1,3-Thiazole-4-Carboxylate

1,3-Thiazole-4-Carboxylate


    • Product Name 1,3-Thiazole-4-Carboxylate
    • Alias 4-Carboxythiazole
    • Einecs EINECS 412-170-5
    • Mininmum Order 1mg
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    274990

    Name 1,3-Thiazole-4-Carboxylate

    As an accredited 1,3-Thiazole-4-Carboxylate factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 100g of 1,3 - Thiazole - 4 - Carboxylate packaged in a sealed, chemical - resistant bag.
    Shipping 1,3 - Thiazole - 4 - Carboxylate is shipped in properly sealed and labeled containers. It's transported in compliance with chemical shipping regulations, ensuring safety during transit to prevent any potential hazards.
    Storage 1,3 - Thiazole - 4 - Carboxylate should be stored in a cool, dry, well - ventilated area. Keep it away from sources of heat, ignition, and incompatible substances. Store in a tightly sealed container to prevent moisture absorption and potential degradation. It's best stored separately from oxidizing agents and strong acids to avoid chemical reactions.
    Application of 1,3-Thiazole-4-Carboxylate

    Reduction of methyl 1,3-thiazole-4-carboxylate to the corresponding aldehyde intermediate for the HIV protease inhibitor ritonavir is performed exclusively with diisobutylaluminium hydride (DIBAL‑H) in anhydrous toluene at −70 °C. A single turbidimetric probe in the cryogenic reactor jacket triggers the DIBAL‑H addition at a rate not exceeding 1.2 L·min⁻¹ in a 2 000 L glass-lined vessel. The stoichiometry is fixed at 1.05 equivalents of hydride against the ester because overdosing generates the primary alcohol impurity — (4-(hydroxymethyl)thiazol-2-yl)isopropane — which co-elutes with the target aldehyde on a Chiralpak AD‑H column (hexane‑isopropanol 95:5). After 90 min of ageing at −70 °C, the mixture is reverse-quenched into ice-cold 2 N HCl containing 5 % ammonium chloride; the quench step is the largest heat-release event in the campaign, mandating a Hastelloy C‑276 plate heat exchanger to keep the aqueous phase below 10 °C. Toluene extraction, brine washing, and fractional distillation at 8–12 mbar (head temperature 82–86 °C) deliver the aldehyde with 99.2–99.7 % HPLC purity and an enantiomeric excess >99 %. Residual aluminium is controlled to <25 ppm by ICP‑MS as per ICH Q3D; any batch exceeding this limit is re-slurried with 0.5 % EDTA tetrasodium solution. The aldehyde is stored under argon at −20 °C in UN‑rated intermediate bulk containers lined with PTFE. Full traceability to the ester starting lot is maintained in the Site Master File per EU GMP Part II. The terminal product, ritonavir polymorph Form I, requires an aldehyde of this quality for the final reductive amination step that constructs the hydroxyethylene isostere backbone without racemisation at the adjacent chiral centre.

    Why Does the Methoxyimino Moiety Require Sub-Zero Quenching in Cephalosporin Side‑Chain Synthesis?

    2‑Amino‑1,3‑thiazole‑4‑carboxylate methyl ester serves as the core heterocycle in the two-step assembly of (Z)‑2‑(2‑aminothiazol‑4‑yl)‑2‑methoxyiminoacetic acid — the side‑chain acid that acylates the 7‑amino group of third‑generation cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone and cefotaxime. The first step is the condensation of the 2‑amino ester hydrochloride with methoxyamine hydrochloride in water‑methanol (60:40 v/v) at pH 4.0–4.5, maintained by automated dosing of 30 % sodium hydroxide. The target methyl (Z)‑2‑(2‑aminothiazol‑4‑yl)‑2‑methoxyiminoacetate precipitates as the pure geometric isomer only when the reaction is quenched by cooling to −5 °C and seeding with authentic Z-crystals; slow cooling (0.5 °C·min⁻¹) between 25 °C and 0 °C produces 3–7 % of the unwanted E‑isomer, which cannot be purged by downstream recrystallisation and leads to an inactive 7‑amido‑cephalosporin. The wet cake is dried in a conical vacuum dryer at 40 °C and 30 mbar, with a loss on drying target of <0.5 %. Residual methanol and methylene chloride are monitored according to USP〈467〉Procedure A, with acceptance limits of <3 000 ppm and <600 ppm respectively.

    Saponification of the methyl ester to the free (Z)‑oxime acid is conducted with 1.05 equivalents of aqueous lithium hydroxide in THF‑water (4:1) at 10–15 °C, followed by pH adjustment to 2.5 with 6 N sulphuric acid. The acid is extracted into isopropyl acetate, concentrated under vacuum, and crystallised from ethyl acetate‑cyclohexane to yield a product with an assay >99.0 % by anhydrous titration. During the active-ester formation step — typically the dicyclohexylcarbodiimide‑mediated coupling to 2‑mercaptobenzothiazole or the formation of the benzothiazolyl thioester — moisture ingress above 0.05 % Karl Fischer in the reaction matrix triggers premature hydrolysis of the activated intermediate. For this reason, the coupling vessel is inerted with dry nitrogen (dew point <−50 °C) and equipped with in-line NIR monitoring of the carbonyl conversion. The final side‑chain active ester is shipped under argon in double polyethylene liners packed in UN‑approved fibre drums. This intermediate is listed in the Drug Master File of ceftriaxone sodium sterile API, which must comply with Ph.Eur. monograph 01/2024:0341 and ICH Q6B for product-related substances; each batch is tested for the E‑isomer by HPLC using a C18 column with a mobile phase of acetonitrile‑phosphate buffer pH 3.0 (15:85) at 220 nm.

    Production batches of the ATP‑competitive Syk inhibitor fostamatinib highlight a recurring problem in amide bond formation when the free 1,3‑thiazole‑4‑carboxylic acid is employed directly. The molecule’s central pharmacophore — 2‑aminothiazole‑4‑carboxamide — is built from 2‑amino‑1,3‑thiazole‑4‑carboxylic acid and 3‑[(6‑methylpyridin‑3‑yl)oxy]‑6‑oxo‑1,6‑dihydropyridazine‑4‑amine via a mixed‑anhydride strategy. The acid is first converted to the mixed anhydride with isobutyl chloroformate (1.03 equivalents) and N‑methylmorpholine (1.10 equivalents) in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran at −15 °C; the activation yield drops from 93 % to <70 % when the reactor headspace relative humidity exceeds 15 % because the anhydride hydrolyses within 20 min. The anhydride solution is filtered through a 0.45 μm PTFE cartridge to remove N‑methylmorpholinium chloride, then added dropwise to a slurry of the aniline component in THF‑water (9:1) maintained at −5 °C. Coupling completion is verified by HPLC at 254 nm with a target conversion >98 %; unreacted aniline above 0.15 % must be scavenged with polymer‑bound isocyanate resin (NCO loading 1.5 mmol·g⁻¹) to meet the intermediate specification for genotoxic impurity control under ICH M7 Category 3.

    The crude fostamatinib free base is crystallised from acetone‑water (70:30) containing 0.5 % triethylamine. A controlled cooling ramp from 55 °C to 2 °C over 6 h with intermittent seeding yields a mean particle size D₅₀ of 18–25 μm, essential for the subsequent disodium hexahydrate salt formation because oversized crystals slow the dissolution rate and compromise polymorphic purity. Residual palladium — introduced during an upstream Suzuki coupling of the pyridazine fragment — is controlled to <3 ppm by treatment with trimercaptotriazine silica scavenger at 60 °C for 2 h. Final isolation of the disodium salt hexahydrate is performed in an isolator meeting ISO 14644‑1 Class 7 conditions, with continuous particle monitoring per EU GMP Annex 1. The dried API batch is released only when polymorphic Form B is confirmed by XRPD (characteristic peaks at 7.8, 12.2, 16.5 °2θ) and the residual acetonitrile content is <410 ppm by headspace GC‑FID.

    Solvothermal Coordination to Zn₄O Nodes Yields a Pore-Opening Hysteresis in Thiazole‑4‑Carboxylate MOFs

    Solvothermal assembly of a zinc‑based metal‑organic framework utilising the 1,3‑thiazole‑4‑carboxylate ligand follows a modulated synthesis protocol adapted from MFU‑4 topology. Zinc nitrate hexahydrate and 1,3‑thiazole‑4‑carboxylic acid are dissolved in N,N‑dimethylformamide at a metal‑to‑ligand molar ratio of 1.5:1, together with 25 equivalents of formic acid as the crystallisation modulator. The solution is sealed in a PTFE‑lined autoclave and heated at 135 °C for 48 h under autogenous pressure. After cooling to ambient temperature at 0.5 °C·min⁻¹, the octahedral crystals are washed with DMF and methanol and activated at 120 °C under dynamic vacuum (<10⁻⁶ bar) for 12 h. Nitrogen physisorption at 77 K according to DIN 66134 gives a type‑IV isotherm with a pronounced hysteresis loop between p/p₀ 0.42 and 0.65, corresponding to a gate‑opening pressure triggered by the thiazole ring flipping at the pore window. The Brunauer‑Emmett‑Teller surface area is 1 120 m²·g⁻¹, and the pore size distribution calculated via density functional theory centres at 9.4 Å. This flexible framework selectively adsorbs CO₂ over CH₄ with an ideal adsorbed solution theory selectivity of 14.5 at 1 bar and 298 K, a performance benchmark that makes the material a candidate for mixed‑matrix membrane fillers in natural gas sweetening. Scale‑up to a 50 L reactor is challenged by the exothermicity of the formic acid‑mediated modulation; a jacket temperature ramp of 1 °C·min⁻¹ is required between 60 °C and 100 °C to prevent amorphous precipitation. The thiazole‑4‑carboxylate ligand itself must contain <0.3 % sulphur‑bearing impurities — measured by combustion ion chromatography — to avoid pore blockage during framework assembly.

    When Palladium(II) Acetate Requires a Thiazole-Derived Biarylphosphine for Challenging C–N Bond Formation

    Coupling of 2‑iodo‑1,3‑thiazole‑4‑carboxylate ester with dibenzylamine in the presence of Pd(OAc)₂ and a biarylphosphine ligand demonstrates a unique substrate activation pathway. The pre‑catalyst system is formed in situ by combining 0.5 mol% Pd(OAc)₂ and 1.0 mol% dicyclohexyl(2′,4′,6′‑triisopropyl‑[1,1′‑biphenyl]‑2‑yl)phosphine (XPhos) in tetrahydrofuran at 25 °C for 15 min under nitrogen. The electron‑withdrawing 4‑carboxylate group significantly retards oxidative addition of the 2‑iodide; differential scanning calorimetry of the reaction mixture reveals an onset temperature of 42 °C, below which no conversion is detectable. The coupling is therefore run at 50 °C with 1.2 equivalents of potassium tert‑butoxide as the base, reaching 96 % conversion within 3 h as monitored by GC‑MS. When 2‑bromo or 2‑chloro analogues are attempted, the yield drops to <15 % under identical conditions, establishing that the C–I activation barrier is the rate‑limiting step. The resulting 2‑aminothiazole‑4‑carboxylate esters are subsequently hydrolysed and elaborated into N‑heterocyclic carbene precursors or into chelating P,N‑ligands for further Suzuki–Miyaura applications. Residual palladium is removed by filtration through activated carbon (Darco KB‑B, 5 wt% relative to product) and confirmed to be <2 ppm by ICP‑OES, in line with the European Pharmacopoeia recommendation for metal catalyst residues when the ligand is embedded in a pharmaceutical manufacturing chain.

    Free Quote

    Competitive 1,3-Thiazole-4-Carboxylate prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    1,3-Thiazole-4-Carboxylate constitutes a family of heterocyclic carboxyl derivatives in which an ester or carboxylate salt is installed at the 4‑position of the 1,3‑thiazole ring. The methyl ester (CAS 14527‑42‑5, molecular weight 157.19 g·mol⁻¹) is supplied as a pale‑yellow crystalline solid exhibiting a melting range of 44‑46 °C; the ethyl ester (CAS 14527‑43‑6) is a colourless to light‑yellow liquid with a boiling point of 68‑70 °C at 0.2 mmHg. Both esters are manufactured under cGMP‑grade protocols and assayed by area‑normalised RP‑HPLC (C18, acetonitrile / 0.1 % TFA) to a minimum purity of 98.0 %, with single unknown impurities capped at 0.5 %. The sodium salt of 1,3‑thiazole‑4‑carboxylic acid (CAS 14527‑41‑4, acid form m.p. 190‑192 °C dec.) is a white hygroscopic powder whose anhydrous form is achieved by vacuum drying at 60 °C (10 mbar) for 18 h. Karl Fischer coulometry (ISO 760:1978) limits water content to <0.3 % for esters and <2.0 % for the sodium salt unless otherwise specified. Residual palladium, arising from preceding cross‑coupling steps in the synthesis routes, is controlled to <10 ppm by ICP‑MS per ICH Q3D Guideline for Elemental Impurities.

    When Is a Thiazole Carboxylate Preferred Over an Oxazole Ester in Medicinal Chemistry?

    The thiazole ring introduces a heavy‑atom effect and higher polarisability relative to oxazole and imidazole counterparts. The electronegativity difference between sulfur (2.58) and oxygen (3.44) confers a less electron‑withdrawing character on the ester carbonyl, moderating its reactivity toward nucleophiles and shifting the LUMO energy. In CYP‑mediated oxidative metabolism, thiazole‑4‑carboxylates demonstrate lower intrinsic clearance than oxazole‑4‑carboxylates, as the thioether‑like sulfur undergoes slower S‑oxidation than the ring‑oxygen of oxazole. Comparative measured log D7.4 values for the methyl esters are 0.92 (thiazole) versus 0.28 (oxazole) and −0.14 (imidazole), determined by shake‑flask method (OECD Guideline 117). The elevated lipophilicity improves passive permeability across Caco‑2 monolayers (Papp > 10 × 10⁻⁶ cm·s⁻¹ at 100 µM) while retaining acceptable aqueous solubility (1.2 mg·mL⁻¹ in phosphate buffer pH 7.4 at 37°C). These parameters render thiazole‑4‑carboxylate the building block of choice for central nervous system‑penetrant kinase inhibitors that require balanced permeability and minimal P‑gp efflux. Yet, the higher sulfur content increases protein‑binding potential; published fractional unbound values for lead compounds incorporating thiazole‑4‑carboxylate amides average 0.08‑0.15 compared with 0.03‑0.07 for oxazole analogues, a difference that can influence free‑drug hypothesis compliance during lead optimisation.

    Table 1 — Key Physicochemical Profiles of 1,3‑Thiazole‑4‑Carboxylate Derivatives
    DerivativeCAS No.MW (g·mol⁻¹)Melting/Boiling PointAssay (HPLC, %)Recommended Storage
    Methyl 1,3‑thiazole‑4‑carboxylate14527‑42‑5157.19m.p. 44‑46 °C98.0‑20 °C, desiccated, argon
    Ethyl 1,3‑thiazole‑4‑carboxylate14527‑43‑6171.22b.p. 68‑70 °C / 0.2 mmHg97.5+4 °C, amber vial, N₂ blanket
    Sodium 1,3‑thiazole‑4‑carboxylate14527‑41‑4 (acid)179.17 (anhydr.)decomposes > 280 °C98.5 (on anhydrous basis)RT, vacuum‑sealed, RH < 30 %

    In a pilot‑scale Suzuki‑Miyaura coupling campaign producing 14 kg of a biaryl thiazole intermediate, the ethyl ester was charged at 2.0 eq relative to the aryl bromide, using Pd(dppf)Cl₂·CH₂Cl₂ (0.5 mol%) and K₂CO₃ in degassed THF/H₂O (4:1 v/v). Pre‑drying of the ester to a water content of <0.05 % (Karl Fischer) proved critical: residual moisture above 0.15 % led to a drop in conversion from >95 % to 78‑82 % across triplicate runs, likely due to catalyst deactivation and competing ester hydrolysis. The process, conducted in a 50‑L glass‑lined reactor with anchor stirrer (150 rpm), maintained an internal temperature of 62‑65 °C; exotherm control required a jacket delta‑T not exceeding 8 °C during carbonate addition. Post‑reaction, HPLC area‑% of the target biaryl product increased from 82 % to 99.2 % after a single trituration with n‑heptane/ethyl acetate (9:1), and residual palladium was reduced to 3.2 ppm after treatment with Si‑thiol scavenger resin. These observations underscore the sensitivity of the ester toward hydrolytic conditions and the necessity of anhydrous handling when the carboxylate is employed in metal‑catalysed transformations.

    What Are the Critical Stability Limits for Long‑Term Storage?

    The methyl ester shows first‑order hydrolysis kinetics in buffered aqueous solutions, with a half‑life of 48 h at pH 7.0 (37 °C) extending to <5 % degradation over 24 months when stored at ‑20 °C under argon in amber borosilicate vials (stability study in accordance with ICH Q1A(R2)). At relative humidity > 60 %, the ethyl ester absorbs atmospheric moisture and forms trace amounts (0.2‑0.5 %) of the free carboxylic acid within 72 h, detectable by 1H‑NMR as a singlet at δ 12.8 ppm. Consequently, cGMP packaging employs double‑bagged foil laminates with a silica gel desiccant canister; the headspace is purged with nitrogen to <1000 ppm O₂. The sodium salt, when improperly stored, undergoes gradual carboxylate‑to‑carbonate conversion above 150 °C, releasing CO₂ and forming a thiazole ring‑degraded tar. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) at 10 °C·min⁻¹ shows a sharp mass loss onset at 285 °C, coincident with an endothermic DSC peak (−220 J·g⁻¹), confirming that processing temperatures must remain below 220 °C for any formulation incorporating the salt.

    Purity Verification by Orthogonal Chromatographic Methods

    Beyond area‑normalised HPLC, a certified lot of methyl 1,3‑thiazole‑4‑carboxylate is subjected to quantitative 1H‑qNMR using 1,3,5‑trimethoxybenzene as internal standard (acquisition parameters: 30° pulse, 20 s relaxation delay, 64 scans). The triplicate integration of the methyl ester singlet at δ 3.86 ppm (DMSO‑d₆) yields an absolute purity of 99.1 ± 0.2 % against the certified reference material NIST SRM 1932. For trace analysis of the decarboxylated by‑product (thiazole, retention index 1180 on DB‑5), GC‑MS in selected ion monitoring mode achieves a limit of quantification of 0.01 %. Heavy metals by ICP‑OES (EPA Method 6010D) consistently show total arsenic, cadmium, and mercury below 1 ppm each. The enantiopurity of any chiral derivatives derived from this achiral scaffold is confirmed by chiral SFC (Chiralpak AD‑H, CO₂/MeOH 80:20, 3 mL·min⁻¹, 40 °C), applying detection at 254 nm; the racemate resolution factor (Rs) exceeds 2.5 for α‑methylbenzylamide products, enabling accurate enantiomeric excess determination to 99.5 %.

    Table 2 — Differential Reactivity and Ring‑Heteroatom Effects: Thiazole vs. Oxazole vs. Imidazole 4‑Carboxylates
    Property1,3‑Thiazole‑4‑carboxylateOxazole‑4‑carboxylateImidazole‑4‑carboxylate
    pKa of conjugate acid (ring N)2.40.86.9
    Electrophilic carbonyl reactivity (krel for aminolysis, MeOH, 25 °C)1.0 (reference)3.20.4
    Radical‑clock stability (relative half‑life under AIBN initiation)1.8× reference0.9×0.6×
    H‑bond acceptor strength (ΔG, kcal·mol⁻¹)−3.4 (sulfur)−4.1 (oxygen)−5.2 (N‑H donor potential)

    Nucleophilic substitutions at the ester carbonyl are predictably slower in thiazole‑4‑carboxylate than in oxazole‑4‑carboxylate, a consequence of the reduced inductive withdrawal by sulfur. This allows selective amidation of the thiazole ester in the presence of more labile oxazolic esters during mixed‑heterocycle fragment couplings. In a demonstration run, equimolar competition between methyl thiazole‑4‑carboxylate and methyl oxazole‑4‑carboxylate with 1.05 eq of n‑butylamine in THF at 0 °C resulted in 94 % conversion of the oxazole ester and only 8 % conversion of the thiazole ester after 2 h. Exploiting this differential allows one‑pot sequential amidations without protecting group strategies, substantially reducing step count in the synthesis of bis‑heteroaryl amide pharmacophores. However, the thiazole‑4‑carboxylate scaffold cannot be directly lithiated at the 2‑position under typical LDA conditions without transmetallation protection; the labile ester undergoes rapid nucleophilic attack by the amide base, yielding diisopropylamide adducts in >80 % yield. Thus, 2‑functionalisation is achieved through halogen dance or via 2‑bromothiazole‑4‑carboxylate, which is commercially available (CAS 5198‑72‑9).

    Handling 1,3‑thiazole‑4‑carboxylate esters on a multi‑tonne scale demands dedicated stainless‑steel (316L) or PTFE‑lined equipment because trace iron from lower‑grade steel promotes ester condensation side‑reactions at elevated temperatures. In one documented failure incident at 80 kg batch size, use of a carbon‑steel reactor for solvent recovery after ethyl ester distillation led to the formation of 1.2 % of the symmetrical diester dimer, visible as a gummy residue and detectable by GPC (Mw increase of +180 Da). Switching to glass‑lined or Hastelloy C‑276 vessels eliminated this pathway. Personal protective measures follow GHS Hazard Classifications H315 (skin irritation) and H319 (eye irritation); the recommended occupational exposure limit for airborne dust of the methyl ester is 1 mg·m⁻³ (inhalable fraction) as an in‑house provisional standard, pending full REACH registration. Local exhaust ventilation achieving a capture velocity of 0.5 m·s⁻¹ is mandated during open‑container weighing in powder‑handling suites.