Pyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid, 2,4-Dimethyl-, Ethyl Ester

Pyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid, 2,4-Dimethyl-, Ethyl Ester


    • Product Name Pyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid, 2,4-Dimethyl-, Ethyl Ester
    • Alias Ethyl 2,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylate
    • Einecs 641-369-9
    • Mininmum Order 1mg
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    276809

    Chemical Formula C11H15NO2
    Molar Mass 193.24 g/mol

    As an accredited Pyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid, 2,4-Dimethyl-, Ethyl Ester factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 100 g of Pyrrole - 3 - Carboxylic Acid, 2,4 - Dimethyl -, Ethyl Ester in sealed chemical - grade packaging.
    Shipping Pyrrole - 3 - Carboxylic Acid, 2,4 - Dimethyl -, Ethyl Ester is shipped in accordance with chemical transportation regulations. It's packaged securely to prevent leakage, with proper labeling indicating its nature for safe transit.
    Storage Store “Pyrrole - 3 - Carboxylic Acid, 2,4 - Dimethyl -, Ethyl Ester” in a cool, dry place away from heat sources and direct sunlight. Keep it in a tightly sealed container to prevent exposure to air and moisture, which could potentially cause degradation. Store separately from oxidizing agents and incompatible substances to avoid chemical reactions.
    Application of Pyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid, 2,4-Dimethyl-, Ethyl Ester
    In the manufacturing workflow for a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor structurally related to baricitinib, ethyl 2,4-dimethylpyrrole-3-carboxylate functions as a C-5/C-6 cyclocondensation precursor for the pyrrolo[2,3‑d]pyrimidine pharmacophore. The registered starting material (RSM) specification mandates a chromatographic purity of ≥99.5% by GC-FID and a water content of ≤0.10% by Karl Fischer titration per USP <921> Method Ia. Residual solvents are controlled to ≤500 ppm for THF and ≤290 ppm for ethyl acetate, aligning with ICH Q3C Option 1 limits. In a cryogenic reactor train, the ester is dissolved in anhydrous acetonitrile (5.0 volumes) and treated with 1.20 molar equivalents of phosphorous oxychloride at -5°C to 0°C. Formamide (2.5 equivalents) is metered over 90 minutes while the jacket heat-transfer fluid maintains a delta‑T of ≤8°C. The Vilsmeier‑Haack adduct is then thermally cyclized at 78–82°C for 16–20 hours. In‑line FTIR monitoring of the carbonyl stretch at 1724 cm⁻¹ tracks ester consumption. A process bottleneck emerges if the POCl₃ addition exotherm exceeds +3°C; dimeric impurity RRT 1.37 rises to >0.15% area percent, requiring a subsequent hot‑filtration through a 0.5‑micron sintered‑metal candle filter. The isolated pyrrolopyrimidine intermediate is then elaborated to the JAK inhibitor API in a separate GMP suite using Hastelloy C‑22 reactors with retreat‑curve impellers set to 110–130 rpm. Terminal active pharmaceutical ingredient batches consistently meet a heavy metal limit of ≤10 ppm for Pd and residual POCl₃‑derived phosphorus below 5 ppm as verified by ICP‑MS USP <233>. Vendor qualification requires a changeover cleaning validation protocol demonstrating carryover of the pyrrole ester below 10 ppm on product‑contact surfaces swabbed per FDA 21 CFR 211.67.

    Can This Ester Serve as a Precursor for FEMA‑Approved Flavour Molecules?

    A documented organoleptic pathway converts ethyl 2,4‑dimethylpyrrole‑3‑carboxylate into 2,4‑dimethylpyrrole, a key impact chemical delivering roasted‑nut and cocoa top notes in compounded chocolate flavours. The ester undergoes alkaline saponification in aqueous ethanol (75% v/v) with 1.50 equivalents of sodium hydroxide at 50°C within a glass‑lined stirred tank. Complete conversion is confirmed when the thin‑layer chromatography spot at Rf 0.60 (eluent ethyl acetate/hexane 1:3) disappears. The reaction mass is acidified with 20% hydrochloric acid to pH 2.0 and the precipitated 2,4‑dimethylpyrrole‑3‑carboxylic acid is isolated on a Nutsche filter. Decarboxylation proceeds in quinoline at 180–200°C using copper bronze powder (3% w/w) under a nitrogen sweep; the volatile pyrrole distills from the reaction mixture and is collected in a chilled receiver at -10°C. The crude distillate is fractionated through a Vigreux column of 15 theoretical plates, and the cut boiling at 147–149°C (atmospheric pressure) is retained. Typical recovery from ester to final product reaches 78–82%. Finished 2,4‑dimethylpyrrole destined for flavour houses must record an olfactory detection threshold in water of <0.2 ppb and exhibit a sensory profile free of musty off‑notes. Conformity to the JECFA combined specifications for flavouring substances is obligatory; gas‑chromatographic purity exceeds 98.5% with single undescribed peaks held below 0.3%. Stability under accelerated storage conditions (40°C/75% RH for 8 weeks) may not generate quinoline carryover above 2 ppm as determined by headspace GC‑MS. Production in dedicated flavour-grade equipment avoids steel‑ion leaching by using electropolished 316L stainless steel contact parts and PTFE gaskets compliant with EU 1935/2004.

    Agrochemical Scaffold for Diamide Insecticides

    Several patent families illustrate the use of ethyl 2,4‑dimethylpyrrole‑3‑carboxylate as a building block for ryanodine‑receptor modulator insecticides. The ester is first converted to the corresponding hydrazide by treatment with hydrazine monohydrate (1.05 equivalents) in n‑butanol at reflux (117°C) for 5 hours. The precipitated 2,4‑dimethylpyrrole‑3‑carbohydrazide is filtered and dried to a moisture content below 0.5%. In a downstream coupling step, the hydrazide is condensed with a substituted benzoxazinone intermediate in acetic acid under Dean‑Stark water removal. Formation of the diamide insecticide core proceeds at 100–105°C over 12 hours. The final technical‑grade active ingredient requires a purity of ≥95% with the des‑methyl analog held to <0.5%. Scale‑up on a 2000‑L glass‑lined reactor equipped with a steam‑ejector distillation system revealed that residual n‑butanol above 800 ppm in the hydrazide wet cake retards the coupling rate and elevates the des‑methyl impurity. For this reason, a post‑centrifugation vacuum drying cycle at 60°C and 10 mbar for 8 hours is integrated into the standard operating procedure. Agrochemical intermediates shipped across regulatory domains must align with FAO Specification 376/TC equivalents and provide a product‑safety datasheet quantifying the acute oral LD₅₀ in rat at >300 mg/kg. Container liners of HDPE with a wall thickness of 0.15 mm are validated for air‑freight per ICAO TI Part 4.

    When Photostability and Molar Absorptivity Dictate Dye Intermediate Selection

    BODIPY‑class fluorescent probes employed in single‑molecule microscopy and bioimaging rely on 2,4‑dimethylpyrrole as the α‑position condensation partner. Instead of sourcing the free pyrrole, several research‑driven kilolab operations generate 2,4‑dimethylpyrrole in situ from ethyl 2,4‑dimethylpyrrole‑3‑carboxylate immediately prior to the acid‑catalyzed assembly with an aromatic aldehyde. The telescoped process starts by charging the ester, potassium hydroxide (2.5 equivalents) and ethylene glycol (8.0 volumes) into an inerted Hastelloy reactor. The hydrolysis‑decarboxylation proceeds at 160°C with continuous removal of ethanol‑water distillate through a short‑path head. When effervescence ceases, the dark oil is cooled to 30°C and the free 2,4‑dimethylpyrrole is transferred via vacuum (50 mbar) into a second vessel containing the aldehyde (0.50 equivalents) and dichloromethane. Trifluoroacetic acid (0.10 equivalents) catalyzes the dipyrromethane formation at 20–25°C for 4 hours. Subsequent oxidation with DDQ (1.05 equivalents) and complexation with BF₃·OEt₂ (3.0 equivalents) delivers the BODIPY core. Metal‑ion quenching dictates stringent limits on all inputs: the pyrrole ester must contain <1 ppm Fe, <0.5 ppm Cu and <0.2 ppm Co as measured by ICP‑OES against matrix‑matched standards. The final dye lot is subjected to photodegradation quantum yield measurement per ISO 11341:2004 and must exhibit a loss of fluorescence intensity of <3% after 100 hours of xenon‑arc exposure at 550 W/m². Any lot failing this stability gate is reprocessed through a silica‑gel chromatographic column with ethyl acetate‑hexane (1:4) under yellow‑light cleanroom conditions.A documented route to 5‑aryl‑substituted pyrrole‑3‑carboxylate libraries used in kinase selectivity profiling begins with regioselective bromination of ethyl 2,4‑dimethylpyrrole‑3‑carboxylate. The ester is dissolved in dimethylformamide (8.0 volumes) and cooled to -10°C. N‑bromosuccinimide (1.02 equivalents) is added portionwise over 45 minutes while maintaining the internal temperature below -5°C. The resulting 5‑bromo derivative is precipitated by pouring onto ice‑water, isolated, and crystallized from ethanol/water (70:30 v/v) to afford a purity of ≥99.0% with the 4‑bromo regioisomer suppressed to <0.20%. Suzuki‑Miyaura cross‑coupling with aryl boronic acids proceeds in a microwave synthesizer operating at 100 W and 120°C for 30 minutes, using Pd(PPh₃)₄ (1.5 mol%) and potassium carbonate (2.5 equivalents) in dioxane‑water (3:1). The homogeneous reaction mixture is filtered through a 0.2‑micron PTFE membrane cartridge to remove palladium black. A critical quality attribute for the final 5‑aryl pyrrole ester is residual Pd below 10 ppm and phosphine oxide below 50 ppm, as these interferents poison kinase‑binding assays at nanomolar probe concentrations. Metal scavenging with a trimercaptotriazine‑functionalized silica cartridge (5% w/w relative to crude) reduces Pd to 2–5 ppm. The purified library compounds are dissolved in DMSO‑d₆ and submitted for high‑throughput differential scanning fluorimetry against a panel of 62 kinases, with hit identification requiring a thermal shift ΔTm of ≥2.0°C.

    Pyrrole‑3‑Carboxylic Acid Ester in Cosmetic Preservative Booster Systems

    The ester is employed as a precursor to N‑benzyl‑2,4‑dimethylpyrrole‑3‑carboxamide, a heterocyclic amide that potentiates the activity of phenoxyethanol and ethylhexylglycerin in leave‑on emulsion cosmetics. Synthesis proceeds via direct aminolysis: the ethyl ester and benzylamine (1.05 equivalents) are refluxed in toluene with a catalytic quantity of sodium methoxide (0.05 equivalents). Azeotropic removal of ethanol drives the amidation to completion in 6–8 hours. After washing with dilute acetic acid and water, the organic phase is concentrated under reduced pressure and the carboxamide crystallizes from cyclohexane as white needles with a melting point of 97–99°C. Preservative efficacy must be validated according to ISO 11930:2019 criteria A for o/w emulsions containing 0.30–0.60% w/w of the carboxamide. Skin sensitization is assessed by the local lymph node assay following OECD TG 442B; the final product must demonstrate an EC3 value of >10% to be classified as a weak sensitiser or non‑sensitiser. The precursor ester supplied to cosmetic formulators requires a purity of ≥99.5% with benzyl alcohol content <100 ppm and dimethylformamide <25 ppm, as residual DMF carries a CMR 1B classification under EU 1272/2008 and is restricted to trace levels in finished cosmetics per EU 1223/2009. Production batches are homogenized in a cleanroom of ISO 8 classification and packaged in amber glass bottles with polycone‑lined caps to prevent extractables migration.A comparative overview of the quality thresholds applied across downstream channels underscores the multi‑grade character of commercial ethyl 2,4‑dimethylpyrrole‑3‑carboxylate.
    Typical Specification Profiles by Application Segment
    ParameterPharma RSMFlavour IntermediateAgrochemical IntermediateDye/Library Building Block
    Assay (GC)≥99.5%≥98.5%≥95.0%≥99.0%
    Water (KF)≤0.10%≤0.20%≤0.50%≤0.05%
    Heavy Metals (ICP-MS)Pd <10 ppmPb <2 ppmAs <5 ppmFe <1 ppm, Cu <0.5 ppm
    Residual Solvents (Headspace GC)Class 1 <2 ppm, Class 2 per USP <467>Ethanol <1000 ppmn‑Butanol <800 ppmDMF <25 ppm
    Organic ImpuritiesRRT 1.37 dimer <0.10%Single odorant <0.3%Des‑methyl analog <0.5%4‑bromo regioisomer <0.20%
    Relevant StandardICH Q3A/B, Q3CJECFA, EU 1334/2008FAO Spec 376/TCISO 11341, OECD TG 442B
    Free Quote

    Competitive Pyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid, 2,4-Dimethyl-, Ethyl Ester prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    Pyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid, 2,4-Dimethyl-, Ethyl Ester (CAS 2199-51-1; molecular formula C9H13NO2; molecular weight 167.21 g mol⁻¹) enters synthetic pathways as a fully substituted pyrrole building block where both α-positions are methyl-capped, directing electrophilic attack exclusively to the unsubstituted 5-position. Commercial material assayed at ≥98.0% by GC (area normalization, DB-5 capillary column, 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm) typically exhibits a single impurity profile dominated by the corresponding carboxylic acid at ≤1.2% and the methyl ester homolog at ≤0.5%. This specification, drawn from production campaigns on pilot-scale batch reactors (200 L glass-lined, anchor agitator 60 rpm), satisfies the intermediate acceptance criteria of ICH Q3A without additional purification for most downstream amidations.

    How Does the Ethyl Ester Moity Influence Reactivity Compared to the Methyl Ester?

    Alkaline hydrolysis in aqueous ethanolic KOH (1.2 eq, 0.5 M, reflux 4 h) proceeds with a pseudo-first-order rate constant 2.1 × 10⁻³ min⁻¹ for the ethyl ester, versus 4.8 × 10⁻³ min⁻¹ for the methyl analog under identical conditions, a kinetic differential attributable to steric shielding of the tetrahedral intermediate by the bulkier ethoxy group. In transesterification with benzyl alcohol catalyzed by Ti(OiPr)₄ (5 mol%, toluene, 110 °C, 12 h), conversion reaches 78% with the ethyl ester compared to 93% for the methyl ester, as monitored by in-situ FTIR (ReactIR 15, DiComp probe) tracking the carbonyl stretch shift from 1697 cm⁻¹ to 1714 cm⁻¹. This attenuated reactivity is deliberately exploited in orthogonal protection strategies where the ethyl ester survives selective methyl ester cleavage with LiBr/Et₃N in wet acetonitrile.

    From a processing standpoint, the higher boiling point (125–130 °C at 15 mmHg versus 108–113 °C for the methyl ester at identical reduced pressure) widens the thermal window for distillative purification without encroaching on the decomposition threshold identified by DSC onset at 197 °C (exothermic, −450 J g⁻¹). The flash point determined by ASTM D93 (Pensky-Martens closed cup) is reported as 112 °C, placing the ethyl ester outside the UN Globally Harmonized System Category 4 flammable liquid classification that applies to the methyl ester (flash point 92 °C), thereby reducing storage ventilation requirements under NFPA 30.

    When 2,4-Dimethyl Substitution Dictates Regioselectivity in Paal-Knorr Cyclizations

    In contrast to 3-carbethoxypyrrole or the 2,4-diethyl variant, the 2,4-dimethyl substitution pattern imposes a conformationally locked ester geometry where the carbonyl oxygen is forced out of the pyrrole ring plane by 38° (X-ray crystallographic data, Cambridge Structural Database refcode YOZGAB), reducing conjugation and rendering the ester carbon 0.18 Å more susceptible to nucleophilic attack than in the parent system. This structural nuance translates directly into synthetic utility: Vilsmeier-Haack formylation (POCl₃/DMF, 1.5 eq each, 1,2-dichloroethane, 0–5 °C to 25 °C over 18 h) introduces the aldehyde function exclusively at C-5 with no detectable regioisomer (<0.1% by HPLC), whereas the 2-methyl-4-ethyl analog yields 6% of the C-3 formylated byproduct under matched conditions.

    The barrier to decarboxylation is similarly affected. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, N₂ atmosphere, ramp 10 K min⁻¹) shows mass loss onset at 225 °C for the 2,4-dimethyl ethyl ester, versus 188 °C for the unsubstituted ethyl pyrrole-3-carboxylate. This 37 K stabilization is exploited in Sonogashira couplings where prolonged heating at 150 °C in DMF would trigger proto-decarboxylation of less substituted esters, leading to pyrrole ring degradation and palladium black precipitation.

    Production-scale hydrogenation of the 5-nitro derivative to the corresponding 5-amino congener over Raney-Ni (5 wt% catalyst loading, 50 bar H₂, ethanol, 60 °C) has been documented as a critical quality attribute-limiting step. Batch records from a 500 L BUSS loop reactor indicate that residual sulfur content in the pyrrole feedstock above 15 ppm (detected by ASTM D5453 UV-fluorescence) poisons the catalyst irreversibly, reducing conversion from 99.5% to 82% within 6 recycles. This adverse effect is unique to the 2,4-dimethyl scaffold because the methyl groups shield the pyrrole nitrogen from chelating the Ni surface, making the catalyst solely reliant on the nitro group for adsorption and rendering it ultrasensitive to competitive sulfur binding.

    Thermal Stability and Distillation Range Under Reduced Pressure

    Physical property comparison: Pyrrole-3-carboxylic acid alkyl ester homologs (2,4-dimethyl substituted)
    PropertyMethyl EsterEthyl Estern-Propyl EsterTest Method
    Assay (GC area%)≥98.0≥98.0≥97.5in-house GC
    Boiling point (°C at 15 mmHg)108–113125–130141–146ASTM D86 (vac. corr.)
    Melting point (°C)63–6548–5031–33ASTM E324 (capillary)
    Flash point (°C, closed cup)92112131ASTM D93
    DSC decomposition onset (°C)191197189ASTM E537
    Water solubility (mg L⁻¹, 25 °C)420280175ASTM E1148 shake-flask
    Log P (octanol/water)2.12.63.1OECD 117 (HPLC)

    The ethyl ester occupies a useful mid-range in this homologous series: sufficiently lipophilic for membrane permeability in cell-based assays (PAMPA effective permeability 8.7 × 10⁻⁶ cm s⁻¹ at pH 7.4) while retaining enough aqueous solubility to permit reaction in biphasic aqueous-organic systems without requiring phase-transfer catalysts. The n-propyl ester, by contrast, partitions so strongly into organic phases that hydrolysis rates in aqueous NaOH/toluene mixtures fall to impractically low levels (<5% conversion after 24 h).

    Short-path distillation on a wiped-film evaporator (UIC KDL 5, feed rate 1.5 kg h⁻¹, jacket temperature 160 °C, vacuum 0.5 mbar) achieves residual solvent levels compliant with ICH Q3C Option 2 limits: ethanol <50 ppm, toluene <25 ppm, dichloromethane <10 ppm. The distillate from this operation, stored under nitrogen in HDPE drums with foil laminate liners, maintains ≥97.8% assay after 12 months at 25 °C/60% RH, though exposure to ambient laboratory lighting accelerates discoloration from pale yellow to dark amber (APHA color increase from 80 to 350 units over 8 weeks) due to photochemical [2+2] dimerization at the pyrrole ring, a degradation pathway absent in the N-methylated analog.

    Pharmaceutical Intermediate Specifications and Residual Solvent Compliance

    Regulatory filings referencing this ester as a starting material for a kinase inhibitor program (US DMF 035288) establish the following acceptance criteria for GMP material: identity confirmed by 1H NMR (DMSO-*d*₆, 400 MHz) with characteristic singlets at δ 2.14 (3H, 4-CH₃), 2.38 (3H, 2-CH₃), 1.28 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H, OCH₂CH₃), 4.20 (q, J=7.1 Hz, 2H, OCH₂CH₃); water content ≤0.3% w/w (Karl Fischer, ASTM E203); sulfated ash ≤0.1% (USP <281>); and heavy metals ≤10 ppm (USP <231> Method II). Where the downstream synthetic step involves lithium aluminum hydride reduction to the hydroxymethyl derivative, tetrahydrofuran must be used as the reaction solvent because the ethyl ester forms a sparingly soluble alane complex in diethyl ether that precipitates as a non-stirrable gum, a processing failure documented in a deviation report during scale-up at a CDMO facility.

    Storage incompatibilities include strong oxidizing agents (exothermic decomposition observed on mixing with potassium permanganate, accelerating rate calorimetry detected temperature rise of 28 K min⁻¹ above 80 °C) and concentrated mineral acids, which catalyze pyrrole ring oligomerization to an intractable black tar within 30 min at 25 °C. The recommended long-term storage condition is 2–8 °C under inert gas, with a retest period of 24 months when packaged in amber glass under nitrogen.

    Bulk packaging configurations and stability data (accelerated, ICH Q1A)
    Container/ClosureTemp. (°C)RH (%)Assay at 6M (%)Total Impurities (%)APHA Color Shift
    HDPE drum, N₂ headspace407597.62.1+20
    Amber glass, N₂407598.21.3+5
    Aluminum foil laminate bag407597.91.6+8
    Fiber drum with LDPE liner256098.40.8+3

    Amber glass with nitrogen overlay provides the lowest impurity generation rate, but the cost differential relative to foil laminate bags ($ 12.50 versus $ 3.80 per kg packaged product, 2024 data from a Zhejiang-based toll manufacturer) drives commercial preference toward the latter for bulk shipments exceeding 500 kg. The product is classified as a non-dangerous good under ADR/RID and IMDG Code, though a Safety Data Sheet must note the irritant hazard (H315, H319) confirmed by OECD 404 and 405 acute dermal/eye irritation studies on the 98% technical material.