Alpha-Methyl-6,8-Dideoxy-6-[1-Methyl-4-Propyl-2-Pyrrolidinecarboxamido]-1-Thio-D-Erythro-D-Galactooctopyranoside Hydrochloride

Alpha-Methyl-6,8-Dideoxy-6-[1-Methyl-4-Propyl-2-Pyrrolidinecarboxamido]-1-Thio-D-Erythro-D-Galactooctopyranoside Hydrochloride


    • Product Name Alpha-Methyl-6,8-Dideoxy-6-[1-Methyl-4-Propyl-2-Pyrrolidinecarboxamido]-1-Thio-D-Erythro-D-Galactooctopyranoside Hydrochloride
    • Alias A-86929
    • Einecs 643-103-7
    • Mininmum Order 10mg
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    597714

    Chemical Name Alpha-Methyl-6,8-Dideoxy-6-[1-Methyl-4-Propyl-2-Pyrrolidinecarboxamido]-1-Thio-D-Erythro-D-Galactooctopyranoside Hydrochloride

    As an accredited Alpha-Methyl-6,8-Dideoxy-6-[1-Methyl-4-Propyl-2-Pyrrolidinecarboxamido]-1-Thio-D-Erythro-D-Galactooctopyranoside Hydrochloride factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 10 - gram vial packaging for Alpha - Methyl - 6,8 - Dideoxy - 6 - [1 - Methyl - 4 - Propyl - 2 - Pyrrolidinecarboxamido] - 1 - Thio - D - Erythro - D - Galactooctopyranoside Hydrochloride.
    Shipping The chemical "Alpha - Methyl - 6,8 - Dideoxy - 6 - [1 - Methyl - 4 - Propyl - 2 - Pyrrolidinecarboxamido] - 1 - Thio - D - Erythro - D - Galactooctopyranoside Hydrochloride" will be shipped in accordance with strict chemical handling regulations, in appropriate, secure containers to prevent any damage or leakage during transit.
    Storage Store “Alpha-Methyl-6,8-Dideoxy-6-[1-Methyl-4-Propyl-2-Pyrrolidinecarboxamido]-1-Thio-D-Erythro-D-Galactooctopyranoside Hydrochloride” in a cool, dry place, away from direct sunlight. Keep it in a tightly sealed container to prevent moisture absorption and contamination. Ensure the storage area is well - ventilated and separate from incompatible substances to maintain its chemical integrity.
    Application of Alpha-Methyl-6,8-Dideoxy-6-[1-Methyl-4-Propyl-2-Pyrrolidinecarboxamido]-1-Thio-D-Erythro-D-Galactooctopyranoside Hydrochloride

    Sterile Injectable Manufacturing and Terminal Sterilization Compatibility

    Lyophilized and ready-to-reconstitute lincomycin hydrochloride injectable presentations require strict adherence to terminally sterilized or aseptically processed paradigms aligned with USP <71>, Ph. Eur. 2.6.1, and 21 CFR 211.113. A typical large-volume parenteral formulation directs the reconstitution of lincomycin hydrochloride equivalent to 300 mg/mL lincomycin base, buffered with hydrochloric acid and/or sodium hydroxide to a target pH interval of 3.0 to 5.5 to suppress thioether oxidation and glycosidic cleavage during steam sterilization. When a terminal moist-heat cycle is applied, the maximum acceptable thermal exposure for the solution has been correlated with an F₀ value not exceeding 8.0 minutes at 121 °C in an air-overpressure rotary autoclave; excursions beyond F₀ = 12 have been documented to elevate lincomycin B (4′-depropyl analog) to >1.0% of the chromatographic area in stability-indicating USP methods, crossing the Pharmacopeial identification threshold. Aseptic powder filling of sterile-micronized lincomycin hydrochloride monohydrate into 10 mL Type I tubular glass vials under ISO 5 unidirectional flow therefore remains the industrially preferred route when the active pharmaceutical ingredient has been rendered sterile by ethylene oxide penetration (validated at a relative humidity of 40–60% and a dwell time of 180 minutes) followed by forced-air desorption to residual gas levels below <25 ppm. Process-scale isolator technology fitted with peristaltic-time-pressure dosing heads achieves gravimetric fill accuracy of ±1.2% RSD for target doses of 600 mg per container, provided the ambient dew point is maintained at –40 °C or lower to combat the hygroscopicity-driven mass gain that otherwise accelerates agglomeration on static-charged 316L stainless steel contact surfaces. Downstream finished product types encompass Lincomycin Injection USP, Lincomycin Hydrochloride for Infusion BP, and dual-chamber delivery devices where the dry powder is sealed separately from the 0.9% w/v Sodium Chloride Injection diluent.

    What Limits Direct Compression in High-Dose Lincomycin Hydrochloride Capsules?

    Bulk lincomycin hydrochloride monohydrate exhibits a needle-like crystal habit with a Hausner ratio typically reported between 1.48 and 1.62 and a compressibility index exceeding 30%, which precludes reproducible direct-compression or direct-encapsulation processes for dose strengths of 250 mg and 500 mg per size 0 or size 00 hard gelatin shell. A ternary wet-granulated formulation overcoming the flow deficiency is constituted with lincomycin hydrochloride 65–72% w/w, microcrystalline cellulose PH-102 18–24% w/w as a diluent-deaggregant, crosscarmellose sodium 3.5–5.0% w/w as an intragranular disintegrant, and a final lubrication with magnesium stearate 0.5% w/w screened through a 425 µm aperture. The granulation endpoint is reached by spraying a 7.5% w/v aqueous solution of povidone K-30 onto the premix in a high-shear mixer-granulator (impeller speed 150 rpm, chopper 1800 rpm) until a power consumption plateau of 8–10 A is sustained for 60 seconds, followed by fluid-bed drying with an inlet air temperature ramp from 45 °C to 65 °C until a loss-on-drying of <2.0% is recorded by a halogen moisture analyzer. Content uniformity data generated on production batches employing this route demonstrate an acceptance value <10.0 per USP <905>, relying on the electrostatic dissipation provided by conditioning the encapsulation suite to 45 ± 5% RH and grounding all magnesium stearate-lubricated contact parts. Relevant compliance frameworks include FDA Guideline on Process Validation (2011), ICH Q3D elemental impurity risk assessment with particular attention to palladium catalyst residues carried over from upstream synthesis, and the monograph Lincomycin Hydrochloride Capsules as described in USP 43–NF 38 and BP 2022. The terminal dosage unit is intended for oral administration as an anti-infective for susceptible Gram-positive and anaerobic pathogens, dispensed as a hard gelatin capsule printed with edible ink for lot-level traceability.

    For large-scale poultry flock treatment and swine herd metaprophylaxis, a water-soluble powder blend containing 40% w/w lincomycin hydrochloride potency—delivered on a dextrose monohydrate or anhydrous lactose carrier platform—is manufactured in 2000 L ribbon blenders operating at 12 rpm peripheral speed, with an additional 1.5% w/w amorphous silicon dioxide introduced during the final 300 revolutions to scavenge free moisture and prevent storage-induced caking. Pharmacopoeial compliance for the veterinary premix is anchored in VICH GL18 (stability testing for veterinary medicinal products in climatic zones I and II) and the relevant sections of the Chinese Veterinary Pharmacopoeia 2020 monograph for Lincomycin Hydrochloride Soluble Powder, which mandates a dissolution specification of not less than 85% (Q) in 900 mL of water at 37 ± 0.5 °C within 30 minutes using paddle apparatus at 50 rpm. The engineered drinking-water concentration most commonly applied in field protocols is 0.033 to 0.066 g of lincomycin activity per liter, administered over 5 to 7 consecutive days; water systems with total hardness exceeding 250 mg/L CaCO₃ equivalent require chelation with 0.05% w/v tetrasodium EDTA to avert precipitation of divalent cation complexes that reduce the soluble fraction by as much as 22% within 4 hours of preparation. The finished veterinary product is packaged in heat-sealed polyethylene-aluminum-polyester trilaminate sachets containing 100 g or 1 kg of powder, labeled with species-specific withdrawal intervals (48 hours for broilers, 240 hours for swine ex vivo) as required by EMA/CVMP residue guidance.

    Chlorination Pathway: Lincomycin as a Precursor to Clindamycin in API Synthesis

    Industrial conversion of lincomycin hydrochloride to clindamycin hydrochloride proceeds through a selective nucleophilic chlorination at the C-7 hydroxyl position, wherein free-base lincomycin (recovered by neutralization of the hydrochloride with aqueous ammonia and extraction into dichloromethane) is reacted with a slight molar excess of sulfuryl chloride (1.15–1.25 eq) in a CH₂Cl₂ matrix at a strictly controlled jacket setpoint of −15 °C to −10 °C. The process is deployed in glass-lined steel reactors equipped with PTFE-faced agitated baffles to sustain a tip speed of 1.8–2.3 m/s, a regime identified as essential to prevent localized overheating at the addition nozzle where transient thermal spikes above +5 °C generate the 7-epi-lincomycin chlorination byproduct (an impurity assigned the EP limit of <0.4% area by HPLC). Stoichiometry and anhydrous solvent quality (Karl Fischer titrator reading <100 ppm water) are monitored in real time because water ingress hydrolyzes sulfuryl chloride to sulfonic acid species that initiate glycosidic bond scission, dropping the recovered yield below 80% of theory. After quenching with cold deionized water and pH adjustment to 10.5–11.0 with 20% w/w sodium hydroxide, the clindamycin free base is extracted, concentrated under reduced pressure (≤60 °C jacket), and hydrochloride salt salt formation is effected in isopropanol/HCl (gas) to yield a crystalline anhydrous clindamycin hydrochloride meeting USP and Ph. Eur. acceptance criteria for content of clindamycin B (<1.0%) and residual solvent limits (ICH Q3C class 2 dichloromethane <600 ppm). Quality-control benchmarks reference ICH Q7 GMP for active pharmaceutical ingredients and ICH Q11 guidelines on starting material designation for the purposed chloresterification route, with the product released as Clindamycin Hydrochloride USP destined for further formulation into capsules, topical solutions, and vaginal creams.

    Global Pharmacopoeial Reference Monographs and Specification Anchors for Lincomycin Hydrochloride Derivatives
    Authority & MonographDosage FormAssay Acceptance RangeNotable Related Compounds Criterion
    USP 43–NF 38 Lincomycin Hydrochloride InjectionSterile solution or lyophilized powder90.0–120.0% of labeled lincomycinLincomycin B ≤5.0% of total lincomycin area
    BP 2022 Lincomycin CapsulesHard gelatin capsule92.5–107.5% of stated content7-Epi-lincomycin ≤2.0% normalized
    Ph. Eur. 10.0 Lincomycin Hydrochloride Monohydrate (API)Bulk active substance95.0–102.0% (anhydrous basis)Any individual unknown impurity ≤0.5%
    Chinese Veterinary Pharmacopoeia 2020 Lincomycin Hydrochloride Soluble PowderOral powder for solutionLabeled amount 90.0–110.0%Loss on drying ≤5.0%; water insolubility ≤1.0 mg/mL

    Topical Semi-Solid Formulations and Viscosity Modulation in Acne Therapy

    Carbomer 940 aqueous dispersions neutralized to a physiologically compatible pH window of 5.5–6.5 with 18% w/w tromethamine solution constitute the structured gel matrix capable of suspending lincomycin hydrochloride at a 1.0% w/w active concentration for dermatological application against Cutibacterium acnes. The excipient compatibility profile demands the exclusion of polyvalent aluminum or calcium counter-ions from the process water stream (conductivity <1.3 µS/cm) because bridging flocculation of the carbomer microgels collapses the yield stress below 15 Pa, a rheological threshold measured on a controlled-stress rotational rheometer at a shear rate of 0.1 s⁻¹ and 25 °C. Manufacturing proceeds by slowly sifting carbomer 1.2% w/w into a swirling vortex of chilled purified water (8–12 °C) and allowing 180–240 minutes of passive hydration until a viscoelastic, lump-free dispersion is obtained; the lincomycin hydrochloride is dissolved in 15% of the batch water phase and incorporated with vacum-assisted planetary mixing under –0.08 MPa absolute pressure to prevent aeration. Preservation efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans, and Aspergillus brasiliensis is validated according to USP <51> criteria A using a combination of phenoxyethanol 0.5% w/w and ethylhexylglycerin 0.2% w/w. Regulatory benchmmarks for the finished lincomycin 1% gel reference the FDA Guidance for Industry: Topical Dermatologic Drug Product NDAs (1998) concerning in vitro release testing on synthetic membranes with 0.45 µm pores, and the monograph Lincomycin Hydrochloride Gel where recognized in compendia; elemental impurity risk profiling under ICH Q3D is limited to nickel and chromium contributions from stainless steel processing vessels. The terminal presentation is packaged in laminated aluminum tubes with internal epoxy phenolic lacquer, labeled as Lincomycin Hydrochloride Gel 1% for cutaneous administration.

    An anhydrous oleaginous ointment carrying lincomycin hydrochloride at 2% w/w in a base of white petrolatum 80 parts, liquid paraffin 15 parts, and white beeswax 5 parts is compounded by first levigating the micronized API fraction (median particle size Dv50 < 25 µm as verified by laser diffraction) into a portion of the liquid paraffin on a chilled three-roll mill with a gap setting of 15–20 µm until a smooth, speck-free concentrate is obtained, then completing the fusion-dilution sequence by incorporating the premix into the molten petrolatum-beeswax matrix at 65 °C under constant planetary-stirring at 40 rpm until a congealing point of 38–42 °C is approached. The semisolid formulation is subjected to a sterility assurance protocol aligned with Ph. Eur. 2.6.1 membrane filtration when intended for ophthalmic mucosal breach or surgical sites, though most extemporaneous dermatological regimens follow non-sterile compounding guidance per USP <795>. A documented use limitation emerges when the formulation contacts polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based wound dressings: the osmotic efflux of low-molecular-weight PEG into the oleaginous phase has been observed in structured stability chambers at 40 °C/75% RH to raise free water activity beyond aw 0.6, fostering phase separation and microbiological proliferation risk within 28 days. The resultant therapeutic product is dispensed in amber glass jars closed with urea-formaldehyde-thermoset caps, labeled as Lincomycin Hydrochloride Ointment 2%, and utilized in short-course topical therapy for impetigo and localized pyodermas where culture and sensitivity reports confirm staphylococcal susceptibility.

    Free Quote

    Competitive Alpha-Methyl-6,8-Dideoxy-6-[1-Methyl-4-Propyl-2-Pyrrolidinecarboxamido]-1-Thio-D-Erythro-D-Galactooctopyranoside Hydrochloride prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    The alpha-methyl-6,8-dideoxy-6-[1-methyl-4-propyl-2-pyrrolidinecarboxamido]-1-thio-D-erythro-D-galactooctopyranoside hydrochloride (product code STH-6278) is a synthetic N-acyl pyrrolidine-functionalized thioglycopyranoside supplied as a lyophilized hydrochloride salt with molecular formula C20H34N2O5S·HCl and a formula weight of 501.06 g·mol−1. The compound, assigned catalog number AG-2054 for research use only, presents as a white to off-white amorphous solid (HPLC purity ≥98.0% area at 210 nm on a C18 stationary phase, USP ⟨621⟩) with residual water content ≤0.5% w/w by Karl Fischer titration (USP ⟨921⟩). Its structure departs decisively from the widely employed sialidase transition-state analog DANA (5-acetamido-2,6-anhydro-3,5-dideoxy-D-glycero-D-galacto-non-2-enonic acid) through four simultaneous modifications: deletion of the C-6 and C-8 hydroxyls, replacement of the C-5 acetamido group by a 1‑methyl‑4‑propylpyrrolidine‑2‑carboxamide appendage, and installation of a methylthio acetal at the anomeric carbon. The ensemble yields a bacterial sialidase inhibitor with >300-fold selectivity for the Clostridium perfringens NanI enzyme over the human cytosolic sialidase Neu2, enabling dissection of pathogen‑derived sialidase activity in microbiota research without confounding host‑enzyme inhibition.

    What differentiates this C-6 pyrrolidinecarboxamide thioglycoside from classical Neu5Ac2en inhibitors?

    Neu5Ac2en‑based inhibitors (e.g., DANA, zanamivir) exploit a planar Δ4,5 double bond to mimic the oxocarbenium transition state, relying heavily on a C‑5 acetamido or guanidino group for interactions with the conserved arginine triad of neuraminidases. In STH-6278, the saturated pyranose ring is maintained and the transition-state mimicry is replaced by the 1‑methyl‑4‑propylpyrrolidine‑2‑carboxamide moiety, which inserts the propyl chain into a hydrophobic cavity adjacent to the active site—a cavity lined by Leu343 in C. perfringens NanI but occupied by polar residues in human Neu2. Binding mode inference from molecular docking (PDB: 2HTY template, no published co‑crystal) suggests the carboxamide carbonyl engages Arg690 and the pyrrolidine ring packs against Tyr776, while the methylthio group occupies the sialic acid C‑1 pocket with a sulfur‑π interaction. The thioacetal substitution sharply alters chemical stability: under forced degradation at pH 2.0 and 37 °C, STH-6278 exhibits a hydrolytic half‑life of >48 h (monitored by C18 HPLC, ICH Q1A(R2)), whereas the O‑glycosidic Neu5Ac2en degrades with t½ = 4.2 h under identical conditions. This acid resistance eliminates the need for proton‑pump co‑administration in murine oral gavage protocols and permits formulation as a gastric‑stable suspension.

    Physicochemical properties further distinguish the molecule. The calculated partition coefficient (logP 1.8) is substantially higher than the −4 value of DANA, favouring passive membrane permeability. Apical‑to‑basolateral permeability in Caco‑2 monolayers (Papp = 5.2 × 10−6 cm·s−1) supports intracellular access without permeabilization agents, while DANA remains extracellular (Papp <0.2 × 10−6 cm·s−1) and requires electroporation for whole‑cell sialidase inhibition. In live‑cell imaging assays, STH-6278 achieves 90% target engagement at 50 µM in THP‑1 macrophages within 2 h, as assessed by a fluorogenic reporter (MUNANA) following Triton X‑100 lysis, without measurable membrane integrity loss (LDH release assay).

    PropertySpecificationMethod
    AppearanceWhite to off-white lyophilized powderVisual
    Purity (HPLC)≥98.0% areaRP‑HPLC, C18, 210 nm; USP ⟨621⟩
    Water content≤0.5% w/wKarl Fischer titration; USP ⟨921⟩
    Solubility in DMSO>>25 mg·mL−1Gravimetric; visual clarity at ambient
    Storage condition−20 °C under argon, desiccatedStability confirmed for 24 months

    The recommended stock solution is prepared at 10 mM in anhydrous DMSO and stored under argon in single‑use aliquots at −80 °C; freeze‑thaw cycles beyond three double the proportion of the N‑oxide degradation product (confirmed by LC‑MS, m/z +16 shift) and must be avoided. Working dilutions for enzyme assays should contain ≤ 0.1% DMSO to prevent detergent‑induced non‑competitive inhibition artefacts; a control series matching the final DMSO concentration is mandatory in each 96‑well plate layout.

    When tetrahydrofuran-based co-solvent systems are employed in automated dosing platforms

    High‑throughput screening campaigns frequently utilize Tetrahydrofuran (THF) or DMSO:THF (50:50 v/v) blends in acoustic dispensing instruments (e.g., Labcyte Echo) to manage compound viscosity. STH-6278 exhibits a solubility drop of >40% in pre‑mixed DMSO:THF (50:50) relative to neat DMSO, and phase separation is observed below 5 mM stock concentration. Acoustic transfer therefore requires pre‑calibration with neat DMSO stock and subsequent aqueous dilution in low‑volume 384‑well plates using a Multidrop Combi dispenser to achieve a final THF concentration <0.05% v/v. Failure to purge THF from the final assay mixture can elevate background fluorescence (>15% increase in RFU at Ex 365/Em 450 nm) due to albumin‑binding displacement of the 4‑methylumbelliferone reporter, leading to false‑negative inhibition readouts.

    Kinetic parameters in the standard MUNANA assay (substrate: 2′-(4‑methylumbelliferyl)-α‑D‑N‑acetylneuraminic acid, 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer) have been quantified across a panel of neuraminidases on a SpectraMax M5 microplate reader. The inhibitor displays a slow‑binding mechanism (onset time 12 min at 25 °C), necessitating 30‑min pre‑incubation. The selectivity profile is governed by the propyl‑substituted pyrrolidine: the extended hydrophobic contact reduces Ki for bacterial NanI by two orders of magnitude relative to human Neu2. The following comparative data were generated with recombinant enzymes (cloned and expressed in E. coli, purified via His‑tag affinity) and are representative of three independent batch syntheses.

    EnzymeKi (nM)IC50 (nM)Selectivity fold vs. human Neu2Assay pH
    C. perfringens NanI27 ± 4613305.5
    Influenza A N1 (H1N1)42 ± 7892126.5
    Human cytosolic Neu28,900 ± 1,20020,1005.0

    Operational boundaries critically influence reproducibility. Reconstituted buffer solutions must be precisely pH‑adjusted and filtered (0.22 µm PVDF) because a pH drift of more than ±0.1 unit shifts the IC50 by 15–18%. The presence of reducing agents is deleterious: dithiothreitol (DTT) above 1 mM triggers reductive cleavage of the thioacetal bond (confirmed by HPLC mass recovery below 85% after 4 h at ambient), generating the free pyrrolidine‑carboxamide fragment and a thiol‑containing sugar that acts as a slow‑onset irreversible inhibitor of unrelated cysteine proteases. For this reason, STH-6278 must not be co‑formulated with DTT or β‑mercaptoethanol in assay buffers intended for redox‑sensitive targets. The hydrochloride salt is hygroscopic above 60% RH; weighing should be performed in a dry nitrogen glovebox, and stock vials must be equilibrated to ambient temperature before opening to prevent condensation‑induced hydrolysis. Batch‑to‑batch variance in inhibitory potency (coefficient of variation ±10% in IC50) has been traced to residual trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) from the final preparative HPLC step; an additional ion‑exchange polishing (Dowex 1×8 chloride form) reduces TFA content to <50 ppm and restores batch consistency.