1,2-Benzisothiazole,3-(1-Piperazinyl)-,Monohydrochloride

1,2-Benzisothiazole,3-(1-Piperazinyl)-,Monohydrochloride


    • Product Name 1,2-Benzisothiazole,3-(1-Piperazinyl)-,Monohydrochloride
    • Alias Piperazine,1-(2-benzothiazolyl)-,monohydrochloride
    • Einecs 620-250-1
    • Mininmum Order 1g
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    211516

    Chemical Name 1,2-Benzisothiazole,3-(1-Piperazinyl)-, Monohydrochloride
    Molecular Formula C11H14ClN3S
    Molecular Weight 255.77
    Appearance Typically a solid (description may vary)

    As an accredited 1,2-Benzisothiazole,3-(1-Piperazinyl)-,Monohydrochloride factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 100g of 1,2 - Benzisothiazole, 3-(1 - Piperazinyl)-, Monohydrochloride in sealed chemical - grade packaging.
    Shipping 1,2 - Benzisothiazole, 3 - (1 - Piperazinyl) - Monohydrochloride is shipped in well - sealed containers, following strict chemical shipping regulations. Special care is taken to prevent exposure, with proper labeling for safety during transit.
    Storage 1,2 - Benzisothiazole, 3 - (1 - Piperazinyl)-, Monohydrochloride should be stored in a cool, dry place. Keep it in a tightly sealed container to prevent moisture absorption and exposure to air, which could potentially affect its chemical properties. Avoid storage near sources of heat or ignition. Store away from incompatible substances to prevent chemical reactions.
    Application of 1,2-Benzisothiazole,3-(1-Piperazinyl)-,Monohydrochloride

    In the synthesis of ziprasidone hydrochloride monohydrate, a benzisothiazole-piperazine fragment serves as the nitrogenous heterocyclic anchor required for high-affinity binding at the 5-HT2A and D2 receptor sites. The monohydrochloride salt of 3-(1-piperazinyl)-1,2-benzisothiazole (C₁₁H₁₃N₃S·HCl, MW 255.76 g mol⁻¹) is released to its free base immediately prior to the N‑alkylation step with 6-chloro-5-(2-chloroethyl)-1,3-dihydro-2H-indol-2-one in a polar aprotic medium. Compliance in commercial campaigns is governed by ICH Q7 and the guidance for residual solvents according to USP 〈467〉; when the intermediate is filed as a Type II Drug Master File with the US FDA, the holder must provide a full disclosure of the synthetic pathway, covering genotoxic impurity risk assessment under ICH M7 thresholds. The charged molar ratio typically places the free base of the benzisothiazole-piperazine at 1.05–1.10 equivalents relative to the indolinone electrophile, translating to a practical addition level of approximately 0.62–0.65 kg of the hydrochloride salt per kilogram of ziprasidone free base at a reaction yield exceeding 87% of theory. The downstream process couples high-temperature (90–105 °C) carbonate-assisted coupling in dimethylformamide with a chain of aqueous washes, activated-carbon treatment, and final recrystallization from ethanol‑water; jacketed glass-lined reactors equipped with packed reflux columns are standard, and the crystallizer must hold a loss-on-drying specification ≤ 0.5% to prevent hydrate form interconversion in the final polymorph. Terminal dosage forms include oral gelatin capsules of 20 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, and 80 mg ziprasidone base equivalent, as well as a lyophilised powder for intramuscular injection reconstituted in 20 mg mL⁻¹ presentations.

    What Precautions Govern the Use of This Intermediate in Lurasidone Alkylation at Tonne Scale?

    During the manufacture of lurasidone hydrochloride — a benzisothiazole-piperazine‑bearing atypical antipsychotic acting on D2, 5-HT2A, 5-HT7, and 5-HT1A — the mono-N-alkylation of 1,2-benzisothiazol-3-(1-piperazinyl) free base with (1R,2R)-cyclohexane-1,2-diylbis(methylene) dimethanesulfonate or the corresponding di‑p‑toluenesulfonate ester demands rigorous thermal management. The reaction is classified as a critical process step under ICH Q7 Section 12.1 because the half-life of the bis‑electrophile in the presence of the piperazine nucleophile can drop to minutes when the internal temperature exceeds 12 °C; adiabatic calorimetry (ARC) data from production‐scale campaigns indicate an onset of runaway decomposition at ΔTad > 72 K if the dosing rate of the sulfonate ester is not slaved to the jacket‑cooling duty. The validated master batch record therefore specifies a semi-batch protocol in which a 0.95–1.00 M solution of the free base in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone‑acetonitrile (3:1 v/v) is maintained at −5 to 0 °C and the electrophile solution is metered over 6–8 hours while the heat-flow signal from a Mettler Toledo RC1e reaction calorimeter is logged; any transient exceeding 35 W kg⁻¹ triggers automatic interlock of the dosing pump. The additive ratio, calculated on the limiting intermediate, amounts to 1.30–1.35 molar equivalents of the bis-mesylate toward the piperazine nitrogen, which corresponds to 0.56–0.58 kg of the monohydrochloride salt per kilogram of lurasidone free base (MW 456.58) in an industrial sequence that runs at 70–78% isolated yield after chromatography on silica‑60 and ethanolic HCl salt formation. Post‑reaction quenching with 5% aqueous ammonium chloride, phase separation in a centrifugal extractor, and multi-stage wiped‑film distillation to meet a NMT 0.10% residual sulfonate ester limit — verified by LC‑MS/MS with a limit of quantification at 1 ppm — constitute the downstream purification train; filtration through a 0.2 µm sterilising cartridge prior to spray drying yields a crystalline monohydrochloride that conforms to Ph.Eur. 10.7 and USP 43 monograph specifications. The terminal finished goods are immediate‑release film‑coated tablets delivering 20 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, 80 mg, or 120 mg of lurasidone hydrochloride, manufactured under 21 CFR 211 in dedicated suites with validated air‑handling units to prevent cross‑contamination with other benzisothiazole‑based actives.

    In the approved Japanese manufacturing route for perospirone hydrochloride (Lullan®), the benzisothiazole‑piperazine hydrochloride intermediate is condensed with N-(4-bromobutyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-2,3-dioxoisoquinoline-5-sulfonamide via a Williamson‑type etherification preceded by free‑basing in situ with sodium carbonate. The heterogeneous reaction in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) proceeds at 55–60 °C under a nitrogen pad, and the particle‑size distribution of the intermediate salt proves critical: sieve analysis must confirm d50 ≤ 75 µm because coarser crystals lead to incomplete conversion and residual reactants above the action limit of 0.15 area-% on HPLC. The addition table for a 500 L glass‑lined vessel lists 42.0 kg of the monohydrochloride (0.164 kmol) alongside 48.5 kg of the bromo‑butyl isoquinoline sulfonamide (0.156 kmol) — an 1.05‑fold molar excess of the benzisothiazole side — to compensate for partition losses to the aqueous sodium bromide phase that accumulates during the work‑up. On a mass basis, this equates to roughly 0.50–0.51 kg of the hydrochloride salt per kilogram of perospirone free base (MW 510.63). Supervisory control of the batch relies on inline FTIR to track the disappearance of the C‑Br stretch at 643 cm⁻¹; endpoint is declared when the signal drops below 0.2% of the initial absorbance. Following vacuum steam stripping to remove DMSO below 0.1% residual, the crude perospirone base is taken up in methyl isobutyl ketone and washed with 1.0 N sodium hydroxide, then treated with ethanolic hydrogen chloride to precipitate perospirone hydrochloride. Recrystallization from 2‑propanol:water (9:1) yields compact prisms with a melting point of 232–234 °C (dec.) that meet the Japanese Pharmacopoeia monograph identity tests. The final dosage forms registered in Japan are oral tablets containing 4 mg and 8 mg perospirone hydrochloride; Hong Kong and South Korean supplementary approvals additionally cover an extemporaneous oral suspension (4 mg mL⁻¹) prepared with Ora‑Sweet® vehicle.

    When the Benzisothiazole-Piperazine Scaffold Enters Fragment-Based Library Production

    Beyond fully commercialised active pharmaceutical ingredients, the monohydrochloride salt of 3-(1-piperazinyl)-1,2-benzisothiazole functions as a privileged fragment within the piperazine‑extended heterocycle chemical space that contemporary CNS drug-discovery programmes exploit for D2/5-HT1A/5-HT2A poly‑pharmacology. Contract research organisations and early-phase medicinal chemistry groups procure the compound under an analytical certificate confirming purity ≥98.0 area-% (HPLC at 254 nm), water content ≤0.3% (Karl Fischer, titration to dead‑stop), and elemental chlorine content within ±0.5% of the theoretical 13.86% for C₁₁H₁₃N₃S·HCl. The additive ratio in parallel solution‑phase arrays is dictated by the library design: for a 96‑well plate each well receives 0.20 mmol of the benzisothiazole‑piperazine free base (generated by washing a dichloromethane solution of the salt with 2.0 M aqueous NaOH) and 0.24 mmol of a chloro‑ or bromo‑heteroaryl capping reagent dissolved in 0.6 mL of anhydrous dimethylacetamide, together with 0.44 mmol of N,N‑diisopropylethylamine. Reaction blocks are agitated at 800 rpm orbitally at 80 °C for 16 h in a glove box under dry argon, after which automated solid‑phase extraction on 50 mg silica cartridges with an ethyl acetate‑hexane gradient removes the tertiary amine hydrochloride by‑product; the eluted fractions are evaporated in a Genevac HT‑12 centrifugal evaporator and checked for uniformity by LC‑MS using a single‑quadrupole instrument operating in APCI+ mode. Process‑scale‑up to 50 g batch size for lead‑optimisation campaigns utilises a 2 L jacketed reactor with a Hastelloy‑C impeller, and the settled slurry of the hydrochloride salt in dry tetrahydrofuran is activated by slow addition of 1.05 eq. sodium hexamethyldisilazide (2.0 M in THF) at 0–5 °C before the electrophile is introduced. The resulting focused libraries feed structure‑activity‑relationship matrices and deliver tool compounds — later evaluated in rodent behavioural models — with typical purity after preparative HPLC exceeding 95%. Compliance in this discovery environment is aligned with ISO 9001:2015 laboratory quality management systems rather than GMP, because the terminal products are not intended for human administration but serve as pharmacological probes.

    Material Input Profiles Across Commercial Benzisothiazole‑Piperazine‑Containing Active Substances

    Target API Free BaseMW (g mol⁻¹)Theoretical Demand of HCl Salt (kg per kg API)Practical Charged EquivalentTypical Yield Window
    Ziprasidone (C₂₁H₂₁ClN₄OS)412.940.6191.05–1.10 eq.80–88%
    Lurasidone (C₂₈H₃₆N₄O₂S)456.580.5601.30–1.35 eq.68–78%
    Perospirone (C₂₆H₃₂N₄O₅S₂)510.630.5011.05 eq.72–82%
    Fragment‑library building block (research scale)1.20 eq. vs. electrophile60–95% (prep. HPLC)

    Irrespective of the final application, the hydrochloride salt’s hygroscopicity forces a common storage boundary: bulk drums must be kept under a dry‑nitrogen blanket at ≤ 25 °C and re‑conditioned for 8 h at 40 °C under 50 mbar vacuum if the container has been opened at relative humidity exceeding 60%. Failure to perform this step in the lurasidone route depresses the equilibrium conversion by 8–12% because water competes for the sulfonate ester electrophile and generates free alcohol intermediates that act as terminating impurities. Combination of the free base with acetic anhydride or succinic anhydride during storage tank cleaning constitutes an additional incompatibility — spontaneous acylation at the piperazine‑NH yields an amide that is inert in downstream N‑alkylation and must be removed by flash chromatography before the main charge can be committed. These operational constraints are documented in the internal process‑hazard analysis records and periodically audited under ISO 14001:2015 and OHSAS 18001 site certifications, ensuring that safety datasheets provided to tolling partners reflect current findings from production‑scale campaigns.

    Free Quote

    Competitive 1,2-Benzisothiazole,3-(1-Piperazinyl)-,Monohydrochloride prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction
    When synthesised under current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) conditions, the compound identified as 1,2-benzisothiazole,3-(1-piperazinyl)-, monohydrochloride (CAS 87691-88-1; molecular formula C₁₁H₁₃N₃S·HCl, molecular weight 255.77 g·mol⁻¹) appears as an off-white to pale yellow crystalline powder with a melting range of 198–202 °C (decomposition). The material serves as a key arylpiperazine building block in the convergent synthesis of the atypical antipsychotic ziprasidone hydrochloride monohydrate, where it undergoes N‑alkylation with a chloroethylindolone intermediate. Typical production-scale batches exhibit an HPLC assay (area‑%) of ≥99.0 %, with single‑impurity thresholds not exceeding 0.10 % for des‑chloro analogues and 0.15 % for oxidative dimeric by‑products, as resolved on a C₁₈ column with UV detection at 254 nm. Residual solvent levels comply with ICH Q3C (R8) Option‑1 limits, with ethanol ≤5000 ppm, ethyl acetate ≤5000 ppm, and toluene ≤890 ppm routinely reported in Certificates of Analysis for kilogram‑scale deliveries.

    How Does the Hydrochloride Salt Improve Process Robustness over the Free Base?

    The hydrochloride salt is preferred over the free base (CAS 87691-87-0, pKa₁ ≈ 7.8 for the piperazine nitrogen) in multi‑tonne manufacturing because it eliminates the hygroscopicity that causes erratic stoichiometric control during N‑alkylation. Water absorption by the free base, which can exceed 2.0 wt% after 4 hours of ambient exposure at 60 % RH, leads to hydrolysis of the alkylating agent and yield losses of 8–12 % on a 100‑kg batch scale in a Hastelloy C‑276 reactor. The monohydrochloride, by contrast, maintains a Karl Fischer water content of ≤0.5 % when stored under nitrogen in sealed polyethylene‑lined fibre drums, eliminating the need for pre‑drying in a vacuum oven unless storage RH has exceeded 65 %. Further, the salt form exhibits superior dissolution characteristics in the polar aprotic solvent dimethylformamide (DMF) at 80 °C, reaching a concentration of 0.85 mol·L⁻¹ without turbidity, which facilitates uniform coupling kinetics.

    Critical Purity Specifications and Impurity Profiles

    Two process‑derived impurities that directly affect downstream ziprasidone impurity profiles are benzo[d]isothiazol‑3(2H)‑one (CAS 2634-33-5) and the N‑oxide of the parent heterocycle. In one commercial route, residual benzo[d]isothiazol‑3(2H)‑one, introduced during piperazine ring closure, can co‑crystallise with the hydrochloride and reach 0.08–0.12 % if the antisolvent crystallisation from isopropanol/water is performed above 5 °C. The use of palladium‑catalysed coupling methods for the downstream ziprasidone step renders the intermediate sensitive to elemental palladium residues; thus, the monohydrochloride is routinely controlled to Pd ≤ 10 ppm (by ICP‑MS per USP 〈232〉/〈233〉) and total heavy metals ≤ 20 ppm. The N‑oxide impurity, formed during aerobic processing of the free base prior to salt formation, is capped at 0.20 % because it propagates into a N‑oxide ziprasidone degradant that co‑elutes with the active pharmaceutical ingredient under the pharmacopoeial HPLC method of the monohydrate.

    Comparative Reactivity with 3‑Chloro‑1,2‑benzisothiazole

    When 3‑chloro‑1,2‑benzisothiazole (CAS 7716-66-7) is used as an alternative electrophile, an additional amination step with piperazine is required, introducing extra processing and a potential regioisomeric impurity of the 2‑substituted benzisothiazole. The monohydrochloride bypasses this sequence and provides the entire 3‑(piperazin‑1‑yl) fragment in a single convergent operation. Kinetic data from a 200‑L glass‑lined reactor show that the N‑alkylation of the monohydrochloride with 1.05 equivalents of 5‑(2‑chloroethyl)‑6‑chlorooxindole in DMF, using powdered potassium carbonate (1.2 eq) and potassium iodide (0.1 eq), reaches >98 % conversion in 6 hours at 85–90 °C. Under identical conditions, the free base yields 94 % conversion and requires an additional 3‑hour hold to consume residual alkylating agent, leading to higher levels of the corresponding vinylindolone impurity. Using 3‑chloro‑1,2‑benzisothiazole in a two‑step process (halogen displacement then alkylation) typically results in an overall yield from benzisothiazole to ziprasidone stage‑II of 68–72 %, compared with 81–85 % for the direct monohydrochloride route, based on production‑campaign data aggregated over 15 batches.
    Comparative Performance in Alkylation Step (DMF, 85–90 °C)
    ParameterMonohydrochloride (CAS 87691-88-1)Free base (CAS 87691-87-0)
    Conversion at 6 h (%)98.594.0
    Vinylindolone impurity (%)0.250.65
    Post‑reaction hold time (h)03
    Isolated yield from alkylation (%)8879
    Water content of input (wt%)0.352.1
    Storage at 2–8 °C under an inert gas blanket is recommended because prolonged exposure to temperatures above 30 °C induces a colour shift from off‑white to light amber, indicative of radical‑mediated decomposition that elevates the N‑oxide content to 0.5 % within 12 weeks. The compound is incompatible with strong oxidising agents—contact with m‑chloroperbenzoic acid in dichloromethane rapidly generates the N‑oxide—and with aqueous sodium hydroxide above 1 M, which liberates the free base as a sticky precipitate that entrains solvent and resists filtration under production‑scale centrifuge conditions. In one incident documented on a 500‑kg campaign, accidental exposure to atmospheric moisture during batch charging caused the measured water content to rise to 0.8 %; the subsequent N‑alkylation gave a 6 % drop in isolated yield and required charcoal treatment to bring the solution colour back within the APHA ≤300 specification. Consequently, a pre‑drying protocol of 4 hours at 45 °C and 5 mbar in a Nutsche filter‑dryer is activated whenever the moisture specification is breached.

    Analytical Characterisation and Routine Release Testing

    Monochromatic identity confirmation relies on infrared spectroscopy (KBr disc) with characteristic absorbances at 1580 cm⁻¹ (C=N stretch), 1245 cm⁻¹ (C‑N piperazine), and a broad 2400–2800 cm⁻¹ band for the protonated piperazine nitrogen. The compendial HPLC method uses a 4.6 mm × 250 mm octadecylsilane column (5 µm) with a mobile phase of acetonitrile and 0.05 M phosphate buffer pH 3.0 (35:65 v/v), flow rate 1.0 mL·min⁻¹, and detection at 254 nm. The retention time of the monohydrochloride peak is typically 12.7 ± 0.2 minutes under these conditions. Proton NMR (DMSO‑d₆, 400 MHz) displays a characteristic multiplet at δ 3.25–3.45 ppm for the eight piperazine protons and aromatic resonances between δ 7.40–8.10 ppm, with the salt proton residing as a broad singlet around δ 9.5 ppm. For supply‑chain tracking, the material is assigned a lot‑specific identifier linked to the synthetic route that starts from saccharin. The salification is conducted in isopropanol with 1.05 equivalents of concentrated hydrochloric acid, and subsequent recrystallisation from isopropanol/water (90:10 v/v) reduces the residual saccharin content to 0.05 %. In direct comparison with the corresponding maleate and sulfate salts, the monohydrochloride offers the highest solubility in DMF (0.85 mol·L⁻¹ at 80 °C) and the lowest propensity for ion‑pair aggregation, as determined by dynamic light scattering on filtered solutions.
    Salient Specification Attributes (Batch Analysis of ≤ 100 kg)
    AttributeSpecification LimitAnalytical Method
    Assay (anhydrous, solvent‑free)99.0–101.0 %HPLC (area‑%), USP 〈621〉
    Water (Karl Fischer)0.5 %USP 〈921〉, Method Ia
    Residual Isopropanol5000 ppmGC‑HS, ICH Q3C
    Palladium10 ppmICP‑MS, USP 〈233〉
    Sulphated Ash0.1 %USP 〈281〉
    Benzo[d]isothiazol‑3(2H)‑one0.10 %HPLC (relative response factor 1.2)
    In large‑scale ziprasidone manufacturing, the N‑alkylation charge is routinely adjusted based on the actual assay value; a deviation of 0.5 % in the assay of the monohydrochloride correlates with a 0.7 % shift in the final ziprasidone base yield after crystallisation. This sensitivity drove implementation of near‑infrared (NIR) in‑process monitoring on a commercial 4000‑L reactor train to ensure that the equivalent molar charge remains within 1.00–1.05 of the theoretical requirement. The absence of a tertiary amine protecting group, a feature in some 1‑(2‑pyrimidinyl)piperazine derivatives, removes the need for an acidolytic deprotection step that would generate genotoxic alkyl halide by‑products. Published data for this specific configuration in continuous‑flow systems is limited, though laboratory feasibility studies at a 10‑mL microreactor scale have demonstrated residence‑time distributions comparable to batch, provided the plug‑flow reactor is maintained above 80 °C. Contact with polyamide‑11 transfer hoses during solvent charging should be avoided because trace extractable caprolactam has been shown to form a Schiff base with the liberated piperazine nitrogen at process temperatures, generating a persistent low‑level impurity that co‑crystallises with the final ziprasidone and elevates the known impurity threshold beyond the ICH Q3B identification limit. Therefore, all wetted parts in transfer lines are specified as 316L stainless steel or PTFE‑lined. Thermal gravimetric analysis reveals a mass loss of 0.3 % up to 150 °C, after which decomposition accelerates with an exotherm onset near 205 °C; consequently, drying operations do not exceed 50 °C even under reduced pressure. The DSC thermogram consistently exhibits a single endothermic event at 198 °C (peak), which aligns with the melting‑with‑decomposition behaviour and is used to confirm polymorph identity against a reference standard derived from the original ziprasidone New Drug Application. Where a simplified supply pathway is sought, some purchasers evaluate 3‑(piperazin‑1‑yl)‑1,2‑benzisothiazole hydrobromide; however, the hydrobromide counterpart demonstrates 30 % lower solubility in DMF and introduces bromide‑catalysed side reactions when potassium carbonate is used as the base, resulting in an ethyl‑indolone bromide adduct at 0.3–0.5 %. The monohydrochloride therefore remains the salt of choice under current compendial intermediate monographs under development in the European Pharmacopoeia.