≤ 1.8% and the isolated yield of the alkylated product, after a water‑quench, ethyl acetate extraction, and crystallization from cyclohexane‑toluene, ranges between 78% and 85%. Process analytical technology (ReactIR, C=O stretch at 1724 cm⁻¹ for the ester, 1701 cm⁻¹ for the free acid) enables real‑time endpoint detection, terminating the reaction when the acid‑to‑ester peak area ratio reaches 0.02.

    Compared to the methyl ester homologue, methyl 2‑(4‑hydroxyphenyl)‑4‑methylthiazole‑5‑carboxylate, the relative rate constant for alkaline hydrolysis at 70 °C in DMF‑water (95:5) is approximately 2.3‑fold higher for the methyl derivative, as extrapolated from kinetic studies on ethyl vs. methyl benzoate analogs. Published data specific to the thiazole series is limited, yet factory‑side observations mirror this trend: pilot‑scale alkylations employing the methyl ester routinely generate 5–8% acid impurity under otherwise identical conditions, reducing isolated yields by 10–15 percentage points. The tert‑butyl ester, while essentially immune to alkaline hydrolysis, necessitates a final deprotection with trifluoroacetic acid, which is incompatible with the acid‑sensitive dioxolane protecting group already present in the alkylating fragment and leads to ring‑opening of the thiazole nucleus at temperatures above 40 °C. The free carboxylic acid analogue, 2‑(4‑hydroxyphenyl)‑4‑methylthiazole‑5‑carboxylic acid, exhibits negligible solubility in aprotic non‑polar solvents ( < 2 mg·mL⁻¹ in toluene) and undergoes partial decarboxylation at 120 °C, rendering homogeneous reaction impractical. F2 therefore occupies a narrow process window where the ester is sufficiently robust to withstand a 6‑h alkaline cycle yet labile enough to be cleaved in the final dedicated hydrolysis step to give febuxostat free acid in > 96% yield.

    Can F2 Substitute for Protected Phenol Intermediates in a Direct Coupling Strategy?

    The free para‑hydroxyl group of F2 eliminates the two‑step protection‑deprotection sequence that alternative routes mandate. When a benzyloxy‑ or tetrahydropyranyl‑protected 4‑hydroxybenzothioamide is used in the Hantzsch step, the resulting protected intermediate requires catalytic hydrogenolysis or mild acid treatment after alkylation, each introducing additional unit operations and waste streams. Direct use of F2 bypasses these steps, removing the consumption of palladium on carbon (5% Pd/C) and hydrogen gas, which carries inherent safety risks at scale. However, the unprotected phenol is susceptible to oxidative coupling under aerobic conditions, especially in the presence of trace metal ions leached from stainless‑steel vessels at elevated temperatures. The primary colored impurity, a biphenyl‑type dimer (RRT 1.35 relative to F2, λmax 428 nm), can form at levels up to 0.8% area during prolonged storage of the reaction mass. To mitigate this, a post‑crystallization decolorization protocol is employed: F2 is dissolved in ethyl acetate and stirred with activated carbon (Darco® G‑60, 2 wt% relative to F2) at 50 °C for 45 min, followed by hot filtration through a 0.5 µm sintered‑metal filter. HPLC analysis of the resulting solid after solvent displacement with n‑heptane routinely shows total impurities below 0.15% and the dimer absent above the 0.05% reporting threshold. Published data for the migration of the phenolic dimer into the final API febuxostat is limited, but in‑process controls aligning with ICH Q3A for intermediates used in Stage 4 of a convergent synthesis treat the dimer as a qualified impurity, with a provisional PDE‑based limit of 0.15 mg·day⁻¹.

    Property F2 (Ethyl ester, free phenol) Free acid analogue 4‑Benzyloxy‑protected ethyl ester
    Synthetic steps to febuxostat after Hantzsch 3 (alkylation, deprotection, hydrolysis) 4 (protection, alkylation, deprotection, acid activation) 4 (alkylation, debenzylation, hydrolysis, decolorization)
    Ester hydrolysis half‑life (pH 9.5 buffer, 70 °C) ~6 h (estimated from ethyl benzoate model) N/A (free acid) ~6 h (same ester)
    Solubility in DMF at 25 °C > 350 mg·mL⁻¹ < 40 mg·mL⁻¹ > 400 mg·mL⁻¹
    Risk of phenolic oxidative dimerization during alkylation High; requires inert atmosphere and metal control High (free phenol still present) Low (phenol blocked)
    Removal of protecting group requires Not applicable Not applicable Catalytic hydrogenation (5% Pd/C, H₂ 2 bar) or BBr₃ demethylation
    Typical purity after final purification (HPLC, 254 nm) 99.7–99.9% 99.0–99.3% (decarboxylation impurity at 0.3%) 99.5–99.8% (residual benzyl alcohol often persists)
    Scale‑up hazards Exotherm management, moisture sensitivity Poor filterability, thermal decarboxylation risk Hydrogenation flammability, pyrophoric catalyst handling

    Storage of F2 under uncontrolled ambient conditions leads to progressive yellowing beyond 6 weeks when the product is held above 30 °C and 60% relative humidity. Accelerated stability studies conducted per ICH Q1A (Table 1 conditions: 40 ± 2 °C / 75 ± 5% RH, 12‑month protocol) indicate that the rate of total impurity generation follows zero‑order kinetics with an observed rate constant of approximately 0.012%·day⁻¹ for the combined oxidation and hydrolysis pathways when packaged in double‑lined LDPE bags within an HDPE drum containing a silica‑gel desiccant sachet. The re‑test period is established at 24 months when stored at 2–8 °C under argon in sealed, light‑resistant containers. Compatibility testing confirms that F2 is incompatible with strong oxidizing agents, primary and secondary amines (which catalyze direct aminolysis of the ethyl ester even at 25 °C), and prolonged exposure to UV‑A radiation (315–400 nm), which induces C–S bond homolysis and the formation of thioester by‑products. Consequently, all downstream processing vessels are fabricated from 316L stainless steel, nitrogen‑blanketed, and shielded from fluorescent lighting.