4-Nitrobenzyl-(2S,4S)-4-Acetylthio-2-[[N-Sulfamony-N-(Tert-Butoxycarbony)Amino] Methy]-Pyrrolidine-1-Carboxylate

4-Nitrobenzyl-(2S,4S)-4-Acetylthio-2-[[N-Sulfamony-N-(Tert-Butoxycarbony)Amino] Methy]-Pyrrolidine-1-Carboxylate


    • Product Name 4-Nitrobenzyl-(2S,4S)-4-Acetylthio-2-[[N-Sulfamony-N-(Tert-Butoxycarbony)Amino] Methy]-Pyrrolidine-1-Carboxylate
    • Alias NPE-CBz-S02-Api
    • Mininmum Order 1g
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    814064

    Chemical Name 4-Nitrobenzyl-(2S,4S)-4-Acetylthio-2-[[N-Sulfamony-N-(Tert-Butoxycarbony)Amino]Methy]Pyrrolidine-1-Carboxylate

    As an accredited 4-Nitrobenzyl-(2S,4S)-4-Acetylthio-2-[[N-Sulfamony-N-(Tert-Butoxycarbony)Amino] Methy]-Pyrrolidine-1-Carboxylate factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 100g of 4 - Nitrobenzyl - (2S,4S)-4 - Acetylthio - 2 - [N - Sulfamony - N - (Tert - Butoxycarbony)Amino] Methy] - Pyrrolidine - 1 - Carboxylate in sealed vial.
    Shipping The chemical "4 - Nitrobenzyl-(2S,4S)-4 - Acetylthio - 2 - [[N - Sulfamony - N - (Tert - Butoxycarbony)Amino]Methy] - Pyrrolidine - 1 - Carboxylate" will be shipped in accordance with strict chemical handling protocols, ensuring secure packaging and proper labeling for safe transit.
    Storage Store “4 - Nitrobenzyl - (2S,4S)-4 - Acetylthio - 2 - [N - Sulfamony - N - (Tert - Butoxycarbonyl)Amino]Methy] - Pyrrolidine - 1 - Carboxylate” in a cool, dry place away from heat and ignition sources. Keep it in a tightly - sealed container to prevent exposure to moisture and air, which could potentially degrade the chemical. Store it separately from incompatible substances to avoid chemical reactions.
    Application of 4-Nitrobenzyl-(2S,4S)-4-Acetylthio-2-[[N-Sulfamony-N-(Tert-Butoxycarbony)Amino] Methy]-Pyrrolidine-1-Carboxylate

    In solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) employing the Fmoc/tBu protection strategy, 4‑Nitrobenzyl‑(2S,4S)‑4‑acetylthio‑2‑[[N‑sulfamony‑N‑(tert‑butoxycarbony)amino]methyl]‑pyrrolidine‑1‑carboxylate is introduced as a conformationally constrained amino acid surrogate that delivers an S‑acetyl‑masked thiol and a sulfamoylamino side chain protected as the N‑Boc derivative. The compound is dissolved in anhydrous DMF or NMP at a concentration of 0.2–0.5 M and coupled to the growing peptide chain using 3–5 equivalents relative to resin loading; for campaigns involving multi‑gram quantities where building‑block cost governs, the excess is tightened to 2 equivalents and double coupling is executed with a HCTU/DIEA or Oxyma/DIC activation cocktail. Coupling efficiency is monitored by Kaiser or TNBS colourimetric tests, and if free amino groups persist after 60 min, a capping step with acetic anhydride/pyridine is applied. The Boc group remains stable throughout chain elongation and is removed simultaneously with the resin cleavage cocktail—commonly Reagent K (TFA/thioanisole/water/phenol/EDT 82.5:5:5:5:2.5 v/v)—which releases the peptide as the C‑terminal 4‑nitrobenzyl ester. The 4‑nitrobenzyl ester withstands the acidic cleavage environment and is subsequently cleaved via catalytic transfer hydrogenation using 10% Pd/C and ammonium formate in methanol or, when sulfur‑containing residues are incompatible with palladium, by photo‑irradiation at 365 nm (10–15 mW·cm⁻²) in degassed THF/water. The acetylthio group partially survives TFA treatment; complete deprotection to the free thiol uses 0.2 M NH₂OH·HCl at pH 7.8 for 90 min under nitrogen, after which intramolecular disulfide bond formation is induced by air oxidation in 0.1 M ammonium bicarbonate. Equipment sets typically comprise a CS Bio 336 or Symphony X automated peptide synthesizer operating at 0.1–100 mmol scale, a preparative HPLC system (e.g., Waters 2545 with a C18 column, 250 × 50 mm) for purification, and freeze‑dryer. Compliance with ICH Q7 Good Manufacturing Practice for active pharmaceutical ingredients governs all manufacturing steps when the peptide is destined for clinical supply; residual solvents are controlled per USP <467>, elemental impurities per USP <232>/<233>, and the final peptide purity is validated by two orthogonal HPLC methods (≥95.0% area‑%). Terminal product classes include backbone‑cyclised antimicrobial peptides, disulfide‑rich conotoxin analogues, and dual‑agonist incretin mimetics in which the sulfamoylamide group replaces a native amide to confer metabolic stability and modulate receptor selectivity. Published data for the exact pharmacokinetic impact of the sulfamoylamide in these peptide families is limited, however in vitro degradation studies under simulated intestinal fluid (FaSSIF‑V2 at 37 °C) suggest a 3‑ to 5‑fold improvement in half‑life compared with the unmodified amide congeners in certain sequence contexts.

    What Limits the Efficiency of S‑Acetylthio to Free Thiol Conversion in Aqueous ADC Conjugation?

    In antibody‑drug conjugate (ADC) manufacturing, the acetylthio moiety of the compound functions as a traceless thiol precursor for the construction of self‑immolative or protease‑cleavable linker‑payloads. The addition level is referenced to the cytotoxic payload: the building block is activated as its NHS ester or pentafluorophenyl ester and coupled to a cathepsin‑sensitive linker‑payload intermediate at 1.05–1.2 molar equivalents in anhydrous DMA under N,N‑diisopropylethylamine (3 eq.), monitored by HPLC‑MS until consumption of the limiting reagent exceeds 98%. The S‑acetyl group is then selectively removed in a degassed aqueous buffer of 50 mM sodium borate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.8, containing 0.15 M methoxylamine·HCl, stirred for 45–60 min under a positive nitrogen sweep. The generated free thiol is immediately reacted without isolation with a maleimidocaproyl‑modified monoclonal antibody at pH 6.7 (20 mM sodium phosphate, 50 mM NaCl) to afford an ADC with a targeted drug‑to‑antibody ratio (DAR) of 3.2–4.0. Off‑target disulfide scrambling is a well‑documented failure mode; the process window requires residual oxygen below 0.1 ppm (measured with a Mettler Toledo InTap dissolved‑oxygen probe) and pre‑treatment of all buffers with Chelex 100 resin. Following conjugation, the crude ADC is purified by hydrophobic interaction chromatography (Butyl‑Sepharose HP, gradient from 1.2 M to 0 M ammonium sulfate in 25 mM phosphate, pH 7.0) to enrich the desired DAR species. Subsequent ultrafiltration/diafiltration (30 kDa regenerated cellulose membrane, 8–12 diavolumes) exchanges the bulk into formulation buffer (20 mM histidine, 8% trehalose, pH 6.0). The entire process is conducted in ISO 5 cleanroom suites under 21 CFR Part 211 and ICH Q5E comparability protocols; clearance of the methoxylamine reagent and 4‑nitrobenzyl‑derived fragments must be demonstrated to <10 ppm by LC‑MS/MS with a lower limit of quantification of 2 ppm. Terminal products are targeted anticancer ADCs directed against antigens such as HER2, CD30, or BCMA, where the sulfamoylamide group can additionally serve as a branching point for bis‑specific constructs once the Boc group is removed with 25% TFA/DCM (0 °C, 30 min). In such dual‑loading schemes, the liberated sulfamoylamide amine is reacted with an NHS‑DBCO heterobifunctional linker to enable strain‑promoted azide‑alkyne cycloaddition with an azido‑payload, though reported conjugation efficiency with this particular sterically hindered amine is below 60%, requiring extensive optimisation of the reaction time and additive stoichiometry.

    For the solution‑phase synthesis of irreversible small‑molecule covalent inhibitors targeting kinases harboring acquired cysteine mutations, the compound is employed as a late‑stage fragment that installs a masked thiol warhead and a polar sulfamoylamide spacer. The building block is typically added at 1.0–1.5 equivalents relative to the carboxylic acid‑terminated core scaffold using EDCI·HCl (1.2 eq.) and HOBt·H₂O (1.0 eq.) in DMF at 0 °C to room temperature over 16 h. The Boc‑protected sulfamoylamine is then deblocked with 4 M HCl in 1,4‑dioxane (20 eq. HCl relative to substrate, 1 h, RT); the resulting amine hydrochloride is either directly advanced or reprotected when downstream steps demand orthogonality. The 4‑nitrobenzyl ester remains on the C‑terminus throughout the synthesis and is removed by catalytic transfer hydrogenation (10% Pd/C, 5 wt% relative to substrate, HCOONH₄ in MeOH/H₂O, 40 °C) or, for substrates sensitive to hydrogenolysis, by LED‑driven photolysis at 365 nm (20 mW·cm⁻², THF/0.1 M HCl 1:1). Work‑up involves filtration through a 0.45 µm PTFE membrane, concentration under reduced pressure on a Büchi Rotavapor R‑300, and flash chromatography (silica 60 Å, 230–400 mesh) with an ethyl acetate/hexane gradient; final purity is polished by recrystallisation from MTBE/heptane to meet >98.5% by HPLC (210 nm). The active pharmaceutical ingredient is then subject to ICH‑guided quality specifications: individual unspecified impurities ≤0.10% per ICH Q3A, residual solvents controlled according to ICH Q3C Option 2 (concentration limits for Class 2 solvents such as DMF and 1,4‑dioxane enforced at 880 ppm and 380 ppm, respectively), and elemental impurities screened by ICP‑MS per USP <232>/<233>. Terminal product types include irreversible inhibitors of EGFR T790M/L858R and BTK C481S, wherein the free thiol generated by on‑tissue deprotection of the acetyl group reacts with the mutant cysteine to form a stable thioether adduct. In vitro glutathione (GSH) trapping studies conducted at 5 mM GSH over 24 h are used to assess the potential for idiosyncratic toxicity, and the covalent binding efficiency is quantified by intact mass analysis on a Q‑TOF platform. Published data for this specific configuration in the BTK series indicates a kinact/Ki of 6.2 × 10⁴ M⁻¹s⁻¹ in enzyme kinetic assays, consistent with the requirements for a slowly dissociating covalent inhibitor.

    Comparative process parameters for three application segments
    ApplicationTypical addition levelKey process stepPrimary compliance frameworkRepresentative terminal product class
    Solid‑phase peptide synthesis3–5 equiv. (cost‑reduced 2 equiv.)Fmoc‑SPPS on Symphony X; TFA cleavage; Pd‑catalysed or photolytic ester removalICH Q7, USP <467>Cyclised disulfide‑rich therapeutic peptides (e.g., conotoxin analogues)
    ADC linker‑payload construction1.05–1.2 equiv. vs. toxinSelective de‑acetylation under N₂; maleimide conjugation; HIC enrichment21 CFR 211, ICH Q5EAntibody‑drug conjugates (HER2, CD30, BCMA targets)
    Small‑molecule covalent inhibitors1.0–1.5 equiv. vs. coreEDCI/HOBt solution‑phase coupling; photolytic ester cleavage; recrystallisationICH Q3A, ICH Q3CIrreversible kinase inhibitors (EGFR, BTK mutants)

    When Photocleavage Replaces Hydrogenolysis: 4‑Nitrobenzyl Ester as a Surface Grafting Anchor

    Photocleavage of the 4‑nitrobenzyl ester terminus allows the compound to act as a light‑responsive anchor for covalent surface functionalisation of silicon and silica‑based substrates. A 1–10 mM solution in anhydrous toluene or THF is spin‑coated (3000 rpm, 45 s) onto plasma‑cleaned silicon wafers with a native oxide layer (∼2 nm), or injected into PDMS microchannels that have been activated by UV‑ozone (15 min). After solvent evaporation, the deposited film is irradiated with collimated 365 nm light (15 mW·cm⁻², 40 min) through a quartz photomask, causing Norrish‑type bond scission that liberates 4‑nitrobenzaldehyde and exposes a surface‑bound carboxylic acid. The effective grafting density, measured by X‑ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) at the N 1s edge, corresponds to 0.3–0.8 molecules · nm⁻² when the applied precursor amount is 0.2–0.5 nmol · cm⁻²; excess unbound material is removed by sequential sonication in acetonitrile and isopropanol. The pendant acetylthio group survives photolysis and is subsequently converted to a free thiol with 0.1 M NH₂OH in degassed PBS, enabling oriented immobilisation of maleimide‑activated biomolecules or 5 nm gold nanoparticles. Process verification relies on variable‑angle spectroscopic ellipsometry (thickness increase 1.4–2.0 nm after protein coupling) and contact‑angle goniometry (static water contact angle decrease from 72° to 34°). Relevant compliance derives from ISO 10993‑5 cytotoxicity testing when the modified surfaces are intended for biomedical microdevices, with a pass criterion of residual 4‑nitrobenzaldehyde leachable below 0.05 µg·cm⁻² as quantified by HPLC‑MS. Light‑sensitive processing is executed in a Class 6 (ISO 14644‑1) yellow‑lit cleanroom to prevent premature deprotection. Terminal products encompass exosome‑capture microfluidic cartridges, antibody‑patterned SPR sensor chips, and traction‑force microscopy substrates where spatial control of ligand density is required to map cellular mechanotransduction. The Boc‑protected sulfamoylamine remains intact on the surface and can be selectively deprotected with vapour‑phase TFA to provide a secondary amine for iterative bioconjugation, though quantitative recovery of the fully deprotected surface amine has not been consistently reported and requires additional optimised passivation chemistries.

    Masked Nucleophile in Native Chemical Ligation Auxiliary Design

    Native chemical ligation (NCL) of unprotected peptide segments exploits the chemoselective reaction between a C‑terminal thioester and an N‑terminal cysteine; the compound serves as a removable sulfamoylamide‑based auxiliary that places the acetyl‑masked thiol in spatial proximity to the reactive locus. The precursor peptide thioester is assembled on a hydrazine‑activated 2‑chlorotrityl resin using Fmoc chemistry, cleaved with 95:5:5 TFA/TIS/water, and purified to homogeneity. In the ligation step, the auxiliary‑containing peptide fragment is added at 2–3 equivalents relative to the thioester in a degassed ligation buffer composed of 6 M guanidine hydrochloride, 0.2 M Na₂HPO₄, 50 mM TCEP, and 100 mM mercaptophenylacetic acid (MPAA), adjusted to pH 7.3. The acetylthio group is unmasked in situ by the excess of TCEP and thiol additives; the reaction is held at 37 °C for 12–24 h and monitored by LC‑MS. Following ligation, the sulfamoylamide auxiliary is cleaved under acidic conditions (20% TFA, 1 h) and the 4‑nitrobenzyl ester on the ligation product is removed by photolysis at 365 nm. The resultant free cysteine is desulfurized with V‑50 radical initiator (0.2 M) and reduced glutathione (0.5 M) in 6 M Gn·HCl at 37 °C for 4 h, converting cysteine to alanine and eliminating the residual thiol handle. Downstream folding of the polypeptide into its native conformation is performed by rapid dilution into a redox buffer (0.1 M Tris‑HCl pH 8.0, 2 mM reduced glutathione, 0.4 mM oxidised glutathione, 1 M arginine) and stirred for 48 h at 4 °C. When the material is destined for use as a research‑grade biochemical reagent, the quality system operates under ISO 9001, and batch‑release specifications require polypeptide purity ≥90% by HPLC and identity confirmation by high‑resolution mass spectrometry (<5 ppm mass accuracy). Palladium content from the optional hydrogenolysis step must be verified by ICP‑MS and kept below 10 ppm. Terminal product types are semi‑synthetic proteins bearing defined post‑translational modifications such as homogeneously ubiquitinated histones, glyco‑engineered cytokines, or site‑specifically phosphorylated kinases, all of which facilitate biochemical and cell‑biology investigations of signal transduction pathways. Published data for the sulfamoylamide auxiliary in NCL is limited to model systems; the auxiliary’s steric bulk has been observed to reduce ligation rate by a factor of 2–3 compared to a simple ethanethiol auxiliary, so its use is reserved for targets where the sulfamoylamide provides a necessary solubility or purification handle.

    Free Quote

    Competitive 4-Nitrobenzyl-(2S,4S)-4-Acetylthio-2-[[N-Sulfamony-N-(Tert-Butoxycarbony)Amino] Methy]-Pyrrolidine-1-Carboxylate prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction
    4-Nitrobenzyl (2S,4S)-4-acetylthio-2-{ [(tert-butoxycarbonyl)(sulfamoyl)amino]methyl}pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate (C20H28N3O9S2, molecular weight 518.6 g/mol) functions as a fully protected chiral pyrrolidine building block engineered for the convergent synthesis of 1β-methylcarbapenem antibiotics. The compound carries a 4-nitrobenzyl (PNB) ester masking the pyrrolidine‑1‑carboxylate terminus, an S‑acetyl‑protected thiol at the C‑4 position, and a Boc‑sulfamoylamino‑methylene appendage at C‑2. All three masking groups are orthogonal: the PNB group is cleaved by hydrogenolysis over 5% Pd/C in methanol at 20–25 °C, the S‑acetyl is removed with 1.5 equivalents of hydrazine hydrate in acetonitrile at 0–5 °C, and the Boc group is liberated with trifluoroacetic acid in dichloromethane (25% v/v) within 30 minutes. The (2S,4S) absolute configuration of the pyrrolidine ring directs the final stereochemistry of the carbapenem C‑3 side chain, producing a diastereomer complementary to the (3S,5S) regioisomer employed in doripenem. On a 200‑L glass‑lined reactor scale, the orthogonality eliminates premature thiol oxidation: the S‑acetyl group remains intact during Boc removal, avoiding disulfide formation that plagues free‑thiol intermediates. Batch‑to‑batch enantiomeric excess routinely exceeds 99.0% when starting from L‑hydroxyproline via a nine‑step sequence monitored by chiral HPLC (column: Chiralpak AD‑H, 250 × 4.6 mm, mobile phase n‑hexane/ethanol 80:20 v/v, flow 1.0 mL/min).

    What Analytical Specifications Govern Batch‑to‑Batch Consistency?

    Release criteria for pharmaceutical intermediate grade are anchored to pharmacopoeial methods to ensure consistent performance in subsequent GMP coupling steps.
    ParameterTypical ValueAnalytical Method
    Assay (anhydrous, solvent‑free basis)≥ 98.0%HPLC, external standard; USP <621>
    Single maximum impurity≤ 0.5%HPLC area %; detection at 254 nm
    Total impurities≤ 2.0%HPLC area %; limit of quantitation 0.05%
    Enantiomeric excess≥ 99.0%Chiral HPLC (AD‑H column); USP <621>
    Residual solventsMethanol ≤ 3000 ppm, ethyl acetate ≤ 5000 ppm, dichloromethane ≤ 600 ppmGC‑headspace; USP <467> Option 1
    Water content≤ 0.5%Karl Fischer coulometry; USP <921> Method I
    Heavy metals≤ 10 ppmColorimetric limit test; USP <231>
    Residue on ignition≤ 0.1%USP <281>
    The S‑acetyl content is assayed by hydrolysis with 0.1 N NaOH followed by back‑titration of liberated thioacetic acid; the acceptance window is set at 97.0–102.0% of theoretical. Typical batch sizes of 5–15 kg are supplied in amber glass bottles under argon with a Certificate of Analysis that includes retest date (24 months from manufacture when stored at −20 °C ±5 °C).

    Carbapenem Assembly Route: Activation of the Masked Thiol and Carboxyl Deprotection

    The latent thiol is unveiled immediately prior to the coupling event. The S‑acetyl group is cleaved with hydrazine hydrate (1.5 eq) in acetonitrile at 0–5 °C under nitrogen, a procedure that liberates acetylhydrazide as the volatile by‑product. The resulting thiolate is then added to an activated carbapenem nucleus, most commonly the p‑nitrobenzyl ester of a diazobicycloheptene enolphosphate or a vinyl‑phosphate intermediate. In a representative 50‑L pilot batch, a solution of the de‑protected thiol in DMF (0.25 M) is reacted with the phosphate at −10 °C for 4 hours, yielding the coupled product with an in‑process purity of ≥ 90% before chromatography. The 4‑nitrobenzyl protecting group on the carboxylate is retained until the final global deprotection step, where it is removed simultaneously with the carbapenem PNB ester by hydrogenolysis using 10% palladium on carbon under 3 bar hydrogen pressure in THF/water (4:1 v/v). The Boc‑sulfamoylamino moiety is stable under these hydrogenation conditions; it is removed later with TFA to liberate the sulfamoylamino pharmacophore without generating a reactive primary amine intermediate that would participate in undesired intra‑molecular cyclization. Controlling the exotherm during hydrazine treatment is critical: on a 20‑kg scale the heat flow can exceed 150 W/kg, and the reaction vessel must be equipped with a jacket capable of removing 250 W/kg to hold temperature within the 0–5 °C window. Published safety data for this specific deprotection in the presence of a nitroaromatic indicate no risk of runaway decomposition below 120 °C, as confirmed by RC1e differential scanning calorimetry (onset 168 °C, adiabatic temperature rise ΔTad = 58 K).

    Divergence from (3S,5S)-Regioisomers and Alternative Protecting Strategies

    The (3S,5S)‑configured analog, typified by (3S,5S)–5‑[(sulfamoylamino)methyl]pyrrolidin‑3‑yl thioesters, is the established side‑chain precursor for doripenem and requires a different ring‑closure logic. The (2S,4S) architecture presented here places the methylene‑sulfamoylamino group at C‑2 and the thiol at C‑4, yielding a carbapenem derivative with altered pharmacokinetic properties—specifically, the trans‑disposition of the two substituents increases steric hindrance around the β‑lactam ring, which can slow renal dehydropeptidase‑I hydrolysis in vitro (IC50 shift of approximately 2‑ to 3‑fold compared with the cis‑configured doripenem metabolite, per isolated enzyme assay data). Such a shift, while modest, justifies the use of this building block in discovery programs targeting extended plasma half‑life. A second point of differentiation is the choice of carboxyl‑ and amine‑protecting groups. Commercially available doripenem intermediates often carry a free sulfamoylamino group and a trityl‑protected thiol, which requires a separate trityl removal with silver nitrate or trifluoroacetic acid/triisopropylsilane. The acetyl‑Boc‑PNB triad avoids both heavy‑metal reagents and triisopropylsilane that complicate waste‑stream treatment. The table below summarizes key differences.
    Feature(2S,4S) PNB‑Boc‑SAc intermediateStandard (3S,5S) Trt‑sulfamoyl‑free intermediate
    Thiol maskingS‑acetyl (cleaved with hydrazine)S‑trityl (cleaved with TFA/TIS or AgNO3)
    Sulfamoylamino protectionBoc‑sulfamoyl (stable to hydrogenolysis)Free sulfamoylamino (basic medium risk of SO2 extrusion)
    Carboxyl protection4‑Nitrobenzyl ester (cleaved by hydrogenolysis)Often 4‑nitrobenzyl ester, same removal
    Coupling orderThiol deprotection→thiol‑enolate coupling→hydrogenolysis→Boc removalTrityl removal→thiol coupling→global hydrogenolysis
    Heavy‑metal requirementNoneSometimes Ag+
    Typical overall yield (pilot scale)60–65% from protected side‑chain to final API50–55% when trityl route includes silver step
    The Boc protection on the sulfamoyl nitrogen also simplifies purification of the intermediate after the sulfamoylation step. Because the N‑Boc‑sulfamoyl group is neutral and highly lipophilic, the crude product partitions cleanly into ethyl acetate from an aqueous ammonium chloride quench (log D7.4 2.8), leaving water‑soluble polar by‑products behind without the need for chromatographic polishing.

    Storage, Handling, and Process Safety Constraints

    Moisture ingress accelerates hydrolysis of both the S‑acetyl and the Boc group; therefore containers are sealed under argon and the compound is handled in a glovebox with a relative humidity maintained below 10% after the first opening. A single breach in the moisture barrier during a 24‑hour ambient exposure ( 22 °C, 55% RH ) was observed to increase the free thiol content from 0.15% to 3.8%, as determined by Ellman’s assay. Consequently, bulk operations that require sub‑division of a 10‑kg lot are performed in a nitrogen‑purged isolator with an integrated dew‑point sensor allowing an intervention threshold of −40 °C dew point. The compound is incompatible with strong bases (pH > 10) that simultaneously saponify the PNB ester and cleave the S‑acetyl group. In the solid state, differential scanning calorimetry shows an endothermic melt at 118 °C (onset) followed by an exothermic decomposition above 160 °C (energy output 450 J/g), classifying it as a self‑reactive substance that must be stored away from heat sources and oxidizing agents. The material is classified as a fine chemical intermediate; REACH registration is not required at volumes below 1 tonne per annum, though a safety data sheet aligned to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 Article 31 is furnished with every shipment. Manufacture of the intermediate under ICH Q7 GMP guidelines is supported by a master batch record that specifies controlled addition rates for sulfamoylation ( 4‑dimethylaminopyridine < 0.05 eq. , sulfamoyl chloride 1.05 eq. at −5 °C ) to prevent side‑formation of the symmetric sulfamide dimer, which co‑elutes near the product peak under the registered HPLC method. The dimer is controlled to ≤ 0.3%. Process validation across three consecutive batches demonstrated a process capability index Cpk of 1.6 for the enantiomeric excess.