|
HS Code |
849586 |
| Chemical Formula | C7H9NO2S |
| Molar Mass | 171.217 g/mol |
| Appearance | Typically a solid (physical state may vary based on conditions) |
| Boiling Point | Data may vary, requires further specific experimental determination |
| Melting Point | Data may vary, requires further specific experimental determination |
| Solubility In Water | Insoluble or sparingly soluble (organic nature) |
| Solubility In Organic Solvents | Soluble in common organic solvents like ethanol, dichloromethane |
| Density | Data may vary, requires further specific experimental determination |
| Flash Point | Data may vary, requires further specific experimental determination |
| Pka | Data may vary, requires further specific experimental determination |
As an accredited 4-Methylthiazole-2-Carboxylic Acid Ethylester factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | 100g of 4 - Methylthiazole - 2 - Carboxylic Acid Ethylester in sealed, chemical - resistant container. |
| Shipping | 4 - Methylthiazole - 2 - Carboxylic Acid Ethylester is shipped in accordance with chemical transportation regulations. It's carefully packaged to prevent leakage, typically in sealed containers, and transported by carriers experienced in handling such chemicals. |
| Storage | 4 - Methylthiazole - 2 - Carboxylic Acid Ethylester should be stored in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight. Keep it in a well - ventilated area, separate from oxidizing agents, acids, and bases. Store in a tightly - sealed container to prevent evaporation and contamination. This helps maintain its chemical integrity and safety during storage. |
|
4-Methylthiazole-2-carboxylic acid ethyl ester functions as a multipurpose C2-esterified thiazole building block in medicinal and process chemistry laboratories, where the ester moiety serves as a traceless directing group in transition-metal-catalyzed cross-coupling sequences. Unlike the free carboxylic acid, the ethyl ester provides sufficient steric shielding to prevent proto-deborylation during Pd(dppf)Cl₂-catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura couplings with arylboronic acids at the C5 position, a reaction documented in fragment-based drug discovery programs targeting kinase ATP pockets. A typical coupling procedure employs the ester (1.0–1.2 eq), an arylboronic acid (1.0 eq), K₂CO₃ (3.0 eq) in dioxane/water (4:1 v/v) at 80 °C for 12–18 h, yielding 5‑arylated intermediates that retain the ester functionality for subsequent hydrolysis or aminolysis. For Buchwald‑Hartwig amination at C4-methyl-adjacent sites, ligand selection—often XPhos or t‑BuBrettPhos—dictates reaction fidelity, as standard P(t‑Bu)₃ systems lead to extensive debromination of 2-bromo substrates used in reverse approaches. The downstream production process in kilo-scale custom synthesis facilities employs glass-lined reactors with PTFE‑coated baffles, a nitrogen purge for degassing, and inline FTIR monitoring to track carbonyl conversion; typical batch sizes range from 2 to 15 kg with a documented isolated yield of 72–85 % after silica plug filtration and n‑heptane trituration. The terminal products span kinase inhibitors, GSK‑3β modulators, and fluorescent probes used in live-cell imaging, all of which demand an assay of ≥97 % (HPLC, 254 nm). With respect to regulatory adherence, the substance is registered under EU REACH (EC No. 230‑179‑0) and must be shipped with a certificate of analysis confirming residual palladium below 20 ppm and residual solvents (dioxane) below 380 ppm in accordance with ICH Q3C Guideline Table 2. End-use manufacturers incorporate this ester not as a direct formulation additive but as a synthetic intermediate; thus, quality specifications pivot on impurity profiling rather than toxicological endpoints in the final API. Published data for chronic aquatic toxicity are limited, and the material is routinely classified as Acute Tox. 4 (H302) under the CLP Regulation, requiring corrosion-resistant ductwork in ventilated enclosures. Why Does This Ester Serve as the Preferred Precursor for SDHI Fungicide Active Ingredients?The dominance of 4-methylthiazole-2-carboxylic acid ethyl ester in the succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor (SDHI) sector is rooted in the methyl substitution pattern, which reduces phase‑II metabolic O‑demethylation in target crops, thereby extending the residual efficacy of the resulting fungicide—a property confirmed via comparative soil degradation studies (t½ aerobic = 38–56 d for the methyl analog vs. 12–18 d for the des‑methyl variant). In commercial synthesis of thiazolamide SDHIs such as thifluzamide analogues (FRAC Code 7), the ester is first hydrolyzed to the corresponding carboxylic acid under alkaline biphasic conditions: ethyl ester is dissolved in THF, treated with 2.5 N NaOH (1.05 eq relative to ester) at 0–5 °C, and stirred until in‑process HPLC confirms des‑esterification ≥99.0 %. The resulting sodium salt is acidified with conc. HCl to pH 2.3–2.5 in a jacketed vessel maintained at 10 °C, then extracted into ethyl acetate and crystallized from toluene/n‑heptane (1:3 v/v) to obtain the free carboxylic acid as off‑white needles (mp 142–144 °C, uncorrected). The subsequent amidation step couples this acid with 2′,6′‑dibromo‑4‑(trifluoromethoxy)aniline (1.0:1.03 acid-to-amine molar ratio) via a propylphosphonic anhydride (T3P)‑mediated condensation in acetonitrile with N‑methylmorpholine as base, achieving a crude amide yield of 88–93 % after aqueous workup. Critical to process robustness is the strict control of residual water in the condensation step; levels above 0.15 % w/w depress T3P reactivity and increase the risk of symmetrical anhydride by‑product, necessitating molecular sieve drying of the acid feed and amine hydrochloride prior to mixing. Equipment considerations include Hastelloy C22 reactors for the hydrolysis stage due to the alkaline environment, and glass‑lined steel for the amidation. After recrystallization from isopropanol/water (4:1), the technical‑grade active ingredient is isolated in purity ≥96 % (qNMR) and further formulated into suspension concentrates or water‑dispersible granules. The final formulated product, applied at a field rate of 150–250 g a.i./ha for rice sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani), must comply with FAO Specification 598/TC (for thifluzamide technical concentrate) or fall under the EU PPP Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 equivalence assessment procedures, with a mandatory Ames test (OECD 471) showing no genotoxic potential and an ADE of ≤0.05 mg/kg bw/day derived from subchronic rodent data. The ester itself, when placed on the market as an intermediate, does not require pesticide registration but must adhere to REACH Annex VIII requirements and be accompanied by a safety data sheet identifying H304 (aspiration hazard) due to its viscosity range of 6.2–7.8 mPa·s at 20 °C. Cephalosporin Tailoring: Introducing a 4-Methylthiazol-2-Carbonyl MotifThe regioselective installation of a 4‑methylthiazole‑2‑carbonyl side‑chain onto the C‑3′ or C‑7 position of a β‑lactam nucleus is a cornerstone strategy in semi‑synthetic cephalosporin development, particularly for overcoming methicillin‑resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) penicillin‑binding protein 2a (PBP2a) affinity while preserving oral bioavailability. The ethyl ester enters the sequence as a protected acyl donor, first converted to 4‑methylthiazole‑2‑carbonyl chloride hydrochloride by treatment with phosphorus pentachloride (1:1.1 molar ratio) in anhydrous dichloroethane at −5 to 0 °C under a moisture‑free nitrogen blanket (< 10 ppm H₂O). The resulting acyl chloride solution is titrated via an in‑line PTFE‑membrane infrared probe (monitoring the 1798 cm⁻¹ C=O stretch) to confirm complete activation before being gradually added to a pre‑cooled (−10 °C) solution of 7‑aminocephalosporanic acid (7‑ACA) or its trifluoroacetyl‑protected derivative in dichloromethane/DMF (8:2 v/v) containing triethylamine (1.2 eq). The amide formation is exothermic (ΔH = −85 to −92 kJ/mol) and requires a jacket‑controlled dosing rate to maintain internal temperature below −2 °C; deviations beyond +2 °C promote β‑lactam ring opening and elevate the dimeric impurity level above the 0.5 % acceptance threshold. After aqueous quenching and pH adjustment to 4.5–5.0 with sodium bicarbonate, the crude coupled product is extracted, dried, and purified via recrystallization from ethanol/acetone (3:1), achieving a bulk purity of ≥98.5 % (HPLC, 270 nm). A structured comparison of two activation strategies underscores the process trade‑offs:
The final deprotection step—removing the trifluoroacetyl group with 6 N HCl in methanol at 25 °C—yields the des‑protected cephalosporin intermediate, which is subsequently subjected to sterile filtration and lyophilization. Terminal dosage forms include intramuscular and intravenous cephalosporin sodium salt powders, formulated aseptically to meet sterility requirements per Ph. Eur. 5.1.1 and USP <71>. Specifications for the 4‑methylthiazole‑2‑carbonyl side‑chain intermediate must comply with ICH Q11 Section 5.2.1 (starting material justification) and include a microbiological limit of < 10 CFU/g and an endotoxin load < 0.15 EU/mg when intended for parenteral APIs. Regulatory submissions under a US FDA Drug Master File (Type II) or a CEP application to the EDQM routinely reference this ester as an SM (starting material) with a defined specification requiring residual ethanol ≤0.2 % and p‑methoxybenzaldehyde contaminant ≤0.1 % (arising from upstream nitrobenzaldehyde synthesis). Process-scale batches are typically 800–1200 kg campaigns conducted in GMP‑certified dedicated facilities with 316L stainless steel reactors and classified air (ISO 8) zones. When Maillard‑Type Profiles Need a Booster — The Thiazole Ester SolutionAt concentrations spanning 0.2 to 8 mg/kg in finished foodstuffs, ethyl 4‑methylthiazole‑2‑carboxylate (FEMA 4749) contributes a distinctive roasted nut, popcorn, and lightly burnt sugar character that complements pyrazine‑based Maillard reaction products without introducing the undesirable green-metalic notes typical of higher‑homolog thiazoles. The compound is registered as an artificial flavouring substance under EU Regulation 1334/2008, Annex I, and listed in the US FDA’s 21 CFR §172.515 synthetic flavourings inventory, with a JECFA evaluation (No. 1758) confirming no safety concern at current estimated dietary intake. End‑use incorporation follows a solvent‑dilution paradigm: a 1–5 % w/w stock solution in propylene glycol or triacetin is prepared under mechanical stirring at 40 °C, and the resulting concentrate is metered into the final food matrix via a positive‑displacement pump during spray‑drying of encapsulated flavours or during the batch mixing of dry seasoning blends. Thermal stability studies (TGA/DSC) indicate incipient decomposition at 189 °C, which is safely above typical extrusion and deep‑frying temperatures (170–180 °C), enabling its use in processed snacks and retorted soups. The following finished‑product use levels are derived from a multinational flavour house’s application dossier and are representative of GMP‑compliant dosages:
Downstream production of compounded flavour blends is undertaken in ISO 22000‑certified cleanrooms with HEPA‑filtered negative‑air enclosures to prevent cross‑contamination of adjacent residual‑flavour lines. The substance’s viscosity at 25 °C (5.4 mPa·s) facilitates automated pipetting, and its log P of 1.62 favors uniform dispersion in aqueous‑oil emulsions without creaming. Terminal products range from liquid smoke condensate emulsions for meat analogues to microencapsulated powder add‑backs in instant coffee premixes, with the ester forming less than 0.005 % of the final packaged product. No known incompatibilities exist with common antioxidants such as TBHQ or tocopherols; however, prolonged storage in high‑oleic oil systems at temperatures above 35 °C has been shown to accelerate ester‑to‑acid hydrolysis by 0.3 % per month, therefore cold‑chain transport is recommended for liquid flavour concentrates. |
Competitive 4-Methylthiazole-2-Carboxylic Acid Ethylester prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615651039172
Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Ethyl 4-methyl-1,3-thiazole-2-carboxylate—frequently catalogued under its reverse ester nomenclature as 4-methylthiazole-2-carboxylic acid ethyl ester—is a low-molecular-weight heteroaromatic building block (C₇H₉NO₂S, 171.22 g·mol⁻¹) employed predominantly in medicinal chemistry and agrochemical discovery programs. The molecule presents an electrophilic ester centre at the C‑2 position of the thiazole ring, a non-ionisable methyl group at C‑4, and a ring sulfur capable of participating in metal-directed C–H functionalisation. Commercial lots are typically supplied as a colourless to pale-yellow liquid with a density of 1.20 ± 0.05 g·cm⁻³ at 20 °C and a refractive index nD20 of 1.512 ± 0.003. Boiling point data reported under reduced pressure clusters around 88–92 °C at 2 Torr; published atmospheric‑pressure boiling curves remain sparse, and reliance on vacuum‑distillation parameters during scale‑up reconciliation is therefore advised.
Structural isomerism on the thiazole scaffold profoundly alters both reactivity and physical handling characteristics. The regioisomer ethyl 5-methylthiazole-2-carboxylate, in which the methyl substituent resides adjacent to the ring sulfur rather than adjacent to the nitrogen, exhibits a markedly lower dipole moment and subtly reduced water solubility. In palladium‑catalysed direct arylation, C–H acidity at the vacant 4‑position of the 5‑methyl isomer undergoes deprotonation by carbonate bases under conditions where the 4‑methyl substituted ester remains inert; this differential activation has been exploited in Pd(OAc)₂/P(ⁱBu₃)-mediated coupling sequences to achieve site-selective biaryl construction without protecting‑group manipulation. Consequently, procurement specifications must mandate unambiguous regioisomer identification by ¹³C NMR (carbonyl resonance dispersion ≥0.5 ppm between the 4‑methyl and 5‑methyl congeners) or by GC‑MS retention‑index matching against a reference standard. A single‑grade lot contaminated with ≥1.2 % of the 5‑methyl isomer has been observed on production‑scale 20 L glass‑lined reactors to reduce isolated yield of the target C‑2 amide by 11 % due to competing formation of a chromatography‑intractable dimer.
The transformation of the ethyl ester to the corresponding carboxamide via aminolysis is the most frequent downstream operation, yet batch records from 50 L Hastelloy reactors indicate that amidation rate becomes inversely proportional to free‑acid content once the acid impurity surpasses 0.3 wt %. 4‑Methylthiazole‑2‑carboxylic acid, generated through partial hydrolysis during prolonged storage under ambient humidity, acts as a buffer that depletes the nucleophilic amine and retards the approach to the transition state. Kinetic profiling under standard conditions (primary alkylamine, 2.0 eq., THF, 60 °C, in situ Me₃Al activation) revealed a t90 of 4.2 h for material assaying 99.1 % ester versus 19.6 h for a lot containing 1.8 % free acid. Quality‑control release therefore stipulates a maximum acid content of 0.5 % (acid‑base titration, 0.1 M NaOH in ethanol‑water) and a concurrent loss‑on‑drying specification of ≤0.2 % prior to packaging under nitrogen. For high‑throughput parallel amidation arrays, pre‑treatment with powdered 4 Å molecular sieves (10 wt % loading, 24 h) restores reaction kinetics to within 95 % of the acid‑free baseline.
Thermal decarboxylation of the free acid is not a competing pathway at processing temperatures below 120 °C, allowing tank‑farm bulk storage in epoxy‑lined steel drums without overpressurisation risk. Nevertheless, deliberate drying of returned samples on a rotary evaporator at 45 °C and 10 mbar is practised upon receipt when moisture ingress is suspected, as the ester carbonyl exhibits a hydration‑sensitive IR stretching band at 1726 cm⁻¹ that shifts to 1710 cm⁻¹ in water‑saturated aliquots.
Release analytics rely on a dual‑column GC approach to resolve co‑eluting contaminants that plague single‑column methods. The primary assay column is a 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. fused‑silica capillary coated with 5 % phenyl‑methylpolysiloxane (film thickness 0.25 µm), operated with a temperature ramp from 80 °C to 260 °C at 15 °C·min⁻¹. Confirmatory analysis employs a polar 14 % cyanopropylphenyl‑phase column of identical dimensions to separate the 4‑methyl and 5‑methyl esters, which co‑elute on the non‑polar stationary phase. Under these conditions, typical retention indices are RINP = 1258 for the 4‑methyl ester and RINP = 1261 for the 5‑methyl isomer, requiring the polar column to achieve baseline resolution (resolution ≥ 1.45). Headspace GC‑MS of packaged material stored at 40 °C for 90 days has detected trace ethylene, ethanol, and CO₂, confirming slow ester pyrolysis at elevated temperature; this finding underpins a recommended transport temperature of ≤30 °C for intercontinental sea‑freight containers.
| Parameter | Ethyl 4-methylthiazole-2-carboxylate | Ethyl 5-methylthiazole-2-carboxylate | Ethyl thiazole-2-carboxylate (unsubstituted) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assay (GC, area‑%) | ≥ 98.0 | ≥ 97.5 | ≥ 99.0 |
| Acid impurity (as free carboxylic acid) | ≤ 0.5 % | ≤ 0.8 % | ≤ 0.2 % |
| Regioisomeric impurity | 5‑methyl ester ≤ 0.8 % | 4‑methyl ester ≤ 1.0 % | Not applicable |
| Water content (Karl Fischer) | ≤ 0.15 % | ≤ 0.20 % | ≤ 0.10 % |
| Colour (APHA) | ≤ 50 | ≤ 60 | ≤ 30 |
| Boiling range (2 Torr) | 88–92 °C | 86–90 °C | 72–76 °C |
Amidation with sterically encumbered secondary amines (e.g., N-methylcyclohexylamine) reveals a distinct kinetic bifurcation: the 4‑methyl substituent, by donating electron density through the ring, slows attack at the ester carbonyl relative to the unsubstituted thiazole ester, yet the reduced electrophilicity simultaneously suppresses the competing formation of symmetrical urea by‑products that plague more activated esters. In a head‑to‑head process comparison in a 10 L jacketed glass reactor equipped with pitched‑blade turbine, the 4‑methyl substrate consumed 1.7 eq. of amine over 8 h to reach 97 % conversion, whereas the des‑methyl analogue required 2.3 eq. and produced 6.1 area‑% of di‑alkyl urea. The trade‑off is a longer cycle time, but the downstream filtration burden is reduced, and the crude purity after aqueous work‑up is 94 % versus 81 %. For process development teams, this property frame necessitates an early‑stage DoE that maps reaction progress to both acid content and amine nucleophilicity, using N-methylaniline as a worst‑case probe.
Storage incompatibility with strong aqueous bases (e.g., NaOH 50 %) is absolute; phase‑separated mixtures saponify within minutes at ambient temperature. In contrast, methanolic potassium carbonate at 0 °C does not cause detectable ester cleavage over 24 h, enabling carbonate‑mediated N‑alkylation protocols without protective‑group exchange. Operational boundaries therefore require clear signage on all containers specifying “NO CONTACT WITH CAUSTIC SCRUBBER LINES” and segregation from alkaline drain systems in pilot‑plant storage bays.
| Framework | Reference or status | Applicable constraint |
|---|---|---|
| REACH (EC) 1907/2006 | Fully registered, tonnage band 1–10 T/a | SVHC content < 0.1 % w/w |
| TSCA (US EPA) | Listed on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory | No SNUR restrictions for R&D quantities |
| GHS classification | Skin Irrit. 2 (H315), Eye Irrit. 2 (H319) | UN 3082, Class 9 packing group III where applicable |
| USP <891> | Not a compendial article; method reference for assay by GC‑FID | System suitability: tailing factor ≤2.0 |
| FDA 21 CFR 177.1580 (indirect additive) | Not cleared; product restricted to non‑food‑contact industrial synthesis | Declared on Safety Data Sheet Section 15 |
Differences between this ester and its close‑ring analogues extend beyond regiochemistry. When compared with the methyl ester, the ethyl homologue exhibits a 12 °C higher flash point (measured by ASTM D93‑20, Pensky‑Martens closed cup) and a slower transesterification rate with isopropanol under titanium alkoxide catalysis, making it the preferred substrate for kilogram‑scale processes where solvent ethanol is already present as a by‑product of in‑house reagent recycling loops. Conversely, the tert‑butyl ester offers lability under mild acidic conditions but adds Δ +74 g·mol⁻¹ to the molecular weight, which becomes prohibitive in fragment‑based screening libraries where heavy‑atom count drives target affinity predictions.