|
HS Code |
194767 |
| Chemical Formula | C7H11N3S |
| Molar Mass | 169.25 g/mol |
| Appearance | Solid (usually) |
| Melting Point | Data needed |
| Boiling Point | Data needed |
| Solubility In Water | Data needed |
| Solubility In Organic Solvents | Data needed |
| Density | Data needed |
| Pka | Data needed |
| Chirality | Chiral, (6S)-configuration |
As an accredited (6S)-2,6-Diamino-4,5,6,7-Tetrahydrobenzothiazole factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | (6S)-2,6 - Diamino - 4,5,6,7 - Tetrahydrobenzothiazole: 100g in sealed chemical - grade packaging. |
| Shipping | (6S)-2,6 - Diamino - 4,5,6,7 - Tetrahydrobenzothiazole is shipped in sealed, corrosion - resistant containers. Special care is taken to ensure compliance with chemical transportation regulations to prevent leakage and ensure safety during transit. |
| Storage | (6S)-2,6 - Diamino-4,5,6,7 - Tetrahydrobenzothiazole should be stored in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight. Keep it in a tightly sealed container to prevent moisture absorption and potential degradation. Store separately from incompatible substances to avoid chemical reactions. Follow proper safety guidelines in a well - ventilated storage area. |
|
In the commercial synthesis of pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate, the (6S)-configured 2,6-diamino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzothiazole serves as the single enantiomeric building block for the final API. Reductive N-alkylation with n-propionaldehyde is conducted in methanol or ethanol under a hydrogen pressure of 1–3 bar using 5% platinum on carbon (Pt/C) at a catalyst loading of 0.5–1.0 wt% relative to the diamine substrate. The aldehyde-to-amine molar ratio is strictly maintained between 1.00 and 1.10 to prevent over-alkylation; any excess above 1.15 generates the N,N-dipropyl tertiary amine impurity, which is difficult to purge during the hydrochloride salt precipitation. The hydrogenation vessel, typically a glass-lined or stainless-steel reactor with a gas-induction agitator, is operated at 20–25 °C. Reaction progress is monitored by thin-layer chromatography or in-process HPLC until the primary amine peak declines below 0.5% area. The resulting pramipexole base is isolated as a free amine oil or, more commonly, directly acidified with concentrated hydrochloric acid to precipitate the dihydrochloride monohydrate. The salt is filtered, washed with cold isopropanol, and dried under vacuum at 45–50 °C. Final product complies with the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) monograph 2638 and the USP Pramipexole Dihydrochloride monograph, with specific assays requiring purity ≥99.0% (anhydrous basis), total impurities ≤1.0%, and residual methanol ≤3000 ppm per ICH Q3C (R8) Class 2 guidelines. The dried salt is the terminal intermediate that will be formulated into immediate-release or extended-release solid oral dosage forms. How Does the (6S) Intermediate Impact the Formation of Pramipexole Dimer Impurity?When the starting chiral diamine contains even minor amounts of the (R)-enantiomer, reductive alkylation produces a mixture of (S)- and (R)-pramipexole, which can subsequently undergo oxidative coupling to form a diastereomeric dimer identified in the Ph. Eur. impurity profile as “impurity C” or a related bis-thiazole species. The (6S)-enantiomeric purity of the input material therefore directly governs the pharmacopoeial limit for this dimer, which is typically capped at ≤0.15% area by HPLC. Control is achieved through chiral stationary phase (CSP) testing using a Chiralpak AD-H (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) column, with a mobile phase of n-hexane/ethanol/diethylamine (80:20:0.1 v/v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and UV detection at 254 nm. The injection precision is validated at 20 µL, and the retention time of the (R)-isomer must fall within ±2% of the system suitability standard. During manufacturing scale-up, batches with enantiomeric excess below 99.5% (ee) are rejected for API use because the subsequent dimer formation is not entirely suppressed by adjusting stoichiometry; it is kinetically controlled by the concentration of the minor enantiomer. In solid-state stability studies conducted under 40 °C/75% RH per ICH Q1A(R2), the dimer content may increase by 0.03–0.08% over 6 months, so the initial limit is set conservatively. The terminal pharmaceutical product is the same pramipexole tablet, but the control point at the (6S)-intermediate stage avoids batch failure during finished-product release under USP <621> system precision criteria. Milling to a controlled particle size distribution is executed directly on the (6S)-diamine salt or on the final API before formulation. For immediate-release tablets containing 0.125 mg, 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, or 1.5 mg of pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate, the drug substance is micronized in a spiral jet mill with nitrogen at 6.0 bar grinding pressure and a feed rate that maintains a classifier speed of 8,000–12,000 rpm, yielding a volume median diameter (D50) of 5–15 µm and D90 below 30 µm. This target is mandatory because dissolution is the rate-limiting step; USP Pramipexole Tablets monograph specifies a dissolution test using Apparatus 2 (paddle) at 50 rpm in 900 mL of 0.05 M phosphate buffer pH 6.8, with a Q value of 80% dissolved within 30 minutes. Formulation incorporates microcrystalline cellulose (NF), mannitol (NF), colloidal silicon dioxide, and magnesium stearate, with the active ingredient content as low as 0.1–1.0% w/w of the tablet core, making blend uniformity critical. The wet granulation end-point is determined by a power consumption value on the impeller of a high-shear mixer (e.g., Diosna P 1/6 or equivalent), with water added to 8–12% of the dry powder weight until the granulation torque reaches a plateau. Granules are dried at 50 °C inlet air temperature in a fluid-bed dryer to a loss-on-drying endpoint of 1.5–2.5%. Tablets are compressed on a rotary press equipped with 6 mm round standard concave punches to a target hardness of 4–8 kP. The immediate-release product is subsequently film-coated with Opadry® II (a PVA-based system) in a perforated coating pan, achieving a weight gain of 2.5–3.5%. The final dosage form is identical to the reference listed drug Mirapex®. For extended-release formulations, the manufacturing route shifts to a dry-mix/direct-compression process with hypromellose (HPMC K4M or K100M) as the rate-controlling matrix former, typically at 30–45% w/w of the tablet weight, and dissolution performed with Apparatus 1 (basket) at 100 rpm in 0.05 M phosphate buffer pH 6.8; the acceptance criterion is a multi-point dissolution profile matching the innovator’s f2 similarity factor. Crystalline Form Control for Pramipexole Free Base in Solvent-Mediated TransformationsAlthough the final API is marketed as a dihydrochloride monohydrate salt, the free base (pramipexole) obtained after the reductive alkylation is known to form multiple solvates and anhydrous polymorphs depending on the crystallization solvent. This conversion is carried out to upgrade the chemical purity before salt formation, and the specific crystalline form influences filterability, bulk density, and residual solvent entrapment. When the free base is crystallized from ethyl acetate/n-heptane (3:1 v/v) at a concentration of 150–200 g/L with a cooling rate of 0.2 °C/min from 50 °C to 5 °C, the stable anhydrous Form I (confirmed by XRPD) is obtained in >95% polymorphic purity. Any deviation in solvent composition—particularly water content exceeding 0.5% in the solvent system—leads to the formation of a monohydrate that, upon subsequent hydrochloride salt formation, produces a hygroscopic intermediate with variable stoichiometry. Polymorph identification employs X-ray powder diffraction in accordance with USP <941>, with characteristic peaks for Form I appearing at 2θ = 9.8°, 14.1°, 18.3°, 20.5°, and 24.7° (±0.2°). Differential scanning calorimetry shows a single endothermic melt at 127.2 °C (±1.0 °C) for the anhydrous form. Where the free base is intended for immediate salt conversion, the wet cake from ethyl acetate crystallization is reslurried in isopropanol and acidified without drying, eliminating a drying step that could cause amorphization. The final salt obtained from this controlled polymorph route consistently meets the residual solvent limit for ethyl acetate (≤5000 ppm) under ICH Q3C. This polymorph-directed purification is embedded in the cGMP sequence after the hydrogenation and before salt formation, with the targeted endpoint: pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate EP/USP grade. When the Tetrahydrobenzothiazole Scaffold Is Functionalized as a Dopamine D3 Receptor Ligand for Pharmacological StudiesBeyond the pramipexole API, the (6S)-2,6-diamino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzothiazole serves as a versatile core for constructing libraries of D3-preferring agonists and partial agonists. In a typical medicinal chemistry workflow, the 6-amino group is selectively derivatized through reductive amination with 4-substituted benzaldehydes in the presence of sodium triacetoxyborohydride (1.5–2.5 eq) in dichloromethane/acetic acid (95:5 v/v) at 0 °C to room temperature, followed by purification on a silica gel column (eluent: dichloromethane/methanol/ammonium hydroxide, 90:9:1). The resulting secondary amine products are then subjected to competitive radioligand binding assays using membranes from CHO-K1 cells stably expressing the human dopamine D3 receptor. Displacement of [3H]spiperone (0.5 nM) is measured, and the inhibition constant (Ki) is calculated using the Cheng-Prusoff equation; reference compound pramipexole typically shows a Ki of 0.5–2.0 nM in this assay. All in vitro pharmacological testing is conducted under OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practice and with ethics committee approval where tissue sourcing is involved. To generate tool compounds for in vivo microdialysis studies, the 2-amino group can be acylated with acetic anhydride (1.05 eq) in pyridine at 5 °C to yield the 2-acetamido derivative, blocking tautomer interconversion and minimizing acute toxicity during intravenous infusion in rodents. The chemical purity of these research intermediates is confirmed by LC-MS (ESI+) and 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6), with the acceptance criterion requiring >95% area by HPLC (C18, gradient acetonitrile/water with 0.1% formic acid). The terminal product is not a marketed drug but a characterized pharmacological probe enabling structure-activity relationship (SAR) evaluation, and the (6S) chirality is absolutely retained during all synthetic transformations, confirmed by chiral HPLC with the same AD-H method described above. Post-hydrogenation palladium scavenging is performed when the reductive alkylation uses 5% Pd/C or a mixed Pd-Pt catalyst to improve conversion. After catalyst filtration through a 0.45 µm in-line filter under nitrogen, the crude methanol solution is treated with active charcoal (Norit SX Plus, 0.5% w/w relative to the theoretical API yield) and stirred at 70 °C for 60 minutes. The slurry is recirculated through the same filter in a closed loop to remove dissolved palladium species. The filtrate is then concentrated under reduced pressure and processed as described earlier. Palladium content in the isolated dihydrochloride is determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) in conformity with USP <233> method validation criteria, with the daily instrument calibration verified using 1.0 µg/L, 10 µg/L, and 50 µg/L palladium standard solutions in 2% nitric acid. The specification is set at ≤10 µg/g (ppm) for palladium, as required by ICH Q3D elemental impurity classification (Palladium is a Class 2B element with a permitted daily exposure of 100 µg/day for oral administration). Batches exceeding 5 ppm are recirculated over a fresh charcoal bed. Palladium determination by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (FAAS) is accepted as an alternative only when the limit test has been demonstrated to achieve a detection limit below 2 ppm. Failing these steps results in reprocessing through the salt-reprecipitation stage. The final compendial-grade API is sealed in double polyethylene bags inside fiber drums and stored at 15–25 °C with relative humidity monitoring not exceeding 60%. The warehouse release certificate includes the ICP-MS trace metal report as part of the CoA, directly linked to the finished dosage-form batch record for pramipexole 24-hour extended-release tablets.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitive (6S)-2,6-Diamino-4,5,6,7-Tetrahydrobenzothiazole prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615651039172
Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
(6S)-2,6-Diamino-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzothiazole (CAS 106092-09-5, molecular formula C₇H₁₁N₃S, Mᵣ = 169.25 g·mol⁻¹) constitutes the immediate chiral intermediate in the synthesis of the dopamine D₂/D₃ agonist pramipexole dihydrochloride. The single asymmetric centre at the C‑6 carbon, which carries the primary amino group, is locked in the (S)‑configuration necessary for high‑affinity receptor binding. This diamine is explicitly listed as Impurity A in the Ph.Eur. monograph for Pramipexole dihydrochloride (01/2018:1521), where its content in the finished drug substance is limited to NMT 0.15% by HPLC. When procured as the manufacturing intermediate, however, the free base—typically supplied as a white to off‑white crystalline powder with limited aqueous solubility but freely soluble in 0.1 M HCl—must meet far tighter specifications: an assay of ≥ 98.5% (anhydrous, solvent‑free basis) and an enantiomeric excess of ≥ 99.5% are the de facto entry criteria for coupling to propionaldehyde without secondary resolution steps. The presence of even small amounts of the (R)-enantiomer directly translates into Impurity B (the (R)-isomer of pramipexole) in the final API, which Ph.Eur. limits to ≤ 0.15%. Consequently, the enantiopurity of the diamine intermediate becomes the primary quality lever for pharmacopoeial compliance, distinguishing the (6S)‑enantiomer from the racemic 2,6‑diamino‑4,5,6,7‑tetrahydrobenzothiazole, which is appreciably less expensive but necessitates a wasteful classical resolution with tartaric acid derivatives, eroding overall yield by 20–30% and adding a dedicated chiral-purity hold point.
Because Impurity A in the drug product is the unreacted diamine, the intermediate itself becomes a critical control point during API synthesis. The Ph.Eur. limit of 0.15% applies to the finished pramipexole dihydrochloride, meaning that a free diamine content exceeding roughly 0.05% in the crude API after coupling requires extensive recrystallisation to purge the residual primary amine. Procurement of the diamine with an assay below 98.5% or an enantiomeric excess below 99.5% therefore compresses the purification margin and risks batch rejection. In contrast, chiral resolution of a racemic diamine feedstock introduces a separate diastereomeric salt formation with (S)-mandelic acid that generates 25–40% maternal losses and requires a standalone chiral HPLC release test for the resolved (S)-enantiomer, adding a minimum of 48 h to manufacturing cycle time. The following table presents the typical release specification for the (6S)-diamine as supplied under a pharmaceutical intermediate Drug Master File.
| Attribute | Method | Specification Limit |
|---|---|---|
| Appearance | Visual inspection | White to off‑white crystalline powder |
| Assay (HPLC area%, anhydrous) | Ph.Eur. 2.2.29 | ≥ 98.5% |
| Enantiomeric excess | Chiral HPLC (Chiralpak AD‑H) | ≥ 99.5% (R‑isomer ≤ 0.5%) |
| Any individual unspecified impurity | Ph.Eur. 2.2.29 | ≤ 0.10% |
| Total impurities | Ph.Eur. 2.2.29 | ≤ 0.5% |
| Water content (Karl Fischer) | Ph.Eur. 2.5.12 | ≤ 0.5% w/w |
| Residual solvents | HS‑GC, Ph.Eur. 2.4.24 | Methanol ≤ 3000 ppm, Toluene ≤ 890 ppm (ICH Q3C Class 2) |
| Residue on ignition | Ph.Eur. 2.4.14 | ≤ 0.1% |
| Elemental impurities (ICP‑MS) | USP <233> | Class 1 elements ≤ 30% of PDE; Class 2A ≤ 0.25% |
The absence of an enantiomeric purity specification on racemic diamine—typically supplied with only an assay by HPLC of ≥ 98.0% and water content ≤ 1.0%—renders it unsuitable for direct manufacturing of the (S)-enantiomer of pramipexole unless the resolution step is formally validated. That additional unit operation not only increases the number of critical process parameters but also introduces a further hold point for chiral purity, elevating the regulatory reporting burden under ICH Q7.
In the reductive amination step that installs the N‑6 propyl side‑chain, the diamine free base is dissolved in methanol and treated with propionaldehyde (1.05 eq) followed by portionwise addition of sodium cyanoborohydride (1.15 eq) as a methanol solution. In a 1600 L glass-lined reactor equipped with a pitched-blade turbine agitator, the internal temperature is maintained at 28 ± 2 °C while the pH is held between 7.5 and 8.0 by automated dosing of 2 M hydrochloric acid through a dip tube positioned away from the pH probe tip. Process historians from pilot‑scale campaigns where the acid dosing tip was inadvertently located within the probe’s boundary layer recorded pH fluctuations of ±0.5–0.8 units, coinciding with a detectable rise in the (R)-isomer peak from 0.3% to 1.2% in in‑process chiral HPLC samples. The proton‑dependent epimerisation at C‑6 is catalysed by transient local acidity; published process development reports, including the procedures disclosed in US 4,886,812, emphasise that excursions below pH 6.0 can increase the (R)-enantiomer burden by an order of magnitude, driven by reversible enamine formation and configurational scrambling of the α‑amino stereocentre. High‑fidelity pH control, combined with injection port placement that ensures rapid acid dispersion, is therefore non‑negotiable. Supplementary measures include pre‑drying the diamine to < 0.3% w/w water by Karl Fischer to eliminate adventitious moisture that could hydrolyse sodium cyanoborohydride and generate acidic by‑products.
The quality of the propionaldehyde used in the coupling holds equal weight. Aldol self‑condensation dimers of propionaldehyde, typically 2‑methyl‑2‑pentenal and its reduced alcohol, can form when the aldehyde is stored without adequate inhibitors. When present above 0.2% (by GC), these dimers react with the diamine to generate C‑alkylated impurities that co‑elute close to pramipexole in the USP/Ph.Eur. HPLC system, complicating downstream purity analysis. GMP‑grade propionaldehyde released against an internal specification of purity ≥ 99.5% by GC‑FID, with dimer content ≤ 0.1% and water ≤ 0.05%, has been proven in production campaigns to avoid new impurity peaks above the 0.05% reporting threshold. The aldehyde is tested in accordance with USP <467> for residual solvents, as methanol and acetaldehyde are common contaminants that can generate methylated or ethylated side‑products. Failure to control aldol impurity levels below 0.2% can force an additional crystallisation from acetonitrile/water, lowering the batch yield by 5–8% and increasing the total impurity profile to values approaching the 0.5% limit.
Release testing of each (6S)-diamine batch is performed against a specification anchored in pharmacopoeial general chapters and ICH Q3A/Q3C/Q3D guidelines. The analytical panel couples reversed‑phase HPLC for assay and related substances with a dedicated chiral HPLC method capable of baseline separation of the (R)‑antipode. The following table compiles the validated methods and their key parameters.
| Test | Analytical Technique | Key Parameters | Reference Standard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assay & related substances | RP‑HPLC with UV detection at 210 nm | C18 column, gradient of 0.1% TFA in water & acetonitrile; flow 1.0 mL/min | Ph.Eur. 2.2.29, USP <621> |
| Enantiomeric purity | Chiral HPLC | Chiralpak AD‑H (250 x 4.6 mm), hexane/ethanol/diethylamine (80:20:0.1), flow 0.8 mL/min, detection 254 nm | Ph.Eur. 2.2.29, in‑house enantiomer standard |
| Water content | Coulometric Karl Fischer titration | Hydranal® composite 5 | Ph.Eur. 2.5.12 |
| Residual solvents | Headspace GC‑FID | DB‑624 column, equilibration at 80 °C for 30 min, split injection | Ph.Eur. 2.4.24, ICH Q3C |
| Elemental impurities | ICP‑MS after acid digestion | Monitor As, Cd, Hg, Pb, Co, V, Ni; RF power 1550 W | USP <233>, ICH Q3D |
System suitability criteria include resolution between the (S)- and (R)-enantiomers not less than 2.0 in the chiral method and tailing factor for the diamine peak below 1.5 in the RP‑HPLC assay. Batch‑to‑batch consistency is monitored by tracking the response factor ratio of the diamine relative to a qualified reference standard, with acceptance range 0.90–1.10. The free base exhibits a UV λmax at 262 nm in methanolic solution, a property exploited for peak identity confirmation via DAD.
The free amine is hygroscopic, absorbing up to 1.2% w/w moisture over 4 weeks at 25 °C/60 % RH when stored in unsealed containers, with a corresponding drop in assay of 0.2–0.5% per month attributable to hydrate formation and trace oxidative dimerisation. Storage of packaging‑sealed lots is therefore specified at 2–8 °C under argon, using double LDPE liners with silica gel desiccant enclosed in a fibre‑board drum. Under these conditions, a shelf‑life of 24 months is assigned, with retest intervals of 12 months. Incompatibilities include strong mineral acids (which protonate and racemise the C‑6 amine), strong oxidising agents (which generate sulfoxide and sulfone derivatives with altered retention times), and prolonged exposure to light, which can promote di‑mercapto cross‑linking. The material is classified as non‑hazardous for transport (UN not regulated) and should be handled in a ventilated fume cupboard with nitrile gloves and safety glasses, following the requirements of EC 1272/2008.