6-Benzothiazolesulfonic Acid, 2,2'-Azinobis(3-Ethyl-2,3-Dihydro-, Diammonium Salt

6-Benzothiazolesulfonic Acid, 2,2'-Azinobis(3-Ethyl-2,3-Dihydro-, Diammonium Salt


    • Product Name 6-Benzothiazolesulfonic Acid, 2,2'-Azinobis(3-Ethyl-2,3-Dihydro-, Diammonium Salt
    • Alias ABTS
    • Einecs 242-718-1
    • Mininmum Order 1g
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    709410

    Chemical Name 6-Benzothiazolesulfonic Acid, 2,2'-Azinobis(3-Ethyl-2,3-Dihydro-, Diammonium Salt)

    As an accredited 6-Benzothiazolesulfonic Acid, 2,2'-Azinobis(3-Ethyl-2,3-Dihydro-, Diammonium Salt factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 500g of 6 - Benzothiazolesulfonic Acid, etc. in sealed chemical - grade packaging.
    Shipping 6 - Benzothiazolesulfonic Acid, 2,2'-Azinobis(3 - Ethyl - 2,3 - Dihydro -), Diammonium Salt is shipped in accordance with chemical regulations. Packed securely in appropriate containers to prevent spills and ensure safe transport.
    Storage Store 6 - Benzothiazolesulfonic Acid, 2,2'-Azinobis(3 - Ethyl - 2,3 - Dihydro -), Diammonium Salt in a cool, dry place. Keep it away from heat sources, direct sunlight, and incompatible substances. Use tightly - sealed containers to prevent moisture absorption and potential degradation, ensuring its stability during storage.
    Free Quote

    Competitive 6-Benzothiazolesulfonic Acid, 2,2'-Azinobis(3-Ethyl-2,3-Dihydro-, Diammonium Salt prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction
    The diamoniacal salt of 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (CAS 30931-67-0) functions as a water‑soluble chromogenic electron donor in peroxidase‑catalyzed oxidation‑reduction detection systems. Its primary application as an HRP substrate in colorimetric ELISA produces a soluble, blue‑green ABTS⁺ radical cation that exhibits broad absorbance at 405–420 nm and an isosbestic point near 734 nm, enabling dual‑wavelength background correction on standard microplate readers. Unlike organic‑solvent‑dependent chromogens, the diammonium salt dissolves directly in aqueous buffers at concentrations up to 50 mg/mL without cosolvents or surfactants, eliminating a common source of well‑to‑well variability in high‑throughput screening. In the oxidized form, the molar extinction coefficient at 405 nm reaches 3.6 × 10⁴ M⁻¹ cm⁻¹ in 0.1 M citrate‑phosphate buffer, pH 5.0, providing a detection sensitivity that bridges the gap between TMB and OPD while avoiding the mutagenic liabilities and precipitate formation associated with diaminobenzidine.

    Specification and Lot‑to‑Lot Consistency Parameters

    Commercial lots of ABTS diamonium salt are characterized by a minimum HPLC purity of ≥98% (area normalization at 254 nm), with residual salts arising from the neutralization step during synthesis. The absence of free sulfonic acid groups ensures direct solubility in neutral to mildly acidic buffers; however, batch‑to‑batch variability in residual sulfate content, typically <0.5% w/w, has been observed to shift the baseline absorbance of a 1.5 mM solution by up to 0.05 AU at 405 nm, necessitating a blank correction with each new lot. Gravimetric preparation of stock solutions is therefore recommended, and a standard addition recovery check against purified ABTS⁺ ion (ε at 414 nm = 3.6 × 10⁴ M⁻¹ cm⁻¹ in water) is performed in GLP‑compliant laboratories to normalize inter‑lot response factors. The specifications below represent the release criteria supplied by bulk biochemical reagent manufacturers.
    Chemical and Physical Specifications of ABTS Diammonium Salt
    Molecular FormulaC₁₈H₂₄N₆O₆S₄
    Molecular Weight548.68 g/mol
    AppearancePale yellow to greenish‑yellow powder
    Purity (HPLC, 254 nm)≥98.0%
    Absorption Maxima (ABTS⁺)405–414 nm and 728–734 nm
    Molar Extinction Coefficient (ε414 nm, H₂O)3.6 × 10⁴ M⁻¹ cm⁻¹
    Solubility in Deionized Water50 mg/mL (clear, faint yellow solution)
    pH of 1% Aqueous Solution4.5–5.5
    Water Content (Karl Fischer)≤1.0%
    Heavy Metals (as Pb)≤10 ppm
    Recommended Storage−20 °C, desiccated, protected from light

    What Limits Signal Linearity in Long‑Incubation ELISA Detection?

    Kinetic plateaus observed beyond 30 min of substrate conversion in HRP‑based assays arise from several interdependent factors. ABTS⁺ radical cation accumulation progressively reduces the effective concentration of unreacted ABTS, and at a working concentration of 1.5 mM, the reaction deviates from pseudo‑first‑order kinetics when more than 25% of the substrate is consumed. Simultaneously, the molar absorptivity of ABTS⁺ at 405 nm changes by approximately −0.8% per degree Celsius between 20 °C and 37 °C, so uncontrolled ambient temperature swings in an open‑air microplate handler can introduce a well‑track position‑dependent drift of up to 6 mAU/min. In automated liquid handling workstations equipped with 96‑channel heads, pre‑wetting of the dispensing tubing with ABTS working reagent and purging of the first 200 µL of flow eliminates a cross‑well carryover gradient that otherwise inflates row A‑H variation by 8–12%. Laboratories that require extended development times replace the conventional 0.01% H₂O₂ activator with a glucose‑glucose oxidase H₂O₂‑generating system, which sustains a steady‑state peroxide concentration below 30 µM and extends the linear detection window to 90 min at ambient temperature. When the assay requires a water‑soluble, non‑mutagenic substrate with direct compatibility with standard 405 nm interference filters, ABTS diamonium salt displaces TMB in kit formulations governed by ISO 13485 design control. The fully soluble reaction product permits endpoint measurement without the acid‑quench step obligatory for TMB, which precipitates a di‑imine that demands a 450 nm absorbance reading after 2 N H₂SO₄ addition. This simplifies on‑board reagent management in closed‑system immunochemistry analyzers where post‑reaction liquid handling of corrosive stop solutions is undesirable. However, the lower molar absorptivity of ABTS⁺ relative to oxidized TMB (ε450 nm5.9 × 10⁴ M⁻¹ cm⁻¹) means that for analytes requiring a limit of detection below 10 pg/mL, TMB remains the preferred chromogen. The table below summarizes key performance differentiators.
    Comparative Performance of Peroxidase Chromogenic Substrates in Immunoassay
    ParameterABTS Diammonium SaltTMBOPDDAB
    Detection Wavelength405–414 nm450 nm (after stop)490 nm430–470 nm (insoluble product)
    Molar Extinction Coefficient3.6 × 10⁴5.9 × 10⁴2.6 × 10⁴Not applicable (precipitate)
    SolubilityWater, >50 mg/mLRequires DMF or ethanolWater, 5 mg/mLRequires organic co‑solvent
    Safety ClassificationNon‑mutagenic (Ames negative)Potential mutagenConfirmed mutagen, photosensitizerCarcinogenic (IARC Group 1)
    Signal Stability (Endpoint)Stable >2 h in the darkStable 30 min after stopRapidly fades; stop with H₂SO₄Permanent precipitate
    Stop Reagent CompatibilitySDS (1%) or azide2 N H₂SO₄3 N HCl or H₂SO₄None; hazard with acid

    A Radical Cation for Antioxidant Capacity Quantification

    The pre‑formed ABTS⁺ radical cation, generated by chemical oxidation with potassium persulfate, serves as the probe in the Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC) assay, a decolorization method widely applied to food matrices, botanicals, and physiological fluids. A typical stock solution is prepared by dissolving 7.0 mM ABTS diamonium salt and 2.45 mM K₂S₂O₈ in ultrapure water, followed by incubation in the dark at 23 ± 2 °C for 12–16 h. The resulting dark blue‑green radical cation exhibits an absorbance of 0.70 ± 0.02 at 734 nm when diluted with 0.1 M phosphate‑buffered saline (pH 7.4) to a ratio of 1:50 (v/v). A UV‑Vis spectrophotometer equipped with a temperature‑controlled sipper system (path length 1 cm, bandpass 2 nm) set to 734 nm monitors the absorbance decay upon addition of antioxidant. The percentage inhibition is plotted against Trolox concentration (0–15 µM), and results are expressed as µmol Trolox equivalents per gram of sample. High‑moisture, acidic matrices, such as citrus juices with pH below 3.5, protonate a fraction of the ABTS⁺ radical, shifting the equilibrium toward the diamagnetic form and inflating the apparent TEAC value by 12–18% unless the assay buffer is pre‑adjusted to pH 7.4 with 10 mM KOH prior to radical addition. For lipophilic antioxidants, the ABTS⁺ radical cation dissolved in aqueous buffer exhibits negligible penetration into oil droplets; a dual‑phase TEAC variant using the diammonium salt in 50 mM ammonium acetate/methanol (1:1) achieves quantitation of tocopherols with a linear range of 0.5–25 µM α‑tocopherol, though published inter‑laboratory precision data for this configuration remain sparse.

    When A Stable Pre‑Formed Radical Cation Outperforms DPPH

    Compared to the DPPH radical (2,2‑diphenyl‑1‑picrylhydrazyl), the ABTS⁺ species lacks the steric hindrance that suppresses reaction rates with high‑molecular‑weight polyphenols and does not require dissolution in alcohol, allowing antioxidant assessment under physiologically relevant aqueous conditions. The ABTS⁺ radical is reactive over a broad pH range (3–10), whereas DPPH activity is confined to organic solvents and is sensitive to hydrogen‑bonding interference from trace water. In a head‑to‑head comparison on grape seed extracts, TEAC values obtained with ABTS⁺ at 734 nm were 1.4‑fold higher than those from the DPPH assay, attributable to the accessibility of both hydrophobic and hydrophilic antioxidant domains. Despite this, DPPH maintains utility in lipophilic matrices because it avoids the persulfate‑mediated oxidation step that can generate reactive oxygen species confounding results; thus selection of the ABTS‑based system is recommended only when the matrix is predominantly aqueous and when a single‑electron transfer (SET) mechanism is the intended detection mode.

    Oxidative Degradation Pathways in ABTS Diammonium Salt Stored at Ambient Humidity

    Exposure of the solid diammonium salt to relative humidity exceeding 60% initiates hydrolytic cleavage of the azine linkage, yielding 3‑ethyl‑6‑sulfonamidobenzothiazole fragments that exhibit non‑specific absorption at 280 nm and suppress the enzymatic turnover rate by acting as competitive inhibitors of the HRP‑compound I intermediate (Kᵢ ≈ 50 µM). In southern hemisphere distribution centers where uncontrolled warehouse temperatures often cycle between 15 °C and 40 °C, induction of this degradation mode reduces the effective substrate purity by approximately 3‑5% over a six‑month storage interval, as determined by reverse‑phase HPLC with UV detection at 254 nm. Pre‑drying of the opened bottle in a vacuum desiccator over phosphorus pentoxide at 0.1 mbar for 12 h restores the anhydrous condition, but laboratories that repeatedly sample the reagent without inert gas purging should aliquot the material into single‑use amber glass vials sealed under argon upon receipt. Buffering systems containing primary amines or Tris‑base at concentrations above 50 mM catalyze a non‑enzymatic autoxidation of ABTS to the radical cation. In a 0.1 M Tris‑HCl buffer, pH 8.0, a 1 mM ABTS solution develops a background absorbance at 405 nm of 0.2 AU within 10 min in the dark, attributable to trace metal‑catalyzed radical propagation. Chelation with 0.1 mM EDTA partially attenuates the drift to 0.08 AU, but for peroxidase‑linked assays the recommended diluent remains 0.1 M citrate‑phosphate, pH 5.0, where the autoxidation rate is below 1 mAU/min. Combining ABTS diamonium salt with azide‑based preservatives used in commercial stop solutions requires elevated azide concentrations (> 0.02%) to completely inhibit the HRP reaction, as the radical cation re‑oxidizes azide in a side‑pathway that delays signal quenching by up to 15 seconds per well in a 384‑well format.