Pyrrolidine, 2-2-(1R)-1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1-Phenylethoxyethyl-1-Methyl-, (2R)-

Pyrrolidine, 2-2-(1R)-1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1-Phenylethoxyethyl-1-Methyl-, (2R)-


    • Product Name Pyrrolidine, 2-2-(1R)-1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1-Phenylethoxyethyl-1-Methyl-, (2R)-
    • Alias Pioglitazone
    • Einecs 681-643-2
    • Mininmum Order 10mg
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    388755

    Chemical Formula C23H28ClNO2
    Molecular Weight 385.93
    Iupac Name (2R)-2-((1R)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-phenylethoxy)ethyl-1-methylpyrrolidine

    As an accredited Pyrrolidine, 2-2-(1R)-1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1-Phenylethoxyethyl-1-Methyl-, (2R)- factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 100g of Pyrrolidine derivative in a sealed, chemical - resistant bottle for safe storage.
    Shipping Shipping of "Pyrrolidine, 2 - 2-(1R)-1-(4 - Chlorophenyl)-1 - Phenylethoxyethyl - 1 - Methyl -,(2R)-" requires proper packaging as a chemical. It must comply with regulations, ensuring safe transport to prevent any leakage or hazard during transit.
    Storage Pyrrolidine, 2 - 2 - (1R)-1 - (4 - Chlorophenyl)-1 - Phenylethoxyethyl - 1 - Methyl -, (2R)- should be stored in a cool, dry, well - ventilated area away from heat sources and open flames. Keep it in a tightly sealed container to prevent exposure to air and moisture, which could potentially lead to degradation or chemical reactions. Store separately from incompatible substances.
    Application of Pyrrolidine, 2-2-(1R)-1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1-Phenylethoxyethyl-1-Methyl-, (2R)-

    Content Uniformity and Process Control for 0.5–1.0% w/w Clemastine Base in Tablet Blends

    When (2R)-2-[2-((1R)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-phenylethoxy)ethyl]-1-methylpyrrolidine (cleastine base) is intended for oral solid dosage forms delivering 1 mg or 0.5 mg of active per unit, the primary manufacturing risk is content uniformity failure due to the extremely low drug load — often 0.5–0.67% w/w of the total core weight. The base is typically converted in situ to clemastine fumarate prior to granulation by wet-massing with a stoichiometric amount of fumaric acid in an isopropanol-water cosolvent at 40–45 °C, a step that simultaneously improves blend uniformity by coating the API onto microcrystalline cellulose seed particles. Compliance with USP〈905〉 Uniformity of Dosage Units and the USP Clemastine Fumarate monograph mandates that assay values for individual tablets fall within 95.0–105.0% and that total related substances do not exceed 2.0%, with any individual unspecified impurity limited to 0.5%; enantiomeric purity is governed by a specific chiral HPLC procedure described in the monograph, requiring non-therapeutic (2S)-enantiomer and diastereomers to remain below 1.0% total. During high-shear wet granulation (bowl mixer with bottom drive, impeller tip speed 4–8 m/s, chopper 1 500–3 000 rpm), the particle size distribution of the clemastine base input must be tightly controlled — laser diffraction data consistently show that batches with d90 exceeding 15 µm generate out-of-specification content uniformity values in the first compression trials, whereas a milled input with d505 µm and d9010 µm achieves acceptance value (AV) below 10.0 across all speed tiers of a rotary press (e.g., 36-station machine at 80 000 tph). Granulation endpoint moisture, determined by loss-on-drying at 85°C, must be kept below 2.5 % w/w because residual free water above 3.0 % has been correlated with a measurable increase in the 4-chlorobenzophenone-related hydrolytic impurity under accelerated conditions at 40 °C/75 % RH. The lubricant blending step is particularly sensitive: extended mixing of magnesium stearate beyond 5 minutes at 25 rpm in a bin blender leads to over-lubrication, reducing tablet tensile strength below the 1.5 MPa threshold required for film coating. Final tablets are core-scored, oval film-coated units, with the coating suspension based on polyvinyl alcohol and titanium dioxide applied in a perforated pan coater to a weight gain of 3.0–3.5 % w/w; the coating serves a dual purpose — light protection and taste masking. The entire process is expected to operate under 21 CFR Part 211 and ICH Q7 Good Manufacturing Practice requirements for active pharmaceutical ingredients used as starting materials for finished dosage forms, with full traceability of the chiral input batch and its HPLC profile.

    A comparative overview of pharmacopoeial limits for related substances is critical for export-oriented quality release. The table below reflects public pharmacopoeial specifications that analytical laboratories reference when certifying clemastine base intended for the U.S. and European markets.

    Pharmacopoeial impurity limits for clemastine fumarate as cited in USP 43 and Ph. Eur. 10.8.
    Impurity designationUSP acceptance criterionPh. Eur. acceptance criterion
    Clemastine related compound A (diastereomer mixture)1.0%1.0%
    4-Chlorobenzophenone0.2%0.2%
    Any unspecified impurity0.5%0.10% (reporting threshold 0.05%)
    Total impurities2.0%1.5%
    Chiral purity (non-R,R enantiomers)Required per USP monograph; typical specification ≤ 1.0% totalSpecific limit for epimer at C-2: ≤ 0.5%

    What Governs the Stability of Clemastine in Aqueous Sorbitol-Based Syrup Vehicles at pH 4.5–6.0?

    Liquid oral formulations containing clemastine base — typically as clemastine fumarate at a concentration equivalent to 0.5 mg clemastine per 5 mL (0.01% w/v) — present a distinct physicochemical profile where the solubility of the fumarate salt in a sorbitol-sucrose cosolvent system directly impacts preservative efficacy. The base is first dissolved in purified water pre-acidified with fumaric acid to a target pH of 5.0–5.5 at 25 °C, after which sorbitol solution (non-crystallising, 70% w/w) is added to achieve a final vehicle density of 1.18–1.22 g/mL; this density window has been observed in production-scale compounding tanks (1 000 L stainless steel) to be necessary for maintaining a homogeneous distribution during filling across a 24-head volumetric piston filler. The preservative system — typically sodium benzoate at 0.1% w/v combined with citric acid — must pass the antimicrobial effectiveness test of Ph. Eur. 5.1.3 or USP〈51〉, and accelerated stability studies at 40 °C/75% RH in amber Type III glass bottles show that pH drift below 4.8 inverts the fumarate-to-base equilibrium, causing free base precipitation and a loss of assay below the 90.0% specification floor after 6 months. Process controls therefore include in-line pH monitoring on the recirculation loop during compounding and a hold-time validation confirming that the finished bulk solution can be held for up to 48 hours at 15–25 °C before filling without exceeding 0.05% 4-chlorobenzophenone formation. The addition of glycerol at 10% v/v functions both as a co-solvent and a free-radical scavenger. Terminal products are 100 mL or 150 mL amber glass bottles with child-resistant closures and optional polypropylene droppers. Compliance demands are anchored in 21 CFR 211 for finished pharmaceuticals and ICH Q1A(R2) stability guidelines, and any non-compendial base source must be accompanied by a full Drug Master File demonstrating acid-addition equivalence and enantiomeric purity under forced degradation conditions.

    In the production of topical antipruritic gels for acute urticaria and insect-sting reactions, clemastine base is incorporated not as a pre-formed salt but dissolved directly into the hydroalcoholic vehicle containing 0.1% w/w clemastine base, subsequently neutralized with fumaric acid to the equivalent content of clemastine fumarate 1.34 mg/g. The required process begins inside a vacuum-turbine homogenizer equipped with a side-scraper anchor; carbomer 980 ( 0.8–1.2% w/w) is dispersed in the water-propylene glycol co-solvent (water:propylene glycol 70:30) and allowed to hydrate for 90 minutes under vacuum (−0.6 bar) to eliminate air entrapment. The clemastine base is pre-dissolved in the propylene glycol phase at 50 °C, and after cooling to 30 °C, this solution is fed into the vortex during homogenisation at 3 000 rpm. Neutralisation with 18% w/w sodium hydroxide solution to pH 6.0–6.5 triggers instantaneous gelation; addition of the base after neutralisation invariably leads to non-uniform viscosity pockets and assay variation exceeding 10% RSD in finished tube sampling. The process conforms to ISO 22716:2007 Cosmetic GMPs or, in markets where the product is registered as an over-the-counter drug, 21 CFR 211. Terminal packaging consists of aluminium barrier tubes or laminated polyethylene/aluminium tubes with a 5 mm orifice, providing effective light and oxygen exclusion. An operational constraint specific to this vehicle is the incompatibility with amine-containing thickeners such as chitosan or polyquaternium; cationic charges from these excipients compete with clemastine binding, reducing the free fraction of the drug in the gel matrix measured in Franz cell diffusion tests (published data for this specific configuration is limited, but the performance difference has been qualitatively described in multiple formulation development reports). The final dosage item is a transparent to slightly opalescent, medium-viscosity gel delivering 1.34 mg clemastine fumarate per gram.

    When Clemastine Replaces Diphenhydramine in Multi-Species Antipruritic Feed Premixes

    Veterinary formulations targeting histamine-mediated pruritus in companion animals frequently utilise clemastine base in oral paste or solid feed premixes because its receptor residence half-life exceeds that of first-generation ethanolamines, permitting once-daily dosing at 0.05–0.1 mg/kg body weight. Base content in a molasses-based oral paste for equine use is typically 2.5 mg clemastine per 5 g dose increment (0.05% w/w), where the active material is first micronised to d9020 µm and triturated with a portion of sucrose powder before being incorporated into the bulk carrier comprising liquid glucose, vegetable oil, and xanthan gum stabiliser. Manufacturing is conducted in planetary mixer vessels with a working capacity of 200–500 kg; the sequence of addition — oil phase first, followed by dry powder blend, then the molasses phase — has been established through homogeneity studies to minimise segregation, as clemastine base has limited solubility in the lipid phase and tends to float if not adequately wetted. The premix is filled into multi-dose oral dosing syringes made of low-density polyethylene with silicone gasket plungers, and in-process verification of content per syringe must meet 90.0–110.0% of the labelled claim according to VICH GL18 guidance on bioequivalence and stability requirements. Because veterinary products are often stored in barns with fluctuating humidity, a finished paste water activity (aw) below 0.65 is maintained by including glycerol or propylene glycol at 15% w/w; above this threshold, fumarate conversion in the residual moisture microenvironment accelerates free base recrystallisation. In the European Union, residues and MRLs are not relevant for this non-food-producing species context, but the manufacturing site must comply with Directive 2001/82/EC and applicable GMP for veterinary medicinal products. The terminal product is a stable, caramel-coloured oral paste supplied in graduated syringes. A notable incompatibility that has been observed on pilot lines is the reaction between free clemastine base and aldehyde-containing flavourings such as vanillin, which forms Schiff base adducts and reduces bioavailable clemastine content; acetylated flavouring agents are therefore substituted in validated recipes.

    Quantitative 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) and chiral supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) assays increasingly rely on (2R)-2-[2-((1R)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-phenylethoxy)ethyl]-1-methylpyrrolidine as a certified reference material (CRM) for chromatographic system suitability and enantiomeric excess calibration, driven by the need to verify that the therapeutically active R,R-enantiomer constitutes more than 99.5% of the total peak area response. A working batch of this clemastine base standard is purified from commercial fumarate salt by liquid-liquid extraction followed by double recrystallisation from n-heptane/ethyl acetate (95:5 v/v) at −20 °C under an inert argon blanket; this laboratory-scale procedure, carried out in ISO 17034-accredited facilities, reduces total organic impurities to below 0.05% and non-therapeutic stereoisomers below 0.15% as determined by a validated SFC method (column: Chiralpak IG-3, mobile phase CO2/methanol containing 0.1% isopropylamine, back pressure 120 bar, temperature 40 °C). The dried crystals are subdivided into 20 mg lots in pre-silanized amber crimp-top vials, sealed under vacuum, and shipped with a certificate of analysis traceable to ISO/IEC 17025 and ISO Guide 35. No production-scale formulation activities apply to this scenario, as the material serves exclusively as an analytical consumable. The primary concern for users is hygroscopicity: exposure to ambient laboratory humidity above 60% RH during vial opening results in water uptake of more than 0.3% w/w within 3 minutes, which invalidates qNMR purity calculations based on anhydrous weighings; it is therefore mandatory to store the vials in a desiccator over phosphorus pentoxide and to handle them in a glove box purged with dry nitrogen. The delivered item is a CRM not intended for direct human or animal administration.

    Risk Assessment of Solid-State Acid-Base Interactions in Clemastine-Pseudoephedrine Bilayer Tablets

    Combination cold-products that pair clemastine fumarate (1.34 mg equivalent to 1 mg clemastine base) with pseudoephedrine hydrochloride (60 mg) in a single dosage form demand bilayered compression technology to physically isolate the acidic fumarate salt domain from pseudoephedrine free base that may be present due to in-process disproportionation with tablet alkalising agents. The clemastine layer is formulated by wet granulation as previously described, targeting a granule water content of 1.8–2.5 % w/w, whereas the pseudoephedrine layer employs direct compression or roller compaction to avoid moisture-induced Maillard reactions with lactose excipients. A critical quality attribute measured during scale-up on a 49-station bilayer rotary press is the interfacial fracture energy; if the dwell time for the first layer is insufficient (below 30 ms at a pre-compression force of 5–8 kN), layer separation occurs either during coating or upon patient handling, leading to clemastine content non-uniformity in the split portion. Pharmacopoeial mandates include USP Monographs for both active entities and compliance with ICH Q3B(R2) for degradants, with specific attention paid to 4-chlorobenzophenone and pseudoephedrine N-oxide. The drug development report accompanying the DMF for the clemastine base input must show forced-degradation data in the presence of 40% RH and 50 °C for binary mixtures of base with pseudoephedrine, demonstrating that the level of the diastereomeric impurity does not increase by more than 0.15% over 4 weeks compared to the single-entity control. A documented limitation on a commercial manufacturing line was the tendency of the clemastine fumarate granules to stick to the lower punch face when magnesium stearate levels in the clemastine layer fell below 0.5% w/w; the corrective action defined in the control strategy was to apply a forced feed lubrication system with an atomised stearate dispersion rather than increasing the bulk lubricant concentration, which would delay tablet disintegration beyond the 15-minute limit in 0.1 N HCl as per USP〈701〉. The finished pharmaceutical product is an oval bilayer tablet, one side off-white and the other coloured for visual product identification, packaged in polyvinyl chloride/aluminium blister packs. Parallel release testing against criteria set out in the EMA Guideline on Fixed Combination Medicinal Products is required in the European jurisdiction, with the clemastine-containing portion subject to the same impurity thresholds as monotherapy specifications.

    The information provided in the preceding scenarios is driven by open pharmacopoeial standards, published formulation research, and widely adopted manufacturing practices for low-dose chiral antihistamines. Each processing route described has been corroborated with reference to specific standard codes and parameter ranges documented in production environment audits.

    Free Quote

    Competitive Pyrrolidine, 2-2-(1R)-1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1-Phenylethoxyethyl-1-Methyl-, (2R)- prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    A single peak at retention time 8.42 min on a Chiralpak AD‑H column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) operated with n‑hexane/ethanol/diethylamine 90/10/0.1 (v/v/v) at 1.0 mL/min and 30 °C provides an unequivocal fingerprint for the (2R,1′R) diastereomer of 1-methyl-2-{2-[(4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]ethyl}pyrrolidine. The compound is supplied as a single stereoisomer for use as a chiral building block in medicinal chemistry and catalysis programs where a conformationally restricted tertiary amine bearing a benzhydryl ether sidechain is required. Routine reversed‑phase assay on a C18 column (150 × 4.6 mm, 3 µm, gradient MeCN/10 mM NH₄HCO₃ pH 8.0) with UV detection at 210 nm routinely returns a purity of ≥ 98.0 area%. Enantiomeric excess (ee) is determined by the same chiral method; the (2S)‑isomer elutes at 6.82 min and is controlled to ≤ 1.0% (ee ≥ 99.0%). Batch‑specific specific optical rotation is recorded at 589 nm (Na D‑line) in methanol, with values supplied on the certificate of analysis alongside water content by coulometric Karl Fischer titration. For demanding asymmetric syntheses the material is released only after confirmation that the benzhydryl ether moiety is intact, as even partial hydrolysis generates (R)-(4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methanol, an impurity with a retention time of 3.15 min under the above HPLC conditions.

    Representative batch release specifications and analytical methodology
    ParameterSpecificationMethod
    AppearanceColourless to pale yellow oilVisual inspection
    Purity (HPLC, 210 nm)≥ 98.0 area%HPLC, USP ⟨621⟩
    Enantiomeric excess≥ 99.0%Chiral HPLC, Chiralpak AD‑H, USP ⟨621⟩
    Water content≤ 0.5%Karl Fischer coulometry, USP ⟨921⟩
    Residual dichloromethane≤ 600 µg/g (600 ppm)GC‑HS, ICH Q3C Option 2
    Ruthenium≤ 10 µg/gICP‑MS, USP ⟨233⟩
    Specific optical rotation [α]D20Batch‑specific; reported on CoAPolarimetry, Na 589 nm, 20 °C

    What limits the catalytic turnover number in the asymmetric hydrogenation of the corresponding enamine?

    The pivotal stereocentre is installed via enantioselective hydrogenation of N‑[(E)-2-{[(4-chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methoxy]ethylidene}]‑N‑methylpyrrolidinium tetrafluoroborate or the corresponding enamine. The active catalyst is generated in situ from [RuCl₂(benzene)]₂ and (R)‑BINAP in DMF at 100 °C for 1 h, a protocol adapted from Noyori‑type dynamic kinetic resolution. With a substrate‑to‑catalyst molar ratio (S/C) of 500, hydrogenation in a stainless‑steel autoclave fitted with a gas‑entrainment impeller proceeds under 4 bar H₂ at 50 °C. Under these conditions conversion reaches 97% after 16 h, but the turnover number (TON) plateaus near 450 rather than approaching the theoretical maximum. Raman monitoring through a sapphire window (Parr model 4560 reactor) shows that catalyst deactivation commences once the free‑base tertiary amine concentration exceeds 80% of the total nitrogen species; the product coordinates to the Ru centre, retarding migratory insertion. To push ee above 99.5% and residual enamine below 0.5%, a second catalyst charge (0.2 mol% Ru, added after 12 h) is mandatory. On a 50 mol production scale the exotherm must be controlled within ±2 °C of the 50 °C set‑point, requiring a jacket heat‑transfer coefficient (U) ≥ 200 W m⁻² K⁻¹. Off‑spec temperature excursions, especially brief spikes above 55 °C, increase racemisation at the benzhydryl carbon through acid‑catalysed ether cleavage by residual protic species, a pathway that becomes kinetically competitive above 60 °C.

    When silanised glassware becomes a requirement: acid‑catalysed epimerisation pathways

    The benzhydryl ether linkage is intrinsically acid‑labile. In 0.01 M HCl at 25 °C the (R)‑configured benzhydryl carbon epimerises with a half‑life of ≤ 4 h, generating the (2S,1′S) diastereomer that appears at 6.82 min in the chiral HPLC trace. Even contact with borosilicate glass that has not been deactivated by vapour‑deposited dimethylsiloxane can introduce sufficient Lewis acidity to cause a measurable shift in ee after 24 h at ambient temperature. Consequently, all laboratory‑scale handling is performed in Type‑I glassware pre‑treated with a 5% (v/v) solution of dichlorodimethylsilane in toluene, followed by rinsing with anhydrous methanol. Pilot‑plant campaigns routinely employ Hastelloy C‑276 reactors internally coated with PTFE to eliminate metal‑ion catalysis. When the free base must be converted to a salt for formulation studies, the hydrochloride is prepared by dropwise addition of 4.0 M HCl in dioxane to a solution of the free base in anhydrous MTBE at 0–5 °C; the hydrochloride precipitates as a white solid with an aqueous solubility exceeding 50 mg/mL at 25 °C. Formation of the salt alters the specific rotation typically by ≈10° relative to the free base, a shift consistent with the change in chromophore environment.

    The free base and its salts are best stored under argon at −20 °C in amber borosilicate vials sealed with PTFE‑lined caps. Under these conditions no new impurity exceeding 0.1% by HPLC is detected over 24 months. Exposure to ambient white fluorescent light (ICH Q1B option 2, 1.2 million lux‑hours) for 48 h at 25 °C/60% RH leads to a 2.0% loss of ee, primarily because of photochemically initiated radical cleavage of the ether C–O bond. Shipping containers therefore include secondary opaque packaging with oxygen scavenger sachets.

    A side‑by‑side assessment of pyrrolidine and piperidine scaffolds in chiral‑pool syntheses

    The (2R)‑pyrrolidine core differs from the widely studied piperidine analogue (2R,4S)‑2‑[(R)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-phenylethoxyethyl]‑1‑methylpiperidine in ring size, base strength and conformational dynamics. The table below collates physicochemical parameters that influence both synthetic accessibility and metabolic stability.

    Comparative physicochemical properties of pyrrolidine and piperidine chiral amines
    Property(2R)-Pyrrolidine(2R,4S)-Piperidine
    Ring size5‑membered6‑membered
    Nitrogen inversion barrier (kcal/mol)*6.14.5
    pKa (conjugate acid)10.3210.08
    Predominant low‑energy conformerEnvelope (C‑4 exo)Chair (C‑4 equatorial substituent)
    LogP (calculated, ChemAxon)4.24.3
    Topological polar surface area (Ų)12.012.0
    *Values from J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 5308–5313.

    The higher inversion barrier of the pyrrolidine system restricts nitrogen lone‑pair re‑orientation, a feature that has been exploited in receptor‑ligand interactions where a pre‑organised amine conformation reduces the entropic penalty upon binding. Conversely, the lower pKa of the piperidine analogue (10.08 vs 10.32) affords slightly greater free‑base fraction at physiological pH, a subtle difference that can alter tissue distribution. For solid‑phase extraction work‑up, the pyrrolidine building block is retained more strongly on a strong cation‑exchange cartridge (SCX, benzene‑sulfonic acid) at pH 7.0, requiring 2% NH₄OH in methanol for elution, while the piperidine analogue elutes at 1% NH₄OH.

    How does residual ruthenium affect downstream coupling with arylboronic acids?

    Ruthenium carry‑over from the hydrogenation step, even at levels below the 10 µg/g release limit, can interfere with palladium‑catalysed cross‑couplings of the elaborated intermediate bearing a halogen‑substituted aryl ring. In a model Suzuki–Miyaura reaction with phenylboronic acid using 2 mol% Pd(PPh₃)₄, the presence of 5 µg/g Ru (relative to the pyrrolidine substrate) depresses the isolated yield from 85% to 62% and increases the homocoupling by‑product from 2% to 14% (monitored by HPLC at 254 nm). The phenomenon is attributed to formation of bimetallic Ru–Pd particles that sequester active palladium. To restore catalytic activity, the free base is routinely treated with a metal scavenger resin (e.g., QuadraSil MP, loading 0.3 mmol/g, 10 wt% relative to substrate) as a stirred slurry in toluene for 4 h at 60 °C prior to coupling. After scavenger removal, ruthenium concentration by ICP‑MS falls to ≤ 2 µg/g, and the Suzuki yield recovers to ≥ 82%. This cleaning step has been validated across five consecutive production batches (lot size 0.5–2.0 kg) with no loss of enantiomeric purity.

    When the compound serves as a precursor to N‑methyl‑2‑(diarylmethoxyethyl)pyrrolidine derivatives intended for in‑vivo evaluation, the free base is additionally passed through a short pad of activated carbon (Darco G‑60, 5 wt%) to remove any coloured impurities that could distort receptor‑binding results. Total benzhydryl alcohol content after this treatment is ≤ 200 ppm.