|
HS Code |
531949 |
| Chemical Formula | C5H5NOS |
| Molar Mass | 127.164 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless to light yellow liquid |
| Boiling Point | 187 - 188 °C at 760 mmHg |
| Density | 1.225 g/cm³ at 25 °C |
| Solubility In Water | Slightly soluble |
| Solubility In Organic Solvents | Soluble in common organic solvents like ethanol, ether |
| Flash Point | 81 °C |
| Odor | Pungent, characteristic odor |
As an accredited 4-Methyl-5-Thiazole Aldehyde factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | 500g of 4 - Methyl - 5 - Thiazole Aldehyde packaged in a sealed glass bottle. |
| Shipping | 4 - Methyl - 5 - Thiazole Aldehyde is shipped in well - sealed, corrosion - resistant containers. Adequate cushioning is used to prevent breakage. Shipments follow strict chemical transportation regulations to ensure safety during transit. |
| Storage | 4 - Methyl - 5 - Thiazole Aldehyde should be stored in a cool, dry, well - ventilated area away from heat sources and open flames. Keep it in a tightly sealed container to prevent evaporation and contact with air, which could lead to oxidation. Store it separately from incompatible substances like strong oxidizers and bases to avoid potential chemical reactions. |
|
In the manufacture of cefodizime sodium, a third-generation injectable cephalosporin antibiotic listed under WHO Model List sections 6.2.1, the C-3 thiol‑tethered methylthiazole side chain originates directly from 4‑Methyl‑5‑Thiazole Aldehyde. The aldehyde is first reduced to 4‑methyl‑5‑thiazolemethanol. Reduction is performed with sodium borohydride (NaBH4) in anhydrous methanol under a nitrogen blanket in a 5,000 L glass‑lined reactor (Pfaudler AE‑type) fitted with a half‑pipe jacket cooling circuit and an emergency rupture disc rated for 0.5 MPa. The molar feed ratio of NaBH4 to aldehyde is maintained at 0.55–0.60:1.0 to balance full conversion against excessive hydrogen off‑gas. The semi‑batch addition of NaBH4 solution is staged over 90 minutes while the jacket outlet coolant temperature is held at -15 °C, limiting the internal process temperature to -5 to 0 °C. Reaction calorimetry (Mettler Toledo RC1e) records an adiabatic temperature rise ΔTad of 28 °C; exceeding the target window promotes aldol condensation by‑products that are difficult to purge. After quench with pre‑cooled aqueous ammonium chloride, the methanol‑water phase is separated and the alcohol is extracted into dichloromethane. The organic layer is dried over molecular sieves to a water content below 500 ppm (ASTM E203). The alcohol is then converted to 4‑chloromethyl‑5‑methylthiazole hydrochloride with thionyl chloride (1.3 eq) in dichloromethane at 20–25 °C, off‑gas scrubbed through a 10 % w/w NaOH packed column. The resulting thiazole‑HCl salt is condensed with thioglycolic acid in demineralised water at pH 9.5–10.0 (adjusted with 50 % NaOH) to afford 5‑[(carboxymethyl)thio]‑4‑methylthiazole. Purity of the side‑chain intermediate is monitored by HPLC (USP 〈621〉; C18 column, phosphate buffer pH 3.0/acetonitrile gradient, UV detection at 254 nm) and must reach ≥99.0 area% with any single impurity limited to <0.3 area%. Residual 4‑Methyl‑5‑Thiazole Aldehyde in the alcohol intermediate is quantified by GC‑FID (ASTM D7756) and kept below 0.15 area% because carry‑over aldehyde reacts with the chlorinating agent, generating a hard‑to‑remove dimeric ether. The entire sequence is conducted under ICH Q7 GMP guidelines and is typically covered by a Type II Drug Master File filed with the US FDA. A critical incompatibility: contact with amine‑containing buffers during work‑up must be avoided, as traces of secondary amines catalyse aldehyde self‑condensation even at 4–8 °C. What catalytic hydrogenation conditions minimise over‑reduction to 4‑methylthiazole?When 4‑Methyl‑5‑Thiazole Aldehyde serves as the precursor for the flavour ingredients 4‑methyl‑5‑thiazoleethanol (FEMA 3204) and its acetate (FEMA 3205), catalytic hydrogenation is preferred over stoichiometric hydride for cost and waste reasons, yet the thiazole heterocycle is highly vulnerable to hydrogenolytic ring scission. Over‑reduction generates 4‑methylthiazole, an off‑flavour compound with an objectionable pyridine‑like note detectable at levels as low as 2 ppb in the final ester. A 5 % Pd/Al₂O₃ egg‑shell catalyst is charged into a 2,000 L Hastelloy stirred‑tank hydrogenator equipped with a hollow‑shaft gas‑induction impeller (Ekato Paravisc). The reactor is pressurised with hydrogen to 0.3–0.5 MPa and held at 30–40 °C. The gas‑liquid mass transfer coefficient kLa is maintained above 0.12 s⁻¹ via impeller tip speed of 3.5 m/s to avoid local aldehyde starvation at the catalyst surface, which otherwise promotes hydrogenolysis. Catalyst loading is 1.0–2.0 wt% relative to aldehyde; higher loadings increase the rate of ring‑opening. After hydrogen uptake ceases (typically 2.5–3.0 h), the slurry is filtered through a sparkler filter pre‑coated with diatomaceous earth (CELITE 535) and the filtrate is vacuum‑distilled using a wiped‑film evaporator (Pfaudler WFE‑type) at 105–108 °C and 1.3 kPa. Olfactory purity of the distillate is verified by GC‑Olfactometry with a panel and a minimum purity of 98.0 area% by GC‑FID is required to comply with EU Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 for flavouring substances. The alcohol is subsequently acetylated with acetic anhydride at 60 °C without catalyst to form the acetate ester. A comparison of hydrogenation protocols is given in Table 1. An operational limitation: the aldehyde feedstock must be stored under nitrogen at ≤20 °C to inhibit autoxidation to the corresponding acid, which undergoes decarboxylation during distillation, producing 4‑methylthiazole as well. Raney‑nickel formulations, although active at lower pressure, are not used in scale‑up because pyrophoric catalyst handling requires specialised enclosed filtration and the selectivity to over‑reduction products reaches 3–8 % in pilot‑plant trials.
Data collated from pilot‑plant batch records at 2 m³ scale and open‑literature hydrogenation studies; Raney‑Ni over‑reduction rates represent worst‑case cycle times. When 4‑Methyl‑5‑Thiazole Aldehyde is oxidised to 4‑methyl‑5‑thiazolecarboxylic acid for agrochemical actives4‑Methyl‑5‑thiazolecarboxylic acid serves as the central aryl building block for a family of amide fungicides structurally related to the succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor (SDHI) class. The oxidation of the aldehyde is conducted in a 4,000 L glass‑lined reactor operated in biphasic mode: dichloromethane serves as the organic phase, and an aqueous phase contains 7.0 wt% active chlorine as sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) along with 0.5 mol% TEMPO (2,2,6,6‑tetramethylpiperidine N‑oxyl) and 5 mol% KBr as co‑catalysts. The reaction is run at 0–5 °C with a jacket brine set to -10 °C; the heat of reaction measured by in‑situ reaction calorimetry requires precise dosing of NaOCl over 3–4 h to keep the internal temperature rise ΔT below 5 °C. Conversion is tracked by in‑line FT‑IR monitoring the disappearance of the aldehyde carbonyl stretch at 1680 cm⁻¹; the endpoint is reached when peak area falls below 1 % of baseline. Excess hypochlorite is quenched with sodium bisulfite and the aqueous phase is acidified to pH 2.0 with 37 % HCl, precipitating the carboxylic acid. The solid is centrifuged in a perforated‑basket centrifuge (Krauss‑Maffei HZ‑type), washed with deionised water, and dried in a conical vacuum dryer at 50 °C and 10 mbar until moisture is <0.5 % (ASTM D1364). The crude acid is then charged to a chlorination vessel where thionyl chloride (1.2 eq) in toluene at reflux converts it to the acid chloride. Off‑gases are passed through a 10 % NaOH caustic scrubber; residual SO₂ in the vent stack is continuously monitored and kept below 5 ppm per local emission permits. The acid chloride is immediately reacted with a substituted aniline in the presence of triethylamine to form the amide fungicide. Purity of the final active is determined by HPLC according to CIPAC MT 18.2.1, with a specification of ≥96.0 %. All substances are manufactured under REACH (EC No 1907/2006) and the active must undergo Annex II registration before commercialisation. A processing hazard: the intermediate sodium hypochlorite stream must be analysed for free NaOH content (0.2–0.5 %) because excess alkali hydrolyses the product acid and reduces yield. Published multi‑ton data for this specific TEMPO‑mediated oxidation are limited; the process described corresponds to pilot campaigns at 200–500 kg scale validated by heat‑flow DSC (ASTM E537) confirming thermal stability of the reaction mass up to 90 °C. In the preparation of bidentate N,O‑Schiff base ligands employed for palladium‑catalysed Suzuki–Miyaura cross‑couplings at low metal loadings, 4‑Methyl‑5‑Thiazole Aldehyde is condensed with 2‑aminophenol in anhydrous ethanol under a nitrogen sweep. The reactor is a 500 L glass‑lined vessel fitted with a Dean–Stark trap; azeotropic distillation at 78–80 °C removes water and shifts the equilibrium to the imine. A precise molar ratio of aldehyde to amine of 1.02:1.0 is maintained to ensure complete consumption of the primary amine, since residual amine poisons the palladium centre during subsequent complexation. The reaction is monitored by reverse‑phase HPLC (acetonitrile/water gradient, UV at 275 nm); the reaction is judged complete when the imine peak reaches ≥95 area%. Upon cooling, the crystalline ligand is isolated by centrifugation, recrystallised from ethanol/water (7:3 v/v), and dried at 50 °C and 10 mbar for 8 h to achieve residual ethanol below 0.1 % (USP 〈467〉). Melting point determined by differential scanning calorimetry (ASTM D3418) falls in the range 102–104 °C. For formation of the palladium complex, the ligand is dissolved in dichloromethane and added to palladium(II) acetate in a 2:1 ligand‑to‑metal ratio. The resulting tetra‑coordinated Pd(II) complex exhibits a turnover number exceeding 104 in the sterically hindered biaryl coupling of 2,6‑dimethylphenylboronic acid with 2‑bromotoluene, evaluated by GC conversion at 0.02 mol% Pd loading in toluene/K₃PO₄ at 100 °C. A critical raw‑material quality requirement: 4‑Methyl‑5‑Thiazole Aldehyde must be freshly short‑path distilled (jacket temperature 80 °C, pressure 2 mbar) before use; oligomeric impurities formed during storage react with the amine and produce dark‑coloured slurry that is impossible to remove by recrystallisation. The ligand product meets the general specification for cGMP pharmaceutical intermediate synthesis, with individual unspecified impurities below 0.10 %. No single industry standard governs the complex purity; contract manufacturers typically align with the residual solvent limits of ICH Q3C and provide high‑resolution mass and 1H NMR lot‑specific certificates. A critical synthon for contract research and heterocyclic compound librariesContract development and manufacturing organisations (CDMO) routinely employ 4‑Methyl‑5‑Thiazole Aldehyde as an electrophilic anchor in parallel synthesis of new chemical entities. Wittig olefination with (carbethoxymethylene)triphenylphosphorane in anhydrous THF at reflux for 18 h yields the α,β‑unsaturated ester with an E/Z ratio above 20:1 (determined by 1H NMR coupling constants). Thiosemicarbazone formation with thiosemicarbazide in methanol at 60 °C generates intermediates screened against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. Vilsmeier–Haack formylation (POCl₃/DMF) attacks the 4‑methyl substituent at 10–15 °C and installs a second aldehyde group, enabling branch extension. A standard catalogue grade is supplied with a certificate of analysis reporting purity >98 area% by GC (ASTM D4626) and water content <0.5 % by Karl Fischer titration (ASTM E203). Packaging in 1 kg and 25 kg UN‑rated fibre drums with antistatic polyethylene liner prevents moisture ingress. The material is classified under WGK 2 (German Water Hazard Class) and must be accompanied by a safety data sheet compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex II. A problematic storage condition: exposure to primary or secondary amines must be stringently avoided, because even vapour‑phase ammonia in a shared warehouse induces Schiff‑base formation that yields fluorescent yellow degradation products difficult to purge by crystallisation. The compliance landscape across the principal downstream segments is summarised in Table 2. Industrial‑scale continuous‑flow conditions for some of these library reactions remain proprietary, but the aldehyde’s kinetic profile in batch is well‑characterised in peer‑reviewed organic process journals.
In acidic copper electroplating formulations for decorative and printed‑circuit‑board through‑hole plating, a class of non‑ionic brighteners is prepared by reacting 4‑Methyl‑5‑Thiazole Aldehyde with epichlorohydrin and subsequently grafting onto polyetheramine backbones. The aldehyde is first converted to a quaternary oxirane intermediate by treatment with epichlorohydrin (2.5 eq) and powdered NaOH (1.05 eq) at 40–50 °C in a 1,000 L glass‑lined reactor with anchor agitator. The excess epichlorohydrin functions as both reactant and solvent. After 6 h, the slurry is filtered to remove NaCl, and the filtrate is stripped on a thin‑film evaporator (Buss‑SMS Filmtruder) at 90 °C and 2 mbar to reduce residual epichlorohydrin below 10 ppm (headspace GC, EPA Method 524.2). The purified oxirane is then coupled with Jeffamine® ED‑900 polyetheramine in water at 80 °C under nitrogen. The resulting brightener is dosed into a standard acid‑copper bath (CuSO4·5H2O 200 g/L, H2SO4 50 g/L, Cl⁻ 50 ppm) at a concentration of 20–100 mg/L. Hull cell tests performed according to ASTM B604 show a shift in copper crystallite size from 1.2 µm to 0.2–0.5 µm as determined by SEM image analysis and XRD line broadening. The grain refinement produces a mirror‑bright deposit with thickness uniformity within ±5 % over a current‑density range of 1–6 A/dm². Stringent impurity limits apply to the aldehyde: total halide content (measured by ion chromatography per EPA Method 300.1) must not exceed 50 ppm, because any chloride variation pre‑adjusts the bath equilibrium and shifts the brightening window. The process operates under nitrogen blanketing to prevent aldehyde oxidation; all wetted parts in the oxirane loop are constructed from PTFE‑lined carbon steel to resist hydrochloric acid attack. Patents such as US 4,537,651 describe analogous thiazole‑based brighteners, but the precise structure‑property correlations for 4‑methyl‑substituted variants remain proprietary to plating chemical formulators. |
Competitive 4-Methyl-5-Thiazole Aldehyde prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615651039172
Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
4-Methyl-5-thiazole aldehyde (CAS 82294-70-0), systematically designated 4-methyl-1,3-thiazole-5-carboxaldehyde, is supplied as a low-melting, pale-yellow crystalline mass or clear liquid with a characteristic pungent odor, exhibiting a purity specification of ≥98.0% by GC (FID, DB-5 column, 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm). Its molecular formula C₅H₅NOS and molecular weight 127.16 g mol⁻¹ define a reactive scaffold where the aldehyde function at the 5-position, ortho to the sulfur heteroatom, imparts distinct electrophilic character exploited in Knoevenagel condensations, Vilsmeier–Haack reactions, and reductive aminations. On production scale, handling requires strict exclusion of atmospheric oxygen; bulk storage under nitrogen blanket (≥99.999% purity) and at 2–8°C is mandated to suppress the autocatalytic oxidation to the corresponding carboxylic acid, a degradation pathway that has caused off-specification batches in stirred tank reactors exceeding 48 hours hold time. Residual water content is controlled to ≤0.50% w/w (Karl Fischer, USP 〈921〉 Method Ia), as moisture accelerates hydrolysis of the aldehyde in the presence of trace acid.
The 4-methyl-5-formyl substitution pattern creates steric and electronic signatures that differ markedly from the 2-methyl-4-formyl isomer (CAS 20949-81-9) and the non-methylated thiazole-5-carboxaldehyde (CAS 1003-29-8). The aldehyde carbonyl at C-5 experiences greater steric shielding from the adjacent sulfur atom and the 4-methyl group than the C-2 carbonyl in 2-substituted analogs, leading to a measurable attenuation of nucleophilic addition rates. In a standard model reaction with aniline in anhydrous ethanol at 25°C, the pseudo-first-order rate constant for Schiff base formation for 4-methyl-5-thiazole aldehyde is 0.4–0.6 times that of 2-methyl-4-thiazole carboxaldehyde, as tracked by UV-Vis absorbance at 280 nm. This differential reactivity directly influences process selectivity in pharmaceutical coupling steps: when the aldehyde is condensed with a phosphorus ylide in Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons olefinations for cephalosporin side-chain construction, the methyl positional integrity ensures the required 2-(2-aminothiazol-4-yl)acetic acid framework. Mistaking the 2-formyl isomer yields a regioisomeric impurity that co-elutes with cefditoren pivoxil in reversed-phase HPLC (C18, 5 µm, 250 × 4.6 mm) under the pharmacopoeial conditions of USP 43, necessitating an additional recrystallization that reduces overall yield by 12–15 percentage points. Furthermore, the presence of the methyl group at C-4 raises the pKa of the thiazole ring nitrogen by approximately 0.3–0.5 units relative to the non-methylated thiazole-5-carboxaldehyde, influencing protonation-dependent extraction behavior during aqueous workup.
| Property | 4-Methyl-5-thiazole aldehyde | 2-Methyl-4-thiazole carboxaldehyde | Thiazole-5-carboxaldehyde |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAS | 82294-70-0 | 20949-81-9 | 1003-29-8 |
| Aldehyde position | C-5 | C-4 | C-5 |
| Relative rate (krel) with aniline* | 0.4–0.6 | 1.0 (ref.) | 0.8–0.9 |
| Boiling point | 85–87 °C / 10 mmHg | 105–108 °C / 15 mmHg | 92–94 °C / 12 mmHg |
| Melting point | 24–26 °C | 48–50 °C | −18 °C (liquid) |
*Pseudo-first-order conditions, 0.1 M aldehyde, 1.0 M aniline, anhydrous ethanol, 25.0 ± 0.2 °C, monitored at λmax of product.
During pilot-scale campaigns for cefditoren pivoxil intermediate synthesis, the aldehyde is typically loaded as a 1.05–1.10 molar equivalent relative to the phosphonate ylide, with precise dosing controlled via Coriolis mass flow meter because the exothermic addition step—exhibiting an adiabatic temperature rise of 15°C—accelerates the formation of the aldol self-condensation byproduct. This dimeric impurity, with a relative retention time of 1.37 against the main olefin peak, becomes visible in HPLC chromatograms once the internal temperature exceeds 8°C for more than 12 minutes. Process engineers have documented that maintaining the jacket temperature at -5°C with a dosing rate below 0.25 mL min⁻¹ per kilogram reaction mass limits the dimer to <0.5 area% and avoids triggering the safety interlock typically set at 10°C. A significant failure mode encountered during scale-up from 20 L to 500 L reactors involved localized overheating at the dip tube outlet, resolved by installing a PTFE-tipped dosing lance with multiple 0.8 mm orifices to distribute feed entry.
The product is released against a set of compendial-aligned and internal specifications that address purity, process stability, and regulatory compliance for pharmaceutical intermediate use. Batch-to-batch variability has been characterized across 45 consecutive production lots manufactured via a Vilsmeier–Haack formylation of 4-methylthiazole with DMF/POCl₃. The mean assay (GC) was 98.74% with a standard deviation of 0.32%, indicating a process capability index Cpk of 1.52 against the lower specification limit of 98.0%. Critical impurity 4-methylthiazole (starting material) is controlled to ≤0.30% by the same GC method. The analytical parameters and limits are summarized below.
| Parameter | Specification | Test Method / Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Assay (GC) | ≥98.0% area | In-house GC-FID; column DB-5, 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm; oven 50–250°C at 10°C min⁻¹ |
| Water content | ≤0.50% w/w | USP 〈921〉 Method Ia (Karl Fischer coulometric) |
| Melting point | 24–26°C | USP 〈741〉 Class I |
| Refractive index nD20 | 1.554–1.558 | ISO 5661:1983; Abbe refractometer calibrated with n-C7H16 standard |
| Density (25°C) | 1.205–1.215 g mL⁻¹ | Oscillating U-tube densitometer, ASTM D4052-22 |
| Heavy metals (as Pb) | ≤10 ppm | USP 〈231〉 Method II |
| Residual solvents | DMF ≤0.1% w/w, CH2Cl2 ≤0.06% w/w | Headspace GC-MS per USP 〈467〉 Procedure A |
In the convergent synthesis of cefditoren pivoxil (and structurally related cefteram pivoxil), the 4-methyl-5-thiazole aldehyde serves as the carbonyl donor in a Wittig-type condensation with a protected aminothiazole phosphonate. The 5-formyl orientation is chemically non-negotiable: the product olefin must place the thiazole ring at the β-position relative to the α-aminothiazoleacetate moiety to replicate the natural aminothiazolyl pharmacophore. If 2-formylthiazole derivatives are inadvertently used, the resulting α,β-unsaturated ester incorporates the heterocycle in a reversed attachment, generating a regioisomer that mimics the target in every bulk property except spatial arrangement. This impurity is resistant to fractional crystallization; preparative HPLC (C18, methanol/phosphate buffer pH 3.0, 45:55 v/v) achieves baseline separation only at a critical mobile phase pH of 3.0 ± 0.05, and any drift outside this window collapses the α value from 1.25 to below 1.05, rendering production chromatography uneconomical. Consequently, reliance on chromatographically confirmed positional purity of the input aldehyde is mandatory, with incoming QC requiring ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) demonstration of a single aldehyde proton doublet at δ 10.05 (J = 0.8 Hz) and the absence of extraneous singlets between δ 9.80 and 10.20.
Operational boundaries must be respected when this aldehyde is used in continuous-flow Wittig olefinations. The compound exhibits auto-ignition tendencies upon prolonged contact with strong bases; thus, the stoichiometric premix with NaOMe or KOtBu is avoided. Instead, the aldehyde and phosphonate are co-injected into a micromixer (0.25 mm channel) as separate streams, combining only in the mixing zone where residence time does not exceed 20 seconds. In one validated protocol employing a Corning® Advanced‑Flow™ G1 glass reactor with 5 plates and a channel hydraulic diameter of 0.5 mm, a total flow rate of 18 mL min⁻¹ (DMF as solvent) at -2°C jacket setpoint delivered 180 g h⁻¹ of the olefin intermediate with an in-solution yield of 94% and E/Z selectivity > 50:1. Any attempt to raise the feed aldehyde concentration above 0.8 M induced a temperature excursion beyond 4°C and triggered nucleation of the dimer impurity which then fouled the static mixer channels. Incompatibility with aqueous alkaline conditions further restricts workup choices: exposure to 1 M NaOH at temperatures above 10°C initiates a Cannizzaro disproportionation, converting ≥15% of the aldehyde to the corresponding carboxylic acid and alcohol within 30 minutes, as confirmed by quench and HPLC analysis. These constraints collectively dictate that the aldehyde’s value resides not merely in its chemical identity but in the rigor with which its temperature and concentration windows are observed on the manufacturing floor.