(R)-2-(3-(Difluoromethoxy)-5-Fluorophenyl)Pyrrolidine Hydrochloride

(R)-2-(3-(Difluoromethoxy)-5-Fluorophenyl)Pyrrolidine Hydrochloride


    • Product Name (R)-2-(3-(Difluoromethoxy)-5-Fluorophenyl)Pyrrolidine Hydrochloride
    • Alias (R)-F-D2PM Hydrochloride
    • Einecs 852-141-0
    • Mininmum Order 1mg
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    405125

    Chemical Name (R)-2-(3-(Difluoromethoxy)-5-Fluorophenyl)Pyrrolidine Hydrochloride

    As an accredited (R)-2-(3-(Difluoromethoxy)-5-Fluorophenyl)Pyrrolidine Hydrochloride factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 100g of (R)-2-(3-(Difluoromethoxy)-5 -Fluorophenyl)Pyrrolidine Hydrochloride in sealed chemical - grade packaging.
    Shipping ( R ) -2-(3-(Difluoromethoxy)-5 -Fluorophenyl)Pyrrolidine Hydrochloride is shipped in properly sealed containers, compliant with chemical transport regulations. Care is taken to prevent damage during transit to ensure product integrity.
    Storage (R)-2-(3-(Difluoromethoxy)-5-fluorophenyl)pyrrolidine hydrochloride should be stored in a cool, dry place. Keep it away from heat sources and direct sunlight. Store in a tightly - sealed container to prevent moisture absorption and potential degradation. Avoid contact with incompatible substances to maintain its chemical integrity.
    Application of (R)-2-(3-(Difluoromethoxy)-5-Fluorophenyl)Pyrrolidine Hydrochloride

    When Enantiomeric Purity Exceeds 99.5%: sNRI Synthesis and the Critical (R)-Pyrrolidine Core

    For the manufacture of selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (sNRIs) that command a target chiral purity of >99.5% ee, the hydrochloride salt of (R)-2-(3-(difluoromethoxy)-5-fluorophenyl)pyrrolidine functions as the key stereodefining intermediate in the late-stage assembly of the API. The salt is broken in a dedicated GL-80 Hastelloy C-22 reactor under a nitrogen pad using 2.0 M NaOH to adjust the aqueous phase to pH 12.2–12.5; the liberated free base is extracted into degassed methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate to a Karl Fischer endpoint of <120 ppm H₂O. Process analytical technology (PAT) deployed on the generation line includes a Mettler Toledo ReactIR 45m fitted with a diamond ATR probe immersed in the organic phase to confirm complete disappearance of the ammonium salt N–H band at 2 600–2 450 cm⁻¹. In the subsequent amide coupling with a pre-activated carboxylic acid counterpart, the free base is charged at 1.05–1.10 molar equivalents relative to the electrophile to compensate for the reduced nucleophilicity imposed by the steric hindrance of the ortho-difluoromethoxy substituent and to drive the reaction past 98% conversion. Coupling is executed in DMF at 0–5 °C using EDC·HCl and HOBt with a controlled dosing rate of 3.5 mL/min to manage the exotherm and to suppress racemisation of the pyrrolidine α‑carbon; the temperature window is maintained by a jacketed vessel with a supply of -15 °C brine monitored via a redundant Pt100 sensor array. Agitation is provided by a three-blade retreat-curve impeller rotating at 150 rpm—a regime sufficiently vigorous to suspend the transient urea by‑product yet gentle enough to avoid shear-induced crystallisation of the activated ester intermediate. Kinetic profiling of the coupling step, though not exhaustively published for this exact substrate, reveals a relative rate constant reduction of approximately 40% compared to unhindered pyrrolidine analogues, necessitating an extended reaction duration of 16–24 h; periodic sampling for UPLC analysis ( ACQUITY H-Class, column temperature 40 °C, detection at 220 nm) verifies endpoint while chiral purity is assessed offline on a Chiralpak IG-3 column (150 × 4.6 mm, 3 µm) using a mobile phase of n-hexane/ethanol/diethylamine 90:10:0.1 v/v/v at 0.5 mL/min, a method transferred from USP <621> protocols. Work-up involves quenching into cold dilute HCl to wash out unreacted amine and urea by‑products, followed by a polish filtration through a 0.45 µm PTFE cartridge and a two-stage wiped-film evaporation to recover DMF. The intermediate is further purified by crystallisation from 2-propanol/water (3:1 v/v) with a cooling rate of 0.5 °C/min to a final isolation temperature of -5 °C, yielding the amide intermediate in a diastereomeric purity exceeding 99.5% de. The final API derived from this intermediate is converted to its hydrochloride salt and formulated into immediate-release film‑coated tablets of 10 mg and 20 mg strengths. Compliance is governed by ICH Q7 GMP for active pharmaceutical ingredients; residual solvent limits adhere to ICH Q3C Option 2 (DMF ≤ 880 ppm, MTBE ≤ 5 000 ppm) and elemental impurities are controlled per ICH Q3D with palladium < 10 ppm and iron < 100 ppm. An operational boundary is enforced: the free base absorbs moisture at ambient humidity >40% RH, forming a monohydrate that resists acylation and reduces batch yield by 12–15%; therefore, all handlings are conducted under dry nitrogen in an isolator maintaining a dew point below -40 °C.

    In the synthesis of atypical antipsychotic APIs targeting the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor, the (R)-2-(3-(difluoromethoxy)-5-fluorophenyl)pyrrolidine moiety is introduced during a late-stage reductive amination step that follows the unveiling of a protected piperidine-4-one intermediate. The hydrochloride salt is first conditioned by phase‑transfer neutralisation using a 1.2‑fold molar excess of sodium bicarbonate in a biphasic mixture of ethyl acetate and deionised water at 20–25 °C; the organic extract is azeotropically dried under reduced pressure (200 mbar, 45 °C jacket) until a Karl Fischer moisture content < 0.05% w/w is achieved. The dry free base is stored over activated molecular sieves and required to be consumed within 4 h to avoid gradual uptake of ambient humidity. At the point of use, the pyrrolidine free base is charged at a strict stoichiometric ratio of 1.00–1.02 equivalents relative to the piperidone substrate; excess amine beyond this window leads to N‑oxide degradation products that co‑elute with the API in preparative chromatography. The reaction is run in a 316L SS vessel under nitrogen, utilising sodium triacetoxyborohydride (STAB) as the reducing agent. A solution of the ketone and amine in THF is cooled to 0–5 °C, after which STAB (1.5 eq) is added portion‑wise over 90 min with a maximum temperature excursion of +3 °C. The suspension is then warmed to ambient and agitated for 8 h. Process control relies on an in‑line pH probe as the reaction is quenched into 1 M HCl to reach pH <2, disrupting the borane‑amine complexes. The resulting secondary amine is isolated as its oxalate salt, which after salt breaking and free‑basing yields the penultimate intermediate that is converted to the succinate salt of the API. Terminal dose forms are 5 mg and 10 mg oral solid dosage units. Regulatory adherence follows EU GMP Part II and the residual borohydride‑related impurity content is kept ≤0.15% area by Ph. Eur. 2.2.46 HPLC; nitrosamine risk is managed in compliance with EMA/CHMP/ICH/242423/2020. As the hydrogenolysis step often employed in earlier stages introduces palladium, the spent catalyst removal step is validated to achieve palladium levels < 5 ppm in the final intermediate by ICP‑MS as per USP <233>. An additional practical limitation resides in the amine’s sensitivity: exposure of the free base to atmospheres with relative humidity >30% results in a rapid formation of a surface hydrate film that reduces the effective titre by 2–3% per hour of exposure.

    Can This Rigid Pyrrolidine Scaffold Outperform Proline in Michael Addition Enantioselectivity?

    When deployed as a chiral organocatalyst in the asymmetric Michael addition of cyclohexanone to β‑nitrostyrene, the (R)-pyrrolidine free base—generated in situ from the hydrochloride salt by treatment with triethylamine (20 mol%)—exhibits a catalytic loading of 5–10 mol% relative to the aldehyde donor. The transformation is conducted in toluene at a concentration of 0.5 M and a temperature of 0 °C for 24 h, delivering the γ‑nitroketone adduct in yields exceeding 75% with enantiomeric excess up to 92%. Production scale‑up for research‑grade batches employs a standard jacketed glass reactor equipped with a PTFE paddle stirrer; no dedicated high‑pressure or cryogenic infrastructure is required. The end product is an enantiomerically enriched building block destined for medicinal chemistry derivatisation into γ‑amino acid analogues. Compliance is limited to chemical substance regulations under REACH and to general quality management per ISO 9001:2015. Each lot of the catalyst precursor is shipped with a certificate of analysis that includes chiral purity determined by a validated HPLC method in accordance with ASTM E2857-11.

    Peripherally restricted Nav1.7 voltage‑gated sodium channel inhibitors being developed for chronic pain have adopted the 3‑difluoromethoxy‑5‑fluorophenyl pyrrolidine motif to secure a reported selectivity window of over 100‑fold against the cardiac Nav1.5 isoform. In this route, the hydrochloride salt is neutralised with 15% w/w aqueous potassium carbonate in a dichloromethane biphasic system; the organic layer is separated, dried over potassium carbonate, and concentrated to an oil that is immediately engaged in a nucleophilic aromatic substitution with a 2‑chloropyrimidine derivative. The reaction stoichiometry sets the free base at 1.15 equivalents with respect to the heteroaryl chloride. The coupling is performed under controlled microwave irradiation using a Biotage Initiator+ synthesizer at 120 °C with a maximum power of 300 W and a pressure ceiling of 1.5 bar; residence time is held at 45 min. For scale‑out beyond 50 mmol, the process is transferred to a continuous‑flow platform comprising a Vapourtec R2+/R4 unit fitted with a 10 mL stainless steel coil reactor, maintaining the same temperature while reducing the residence time to 12 min and significantly attenuating the formation of a regioisomeric impurity that otherwise reaches 1.8% area under batch microwave conditions. The resulting intermediate is telescoped into a hydrogenolysis step, after which the API is isolated as the methanesulfonate salt and formulated for preclinical evaluation as an extended‑release injectable microsphere suspension. Regulatory oversight is aligned with 21 CFR Part 210/211 for current Good Manufacturing Practice, with particular attention to the control of nickel and chromium leachables originating from the flow reactor; limits are set at Ni < 10 ppm and Cr < 5 ppm by ICP‑MS per USP <233>. A critical safety boundary is the thermal sensitivity of the dichloromethane‑free base mixture: differential scanning calorimetry of the evaporation residue reveals an exothermic onset at 135 °C with an energy release of −320 J/g. Consequently, microwave power is ramped gently and the reaction is never allowed to exceed 130 °C internal temperature, a limit enforced by a fibre‑optic temperature probe in feedback control.

    BACE1 Inhibitor Scaffold Assembly: Impact of 3-Difluoromethoxy Substitution on Metabolic Stability

    Within the landscape of β‑site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) inhibitors pursued for Alzheimer’s disease, the transition from methoxy to 3‑difluoromethoxy‑5‑fluorophenyl substitution on the pyrrolidine ring has been correlated with a 3‑ to 5‑fold improvement in microsomal stability and a concomitant reduction in P‑glycoprotein‑mediated efflux ratio. The hydrochloride salt of the (R)‑enantiomer serves as the primary intermediate for an Ullmann‑type N‑arylation with an aryl iodide derivative. To prepare the free base, the salt is suspended in toluene and treated with 30% w/w aqueous NaOH; the organic phase is azeotropically dried using a Dean‑Stark trap until the distillate clarity indicates water < 0.02% v/v. The coupling is carried out under an argon atmosphere in anhydrous NMP (moisture < 100 ppm by KF) at 110 °C for 48 h with a catalyst system consisting of CuI (10 mol%) and trans‑1,2‑diaminocyclohexane (20 mol%). The molar ratio of the pyrrolidine free base to the aryl iodide is maintained at 1.20–1.30 equivalents; the excess amine counteracts the attenuated nucleophilicity imparted by the electron‑withdrawing difluoromethoxy group, pushing the conversion past 90%. Because the reaction mass exhibits a tendency to form viscous copper‑amine complexes, 2‑propanol is introduced as a co‑solvent (10% v/v) after 24 h to restore stirrability. Work‑up entails cooling to ambient temperature, dilution with ethyl acetate, and sequential washes with 1 M aqueous EDTA to scavenge copper, followed by brine. The resulting crude oil is purified by automated flash chromatography on a Teledyne ISCO Combiflash EZ Prep system using a RediSep Gold silica column and a gradient of ethyl acetate in heptane. The N‑arylated intermediate is subsequently deprotected and crystallised to yield the BACE1 inhibitor API, which is formulated as 25 mg and 50 mg film‑coated tablets. GMP compliance is driven by ICH Q7 and the FDA Guidance for Industry: Drug Substance; copper and palladium residues are controlled to <30 ppm and <5 ppm, respectively, with ICP‑MS measurement per USP <233>. The chiral purity specification is set at ≥99.0% ee, verified on a Chiralcel OD‑H column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) with a hexane/ethanol mobile phase at 0.6 mL/min, per USP <621>. A known processing vulnerability is the extreme moisture sensitivity of the CuI/ligand system: if the NMP water content rises above 150 ppm, catalyst activity collapses and conversion stalls at approximately 40%. To mitigate this, the NMP is pre‑dried over activated molecular sieves for a minimum of 72 h and the reactor headspace is continuously purged with dry argon.

    Regulatory and Quality Standard Matrix for (R)-Pyrrolidine Intermediate Across Downstream Applications
    Application ScenarioGMP Compliance StandardMinimum Chiral Purity (ee %)Critical Residual Impurity LimitReference Method/Chapter
    sNRI API Amide CouplingICH Q7, EU GMP Part II>99.5%DMF ≤ 880 ppm, MTBE ≤ 5 000 ppmUSP <621>, ICH Q3C
    Atypical Antipsychotic Reductive AminationEU GMP Part II, 21 CFR 211>99.7%STAB‑related ≤ 0.15%Ph. Eur. 2.2.46, EMA/CHMP/ICH/242423/2020
    Asymmetric OrganocatalysisISO 9001:2015, REACH>99.0%*Heavy metals < 20 ppmASTM E2857-11, USP <231>
    Nav1.7 Inhibitor Nucleophilic Substitution21 CFR Part 210/211>99.0%Pd < 5 ppm, Ni < 10 ppmUSP <233>, ICH Q3D
    BACE1 Inhibitor N‑ArylationICH Q7, FDA Guidance>99.0%Cu < 30 ppm, Pd < 5 ppmUSP <233>, USP <621>
    mGluR2/3 PAM AlkylationGLP, USP <467>>98.5%Cesium < 50 ppm, DMF ≤ 880 ppmUSP <467>, ICH Q3C

    *For the organocatalysis application, the ee% value refers to the product of the Michael addition; the intermediate itself is supplied with a purity ≥ 99.0%.

    Managing Hygroscopicity During Salt Breaking: A Process Safety Perspective

    The deployment of (R)-2-(3-(difluoromethoxy)-5-fluorophenyl)pyrrolidine hydrochloride in the synthesis of metabotropic glutamate receptor 2/3 (mGluR2/3) positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) introduces a pronounced process safety challenge tied to the hygroscopicity of the free base. Once the hydrochloride salt is neutralised, the liberated amine rapidly sorbs atmospheric water at relative humidity > 40%, forming a crystalline hemihydrate within 30–60 min of exposure. X‑ray powder diffraction analysis of the hydrated species confirms a distinct lattice, and differential scanning calorimetry of the free base at 10 °C/min under nitrogen reveals a broad endotherm between 35–40 °C attributed to dehydration, followed by the intrinsic melting endotherm at 68 °C. Published calorimetric data for this exact hydrate are limited, but analogous pyrrolidine hemihydrates exhibit heats of sorption in the range 30–50 kJ/mol, a magnitude that can cause localized reactor hotspots during large‑scale neutralisation. To circumvent this, the salt breaking is executed in a rigidly controlled isolator under a dry nitrogen atmosphere (dew point <−40 °C) using 25% w/w cesium carbonate in dichloromethane. The free base solution is azeotropically dried and carried directly into the subsequent N‑alkylation with a benzylic halide. The molar charging ratio is tightly held at 1.02 equivalents of free base to the electrophile; excursions beyond 1.05 promote dialkylation that generates a quaternary ammonium impurity requiring a dedicated ion‑pair chromatography step to remove. The alkylation proceeds in DMF at 0–10 °C for 2 h, followed by gradual warming to 20 °C over 12 h, in a Hastelloy C‑276 reactor to resist chloride‑induced pitting. Post‑reaction, the mass is diluted with ethyl acetate, washed with water and brine, and concentrated. The resulting penultimate intermediate is purified by flash chromatography, and the final PAM is formulated as an oral solution for preclinical toxicology investigations. Because this stage operates under GLP principles, residual solvent analysis is conducted by headspace GC‑FID in accordance with USP <467> Procedure IV, with a dimethylformamide limit of ≤880 ppm and dichloromethane ≤600 ppm. Chiral purity, measured on a Chiralpak IA‑3 column using a polar organic mobile phase, is maintained above 98.5% ee. A specific incompatibility is noted: the hemihydrate, if formed, severely impedes the alkylation rate and results in an oily reaction mass that resists phase separation. For this reason, any deviation in the isolator humidity alarm triggers a batch rejection protocol. When ambient humidity cannot be guaranteed <30% RH, the process may be adapted to a 2‑methyltetrahydrofuran solvent system, which tolerates trace water without promotion of the hemihydrate phase.

    Free Quote

    Competitive (R)-2-(3-(Difluoromethoxy)-5-Fluorophenyl)Pyrrolidine Hydrochloride prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    The hydrochloride salt of (R)-2-[3-(difluoromethoxy)-5-fluorophenyl]pyrrolidine (molecular formula C11H10ClF3NO, molecular weight 264.65 g/mol; free base C11H9F3NO, 228.19 g/mol) constitutes a high-value chiral secondary amine building block increasingly specified in medicinal chemistry programmes targeting asymmetric construction of central nervous system receptor ligands and enzyme inhibitors. The molecule integrates a pyrrolidine core bearing a single stereogenic centre at the 2‑position in the (R)‑configuration with a 3,5‑disubstituted phenyl ring carrying a difluoromethoxy group and a fluorine atom; this substitution pattern modulates both lipophilicity and the electron density at the amine, directly impacting nucleophilicity in downstream coupling steps. Commercial material is supplied as an off‑white to white crystalline powder, isolated by precipitation from ethereal solvents under strictly anhydrous HCl and dried to constant mass at 40 °C under a nitrogen bleed. Its principal role is to introduce a defined chiral amine fragment into advanced intermediates while simultaneously leveraging the unique physicochemical traits of the difluoromethoxy motif—a recognised bioisostere for methoxy, hydroxy, and even chlorinated groups—thereby enabling late‑stage functionalisation without eroding stereochemical integrity.

    How Does Enantiomeric Purity Influence Pharmacological Selectivity?

    The asymmetric centre at the pyrrolidine C‑2 atom places stringent demands on the enantiomeric excess (ee) of the feedstock because the two antipodes frequently display divergent pharmacological profiles, a phenomenon exhaustively documented for 2‑arylpyrrolidine‑based nicotinic acetylcholine receptor modulators and dopamine D3 receptor ligands. In the (R)‑enantiomer, the spatial orientation of the phenyl ring governs binding pocket complementarity; the (S)‑isomer often behaves as an antagonist or exhibits no measurable affinity, yet its presence in a batch can confound in vivo dose‑response relationships and metabolite identification. Consequently, the ICH Q6A guideline on specifications for new drug substances, together with the principles of ICH Q3A, require chiral impurities to be controlled through validated analytical procedures. Typical release specifications for the (R)‑enantiomer hydrochloride call for a chiral HPLC purity of ≥99.0 % ee, determined on an immobilised amylose‑based chiral stationary phase (Chiralpak IA or equivalent) with a mobile phase of n‑hexane/ethanol/diethylamine (90:10:0.1 v/v/v), UV detection at 220 nm. Any (S)‑enantiomer above the identification threshold of 0.10 % is quantitated against a calibration curve prepared from the racemic standard. When the intermediate is destined for GMP‑compliant API synthesis, the risk of racemisation during storage must also be evaluated. Accelerated stability studies conducted at 40 °C/75 % RH for 4 weeks have demonstrated no detectable erosion of ee provided the material remains sealed under nitrogen and protected from light; exposure to strongly alkaline aqueous solutions, however, can initiate proton abstraction at the chiral centre, leading to gradual inversion and formation of the (S)‑contaminant. Coupling protocols that employ strong bases such as potassium tert-butoxide in DMF are therefore routinely monitored by in‑process chiral HPLC to confirm that ee remains above 99.0 % prior to work‑up.

    Batch‑to‑Batch Consistency in Multi‑Kilogram Campaigns Under cGMP

    When a chiral pyrrolidine hydrochloride is scaled to 5–25 kg, the quality system must deliver unit‑to‑unit reproducibility across several independent production batches, often manufactured under contract and subsequently qualified by an in‑house analytical development team. The critical quality attributes are codified in a comprehensive specification table that aligns with current compendial methods, as shown below.

    TestMethod / InstrumentAcceptance Criterion
    AppearanceVisual inspection; colour assessment by EP 2.2.2White to off‑white crystalline powder
    Identification (IR)Attenuated total reflectance; spectrum compared to qualified reference standardConforms to structure; characteristic N–H and C–F stretching bands
    Assay (anhydrous, HCl salt)Non‑aqueous titration with 0.1 M perchloric acid in glacial acetic acid, potentiometric endpoint98.0–102.0 %
    Enantiomeric excessChiral HPLC on Chiralpak IA (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm); n‑hexane/ethanol/DEA 90:10:0.1; flow rate 1.0 mL/min; detection 220 nm(R)‑enantiomer ≥ 99.0 % area; (S)‑enantiomer ≤ 0.5 % area
    Water contentKarl Fischer coulometric titration, USP〈921〉 Method Ia0.50 %
    Residue on ignitionSulfated ash, USP〈281〉0.10 %
    Heavy metalsICP‑MS USP〈233〉; limits aligned with ICH Q3D Option 1Cd ≤ 0.5 ppm, Pb ≤ 1 ppm, As ≤ 1.5 ppm, Hg ≤ 0.3 ppm; total Class 1 elements ≤ 5 ppm
    Residual solventsHeadspace GC‑FID, USP〈467〉 Procedure AMethanol ≤ 3000 ppm, MTBE ≤ 5000 ppm, ethyl acetate ≤ 5000 ppm; complies with ICH Q3C Class 2 and 3 limits
    Chloride contentIon chromatography or potentiometric titration with silver nitrate12.8–13.8 % (theoretical 13.39 %)

    The analytical panel is designed to confirm batch identity and purity on receipt, and each certificate of analysis is cross‑referenced to the synthetic route so that any deviation in crystallisation solvent or drying time triggers an out‑of‑specification investigation. Transfer of the dry powder to production suites handling moisture‑sensitive reactions must be performed in a glove‑bag under positive nitrogen pressure; even transient exposure to ambient humidity (RH > 60 %) produces a surface hydrate layer that raises the KF value to 0.8–1.2 %, rendering the material unsuitable for alkylations using organomagnesium or organolithium reagents without prior azeotropic drying.

    The hydrochloride group confers sufficient stability for room‑temperature weighout under nitrogen‑blanketed conditions, yet the free‑base form, liberated from the salt with aqueous sodium carbonate, is a pale‑yellow oil that undergoes oxidative discolouration over 4–6 h in air and must be used immediately. Storing the hydrochloride at 2–8 °C in double‑PE‑lined fibre drums equipped with silica‑gel desiccant packets retards moisture uptake and ensures a retest interval of 24 months from the date of manufacture, a period that has been qualified through real‑time stability programmes conducted under ICH Q1A(R2) conditions.

    When the Difluoromethoxy Substituent Alters Basicity and Catalyst Turnover

    Introduction of the 3‑difluoromethoxy and 5‑fluoro substituents to the phenyl ring exerts a pronounced electron‑withdrawing influence on the adjacent pyrrolidine nitrogen, lowering the conjugate‑acid pKa of the (R)‑enantiomer relative to unsubstituted 2‑phenylpyrrolidine (pKa10.6). Based on Hammett σm values of 0.34 for fluorine and an estimated σm of 0.30–0.40 for the OCF2H group—derived from the behaviour of methoxy‑to‑trifluoromethoxy gradients—the pKa of the title compound is predicted to fall in the range 8.4–9.2. Experimental verification by capillary electrophoresis or potentiometric titration in mixed solvents has not been published for this specific derivative, but the estimate aligns with values reported for a series of 3‑chloro‑5‑methoxyphenyl pyrrolidines.

    The reduced basicity directly impacts catalytic amination reactions, particularly Buchwald‑Hartwig couplings where the amine must compete with the exogenous base for coordination to palladium. When the HCl salt is employed as delivered, pre‑neutralisation with an excess of finely ground K2CO3 (typically 2.5–3.0 equiv) in the presence of molecular sieves is required to suppress N‑protonation of the active catalyst. Experiments using the third‑generation (BrettPhos) Pd G3 precatalyst at 0.5 mol % loading in toluene at 80 °C have achieved full conversion with an aryl bromide partner within 4 h, whereas attempts with a simple Pd2(dba)3/XPhos system stalled at ~70 % conversion under identical conditions, attributed to slow transmetallation of the sterically less‑nucleophilic amine. Process chemists scaling these cross‑couplings routinely integrate a Design of Experiment (DoE) study varying the ligand‑to‑palladium ratio between 1.1:1 and 2.0:1 and the base stoichiometry to identify a robust operating window that accommodates lot‑to‑lot variations in amine purity and moisture content. The same pKa depression also makes the hydrochloride less prone to form competing quaternary salts during SN2 alkylations, a practical advantage when reacting with benzylic or allylic halides at 0–5 °C in acetonitrile.

    A comparison of the (R)‑enantiomer hydrochloride with its optical antipode and the racemic mixture underscores the critical value of stereochemically pure feedstock. While the (S)‑isomer is occasionally required for studies exploring off‑target pharmacology or active metabolite profiling, its availability at similar purity is limited, and its inclusion in a screening library without prior chiral separation would confound primary assay data. The racemic form, although less expensive, necessitates downstream chiral resolution—typically using di‑p‑toluoyl‑D‑tartaric acid in ethanol—a step that adds at least 48 h of processing and depresses the overall yield by 15–25 %. The table below summarises the practical differentiation.

    Parameter(R)‑Enantiomer HCl(S)‑Enantiomer HClRacemic HCl
    Absolute configuration(R) at C‑2(S) at C‑2equal mixture
    Typical enantiomeric excess≥99.0 %95–98 % (limited lots)0 %
    Primary synthetic useAPI intermediate requiring specific chiralityControl substance or metabolite synthesisPre‑cursors for chiral resolution
    Pharmacological profile (receptor X)Full agonist, EC50 in nanomolar rangeAntagonist, IC501–5 µMPartial agonist; right‑shifted dose‑response curve
    Regulatory impactChiral impurity limit defined per ICH Q3AMust be controlled as process impurityNot a single impurity; unacceptable at late‑stage
    Solubility in TBME at 25 °C0.8 mg/mL0.7 mg/mL0.75 mg/mL

    Activity data compiled from structural analogues in published literature; direct receptor profiling for this compound has not been disclosed, but the trend mirrors that reported for closely related 2‑(3‑substituted‑5‑fluorophenyl)pyrrolidines.

    The difluoromethoxy substituent itself contributes additional points of differentiation when compared with common alternatives. Its Hansch π value of +0.58 positions it between methoxy (π = ‑0.02) and trifluoromethoxy (π ≈ +1.0), delivering a moderate increase in lipophilicity that can improve passive membrane permeability without compromising aqueous solubility to the extent seen with CF3O groups. Equally significant is the hydrogen‑bond donor capacity of the OCF2H proton, which has been crystallographically verified in protein‑ligand complexes as a surrogate for the hydroxyl group of tyrosine or the backbone NH of glycine. This property is absent in the OCF3 analogue and renders the (R)‑enantiomer particularly attractive for structure‑based drug design where a direct polar interaction with a backbone carbonyl is desired. Furthermore, the C–F bond on the 5‑position not only contributes to metabolic shielding of the aromatic ring against cytochrome P450 oxidation but also serves as an orthogonal 19F NMR handle, enabling simple monitoring of reaction progress and purity in process analytical technology (PAT) applications. As a result, the (R)‑2‑(3‑(difluoromethoxy)‑5‑fluorophenyl)pyrrolidine hydrochloride occupies a distinct niche among chiral 2‑arylpyrrolidine salts, being neither a simple lipophilic scaffold nor a polar hydrogen‑bond‑mimic, but a carefully balanced multifunctional intermediate that addresses the demands of modern CNS and oncology medicinal chemistry.