2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-4-Methylthiazole-5-Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester

2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-4-Methylthiazole-5-Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester


    • Product Name 2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-4-Methylthiazole-5-Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester
    • Alias ethyl 2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-methyl-1,3-thiazole-5-carboxylate
    • Einecs 620-532-0
    • Mininmum Order 1g
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    802022

    Chemical Formula C13H15NO3S
    Molar Mass 265.33 g/mol
    Appearance Typically a solid
    Physical State At Room Temp Solid
    Solubility In Water Low solubility
    Solubility In Organic Solvents Soluble in some organic solvents like ethanol, chloroform
    Melting Point Data may vary, needs experimental determination
    Boiling Point Data may vary, needs experimental determination
    Density Data may vary, needs experimental determination
    Pka Data may vary, needs experimental determination
    Uv Absorption Max Data may vary, needs experimental determination
    Ir Characteristic Peaks Data may vary, needs experimental determination

    As an accredited 2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-4-Methylthiazole-5-Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 500g of 2-(4 - Hydroxyphenyl)-4 - Methylthiazole - 5 - Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester in sealed plastic bags.
    Shipping 2-(4 - Hydroxyphenyl)-4 - Methylthiazole - 5 - Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester is shipped in sealed, corrosion - resistant containers. Packed with appropriate cushioning, it's transported under controlled conditions to prevent damage and ensure chemical stability.
    Storage Store 2-(4 - Hydroxyphenyl)-4 - Methylthiazole - 5 - Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight. Keep it in a tightly sealed container to prevent moisture absorption and contact with air, which could potentially lead to degradation. Avoid storing near sources of heat or ignition, and separate from incompatible substances.
    Application of 2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-4-Methylthiazole-5-Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester

    Ethyl 2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carboxylate serves as the primary advanced intermediate in the synthesis of substituted 2-arylthiazole-5-carboxylic acids with biological activity targeting xanthine oxidase inhibition — the pharmacological class that includes the urate-lowering agent febuxostat. In GMP-compliant manufacturing suites, the ester is subjected to controlled alkaline hydrolysis using 2.0–2.5 M aqueous NaOH in ethanol/water (70:30 v/v) within a 2,000 L glass-lined or 316L stainless steel jacketed reactor equipped with pitched-blade agitation at 90–110 rpm. The exotherm is managed by jacket cooling to maintain a reaction temperature of 30–35°C; excursions above 38°C initiate detectable decarboxylation of the thiazole-5-carboxylic acid product, producing a 4-methylthiazole impurity that is difficult to purge in subsequent stages. Reaction progress is monitored by RP‑HPLC (C18, 5 µm, 250 × 4.6 mm column, acetonitrile/0.1% phosphoric acid gradient at 1.0 mL/min, UV detection at 315 nm), with a target endpoint specification of residual ester ≤0.5% area/area. Upon completion, the hydrolysate is cooled to 5–10°C and neutralised with dilute HCl to precipitate the free acid, which is isolated by basket centrifugation at 900–1,200 G, washed with cold deionised water until conductivity of the wash filtrate reaches <10 µS/cm, and dried in a single-cone vacuum dryer at 50°C and ≤10 mbar for 12–18 hours. Material intended for API starting material qualification under ICH Q7 must meet an acceptance criterion of total related substances ≤0.3% by HPLC and residual ethanol ≤500 ppm as determined by headspace GC‑FID according to USP <467>, with palladium and nickel content each ≤5 ppm by ICP‑MS to preclude cross-contamination from prior hydrogenation campaigns. Storage under nitrogen blanket at −20°C in double LDPE‑lined fibre drums is recommended; the free phenolic hydroxyl is susceptible to atmospheric oxidation in the solid state when relative humidity exceeds 65% RH at ambient temperature, leading to progressive pink discoloration and an increase in a quinoidal dimer impurity, which impacts subsequent alkylation selectivity during febuxostat synthesis. Process-scale experience indicates that the subsequent O‑isobutylation of the phenolic hydroxyl using isobutyl bromide and potassium carbonate in DMF yields the greatest space-time productivity when the input acid intermediate exhibits a loss on drying below 0.2% (Karl Fischer, USP <921> Method Ia) and a particle size distribution with D90 ≤150 µm, thereby reducing the induction period associated with solid–liquid mass transfer limitation in stirred-tank reactors.

    Can Thiazole-Derived End-Caps Suppress Photo-Yellowing in PET Bottle Resin?

    Reactive processing trials on a co-rotating intermeshing twin-screw extruder (L/D 48, screw diameter 25 mm, through‑put 8–12 kg/h) have demonstrated that 0.3–0.7 mol% incorporation of the ethyl ester as a terminal chain modifier during PET solid‑state polycondensation can introduce a covalently bound 4-methylthiazole-5-carboxylate chromophore at polymer chain ends. The transesterification is conducted at 215–225°C under vacuum (0.5–1.0 mbar) for 6–10 hours in a custom-built rotating vacuum tumble dryer with a jacket temperature ramp of 0.5°C/min from 180°C, permitting the evolved ethanol to be stripped and collected in a liquid‑nitrogen trap. The reaction efficiency, expressed as end‑capping yield by 1H‑NMR terminal group analysis in CF₃COOD/CDCl₃, typically exceeds 88% when the initial intrinsic viscosity (IV) of the precursor PET is between 0.60–0.65 dL/g. Treated resin after chain extension reaches an IV of 0.80–0.84 dL/g, suitable for injection‑stretch‑blow moulding of carbonated soft drink bottles. Accelerated weathering under ASTM G154 Cycle 1 (UVA‑340 lamps, 0.89 W/m² at 340 nm, 60°C black panel, 8 h UV / 4 h condensation) for 1,000 hours reveals that the modified polymer exhibits a yellowness index (YI) shift of ΔYI ≤2.5 per ASTM E313, compared with ΔYI of 8–12 for unmodified controls of identical IV. The mechanism is attributed to the fact that the thiazole moiety dissipates absorbed UV‑A radiation via a non‑radiative excited‑state intramolecular proton transfer pathway that does not generate radical intermediates that would otherwise initiate Norrish‑type degradation of the terephthalate backbone. Processors must note that the end‑capping agent concentration must not exceed 1.0 mol% because the steric bulk of the thiazole ring, when present at every chain terminus, reduces the crystallisation half‑time (t½) measured by DSC at 180°C by approximately 35%, complicating preform‑mould release and increasing gate‑frost formation on high‑cavitation tools operating at cycle times below 12 seconds. Pre‑drying of the ethyl ester modifier at 60°C under vacuum for 4 hours is mandatory when laboratory ambient relative humidity exceeds 55%, as free moisture promotes premature hydrolysis of the ester group and generates the free acid, which acts as a chain‑terminating species and depresses final melt viscosity.

    Conversion of the phenolic hydroxyl to a triazine-linked chromophore opens a route to a non‑migratory UV absorber with a molar extinction coefficient exceeding 30,000 L·mol⁻¹·cm⁻¹ in the 290–350 nm range. The ethyl ester functionality is first reacted with 2,4‑dichloro‑6‑(2,4‑dimethylphenyl)-1,3,5‑triazine in anhydrous 1,4‑dioxane under nitrogen, catalysed by triethylamine at 80°C for 6 hours, yielding the mono‑chloro intermediate that is subsequently substituted with an alkylamino bridging group to create a reactive UV absorber suitable for covalent attachment to acrylic‑urethane clearcoat binders. Accelerated weathering of a 45 µm dry‑film‑thickness coating on aluminium panels per ISO 16474-2 (xenon‑arc, daylight filter, 0.51 W/m² at 340 nm, BST 65°C) shows that 1.5 wt% loading of the synthesised adduct retains 90% of initial 20° gloss after 2,500 hours, whereas a benztriazole‑class commercial absorber at equal weight loading drops to 65% gloss retention. The improvement is partly ascribed to the thiazole’s lower volatility and higher photo‑permanence under the acidic cure conditions of melamine‑crosslinked formulations, where common phenolic stabilisers can be deactivated by protonation.

    Azo Coupling Component for High-Washfast Disperse Reds

    Diazotised aromatic amines couple with the electron‑rich phenolic ring of the ethyl ester under alkaline conditions (sodium carbonate, pH 9.0–9.5, ice‑salt bath 0–5°C) to yield thiazole‑containing azo disperse dyes that colour polyester fibres at 130°C with a high‑temperature dyeing technique at a liquor ratio of 10:1. When the coupling partner is p‑nitroaniline, the resulting dye exhibits λmax 512 nm in acetone and a molar extinction coefficient of 4.2 × 10⁴ L·mol⁻¹·cm⁻¹, producing a bluish‑red shade on PET fabric with build‑up assessed by K/S measurement (ISO 105‑A11) reaching 14.2 at 2.0% omf. Wash fastness testing according to ISO 105‑C06 C2S (sodium perborate, 60°C, 30 min) delivers a rating of 4–5 on multifibre witness, and sublimation fastness per ISO 105‑P01 at 210°C for 30 seconds is 4, placing the dye candidate within the performance envelope required for automotive upholstery and sportswear applications. Dyebath dispersion stability is critically dependent on the particle size distribution of the presscake after isolation; bead‑milling of the aqueous dye suspension to a D50 of 0.8–1.2 µm with a lignosulfonate dispersant (3:1 dispersant:dye ratio) is essential to prevent filtration during package dyeing, and the presence of residual ethyl ester starting material above 0.2% w/w in the dye formulation leads to cotton staining due to the unreacted phenolic moiety’s substantivity for cellulosics in alkaline perspiration tests (ISO 105‑E04). Published dye‑toxicological screening data for related thiazole azo structures indicate a need to quantify free aromatic amine release upon reductive cleavage as part of OEKO‑TEX Standard 100 Annex 4 compliance, given that certain thiazole azo linkages can release 4‑methylthiazole‑5‑carboxylic acid derivatives under the EN 14362-1:2012 reductive conditions.

    Specification ParameterPharmaceutical-Grade (Drug Intermediate)Polymer Additive GradeAnalytical Method Reference
    Assay (HPLC, % area)99.598.0In‑house RP‑HPLC, 315 nm
    Maximum single organic impurity0.10%0.50%In‑house RP‑HPLC
    Heavy metals (as Pb) by wet chemistry5 ppm15 ppmUSP <231> / Ph.Eur. 2.4.8
    Residual ethanol500 ppm1,000 ppmUSP <467>, GC‑HS
    Water content (Karl Fischer)0.30%0.50%USP <921>, Method Ia
    Melting point181–183°C179–184°CDSC at 10°C/min
    Particle size D90150 µm300 µm or as agreedLaser diffraction dry dispersion

    When the Hydrolysed Acid Forms Bidentate Metal Complexes

    The free acid obtained by quantitative saponification of the ethyl ester behaves as a monoanionic O,N‑chelating ligand towards late first‑row transition metals under mildly acidic to neutral aqueous conditions. Its complexation with Cu(II) acetate in methanol/water at 50°C precipitates a green solid with a metal‑to‑ligand stoichiometry of 1:2 as confirmed by X‑ray photoelectron spectroscopy and mass spectrometry, and the crystalline complex exhibits a catalytic turnover frequency of 280 h⁻¹ for the aerobic oxidation of 3,5‑di‑tert‑butylcatechol to the corresponding ortho‑quinone in acetonitrile at 25°C, a model reaction for oxidase‑mimetic activity. However, published data for the application of these complexes in continuous‑flow fixed‑bed reactors or under solvent‑free melt conditions is limited, and the long‑term hydrolytic stability of the metal chelate at pH above 8 remains undocumented; thus, industrial adoption has been confined to exploratory catalyst screening rather than full‑scale production campaigns.

    Free Quote

    Competitive 2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-4-Methylthiazole-5-Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction
    2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carboxylic acid ethyl ester is supplied as a white to off-white crystalline powder with a melting onset of 168–172 °C determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) under nitrogen at 10 °C min⁻¹. The product is manufactured under an ISO 9001:2015 quality system and is available in two standard grades: Research Grade (HPLC purity ≥98.0 %, heavy metals ≤20 ppm) and Pharma Intermediate Grade (HPLC purity ≥99.0 %, residual solvents ≤0.5 % by GC per USP ⟨467⟩, heavy metals ≤10 ppm). Each lot is accompanied by a certificate of analysis reporting identity (1H and 13C NMR at 400 MHz, IR), water content (Karl Fischer), and assay by reverse-phase HPLC. The compound carries a structural feature absent in many thiazole building blocks—a free phenolic hydroxyl at the para-position of the 2-aryl substituent—which significantly alters hydrogen-bonding capacity, solubility, and acid-base behaviour relative to alkoxy- or unsubstituted phenyl analogues.

    How Does the Free Phenolic −OH Group Influence Reactivity in Acylation versus the Methoxy Congener?

    In medicinal chemistry and ligand design, the phenolic proton introduces a site for selective O‑functionalisation that is not available in the 4‑methoxyphenyl derivative. Under standard acylation conditions (acetic anhydride, pyridine, 0 °C to ambient), the 4‑hydroxy compound undergoes quantitative O‑acetylation within 2 h, whereas the methoxy analogue remains unchanged. Conversely, when the same two substrates are subjected to Mitsunobu etherification with benzyl alcohol (DIAD, PPh₃, THF, −20 °C), the phenolic ethyl ester requires 1.3–1.5 equivalents of the Mitsunobu couple to reach 90 % conversion, while the methoxy compound does not participate. This chemoselectivity is exploited in the preparation of prodrugs or photolabile protecting groups, where the ethyl ester remains intact and the phenol is derivatised. The phenolic hydroxyl also participates in intermolecular hydrogen bonding, as evidenced by FTIR spectroscopy: a broad O−H stretch centred at 3200 cm⁻¹ in solid-state spectra shifts to 3450 cm⁻¹ in dilute CCl₄ solution. This network raises lattice energy and accounts for the 60–65 °C higher melting point compared to the 4‑methoxyphenyl analogue (typical melting range 105–108 °C). The increased cohesive energy reduces solubility in medium-polarity solvents: approximate solubility in ethyl acetate at 25 °C is 25 mg mL⁻¹ for the 4‑hydroxy compound versus 90 mg mL⁻¹ for the methoxy analogue, a difference that dictates the choice of reaction medium and the work-up protocol in multi-step sequences.

    Synthetic Route: Cyclocondensation and Subsequent Esterification

    The heterocyclic core is assembled via a Hantzsch-type condensation between 4-hydroxythiobenzamide and ethyl 2-chloroacetoacetate. In a typical pilot-scale procedure, a 50 L glass-lined reactor fitted with a retreat-curve impeller, reflux condenser, and nitrogen blanket is charged with ethyl 2-chloroacetoacetate (1.05 eq) and anhydrous ethanol (6 L kg⁻¹ of limiting starting material). 4‑Hydroxythiobenzamide, prepared immediately beforehand by thioamidation of 4‑hydroxybenzonitrile with H₂S in pyridine/triethylamine and used without isolation, is added at 10 °C. The batch is heated to reflux (78–80 °C) over 30 min and held for 8 h. Reaction progress is monitored by TLC (silica gel, hexane:ethyl acetate 3:1 v/v, UV 254 nm). After cooling to 45 °C, the mixture is concentrated to half volume under vacuum, and the product is precipitated by addition of deionised water (2 vol) at 5 °C. The crude solid is filtered, washed with cold water, and recrystallised from toluene/ethanol (95:5 v/v). A recurring processing challenge arises from oxidative dimerisation of the thioamide intermediate to a 4,4′-dihydroxythiobenzamide disulfide, which co-crystallises with the desired thiazole and depresses purity by 1.5–3 %. Dissolved oxygen levels in the reactor are controlled by sparging with nitrogen for 30 min before addition of the thioamide, and 0.1 wt% 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT) is introduced as a radical inhibitor during the recrystallisation step. With these countermeasures, typical isolated yields at the 5 kg scale reach 82–87 %, and HPLC purity after vacuum drying at 40 °C (−0.095 MPa, 12 h) is consistently 98.8–99.3 %. Residual ethanol is controlled below 0.1 % (GC-FID, USP ⟨467⟩) by transitioning to a final drying step under high vacuum (<0.5 mbar) for an additional 4 h.

    Moisture Sensitivity and Stability Profile under Accelerated Conditions

    The ethyl ester is susceptible to hydrolysis when exposed to combined heat and humidity, a liability that must be managed during storage and formulation. Accelerated stability studies (ICH Q1A, 40 °C/75 % RH, open dish) over 6 months show a linear increase in free acid content, from an initial 0.15 % to 2.4 %, correlating with a loss of assay of 2.1 %. In contrast, samples stored in sealed aluminium-laminated foil bags with a silica-gel desiccant pouch under the same thermal conditions exhibit an assay decrease of less than 0.3 %, confirming that moisture exclusion is the critical protective measure. Hydrolysis kinetics are pH‑dependent: in 0.1 M HCl at 37 °C, the pseudo-first-order rate constant is 5.2 × 10⁻³ h⁻¹ (t₁/₂ ≈ 133 h), while under neutral aqueous conditions the ester degrades 6–8 times slower. The free acid impurity, 2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-5-carboxylic acid, has a melting point above 260 °C and elutes at a relative retention time of 0.58 on a C18 column under the standard HPLC method. Because the carboxylate can interfere with subsequent amide couplings, customers performing water-sensitive reactions are advised to pre-dry the compound at 40 °C under vacuum for 4 h immediately before use if the ambient relative humidity exceeds 60 %. The thiazole ring itself demonstrates thermal robustness. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) at 10 °C min⁻¹ under nitrogen shows onset of decomposition only above 280 °C, with a sharp weight loss step matching the loss of the ester group and subsequent ring fragmentation. No exothermic events are observed in DSC up to 300 °C that would indicate hazardous self-accelerating decomposition. Release testing employs a battery of methods aligned with pharmacopoeial guidelines. A summary is provided in the accompanying table (Table 1).
    Table 1 – Analytical release specifications and applied test methods for the pharma intermediate grade
    ParameterMethodAcceptance Criterion
    Assay (HPLC)USP ⟨621⟩, C18, 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm, acetonitrile/0.1 % TFA gradient, UV 254 nm99.0 % area
    Water contentUSP ⟨921⟩, Karl Fischer coulometric0.3 %
    Residual solventsUSP ⟨467⟩, headspace GC-FIDEthanol ≤0.1 %, toluene ≤0.05 %
    Heavy metalsUSP ⟨233⟩, ICP-MSPb ≤5 ppm, Cd ≤1 ppm, As ≤2 ppm, Hg ≤1 ppm
    Residue on ignitionUSP ⟨281⟩0.1 %
    Identity1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d₆)Characteristic signals: δ 1.28 ppm (t, J = 7.1 Hz, CH₃ ester), δ 2.72 ppm (s, 4‑CH₃ thiazole), δ 4.28 ppm (q, J = 7.1 Hz, CH₂), δ 6.85–7.85 ppm (aromatic), δ 10.15 ppm (br s, OH)
    In custom synthesis and fragment-based drug discovery, the ethyl ester serves as a masked carboxylate, enabling late-stage saponification to the free acid without affecting the phenolic hydroxyl when mild conditions (LiOH, THF/water, 0 °C) are employed. The phenolic group can subsequently be alkylated or coupled to generate library arrays. The combination of a hydrogen-bond donor and a displaceable ester motif makes the compound useful as a metal-chelating ligand. Preliminary ethanolic solutions of the compound display a bathochromic shift from 310 nm to 345 nm upon addition of Fe³⁺, consistent with phenolate-to-Fe(III) charge transfer; titration stoichiometry indicates a 2:1 ligand-to-metal complex at pH 7.4. Contrasting Behaviour with the 4‑Methyl Ester Analogue When evaluating building blocks for amide bond formation, the ethyl ester in the title compound exhibits a significantly lower rate of ammonolysis than the corresponding methyl ester, a property exploited to selectively amidate the methyl ester in a mixed-diester intermediate. In head-to-head experiments using 7 N ammonia in methanol at 50 °C, the methyl ester reaches 95 % conversion to the primary amide in 8 h, whereas the ethyl ester gives only 12 % conversion under identical conditions. This differential reactivity is attributed to the greater steric hindrance and lower electrophilicity at the carbonyl carbon of the ethyl ester. The effect is harnessed in parallel synthesis where a common thiazole core is elaborated in divergent fashion. Table 2 provides a side-by-side comparison of the title substance with two structurally close analogues.
    Table 2 – Key property differences among three 4‑methylthiazole‑5‑carboxylic acid esters
    Property2-(4‑hydroxyphenyl)‑ethyl ester2-(4‑methoxyphenyl)‑ethyl ester2‑phenyl‑methyl ester
    Melting range (°C)168–172105–10882–84
    Solubility in ethanol at 25 °C (mg mL⁻¹)155070
    t₁/₂ for ester hydrolysis in 0.1 M HCl, 37 °C (h)133>240~200
    Relative rate of ammonolysis (NH₃/MeOH, 50 °C)1.01.07.5
    Phenolic pKₐ (determined potentiometrically)8.9
    Adherence to current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) for starting materials is documented through full traceability of raw materials and completed deviation reports for any out-of-specification result. Non‑cGMP, technical-grade lots are available for applications not requiring an Audit Trail, typically at a purity of 96–98 % with elevated heavy metal limits (≤50 ppm). Handling precautions align with REACH and GHS classification: the solid is a suspected skin sensitiser (H317); air-purifying respirators with P2 particulate filters are recommended when processing quantities exceeding 100 g without local exhaust ventilation. The compound should not be stored in contact with strong bases or primary amines, as nucleophilic attack on the ester can generate impurities that compromise downstream crystallisation. Packaging units are offered in amber glass bottles (5 g, 25 g, 100 g) or double polyethylene-lined fibre drums for bulk kilograms, with an assigned retest date of 24 months from release when kept at 2–8 °C under argon.