Competitive 2-(2-Aminothiazole-4-Yl)-2-[2-(Tertbutoxycarbonyl)Isopropoxyimino]Acetic Acid prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172
or mail to
sales9@bouling-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615651039172
Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com
A white crystalline powder, routinely assigned the empirical formula C₁₃H₁₈N₄O₅S and a molecular weight of
342.37 g·mol⁻¹, constitutes the protected oxime intermediate
2-(2-Aminothiazole-4-yl)-2-[2-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)isopropoxyimino]acetic acid. The compound functions as a regiochemically defined acyl donor in the convergent assembly of third-generation cephalosporin antibiotics, where the aminothiazole ring and the syn‑alkoxyimino pharmacophore are essential for Gram‑negative activity. The tert‑butoxycarbonyl (Boc) cap on the isopropoxyimino hydroxyl preserves the oxidation‑sensitive oxime during iterative synthetic transformations, while the free carboxylic acid at the α‑carbon permits activation without prior deprotection. In current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) campaigns, this intermediate has been adopted to avoid the crystallisation difficulties and solvolysis side‑reactions that accompany the corresponding trityl‑protected variant when scaled beyond pilot‑plant quantities.
Why does the tert-butoxycarbonyl-protected isopropoxyimino moiety determine synthetic utility?
The Boc‑isopropoxyimino appendage imposes a dual protection strategy: the oxime oxygen is masked as a tert‑butyl carbonate, while the α‑amino group of the thiazole remains free. Deprotection is therefore orthogonal. Exposure to trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in anisole‑spiked dichloromethane at
0–5 °C selectively cleaves the Boc group within
30–60 min, releasing the free oxime and gaseous isobutylene without generating the triphenylmethanol by‑product that complicates trityl‑based routes. Because the aminothiazole nitrogen is not protonated under these conditions, N‑acyl‑β‑lactam formation during subsequent coupling is preserved. The acid‑stability differential is sharp: the Boc group undergoes quantitative solvolysis in
≥95% TFA, whereas the aminothiazole‑oxime core remains intact, as monitored by the absence of des‑aminothiazolyl impurities above
0.10% by HPLC (area‑%). This orthogonality allows the final acylation of 7‑aminocephalosporanic acid (7‑ACA) or its protected analogues to be executed without an intermediate isolation of the deprotected oxime, a significant advantage in manufacturing workflows where prolonged exposure of the free oxime to ambient light and moisture elevates the E‑isomer content beyond the pharmaceutically acceptable limit of
1.0%.
The specification profile for material released from a typical kilo‑lab campaign is provided below. Data are derived from validated in‑house methods aligned with Ph. Eur. 2.2.46 (chromatographic separation) and USP <621> (chromatography).
Typical release specifications for 2-(2-aminothiazole-4-yl)-2-[2-(Boc)isopropoxyimino]acetic acid
| Parameter | Method | Acceptance Criterion |
| Appearance | Visual inspection | White to off‑white crystalline powder |
| Assay (anhydrous basis) | HPLC, C18, UV 254 nm | 98.0–102.0% |
| Z‑isomer content | HPLC, C18, UV 270 nm | ≥ 99.0% |
| E‑isomer | Same method | ≤ 0.5% |
| Des‑Boc impurity | HPLC, C18 | ≤ 0.8% |
| Any unspecified impurity | HPLC, C18 | ≤ 0.10% |
| Water content | Karl Fischer, Ph. Eur. 2.5.12 | ≤ 0.5% |
| Heavy metals | USP <231> Method II | ≤ 20 ppm |
| Residual solvents | GC‑HS, USP <467> | Acetonitrile ≤ 410 ppm; DMF ≤ 880 ppm |
Process-scale handling and storage stability
The solid is hygroscopic, gaining
0.3–0.5% water within
4 h at
60% relative humidity and
25 °C. For extended campaigns, storage under an inert atmosphere at
–20 ± 5 °C in double‑lined LDPE containers sealed inside foil‑laminated bags arrests both moisture uptake and thermal Boc deprotection. At
40 °C and
75% RH, accelerated stability studies show
2.1% des‑Boc impurity formation after
14 days, with a concomitant rise in E‑isomer to
1.3% from an initial
0.15%. The thermal degradation follows pseudo‑first‑order kinetics; an Arrhenius estimate based on three isotherms (
40, 50, 60 °C) gives an activation energy of roughly
98 kJ·mol⁻¹ for Boc cleavage, indicating that cold‑chain logistics are mandatory for transcontinental shipment. Incompatibilities are pronounced with primary amines, which catalyse carbamate fragmentation even at
–10 °C, and with strong bases such as DBU, which isomerise the oxime double bond. Pre‑drying at
30 °C under vacuum (
≤10 mbar) for
12 h is recommended immediately before any activation step that employs a coupling agent such as dicyclohexylcarbodiimide or isobutyl chloroformate, as residual water diverts the reactive mixed anhydride into the free acid.
When alternative amino-protecting groups fail in late-stage deprotection
The choice of the Boc‑isopropoxyimino group over trityl, chloroacetyl, or formyl is not driven solely by cost—the Boc derivative is typically
2–3 times more expensive per mole—but by the elimination of side‑reactions that become unmanageable at tonne scale. Trityl‑protected oximes require zinc‑acetic acid reductive cleavage, a heterogeneous step that generates finely divided zinc residues and acetic acid‑laden aqueous streams, complicating plant effluent treatment and pushing the waste‑stream chemical oxygen demand (COD) above
50,000 mg·L⁻¹. Chloroacetyl protection is removed with thiourea, generating genotoxic chloroacetamide by‑products that must be purged below the threshold of toxicological concern (
1.5 µg·day⁻¹ per ICH M7). Formyl protection, while atom‑economic, demands concentrated HCl in methanol, conditions that methylate the aminothiazole nitrogen in
3–5% yield and produce an inseparable impurity. The comparative behaviour is summarised in the following table.
Critical process attributes of oxime-protecting groups employed in cephalosporin intermediate 2-(2-aminothiazole-4-yl)-2-(alkoxyimino)acetic acid
| Protecting Group | Deprotection Reagent | Process‑Limiting Impurity | Typical E‑isomer After Deprotection | Waste Profile |
| Trityl (Ph₃C–) | Zn/AcOH, THF/H₂O | Triphenylmethanol (poorly soluble) | 1.0–1.5% | Acidic aqueous zinc acetate; COD >45,000 mg·L⁻¹ |
| Chloroacetyl | Thiourea, EtOH, reflux | Chloroacetamide (ICH M7 Class 2) | 0.8–1.2% | Organic sulphurous waste; requires active carbon polishing |
| Formyl | HCl/MeOH, 25 °C | N‑Methyl‑aminothiazole (3–5%) | 0.5–1.0% | Methanol‑HCl stream; high chloride in aqueous effluent |
| tert‑Butoxycarbonyl (Boc) | TFA/CH₂Cl₂, anisole, 0–5 °C | Isobutylene (volatile); E‑isomer ≤0.5% | ≤0.5% | TFA recyclable by distillation; aqueous neutralisation to NaF/KF salts |
During the acylation of 7‑amino‑3‑[(1‑methyl‑1H‑tetrazol‑5‑yl)thiomethyl]‑3‑cephem‑4‑carboxylic acid (7‑AMCA) with the title compound, the α‑carboxylic acid is first converted to a mixed anhydride at
–10 to –5 °C using isobutyl chloroformate and N‑methylmorpholine in dry DMF. The activated intermediate is added immediately to a pre‑cooled solution of the 7‑AMCA silyl ester, maintaining the internal temperature below
–5 °C throughout the
45–60 min addition window. After aqueous quench and pH adjustment to
2.5–3.0 with dilute HCl, the protected cephalosporin acid precipitates as a micro‑crystalline solid. The Boc group is subsequently removed in the same reaction vessel by adjusting the medium to anhydrous DCM‑TFA (
1:1 v/v) containing
3% anisole as a carbocation scavenger. The free oxime is obtained in
85–92% yield across both steps, with a Z‑isomer purity exceeding
99.5% as determined by the peak‑area ratio at
270 nm. Discrepancies in reported yields stem from the sensitivity of the mixed‑anhydride formation to adventitious water; reactors with vacuum‑capable jackets and in‑line Karl Fischer monitoring routinely achieve the upper end of this range, whereas campaigns conducted in standard glass‑lined vessels without dedicated drying see yields fall to the
80–85% bracket. Published data for this specific configuration is limited to cephalosporin patent families, where the emphasis remains on the final active pharmaceutical ingredient rather than the isolated protected intermediate, but the consistency of the kilo‑lab outcome across multiple generic manufacturers supports the reproducibility of the Boc‑isopropoxyimino approach when the operational boundaries are respected.