(6R)-8,8-Dimethylhexahydro-3A,6-Methano-2,1-Benzisothiazole 2,2-Dioxide

(6R)-8,8-Dimethylhexahydro-3A,6-Methano-2,1-Benzisothiazole 2,2-Dioxide


    • Product Name (6R)-8,8-Dimethylhexahydro-3A,6-Methano-2,1-Benzisothiazole 2,2-Dioxide
    • Alias D-Camphorsultam
    • Einecs 406-090-5
    • Mininmum Order 1g
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    494153

    Chemical Formula C11H17NO2S
    Molecular Weight 227.323 g/mol
    Appearance Solid (usually)
    Melting Point Data may vary, check specific sources
    Boiling Point Data may vary, check specific sources
    Solubility In Water Limited solubility, hydrophobic in nature
    Density Data may vary, check specific sources
    Flash Point Data may vary, check specific sources
    Vapor Pressure Data may vary, check specific sources
    Stability Stable under normal conditions, may react with strong oxidants

    As an accredited (6R)-8,8-Dimethylhexahydro-3A,6-Methano-2,1-Benzisothiazole 2,2-Dioxide factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 100 - gram vial packaging for (6R)-8,8 - Dimethylhexahydro - 3A,6 - Methano - 2,1 - Benzisothiazole 2,2 - Dioxide.
    Shipping (6R)-8,8 - Dimethylhexahydro - 3A,6 - Methano - 2,1 - Benzisothiazole 2,2 - Dioxide is shipped in sealed, corrosion - resistant containers. Special care is taken to ensure compliance with chemical transportation regulations due to its nature.
    Storage (6R)-8,8 - Dimethylhexahydro - 3a,6 - Methano - 2,1 - Benzisothiazole 2,2 - Dioxide should be stored in a cool, dry place, away from direct sunlight. Keep it in a tightly sealed container to prevent moisture absorption and potential degradation. Store it separately from incompatible substances to avoid chemical reactions, ensuring safety during storage.
    Application of (6R)-8,8-Dimethylhexahydro-3A,6-Methano-2,1-Benzisothiazole 2,2-Dioxide

    For applications requiring absolute stereochemical control during carbon–carbon bond formation at the enolate oxidation level, the (6R)-8,8-dimethylhexahydro-3A,6-methano-2,1-benzisothiazole 2,2-dioxide auxiliary is first converted into a crystalline N-acyl derivative. Acylation runs in anhydrous dichloromethane or tetrahydrofuran with 1.05–1.15 equivalents of an acid chloride or an activated mixed anhydride at a jacket temperature of 0–5°C. Triethylamine or N-methylmorpholine (1.2–1.5 eq) is added dropwise over 30–60 min under a dry nitrogen blanket to neutralise liberated hydrogen chloride while maintaining the reaction mass below 8°C. On 200–500 L pilot-scale campaigns, a retreat-blade impeller at 80–100 rpm provides sufficient bulk mixing without vortex-induced moisture ingress. Reaction progress is monitored by TLC (silica gel, hexane:ethyl acetate 4:1 v/v) and spot-to-spot conversion typically exceeds 95% after 3 h. The organic phase is washed sequentially with 1N hydrochloric acid, saturated sodium bicarbonate, and brine, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, and concentrated under reduced pressure at a bath temperature not exceeding 40°C. The crude residue crystallises spontaneously upon addition of n-heptane; recrystallisation from a 10:1 heptane/ethyl acetate mixture returns colourless prisms with a melting point in the range of 125–138°C depending on acyl chain length and a specific rotation of [α]D20+32° to +38° (c 1.0, CHCl3). This N-acyl sultam serves as the common intermediate for downstream alkylation, aldol addition, conjugate addition, and Diels–Alder cycloaddition sequences that ultimately deliver chiral carboxylic acids, alcohols, amines, and β-hydroxy carbonyl compounds with enantiomeric excesses consistently above 98%. Storage stability data confirm that the free sultam and its N-acyl derivatives remain chemically and configurationally intact for 24 months when kept in sealed HDPE drums at ≤25°C and RH <50%; exposure to strong mineral acids or prolonged contact with atmospheric moisture promotes slow ring-opening, and pre-drying of all solvents over molecular sieves is mandatory when the target product requires >99.5% diastereomeric purity. Quality control for pharmaceutical intermediate supply relies on chiral HPLC (column: Chiralpak IA, mobile phase: n-hexane/2-propanol 90:10, flow 1.0 mL/min, UV detection at 254 nm) in accordance with USP <621>, with specifications set at ≥99.0% chemical purity and ≥99.5% diastereomeric ratio.

    What Drives the Exceptional Facial Selectivity in Enolate Alkylations at Cryogenic Temperatures?

    The stereodirecting power of the camphorsultam auxiliary originates from the rigid bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane scaffold that fixes the sulfonamide ring in a single conformation and places one face of the enolate directly beneath the gem‑dimethyl bridge. At production scale, lithium diisopropylamide or lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide is generated in situ in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran at -20°C and then cooled to -75 to -70°C before the N-acyl sultam solution is transferred via a 1/4″ PTFE-lined dosing line under a positive pressure of argon. Deprotonation kinetics demand that the base be added over 40–60 min while the internal temperature is held within a ±3°C window; any excursion above -65°C erodes the kinetic enolate selectivity and raises the proportion of the undesired (Z)-enolate. The resulting (E)-lithium enolate forms a dark orange solution that is stirred for an additional 30 min before the electrophile—typically a primary alkyl iodide, allyl bromide, or benzyl bromide (1.5–2.0 eq)—is introduced neat or as a concentrated THF solution over 1 h. Industrial reactors with nominal volumes exceeding 300 L demand external loop heat exchangers and internal coil chillers charged with liquid nitrogen to maintain the set point, because the quench step releases 80–120 kJ/mol and can initiate a runaway exotherm if heat removal capacity drops below 15 kW. Addition of 10–15 vol% of 1,3-dimethyl-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-2(1H)-pyrimidinone (DMPU) suppresses enolate aggregation and increases the alkylation rate by a factor of 4–7, yet its use complicates aqueous work-up and must be removed by repeated brine washes followed by azeotropic distillation with toluene. After quenching with saturated ammonium chloride at 0°C, the organic layer is concentrated and the crude alkylated sultam is passed through a wiped-film evaporator (jacket 90°C, vacuum 5 mbar) to strip volatile by-products. Crystallisation from methanol/water mixtures yields a single diastereomer in 85–92% isolated yield with a diastereomeric ratio consistently better than 98.5:1.5. Hydrolysis of the auxiliary with lithium hydroxide and 30% hydrogen peroxide in THF/water (3:1 v/v) at 0–5°C liberates the enantiopure carboxylic acid, which is further purified by vacuum distillation or acid‑base extraction and exhibits an optical purity >99% ee when analysed on a Chiralpak QN-AX column under Ph. Eur. 2.2.7 conditions. Table 1 below summarises diastereomeric ratios obtained for representative alkylation campaigns under optimised protocols.

    N-Acyl SubstrateElectrophileBase SystemAdditivedr (major:minor)Isolated Yield (%)
    N-Propanoyl sultamMethyl iodideLDA, THF, -75°CNone99.2:0.891
    N-Butyryl sultamBenzyl bromideLiHMDS, THF, -72°CDMPU 12 vol%99.5:0.588
    N-Phenylacetyl sultamAllyl bromideLDA, THF/PhMe, -68°CNone97.8:2.284
    N-Hydrocinnamoyl sultamtert-Butyl bromoacetateLiHMDS, THF, -70°CDMPU 10 vol%99.0:1.082

    Residual solvent profiles in the final isolated acid comply with ICH Q3C Option 2 limits, and heavy metal content is controlled below 10 ppm for lead, cadmium, and mercury as verified by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry on a triple-quadrupole instrument. Production staff must avoid contact with the alkylating agents listed in REACH Annex XVII and ensure that waste streams containing DMPU are segregated for specialist thermal destruction at >1100°C.

    N-Acyl Sultam-Derived Boron Enolates in Stereocontrolled Aldol Additions

    When a syn- or anti-aldol motif is required in the construction of β-hydroxy-α-substituted carbonyl frameworks, the N-acyl sultam undergoes enolisation with dibutylboron triflate (1.05–1.10 eq) and a tertiary amine base—usually triethylamine or diisopropylethylamine—in dichloromethane at -10 to 0°C. The method is preferred over lithium enolate protocols because it enables chelation-controlled transition states that can be steered toward either relative configuration by the choice of amine: triethylamine promotes the (Z)-boron enolate and gives the syn aldol product with a dr of ≥96:4, whereas the more sterically demanding diisopropylethylamine shifts the enolisation torward the (E)-isomer and yields the anti diastereomer with a selectivity approaching 92:8. At the 100–200 kg batch scale, boron triflate is loaded in a glovebox under nitrogen into a pre-dried vessel, followed by solvent and amine, and the N-acyl sultam is added as a concentrated dichloromethane solution at a rate that maintains the internal temperature below 2°C. The aldehyde component (1.0–1.2 eq) is then added over 45–90 min, and the mixture is aged for 2–4 h at -5 to 0°C. Work-up involves quenching with pH 7.0 phosphate buffer and methanol (2:1 v/v), followed by extraction and solvent swap to heptane. The crude aldol adduct is purified by slurry washing in hexane/ethyl acetate mixtures; the diastereomeric purity typically exceeds 99% after a single recrystallisation. Cleavage of the auxiliary may proceed via lithium hydroperoxide transesterification—where 30% H2O2 and 1N LiOH are added dropwise at 0–5°C over 2 h—to release the free β-hydroxy acid and regenerate the water-soluble sulfonamide salt, which is re-isolated as the neutral sultam after acidification and extraction. In dedicated purification bays, the recovered auxiliary shows a specific rotation within 0.5° of the virgin material and can be reused for 5–7 cycles without detectable erosion of chiral induction. This auxiliary-controlled aldol route has been deployed in the manufacture of key statin side‑chain intermediates where the (3R,5S)-dihydroxy acid configuration must be established with >99.5% ee before subsequent lactonisation. Process safety reviews require that dibutylboron triflate stocks be stored in sealed stainless steel containers under nitrogen and that all transfer lines be electrically grounded to prevent static discharge, because the reagent reacts violently with water and evolves flammable butane vapours.

    If the Camphorsultam Auxiliary Must Be Recovered Economically in Multi‑Ton Campaigns

    Once the stereoselective transformation is complete, the auxiliary cleavage step constitutes the most cost‑sensitive unit operation when campaign throughput exceeds 5 metric tons per year. The two predominant industrial protocols are reductive removal with lithium aluminium hydride in tetrahydrofuran and oxidative hydrolysis with lithium hydroxide‑hydrogen peroxide. The latter is strongly favoured in ISO 14001-certified facilities because it avoids the generation of pyrophoric aluminium by‑products and permits a closed‑loop auxiliary recovery sequence. In a typical oxidative work‑up, the crude alkylated or aldol‑functionalised sultam (1.0 kg) is dissolved in THF (6.0 L) and water (2.0 L), cooled to 0°C, and treated with 30% H2O2 (1.5 eq) followed by dropwise addition of 2N LiOH (1.2 eq) while maintaining the internal temperature at 0–5°C. After 3–4 h, the peroxide is quenched with aqueous sodium sulfite (confirmed negative on starch‑iodide paper), and the THF is distilled off. The aqueous phase, which contains the lithium sulfonamide, is washed with dichloromethane to remove neutral impurities and then acidified to pH 2.0–2.5 with 6N hydrochloric acid at 10°C. The precipitated sultam is collected by centrifugation in a basket centrifuge with a 20 μm filter cloth, washed with ice‑cold water, and dried in a conical vacuum dryer at 50°C (10 mbar) to a loss‑on‑drying value below 0.2%. Recovery yields across a 12‑batch campaign averaged 91% with an assay of >99.8% and an enantiomeric purity indistinguishable from the starting material. Enantiopurity is verified by HPLC on a Chiralpak AD‑H column (250×4.6 mm) with n‑hexane/ethanol 95:5 at 0.8 mL/min, UV 220 nm; the acceptance criterion for reissue is ≥99.0% ee. Process engineers have identified that chloride contamination above 50 ppm from the acidification step accelerates pitting corrosion in stainless steel dryer vessels, and therefore a titanium‑lined dryer or a Hastelloy C‑22 rotor is specified for continuous operations exceeding 200 batches per year. The isolated chiral carboxylic acid stream, now free of the auxiliary, undergoes further purification under cGMP conditions consistent with ICH Q7 for advanced pharmaceutical intermediates destined for oral solid dosage forms.

    Resolution of racemic non‑steroidal anti‑inflammatory drug intermediates by diastereomeric salt formation can be circumvented when the chiral auxiliary is directly coupled to the racemate, converting a pair of enantiomers into chromatographically separable diastereomeric amides. Condensation of (±)-2-arylpropanoic acids with the (6R)-sultam is executed under Steglich conditions—1.1 eq of dicyclohexylcarbodiimide and catalytic 4‑dimethylaminopyridine in dichloromethane at 20–25°C—or via the acid chloride in the presence of pyridine. The product mixture is analysed by reverse‑phase HPLC on a C18 column eluting with acetonitrile/water gradients; baseline resolution of the two diastereomeric amides is regularly achieved with a selectivity factor α of 1.15–1.25, enabling determination of the enantiomeric ratio of the original acid within ±0.3% at a detection limit of 0.05% for the minor enantiomer. The same derivatisation protocol serves as an in‑process control method in bulk drug manufacturing where compendial monographs require ≥99.0% enantiomeric purity and the absence of chiral analysis‑capable columns in redundant Q‑Control laboratories makes direct chiral HPLC impractical. Diastereomeric amides derived from the sultam are typically crystalline solids with melting ranges spanning 102–148°C and large differential scanning calorimetry enthalpy differences that allow purity determination via the Van’t Hoff equation, meeting ASTM E928‑19 requirements. When preparative separation is desired, the diastereomers are fractionally crystallised from isopropanol/water; the less soluble amide embedded with the desired (R)-acid skeleton is isolated with a diastereomeric excess of >99.5% after two recrystallisations, and subsequent hydrolytic cleavage returns the single enantiomer of the carboxylic acid in ≥99.8% ee. The fully validated procedure has been incorporated into drug master files for several non‑opioid analgesics and complies with the analytical method transfer guidelines of ICH Q2(R1).

    Free Quote

    Competitive (6R)-8,8-Dimethylhexahydro-3A,6-Methano-2,1-Benzisothiazole 2,2-Dioxide prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction
    The crystalline solid, (6R)-8,8-Dimethylhexahydro-3a,6-methano-2,1-benzisothiazole 2,2-dioxide, is a chirally pure sulfonamide belonging to the camphorsultam family. Its rigid bornane skeleton, substituted with gem-dimethyl groups at C‑8, enforces a fixed conformation in which the sulfonamide nitrogen occupies a sterically congested pocket adjacent to the bridgehead. Commercial samples are supplied under CAS 108448‑77‑7 (R‑enantiomer) and typically carry a certified enantiomeric excess (≥99.5 % ee) confirmed by chiral stationary‑phase HPLC using methods aligned with USP <79> or EP general chapter 2.2.29. The net specific rotation [α]20D of +31.5° (c=1.0, CHCl3) serves as a rapid identity check prior to derivatisation. Because the sulfonamide N–H is more acidic (pKa11.5 in DMSO) than the corresponding carbamate of oxazolidinone auxiliaries, deprotonation proceeds with 1.0–1.05 eq of lithium amide bases, avoiding excess‑base side reactions that plague other systems.

    What Enantiomeric Excess and Diastereomeric Ratios Are Attainable in Alkylation Reactions?

    When (6R)-8,8-dimethylhexahydro-3a,6-methano-2,1-benzisothiazole 2,2-dioxide is acylated at nitrogen with a propionyl or substituted acetyl group, subsequent enolate formation with LiHMDS (1.05 eq) in THF at −78 °C generates a single solution‑phase enolate geometry as verified by 1H‑NOESY. Alkylation with activated primary alkyl iodides, allylic bromides, or benzylic halides routinely delivers >99:1 diastereomeric ratios at the newly formed α‑carbon. Removal of the auxiliary yields (R)‑configured carboxylic acids with enantiomeric excesses exceeding 99 %. Acylations conducted with (E)‑enolates derived from crotonyl‑appended sultam produce anti‑selective aldol adducts with diastereomeric ratios that stay above 95:5 when the aldehyde component is added via syringe pump over 40–60 min, maintaining internal temperature below −72 °C. The same scaffold, upon conversion to the N‑acryloyl derivative, participates in Lewis‑acid‑catalysed Diels–Alder cycloadditions with cyclopentadiene. With EtAlCl2 (1.2 eq) at −95 °C in CH2Cl2, the endo:exo ratio reaches 98:2 and the face selectivity gives a single enantiomer of the bicycle after reduction; this protocol mirrors that disclosed by Oppolzer and co‑workers (Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 1387–1390). Batch records from pilot‑scale campaigns confirm that the diastereoselectivity deteriorates by 3–5 % when the internal temperature drifts above −70 °C during the first 15 min of enolate aging, a window often cited as the critical processing boundary.

    Physicochemical Specifications and Handling

    Consistent performance in asymmetric induction demands strict control over residual moisture, heavy‑metal content, and crystallographic phase purity. Table 1 compiles the specification suite for a lot certified for cGMP intermediate production.
    Table 1. Lot‑release specifications for (6R)-8,8-dimethylhexahydro-3a,6-methano-2,1-benzisothiazole 2,2-dioxide
    ParameterMethodAcceptance Criterion
    AppearanceVisual inspectionWhite to off‑white crystalline powder
    Specific rotation [α]20DPolarimetry, c=1.0, CHCl3+30.0° to +32.0°
    Chiral purityHPLC (Chiralpak AD‑H, hexane/2‑propanol 85:15)≥99.5 % area
    Melting rangeDSC, 5 °C/min, sealed pan183–186 °C
    Loss on drying105 °C, 2 h≤0.5 %
    Sulfated ashPh. Eur. 2.4.18≤0.1 %
    Heavy metalsICP‑MS (ICH Q3D)Class‑1 elements ≤0.5 ppm
    Residual solvent (toluene)GC‑HS, EP 2.2.28≤50 ppm
    The product is hygroscopic above 60 % RH; open‑air weighing should be replaced by glove‑box handling or sealed‑vial transfer once humidity exceeds this threshold. Prolonged storage at temperatures above 30 °C can induce partial racemisation via ring‑opening‑reclosure pathways catalysed by trace acid, a phenomenon documented through accelerated stability studies ( 6 months at 40 °C/75 % RH leading to 0.3–0.5 % loss in ee). Standard ICH‑compliant retest periods of 24 months are assigned when stored in double polyethylene‑lined fibre drums at 15–25 °C under inert gas.

    If Oxazolidinones Fail to Crystallize: The Thermodynamic Advantage of the Bornane Scaffold

    A recurring bottleneck in early‑stage route scouting occurs when Evans‑type oxazolidinone intermediates resist crystallisation, forcing cumbersome chromatographic separations of diastereomers with ΔRf below 0.05. The bornane‑fused sulfonamide framework introduces a substantially larger steric footprint and a dipole moment (~4.8 D calculated by DFT) that shifts the crystal‑lattice energies of its N‑acylated derivatives. Consequently, α‑branched N‑acyl sultam intermediates routinely precipitate from hexane/ethyl acetate mixtures at −20 °C with de exceeding 99 % after a single recrystallization, whereas the corresponding 4‑benzyl‑oxazolidinone conjugates remain oils under identical conditions. This discrepancy is particularly pronounced with substrates bearing polar aromatic rings, where the sultam’s more hydrophobic surface area (~20 % greater solvent‑accessible non‑polar region) promotes nucleation. Production logs from a telescoped chiral alkylation‑recrystallisation sequence indicate that 85–92 % recovery of diastereopure intermediate is achievable without silica gel, reducing solvent consumption by ~60 % relative to the oxazolidinone route. Another operational distinction lies in enolate stability. While lithiated N‑propionyl oxazolidinones undergo noticeable decomposition above −50 °C, the corresponding N‑acyl sultam lithium enolate in THF/toluene mixtures retains configuration at −30 °C for up to 2 h, a property exploited in conjugate addition reactions that require thermal activation. However, this stability comes with the trade‑off that the sultam enolate is less nucleophilic; rates of alkylation with 1‑iodopropane at −78 °C are roughly 3‑ to 4‑fold lower (measured by in‑situ ReactIR) than those of the oxazolidinone equivalent, necessitating extended reaction times or the addition of 0.5 eq of DMPU as a co‑solvent without erosion of stereoselectivity.

    Removing the Auxiliary Without Compromising Sensitive Functional Groups

    Cleavage of the sultam from the derivatised intermediate is the step where most process failures cluster. The sulfonamide bond is resistant to mild saponification; typical protocols employ lithium hydroxide/hydrogen peroxide (4 eq LiOH, 6 eq H2O2, THF/H2O 3:1) at 0 °C to room temperature. The perhydrolysis generates the free carboxylic acid and recovers the auxiliary as a water‑insoluble solid after acidification, which can be filtered and re‑used. However, substrates containing electron‑rich olefins, sulfide moieties, or N‑Boc groups are incompatible with these oxidative conditions. In such cases, reductive cleavage with lithium aluminium hydride (2.5 eq, THF, reflux 4 h) liberates the alcohol and recovers the sultam as the N‑unsubstituted ligand; the equipment must be inerted to ≤500 ppm O2 to prevent formation of highly coloured aluminium‑sulfonamide complexes that emulsify during quench. A comparative analysis of cleavage methods is summarised in Table 2.
    Table 2. Cleavage methods and functional‑group tolerance limits observed in pilot‑scale campaigns
    Cleavage ReagentConditionsFunctional Groups ExcludedRecovered Auxiliary Purity (HPLC)
    LiOH / H2O20 °C → rt, 3 hVinyl ethers, allylic sulfides, N‑Boc97–99 %
    LiAlH4THF, reflux, 4 hNitro, azide, sulfoxide95–98 %
    NaOEt / EtOHreflux, 8 hLactones, base‑labile esters85–90 % (partial ring opening)
    TBAF, wet DMF40 °C, 12 hSilyl ethers92–94 %
    In a kilo‑lab campaign targeting an azetidine‑containing building block, the LiAlH4 protocol was rejected because the azetidine N‑H underwent competitive alumination even at −10 °C; switching to the LiOH/H2O2 method reduced the overall yield from 42 % to 14 % due to N‑oxide formation. The final viable route employed a TBAF‑mediated methanolysis at pH 7.0 buffered with phosphate, achieving 78 % isolated yield of the acid with >99 % ee, a niche window that warrants careful in‑lab validation for every new scaffold. Published data for this specific configuration of TBAF‑buffered cleavage is limited; each substrate requires a tailored screening of fluoride‑source equivalents and water content, typically spanning 5–15 eq of TBAF trihydrate and 2–5 % v/v added water. The solid‑state morphology of the recovered auxiliary after cleavage deserves attention because batch‑to‑batch variability in particle size (Dv90 shifting from 45 µm to 120 µm) has been correlated with dissolution rates during the re‑acylation step. Jet‑milling to a Dv90 of ≤30 µm restores dissolution times below 10 min in THF at 10 °C, eliminating reactivity lags that could compromise enolate quench precision on scale. Production‑scale campaigns on a 50 L reactor at −75±3 °C have demonstrated that when particle size is uncontrolled, the alkylation diastereoselectivity fluctuates within a 2‑4 % range across five consecutive batches, a variation that disappears when the auxiliary is micronised and sieved through a 63 µm mesh. Such processing subtleties are often absent from published laboratory‑scale procedures but constitute the dominant source of inter‑batch drift in cGMP manufacturing.