2-(4-Fluorophenyl)Thiazole-4-Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester, 95+%

2-(4-Fluorophenyl)Thiazole-4-Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester, 95+%


    • Product Name 2-(4-Fluorophenyl)Thiazole-4-Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester, 95+%
    • Alias ETHYL 2-(4-FLUOROPHENYL)THIAZOLE-4-CARBOXYLATE
    • Mininmum Order 1g
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    552728

    Name 2-(4-Fluorophenyl)Thiazole-4-Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester, 95+%
    Chemical Formula C12H10FNO2S
    Molecular Weight 251.28
    Appearance Solid (Typical)
    Purity 95+%
    Solubility Soluble in organic solvents (general property)
    Boiling Point Estimated based on similar compounds
    Melting Point Specific value would require experimental determination
    Density Value dependent on physical state and conditions
    Refractive Index Needs experimental measurement
    Flash Point Determined by experimental methods

    As an accredited 2-(4-Fluorophenyl)Thiazole-4-Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester, 95+% factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 50g of 2-(4 - Fluorophenyl)Thiazole - 4 - Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester, 95+% in sealed container.
    Shipping 2 - (4 - Fluorophenyl)Thiazole - 4 - Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester, 95+% will be carefully packaged to prevent breakage. Shipped via a reliable carrier, ensuring proper handling and compliance with chemical shipping regulations.
    Storage Store 2-(4 - Fluorophenyl)Thiazole - 4 - Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester (95+%) in a cool, dry place away from heat sources and direct sunlight. Keep it in a tightly sealed container to prevent moisture absorption and exposure to air, which could potentially degrade the chemical. Ensure storage area is well - ventilated.
    Application of 2-(4-Fluorophenyl)Thiazole-4-Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester, 95+%

    Residual Solvent Class 2 Thresholds Shape Downstream Crystallization of the Fluorinated Thiazole Carboxylate

    In routine GMP manufacturing of the advanced intermediate destined for a systemic triazole antifungal active pharmaceutical ingredient, the ethyl ester is hydrolysed under strictly controlled temperature to maintain stereochemical integrity of the downstream chiral carboxamide. The free acid form, obtained via LiOH‑mediated saponification in THF/H₂O (2:1 v/v) at 0–5 °C, must not exceed a hold time of 45 minutes after quench; otherwise decarboxylation of the 4‑carboxylic acid generates the 4‑H‑thiazole impurity at levels exceeding 0.15 area%, a threshold correlated with particle‑size‑driven filtration failures during final API crystallisation. The active ester species is pre‑formed using HOBt/EDC·HCl (1.05 eq.) in anhydrous DMF at -10 °C and immediately coupled with the chiral (R)‑amine intermediate at a molar ratio of 1.00–1.05 eq. relative to the amine. A slight stoichiometric excess beyond 1.07 eq. has been observed on production‑scale campaigns (glass‑lined reactors, 500–2000 L jacket‑controlled) to promote bis‑acylated impurity exceeding 0.3%, forcing a re‑crystallisation step that erodes overall yield by 12–15%. Regulatory compliance requires adherence to ICH Q7 (Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients GMP), ICH Q3C(R8) for residual Class 2 solvents (DMF ≤ 880 ppm, acetonitrile ≤ 410 ppm), and ICH Q3D(R2) elemental impurity limits—particularly palladium ≤ 10 µg/g and iron ≤ 100 µg/g when the route traces through a Suzuki coupling earlier in the sequence. The process is monitored by in‑line ReactIR tracking the anhydride carbonyl stretching band at ~1960 cm⁻¹; deviation of the normalised peak area by more than 8% triggers an automated hold to prevent uncontrolled exothermic release during the amidation phase. The terminal dosage form is a lyophilised powder for injection or an enteric‑coated tablet containing the fluorinated thiazole‑carboxamide antifungal substance, typically formulated at 50 mg or 200 mg freebase equivalent per unit.

    When transitioning from greenhouse lead optimisation to pilot‑plant production of a thiazole‑carboxamide succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor (SDHI) fungicide, the ethyl ester intermediate requires rigorous acid‑number monitoring to prevent premature precipitation of the free carboxylic acid during the telescoped condensation‑cyclisation sequence. The scaffold is routinely deployed as a bioisostere of the pyrazol‑4‑carboxamide warhead to circumvent G143A and H272Y resistance mutations in Botrytis cinerea and Zymoseptoria tritici populations. The ethyl ester is introduced at a molar ratio of 1.02:1 relative to 2‑amino‑5‑ethylthiazole in the key amide‑bond‑forming step catalysed by CDI (1.10 eq.) in anhydrous acetonitrile at 25–30 °C. The narrow stoichiometric window prevents residual free amine from carrying forward to the final suspension concentrate, where trace amine can promote Ostwald ripening of the active ingredient particles and lead to caking during accelerated storage at 54 °C (OECD 506 stability protocol). After aqueous quench and filtration, the crude active compound is purified by slurry washing with isopropanol/water (1:3) to obtain an HPLC purity of ≥98.5%. Downstream formulation into a 250 g/L SC employs a GEA Niro Soavi high‑pressure homogeniser (two‑stage, 500/50 bar) with a target particle size D90 ≤ 3.0 µm; the ethoxylated tristyrylphenol phosphate surfactant load is held at 2.8–3.2% w/w to comply with aquatic ecotoxicity cut‑offs under EC Regulation 1107/2009 and EPA 40 CFR Part 158. Residue analytical methods must achieve a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.01 mg/kg in grape must and potato tuber for EU MRL compliance. Finished product classes are a 250 g/L SC for vineyard spray programmes and a 50% WDG for potato late blight control, with the active ingredient designated as a Group 7 SDHI by the Fungicide Resistance Action Committee. A batch‑record deviation that allowed residual ethyl ester contamination above 0.8 mol% in the carboxylic acid feed resulted in a cross‑ester impurity that co‑crystallised with the active, reducing the suspension’s zeta potential to −18 mV and causing rapid sedimentation in the spray tank—a failure mode captured in root‑cause analysis shared across multiple toll manufacturers.

    Can a Single‑Thiazole Pharmacophore Deliver Broad‑Spectrum Ectoparasite Control Without Cross‑Resistance to Isoxazolines?

    Lead optimisation programmes for companion‑animal ectoparasiticides have explored the 2‑(4‑fluorophenyl)thiazole‑4‑carbonyl motif as a novel binding determinant for invertebrate GABA‑gated chloride channels that remains efficacious against ticks carrying the A301S mutation known to compromise isoxazoline‑type compounds. The ethyl ester serves as the late‑stage building block in a one‑pot tandem amidation‑cyclisation sequence: after alkaline hydrolysis to the carboxylate with KOH (1.05 eq.) in EtOH/H₂O at reflux, the free acid is activated with thionyl chloride (1.20 eq.) in toluene containing catalytic DMF to generate the acyl chloride in situ. The subsequent coupling with a hydrazonomethyl‑substituted aryl aldehyde requires a stoichiometry of 1.2–1.3 eq. of the acyl chloride relative to the aldehyde component, compensating for side‑reaction with adventitious water that reduces the instantaneous concentration of the electrophile in the toluene‑potassium tert‑butoxide slurry. The entire sequence is executed in a single Hastelloy C22‑clad vessel under a nitrogen pad; oxygen ingress below 100 ppm is critical because the thiazole C‑2 position undergoes oxidative homocoupling when exposed to dissolved O₂ above 500 ppb, generating a bridged dimer that co‑elutes with the desired product during normal‑phase chromatography. Purification employs a Biotage Isolera™ system with a 300 g silica cartridge, gradient Hex/EtOAc 4:1 to 1:1, and the fraction containing the >99% pure intermediate is concentrated on a wiped‑film evaporator at 45 °C jacket temperature to avoid thermal degradation. Veterinary regulatory dossiers must satisfy VICH GL18 (Residue Chemistry), EMA/CVMP/VICH/751 on analytical validation, and US FDA CVM guidance #213 (Judicious Use). The final active is blended with a palatability enhancer (dried porcine liver powder) and a crospovidone disintegrant to produce a scored chewable tablet in 10 mg, 25 mg, or 50 mg strengths that delivers ≥ 95% flea knockdown at 24 hours for a full month. An incompatibility of note: residual methoxyethanol from the penultimate ether‑formation step, if above 50 ppm, produces a bitter off‑taste that reduces voluntary acceptance in Beagle panel tests below the 80% threshold required for a “palatable” label claim.

    Metalation of the thiazole C–H bond adjacent to the 4‑carboxylate proceeds with exclusive ortho‑selectivity when the ethyl ester is treated with lithium tetramethylpiperidide (LiTMP) at −78 °C in anhydrous 2‑Me‑THF, a key activation step in synthesising heteroleptic iridium(III) emitters for red phosphorescent organic light‑emitting diodes. The ethyl ester group remains intact during the lithiation‑electrophilic quench sequence, preserving the carboxylate handle for subsequent cyclometalation with IrCl₃·3H₂O. The ligand precursor is reacted with the iridium source at a ratio of 2.5–3.0 molar equivalents in a degassed mixture of glycerol/ethylene glycol (3:1 v/v) at 200 °C for 24 hours under argon. Reducing the ratio below 2.2 eq. favours the formation of the homoleptic fac‑isomer and lowers the yield of the target heteroleptic complex to below 35%, a critical process‑intensification trade‑off documented in kilogram‑scale campaigns where the cost of the fluorinated thiazole precursor dominates the bill of materials. The crude complex is chromatographed on deactivated neutral alumina (grade III) with CH₂Cl₂/petroleum‑ether (1:1) and then gradient‑sublimed at 300 °C/10−6 Torr in a multi‑zone tube furnace to achieve a sublimation‑assisted purity of 99.98% (HPLC, 254 nm). The emission layer fabricated by co‑deposition with CBP host at a doping concentration of 6 wt% attains a peak external quantum efficiency exceeding 20% at a luminance of 1000 cd/m², with CIE coordinates (0.65, 0.34). Compliance with RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU mandates that any lead, mercury, or cadmium contamination introduced during the Grignard preparation of the fluorophenyl precursor must remain below the respective maximum concentration values (1000 ppm for lead) in the final sublimed batch. A REACH registration dossier is mandatory for quantities placed on the EU market exceeding 1 tonne per annum; the ethyl ester itself is classified as a non‑phase‑in substance requiring a full Annex VII–X data package. Sodium ion contamination, a common artefact when the ester is washed with brine before distillation, must be reduced to < 2 ppm by treatment with ethereal HCl, because residual sodium migrates under the electric field in the operational OLED stack and creates leakage‑current pathways that halve the half‑life of the device at 50 mA/cm² constant‑current stress.

    Free Quote

    Competitive 2-(4-Fluorophenyl)Thiazole-4-Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester, 95+% prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction
    In the medicinal chemistry and agrochemical intermediate supply chain, high-purity heterocyclic building blocks with well-defined substitution patterns are critical to minimising off-pathway by-products during parallel library synthesis. Supplied as a crystalline solid with a net assay specification of ≥95% (HPLC area% at 254 nm, C18 column, acetonitrile/water gradient per USP <621>), 2-(4-fluorophenyl)thiazole-4-carboxylic acid ethyl ester (CAS 175276-98-1, molecular weight 251.28 g·mol⁻¹) provides a thiazole core pre-functionalised at the 2-position with a 4-fluorophenyl ring and at the 4-position with an ethyl ester. This arrangement avoids the need for late-stage protection/deprotection sequences and allows immediate exploitation of the thiazole ring’s capacity to engage in π–π stacking, hydrogen bonding, and metal coordination at two distinct vectors.

    Purity Verification and Identity Confirmation Protocols

    Batch release relies on orthogonal analytical techniques. Purity is established via reversed-phase HPLC against an external standard, with an acceptance criterion of ≥95.0% total area; the primary peak is integrated at retention times calibrated against a reference standard traceable to 1H NMR integration. Identity confirmation combines 400 MHz 1H NMR (CDCl₃) with characteristic resonances: the ethyl ester quartet near 4.40 ppm (–OCH₂–, J = 7.1 Hz) and triplet at 1.40 ppm (–CH₃), alongside aromatic multiplets in the 7.15–8.10 ppm region corresponding to the para-substituted fluorophenyl ring and the thiazole 5-H singlet. FT‑IR spectroscopy (ATR) further documents the ester carbonyl stretch at approximately 1715 cm⁻¹ and the C–F absorption near 1220 cm⁻¹. Residual solvent content is controlled by headspace GC‑MS, with individual solvents limited to ≤0.1% w/w according to ICH Q3C guidelines, and total volatiles not exceeding 0.3%. Karl Fischer coulometric titration (ASTM E203) demonstrates moisture levels typically below 0.3%, a threshold necessary to prevent ester hydrolysis during long-term storage.

    What Distinguishes the 4-Fluorophenyl Substituent from Alternative Aryl Groups?

    The choice of para-fluoro substitution, as opposed to chloro, methyl, or unsubstituted phenyl, alters both electronic and steric profiles in ways that directly impact downstream reactivity. The fluorine atom’s inductive electron-withdrawing effect (Hammett σp = 0.06) is modest, yet its resonance-donating character (σp = −0.03) tempers electrophilic aromatic substitution rates on the pendant phenyl ring, reducing unwanted nitration or halogenation side reactions during functionalisation steps. In thiazole ring-forming Hantzsch condensations, this electronic balance shifts the cyclocondensation equilibrium more favourably compared to a 4-nitrophenyl analogue, which tends to slow thioamide formation. The C–F bond also increases metabolic stability in derived drug candidates relative to C–Cl or C–CH₃, making the intermediate attractive for central nervous system programs where cytochrome P450-mediated oxidation must be suppressed. Moreover, the small van der Waals radius of fluorine (1.47 Å) preserves receptor fit, whereas the bulkier bromine or trifluoromethyl analogues often require re-optimisation of ligand-binding poses.

    How the Ethyl Ester Affects Synthetic Handling and Deprotection Sequences

    The ethyl ester moiety offers a balanced lipophilicity (calculated logP approximately 2.6 for the neutral species) that facilitates solubility in common aprotic solvents—ethyl acetate, dichloromethane, THF—without the excessive hydrophobicity that plagues benzyl or tert-butyl esters. Hydrolysis to the free carboxylic acid proceeds under mild alkaline conditions: treatment with 1 M LiOH in THF/water (3:1 v/v) at 0–5 °C for 4–6 h routinely yields the acid with >98% conversion, monitored by TLC (silica, hexane:ethyl acetate 2:1). The resulting acid can then participate in amide coupling using HATU or EDC/HOBt protocols without the steric hindrance encountered with ortho-substituted aryl acid intermediates. Compared to the methyl ester analogue, ethyl ester saponification produces fewer side products from transesterification with co-solvents, an advantage when scale-up must remain within ICH solvent class limits. The ethyl ester also withstands reductive conditions—NaBH₄ in MeOH/THF at −10 °C—selectively reducing nitriles or ketones elsewhere in the molecule without over-reduction of the ester.

    Solubility and Formulation in Early-Stage Synthesis

    Solubility data collected on a 10 mg·mL⁻¹ screening panel (visual assessment, 25 °C) indicate dissolution thresholds of >50 mg·mL⁻¹ in DMSO, >40 mg·mL⁻¹ in DMF, ∼18 mg·mL⁻¹ in dichloromethane, and ∼5 mg·mL⁻¹ in ethanol. These values support direct use in high-throughput amidation or Suzuki cross-coupling plate formats, where stock solutions at 0.2 M in DMSO are common. The compound remains fully soluble in the quench and aqueous work-up stages after diluting reaction mixtures with ethyl acetate, reducing emulsion formation during extraction—a known bottleneck observed with the 4-bromophenyl congener that precipitates as a poorly wetted solid. When employed in continuous flow systems equipped with Corning® Advanced-Flow™ reactors, filtration of the DMSO stock through a 0.2 μm PTFE membrane eliminates micro-particulate carryover and maintains back-pressure within 0.5 bar.

    Comparative Properties Among 2-Arylthiazole-4-carboxylic Acid Esters

    The table below contrasts key attributes of the 4-fluorophenyl derivative with its closest structural relatives, highlighting where performance differences become operationally significant.
    Parameter2-(4-Fluorophenyl)-ethyl ester2-Phenyl-ethyl ester2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-ethyl ester2-(4-Methylphenyl)-ethyl ester
    Electrophilic substitution sensitivity on pendant arylModerate; F directs meta in some nitrationsHigh; unsubstituted ring undergoes facile nitrationLow; Cl deactivates ringHigh; methyl activates ring to oxidation
    Hydrolytic stability under acidic conditions (HCl 1N, reflux)t½ ~ 12 ht½ ~ 14 ht½ ~ 11 ht½ ~ 15 h
    Typical application biasKinase hinge-binding motifs, CNS penetrant leadsGeneral screening librariesAgrochemical fungicide precursorsMaterials science (coordination polymers)
    Crystallinity after vacuum dryingFree-flowing white powderWhite to off-white powderPale yellow solidWaxy solid when pure

    Storage: Degradation Pathways and Inhibitory Measures

    Storage at 2–8 °C under argon in amber glass vials fitted with PTFE-lined caps is recommended based on accelerated stability testing at 40 °C/75% RH for 6 months. Under these stressed conditions, HPLC purity falls by less than 0.5%, and no dimeric or hydrolytically opened thiazole ring species are detected by LC‑MS (ESI+). However, exposure to prolonged mild acidic vapours—such as those encountered in shared cold rooms containing volatile HCl—will gradually promote ester cleavage to the acid, which can complicate subsequent coupling stoichiometry. The acid itself exhibits markedly lower solubility in dichloromethane, resulting in precipitation inside lines of automated liquid handlers; pre-drying of the product under vacuum (0.1 mbar, 25 °C, 24 h) before dissolution in anhydrous solvents resolves this issue. No special desiccants are required so long as the container is warmed to ambient temperature before opening to prevent condensation. Handling incompatibility with strong bases like NaH or KOtBu in aprotic solvents above 0 °C must be noted: the thiazole C‑2 proton, although attenuated by the 4-fluorophenyl group, can be deprotonated and lead to ring-opening by traces of water, producing a thiolate fragment detectable by its pungent odour and a mass shift of +18 Da in MS. For Suzuki–Miyaura coupling at the thiazole 5-position (after bromination), the ethyl ester is stable under the typical Pd(PPh₃)₄, K₂CO₃, dioxane/water reflux conditions for 16 h, with less than 2% hydrolysis. When integrated into automated parallel synthesis platforms such as the Chemspeed SWING or Mettler-Toledo Quantos solid-dispensing modules, dosing accuracy of ±2% of target mass is achievable without anti-static bars if relative humidity is maintained below 40%. At higher RH, the powder exhibits triboelectric charging, requiring ionising bar intervention to meet dosing tolerances for sub-mmol scale reactions.