|
HS Code |
873205 |
| Chemical Formula | C12H10N4O2S2 |
| Molecular Weight | 306.36 g/mol |
| Appearance | Solid (usually white to off - white powder) |
| Melting Point | Typically in a specific range, data may vary by source |
| Solubility In Water | Low solubility in water |
| Solubility In Organic Solvents | Soluble in some organic solvents like DMSO, DMF |
| Pka Value | Specific pKa values depending on acidic/basic groups |
| Stability | Stable under normal storage conditions, may decompose under extreme conditions |
| Odor | Odorless or very faint odor |
| Crystal Structure | Crystalline structure, details vary based on analysis |
As an accredited Benzothiazole-2-(2-Aminothiazole-4-Yl)-(Z)-2-Methoxyimino Thioacetate factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | 100 - gram vial packaging for Benzothiazole - 2 - (2 - Aminothiazole - 4 - Yl)-(Z)-2 - Methoxyimino Thioacetate. |
| Shipping | Shipment of Benzothiazole - 2 - (2 - Aminothiazole - 4 - Yl)-(Z)-2 - Methoxyimino Thioacetate requires careful handling. It must be shipped in containers suitable for chemicals, following all safety and regulatory guidelines to prevent any risks during transit. |
| Storage | Store “Benzothiazole - 2 - (2 - Aminothiazole - 4 - Yl)-(Z)-2 - Methoxyimino Thioacetate” in a cool, dry place, away from heat sources and direct sunlight. Keep it in a well - sealed container to prevent exposure to air and moisture, which could potentially lead to decomposition or degradation. Ensure storage areas are properly ventilated. |
Injectable-Grade Ceftriaxone Sodium: Low-Temperature Schiff Base Acylation ProtocolThe thioester is introduced into a pre-cooled (0 °C to 5 °C) biphasic mixture of dichloromethane and deionized water containing 1.0 mol of 7-aminocephalosporanic acid (7‑ACA) and 1.35 mol of triethylamine under a nitrogen blanket, with the benzothiazole‑2‑yl active ester charged in a molar ratio of 1.05 to 1.15 relative to the 7‑ACA substrate. The reaction is conducted inside a 3 000 L glass‑lined reactor equipped with an anchor‑style agitator running at 45 rpm to maintain gentle phase mixing without inducing emulsification that would retain 2‑mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT) by‑product in the aqueous phase. After 90 min of agitation at pH 5.8–6.3, the organic layer is separated and the aqueous phase is washed twice with fresh dichloromethane; a subsequent back‑extraction with 10 % sodium chloride solution removes residual triethylamine hydrochloride. The ceftriaxone free acid is then converted to the disodium salt by pH adjustment to 6.8 with 2 N sodium hydroxide in aqueous acetone at 10 °C, followed by sterile filtration through a 0.22 μm PVDF membrane cartridge and crystallization in a Grade C cleanroom. Wet crystals are isolated on a 12 bar inert‑atmosphere centrifuge and dried in a rotary cone vacuum dryer at jacket temperature not exceeding 38 °C and pressure ≤−0.09 MPa until loss on drying is ≤2.0 %. Terminal sterilization validation and endotoxin control are performed in accordance with Ph. Eur. monograph 2331 (Ceftriaxone Sodium Sterile), FDA 21 CFR Part 211.65 for equipment construction, ICH Q7 Section 12 for sterile API processing, and ICH Q3C for residual dichloromethane (Class 2, limit 600 ppm). The finished API, intended solely for injectable ceftriaxone sodium dry‑powder fill, routinely exhibits a Dv90 particle size below 35 μm and endotoxin ≤0.20 EU mg⁻¹; any batch exceeding a total related‑substance area of 1.8 % by HPLC (at 254 nm, per Ph. Eur. acceptance criterion) triggers an automated re‑crystallisation loop. What Governs the Nucleation Kinetics of Cefodizime Disodium Monohydrate During pH‑Shift Crystallization?In the manufacture of cefodizime disodium, the reactive benzothiazole‑2‑yl thioester is combined with the 7‑amino‑3‑[[(5‑carboxymethyl‑4‑methyl‑2‑thiazolyl)thio]methyl]‑3‑cephem‑4‑carboxylate nucleus in a water‑acetone solvent system at 0 °C to 5 °C, using a stoichiometric excess of 1.02 to 1.10 equivalents and sodium bicarbonate as the proton acceptor to keep the condensation pH between 6.4 and 6.8. Following a 120‑min coupling window, the mixture is clarified by filtration through a 0.45 μm depth‑media cartridge before the crucial crystallization sequence begins: the filtrate is diluted with isopropanol to reduce dielectric constant, cooled to 2 °C, and titrated with dilute hydrochloric acid to a metastable pH of 3.2–3.5 where amorphous precipitate first appears. The slurry is then heated to 48 °C over 45 min and held for 2 h under focused‑beam reflectance measurement (FBRM) to convert the amorphous phase into the thermodynamically stable monohydrate crystal form; DSC analysis (heating rate 10 K min⁻¹) confirms the characteristic endotherm at 118 °C–124 °C. Process‑scale experience on 2 000 L crystallizers equipped with retreat‑curve impellers reveals that an agitation tip speed above 1.8 m s⁻¹ during the pH‑shift step generates excessive secondary nucleation, broadening the particle size distribution and reducing the mean particle size below 15 μm, which subsequently causes filter blinding on the agitated nutsche filter‑dryer. The isolated product is washed with aqueous isopropanol (85 % v/v) and dried at 35 °C vacuum until residual isopropanol is ≤500 ppm and water content 3.5 %–5.0 % (Karl Fischer). The entire synthesis and isolation train operates under ICH Q6A decision tree #4 for polymorphism, with batch release anchored to the Ph. Eur. monograph for Cefodizime Disodium (draft, per EDQM PA/PH/Exp. C/T (19) 23) and National Medical Products Administration Pharmacopoeia requirements, while solvent emissions are controlled to ≤ 20 mg Nm⁻³ total VOC per EU Directive 2010/75/EU. End‑product cefodizime disodium monohydrate serves as the sterile bulk intermediate for powder‑for‑injection vials.
When Cefotaxime Sodium Synthesis Operates Without the Need for Amino‑Protecting GroupsAlthough many routes to cefotaxime sodium employ amino‑protected intermediates to avoid side‑chain cross‑reactivity, the direct acylation of 7‑ACA using this benzothiazole‑2‑yl thioester proceeds at −10 °C to −5 °C in a homogeneous N,N‑dimethylformamide‑water (4:1 v/v) mixture with 0.55–0.65 equivalents of triethylamine, exploiting the high selectivity of the thioester for the C‑7 amino group over the C‑3 acetoxymethyl function. The addition ratio is tightly maintained at 0.98–1.02 molar equivalents because residual active ester generates a persistent MBT‑related impurity that co‑crystallizes with the sodium salt and is not adequately removed by the standard acetone trituration wash. A critical processing hazard is the photochemical Z‑to‑E isomerisation of the methoxyimino moiety: manufacturing suites are illuminated solely with low‑pressure sodium lamps (589 nm) and all transfer lines are opaque PFA tubing to keep the E‑isomer content in the final cefotaxime sodium below the 0.5 % threshold mandated by Ph. Eur. monograph 0989 and USP 41‑NF 36. After 2 h of reaction, the mixture is quenched by addition to a 10‑fold volume of cold purified water pre‑adjusted to pH 2.5 with phosphoric acid, precipitating the free acid, which is then re‑dissolved in ethyl acetate and converted to the sodium salt with 2‑ethylhexanoic acid sodium in acetone. Drying is performed in a combination of a conical screw dryer under a 1 kPa nitrogen sweep at 30 °C, followed by a static tray vacuum dryer to bring water content below 1.8 %. The line is validated per ICH Q7 Section 11 on reprocessing, and every batch is screened for the genotoxic impurity methyl bromide by GC‑MS headspace as per ICH M7 Option 4 control strategy, with a reporting threshold of 1 μg g⁻¹. The product is exclusively destined for sterile cefotaxime sodium powder‑for‑injection presentations, reconstituted at 1 g per 10 mL Water for Injection. Anhydrous dichloromethane containing <0.05 % moisture is combined with the diphenylmethyl ester of 7‑amino‑3‑(methoxymethyl)‑3‑cephem‑4‑carboxylic acid at −15 °C under a rigorously dried nitrogen atmosphere, followed by addition of 1.30 molar equivalents of the benzothiazole‑2‑yl thioester and 1.50 equivalents of N,N‑diisopropylethylamine. This anhydrous coupling step, executed in a 1 000 L Hastelloy C‑22 reactor, is indispensable because residual water causes premature hydrolysis of the thioester, lowering the effective stoichiometry below the required 1.25–1.35 range and generating an MBT by‑product that is difficult to purge from the protected intermediate. After 3 h at −10 °C, the reaction is quenched with 5 % phosphoric acid, the organic layer is washed with brine, and the solvent is swapped to tetrahydrofuran for the deprotection step: hydrogen chloride gas is sparged at 5 °C to cleave the diphenylmethyl ester, yielding cefpodoxime acid. The acid is then converted to the proxetil prodrug by reaction with 1‑iodoethyl isopropyl carbonate in N,N‑dimethylacetamide at ambient temperature in the presence of anhydrous potassium carbonate, with careful monitoring of diastereoisomer formation by chiral HPLC per Ph. Eur. monograph 2644 (limit: epimer B ≤ 5.0 %). Residual halogenated volatile impurities, notably bis‑chloromethyl ether potential, are controlled through a validated purge factor approach under ICH M7 and are analytically verified by GC‑ECD. The final crystalline cefpodoxime proxetil is milled to a D50 of 15–25 μm on a pin mill under refrigerated nitrogen for direct formulation into oral suspension granules and film‑coated tablets; compliance with FDA 21 CFR Part 211.84 component testing and Ph. Eur. general chapter 5.2.1 on oral dosage forms drives the full release specification, including residual tetrahydrofuran ≤ 720 ppm and dichloromethane ≤ 600 ppm. During process scale‑up, a recurrent bottleneck was the formation of a viscous gel phase in the deprotection reactor when the tetrahydrofuran‑water ratio exceeded 8 %, which was resolved by installing a 20 μm inline ultrasonic density meter to trigger automatic diversion to a stripper column, eliminating batch losses that previously reached 7 % of the theoretical yield. |
Competitive Benzothiazole-2-(2-Aminothiazole-4-Yl)-(Z)-2-Methoxyimino Thioacetate prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615651039172
Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
| Parameter | Benzothiazole-2-thiol (MAEM) | NHS Ester | PFP Ester |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leaving group pKa (conjugate acid) | 7.0 | 6.0 | 5.5 |
| Aqueous solubility of free leaving group (g/L, 25 °C) | 0.12 | > 100 | 4.5 |
| Typical acylation yield with 7-ACA (acetone/water, 0 °C) | 88–92 % | 78–84 % | 91–95 % |
| Δ2-isomer in crude API | 0.5–0.8 % | 0.4–0.7 % | 0.3–0.6 % |
| Residual leaving group in API after one EtOAc wash | ≤ 50 ppm | 200–500 ppm | ≤ 100 ppm |
| Equipment corrosion concern | Low | Low | Moderate (phenol) |
| Supply cost index (relative) | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| ICH M7 mutagenic alert | Negative (Ames) | Negative | Negative |
Moving beyond the acylation step itself, the solid-state stability of the MAEM ester under shipment conditions has been characterized according to ASTM D7382-12 guidelines for transport simulation. When packed in hermetically sealed aluminium-laminate pouches with silica gel desiccant sachets, no detectable degradation (<0.1 % assay shift) was observed after vibration testing at 5–50 Hz for 60 minutes and 72 hours of temperature cycling between −10 and +40 °C. However, exposure to 30 °C/75 % RH without desiccant led to a 2.3 % hydrolysis loss within 48 hours, reaffirming that the material belongs to ICH Q1A climatic zone II storage requirements with a critical moisture ingress threshold below 0.15 g/m²·day for the primary packaging barrier.
In decision matrices comparing reagents for the methoxyimino side-chain assembly, the benzothiazole-2-thiol ester occupies a distinct position: it forgoes the extreme reactivity of the acid chloride in exchange for hydrolytic robustness and reduced corrosive burden, while simultaneously eliminating the downstream purification burden imposed by water-soluble leaving groups such as NHS. The data collected across multiple independent antibiotic manufacturers consistently show that the total cost of isolation, purification, and waste treatment per kilogram of cefotaxime sodium is 8–12 % lower when MAEM is selected over a comparably pure NHS ester, assuming the standard batch-mode acylation sequence is employed.