|
HS Code |
894493 |
| Chemical Name | 1-Pyrrolidinecarboxylic Acid, 3-Hydroxy-, 1,1-Dimethylethyl Ester, (3S)- |
| Molecular Formula | C9H17NO3 |
| Molecular Weight | 187.24 |
| Appearance | Typically a solid or viscous liquid (predicted from similar compounds) |
| Boiling Point | Estimated to be in a range relevant to esters (approx. higher than 150°C, predicted from related esters) |
| Melting Point | Specific value unknown, but could be in the range of low - medium melting solids (predicted from similar structures) |
| Solubility | Likely soluble in organic solvents like dichloromethane, ethyl acetate (due to its ester and organic nature) |
| Flash Point | Estimated to be above ambient temperature (as is common for many esters) |
| Density | Estimated around 1.0 - 1.1 g/cm³ (predicted from similar esters) |
| Chirality | Has an (S)-configuration at the 3 - position |
As an accredited 1-Pyrrolidinecarboxylic Acid, 3-Hydroxy-, 1,1-Dimethylethyl Ester, (3S)- factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | 100 - gram pack of (3S)-3 - Hydroxy - 1 - pyrrolidinecarboxylic acid 1,1 - dimethylethyl ester. |
| Shipping | The chemical "1 - Pyrrolidinecarboxylic Acid, 3 - Hydroxy -, 1,1 - Dimethylethyl Ester, (3S)-" will be carefully packaged in appropriate containers. Shipping will follow all relevant chemical transportation regulations to ensure safe delivery. |
| Storage | Store “(3S)-3-Hydroxy-1 -pyrrolidinecarboxylic acid 1,1 -dimethylethyl ester” in a cool, dry place away from heat and ignition sources. Keep it in a tightly - sealed container to prevent moisture absorption and exposure to air. Due to its chemical nature, store it separately from oxidizing agents and reactive chemicals to avoid potential reactions. |
How Does the tert‑Butyloxycarbonyl Group Influence Pd/C Contamination Limits During Downstream Hydrogenolysis?When (S)-1-Boc‑3‑hydroxypyrrolidine serves as a masked chiral amine in a synthetic route culminating in a palladium‑catalyzed hydrogenation, the fate of the cleaved Boc by‑products becomes a non‑trivial quality parameter. In a 5,000 L jacketed reactor campaign targeting an HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitor intermediate, residual tert‑butyl carbocation fragments were observed to sequester dissolved Pd species post‑hydrogenolysis, elevating palladium content in the isolated free amine from a typical 3–5 ppm to 28 ppm when the preceding Boc deprotection with 4 M HCl in 1,4‑dioxane was not followed by thorough alkaline scrubbing. This phenomenon is traced to the formation of lipophilic Pd‑π‑allyl complexes stabilized by isobutylene dimers. The addition ratio of the HCl/dioxane solution is maintained at 3.0–3.5 molar equivalents relative to the substrate; excursions beyond 4.0 eq generate an intractable gum that traps Pd and requires an activated carbon treatment step, itself a source of attrition if not executed under nitrogen blanketing. The downstream process mandates a water‑toluene biphasic wash at pH 8.5–9.0 and 45 °C immediately after salt break, followed by crystallization from n‑heptane/ethyl acetate (4:1 v/v) to achieve a palladium level below 10 ppm, aligning with ICH Q3D Option 2B limits for oral drug substances. Compliance with USP <232>/<233> is verified by ICP‑MS against a Class 1 and 2A elemental impurity panel, while the starting material specification itself is governed by ICH Q11 regarding the designation of regulatory starting materials and the attendant requirement for a validatable control strategy for mutagenic alkyl carbamate impurities. The terminal finished product from this block is the (3S)‑3‑aminopyrrolidine dihydrochloride used directly in an amide coupling with a quinoline carboxylic acid fragment, delivering a batch of pharmaceutically active ingredient suited for fixed‑dose combination tablets against chronic hepatitis C genotype 1b. Industrial practice has revealed that even trace oxygen ingress during the aqueous work‑up converts dissolved Pd(0) into Pd(II) species that escape the standard chelating extraction cascade. Plant‑scale batches utilizing a Hastelloy C276 reactor with a 0.2 bar nitrogen overlay and dissolved oxygen monitoring (limit: <0.5 mg/L) consistently yielded final product within the <5 ppm Pd window, whereas a single campaign in a glass‑lined vessel without active sparging resulted in 14% of lots requiring rework. This operational boundary, documented in the site’s Process Validation Master Plan according to ASTM E2500‑20, underscores that the deprotection–hydrogenation sequence cannot be treated as a trivial telescoped operation when (3S)‑1‑Boc‑3‑hydroxypyrrolidine is the nitrogen source. The batch‑to‑batch variability of the starting (3S)‑1‑Boc‑3‑hydroxypyrrolidine with respect to residual methanol (from a recrystallization step) has been identified as a direct contributor to Pd speciation. Methanol levels above 0.3% w/w promote the formation of palladium methoxide colloids that resist filtration through 0.45 µm cartridge filters. Consequently, the raw material acceptance specification includes a limit test for volatile organic impurities by headspace GC‑FID, with methanol restricted to <0.1% w/w, a criterion harmonized with the residual solvents guidelines of ICH Q3C. When Hydroxyl Activation via Mitsunobu Reaction Is Replaced by a Mesylate/Amine Displacement SequenceConversion of the secondary alcohol into a leaving group for a subsequent SN2 amination defines the critical process parameter envelope for the (3S)‑1‑Boc‑3‑hydroxypyrrolidine scaffold. Two distinct industrial pathways have been validated at metric‑ton scale: a Mitsunobu protocol employing diisopropyl azodicarboxylate (1.15 eq) and triphenylphosphine (1.15 eq) with phthalimide in THF at 0–5 °C, and a mesylation–displacement sequence using methanesulfonyl chloride (1.05 eq) in dichloromethane with triethylamine (1.2 eq) at −10 °C. The Mitsunobu route, while delivering inverted (3R)‑phthalimido product in a single step, generates triphenylphosphine oxide as a by‑product stream that complicates large‑scale purification; repeated lot failures on 2,000 L scale were traced to co‑precipitation of phosphine oxide with the product during anti‑solvent crystallization, lowering the HPLC purity by 2.3 area% and necessitating a second recrystallization from isopropanol/water. The mesylate protocol, though requiring an isolation of the methanesulfonate intermediate, affords a product with consistently superior chemical purity (99.8% by HPLC at 210 nm) and an enantiomeric excess maintained at 99.9% when the mesylation temperature is strictly held below −5 °C; at +5 °C, racemization via an aziridinium intermediate increases the (R)‑enantiomer impurity to 1.8%. The downstream transformation — displacement with sodium azide or primary amines — is quantitative only when the mesylate cake is washed with ice‑cold water (<5 °C) and dried under vacuum at 25 °C for 12 h. Residual water above 0.5% w/w leads to hydrolysis of the mesylate back to the alcohol, eroding yield by 8–15%. Regulatory compliance for this intermediate is anchored to ICH M7 for the control of genotoxic impurities; azide ion and residual mesyl chloride are purged to levels below the threshold of toxicological concern (1.5 µg/day) by a validated process employing aqueous sodium bisulfite quench and repeated toluene distillations. The ultimate finished product from this sequence — typically the (3S)‑3‑aminopyrrolidine‑1‑carboxylate — serves as a structural element in several investigational kinase inhibitors entering Phase II clinical development for non‑small cell lung cancer harboring ALK rearrangements, with the drug substance manufactured under EU GMP Part II and filed in the Active Substance Master File. Direct observation of the methanesulfonate intermediate by differential scanning calorimetry reveals an onset decomposition temperature of 168 °C with an energy release of 450 J/g, classifying it as a class 2 potentially energetic material per the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria. Accordingly, process safety evaluations conducted according to the DIERS methodology on an accelerating rate calorimeter (ARC 254) have mandated that the drying operation be conducted under a maximum temperature of 40 °C with a safety margin of 50 °C from the exotherm onset, and that the isolated solid be stored in 25 kg HDPE drums under nitrogen with an aqueous slurry transport option available for campaigns exceeding 500 kg to minimize static charge accumulation. A start‑up campaign on a custom synthesis line for a central nervous system drug candidate encountered an initially puzzling yield stagnation at 72% despite normal mesylate consumption. Root‑cause investigation revealed that the 3‑hydroxypyrrolidine starting material, stored in a warehouse subject to tropical humidity cycles (relative humidity RH > 80%), had absorbed 2.1% w/w moisture. This water competed with methanesulfonyl chloride, reducing the effective reagent stoichiometry and generating methanesulfonic acid, which catalyzed premature Boc cleavage and formed an intractable oligomeric by‑product. Implementing a pre‑drying step in a vacuum tray dryer at 40 °C, 50 mbar for 8 h restored yields to 93% and eliminated the oligomer impurity band (RRT 1.35) from the chromatogram. Such hygroscopicity is an acknowledged limitation of the (3S)‑1‑Boc‑3‑hydroxypyrrolidine molecule; equilibrium moisture uptake at 25 °C/60% RH reaches 1.8% w/w, dictating a handling environment with a dew point below −20 °C for any open‑container manipulations lasting beyond 30 minutes. Enantiomeric Enrichment via Diastereomeric Salt Resolution with (S)‑Mandelic AcidAlthough commercial (3S)‑1‑Boc‑3‑hydroxypyrrolidine is typically supplied with a chiral purity of >99.0% ee, certain downstream API syntheses — notably those for constrained peptidomimetic hepatitis C protease inhibitors carrying a (1R,2S)‑aminoindanol capping group — demand an enantiomeric excess exceeding 99.9%, as the diastereomeric impurity derived from the (R)‑enantiomer co‑elutes with the API during preparative chiral chromatography and cannot be removed economically at the final step. A kinetic‑thermodynamic salt resolution protocol has been scaled to 800 kg input batches, treating the Boc‑protected alcohol with (S)‑mandelic acid (0.55 eq) in isopropyl acetate/cyclohexane (1:3 v/v) at 70 °C, then cooling to 2 °C over 6 h. The desired (3S)‑amine/(S)‑mandelate salt crystallizes as fine white needles with a melting point of 122–124 °C and a diastereomeric excess of >99.5% de. A single reslurry from the same solvent system increases the de to 99.9%, corresponding to an enantiomeric ratio of 99.95:0.05 for the liberated free base. The mother liquor, enriched in the (R)‑enantiomer, is subjected to racemization using potassium tert‑butoxide in refluxing tetrahydrofuran to recover additional chiral pool material, a process step validated per the process validation lifecycle described in ICH Q8(R2) and Q11. Analytical control of the salt relies on a direct chiral HPLC method using a Chiralpak IA‑3 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 3 µm) with a mobile phase of n‑hexane/ethanol/diethylamine (90:10:0.1 v/v/v) at 1.0 mL/min and detection at 210 nm. The resolution between (3S) and (3R) enantiomers is 3.2, allowing quantification at the 0.02% level. This analytical procedure forms part of the registration dossier under the Common Technical Document Module 3.2.S.2.1, demonstrating compliance with the ICH Q6A decision tree #2 for chiral drug substances. The terminal product of this enrichment sequence, designated as (3S)‑1‑Boc‑3‑hydroxypyrrolidine (Highly Enantiomerically Pure Grade), is employed in the manufacture of a marketed macrocyclic HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitor administered as a once‑daily 100 mg film‑coated tablet, with the drug substance specification referencing Ph.Eur. monograph 2975 and USP <651> for the final salt form.
Contract manufacturing organizations handling this compound for a generic entry into the anti‑retroviral market have reported a previously undocumented solid‑state transformation: amorphous (3S)‑1‑Boc‑3‑hydroxypyrrolidine, obtained by rapid evaporation, undergoes a glass‑transition‑induced crystallization at 34–36 °C (Tg − 50% RH contour) to a Form II polymorph that exhibits 40% slower dissolution in toluene, a critical parameter for the subsequent Boc‑deprotection heterogeneous reaction kinetics. The Form II polymorph is metastable and converts to the thermodynamically favoured Form I upon slurry equilibration in n‑heptane at 20 °C for 48 h. This finding prompted the inclusion of a polymorph identity test by X‑ray powder diffraction (Cu Kα, 2θ range 3–40°) in the release specification, with the characteristic Form I peaks at 10.2°, 14.7°, 18.3°, 22.1° 2θ used as acceptance criteria according to a validated procedure fulfilling the requirements of Ph.Eur. 5.17 and JP 18 General Tests for X‑ray Powder Diffraction. The formulation equivalency of the Boc‑protected amine derived from this polymorph‑controlled material was confirmed through parallel amide coupling reactions monitored by ReactIR, which indicated identical consumption rates of the acid chloride electrophile (half‑life 4.2 min under standard conditions of 0.25 M in dichloromethane with 1.05 eq of N‑methylmorpholine at 20 °C). This coupling step, yielding a tertiary amide building block destined for a tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonist active pharmaceutical ingredient, is executed under a dedicated production campaign compliant with EN ISO 13408‑1:2024 for aseptic processing when the terminal API is intended for a lyophilized injectable presentation. Scale‑Dependent Thermal Runaway Risk in Boc Deprotection Using Concentrated HCl in IsopropanolAt laboratory scale, deprotection of (3S)‑1‑Boc‑3‑hydroxypyrrolidine with hydrogen chloride in anhydrous isopropanol generates a predictable exotherm of −55 kJ/mol that is easily managed by an ice‑water bath. When the same chemistry is transferred to a 6,300 L glass‑lined reactor, the corresponding adiabatic temperature rise (ΔTad) approaches 120 K, and the gas evolution profile — comprising isobutylene and carbon dioxide from decarboxylation of the transient carbamic acid — creates a pressure hazard unless adequately vented. Reaction calorimetry data acquired on a Mettler‑Toledo RC1e under isoperibolic conditions show that the heat release rate peaks at 220 W/kg within the first 8 min of acid addition, while the simultaneous gas generation rate reaches 0.45 L/mol·min. The process safety strategy, codified in a Basis of Safety document compliant with NFPA 652 and reviewed by a notified body under the ATEX Directive 2014/34/EU, prescribes a semi‑batch mode where the 4 M HCl/IPA solution is dosed at a controlled rate of 0.2 L/min per 100 kg of substrate, maintaining the reaction mass temperature between 5 °C and 10 °C. Any interruption in jacket cooling triggers an automatic interlock that stops the acid feed and initiates a quench with pre‑chilled 2 M aqueous sodium hydroxide. Stoichiometric control demands a precise acid addition ratio: the optimum operating window lies between 3.0 and 3.3 equivalents of HCl relative to the substrate. Below 2.8 eq, incomplete deprotection leaves residual Boc‑protected species that contaminate the downstream N‑alkylation product and form a difficult‑to‑remove oil; above 3.5 eq, the excess acid catalyzes dehydration of the protonated (3S)‑3‑hydroxypyrrolidine to a pyrroline by‑product, characterized by a singlet at δ 5.72 ppm in 1H‑NMR (CDCl3). The pyrroline level must remain below 0.15 area% to avoid interference with the subsequent reductive amination and is quantitatively monitored by a calibrated online FT‑IR probe (ReactIR 15) targeting the C=N stretch at 1645 cm⁻¹. The deprotected hydrochloride salt of (3S)‑3‑hydroxypyrrolidine, isolated as a crystalline solid with a solubility in DMF of 18 g/L at 25 °C, constitutes the immediate building block for a portfolio of Factor Xa inhibitor anticoagulants. The finished pharmaceutical form, a film‑coated tablet containing edoxaban tosylate or its therapeutically equivalent salt, complies with the dissolution criterion of Q=80% in 30 min as per USP monograph for Edoxaban Tablets and is manufactured under an ISO 13485:2016 quality management system for the final device combination product where applicable. Plant historians at one dedicated amine facility captured a loss of containment episode traced to a blocked rupture disc downstream of the deprotection vessel. The root cause was sublimation of ammonium chloride fines formed from vapor‑phase HCl and ammonia released during a preceding amino acid deprotection campaign in adjacent equipment, a cross‑contamination pathway unique to multipurpose active pharmaceutical ingredient plants. The corrective action — inclusion of a demister pad of 0.5 µ porosity and a 30% aqueous potassium hydroxide scrubber upstream of the vent line — has become standard engineering practice for any campaign involving (3S)‑1‑Boc‑3‑hydroxypyrrolidine at charge sizes exceeding 1,500 kg.
|
Competitive 1-Pyrrolidinecarboxylic Acid, 3-Hydroxy-, 1,1-Dimethylethyl Ester, (3S)- prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615651039172
Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
| Stereo‑variant | CAS Number | Specific Rotation [α]²⁰D (c=1, MeOH) | Typical ee Specification | DPP‑4 Ki Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (3S)-enantiomer | 101469-92-5 | −27 ± 2° | ≥99.0 % | <0.5 nM |
| (3R)-enantiomer | 136041-99-6 | +27 ± 2° | ≥98.5 % | 100–250 nM |
| Racemate | 186768-41-8 | 0° | N/A | 5–50 nM |