Ethyl 4-Formylpyrrole-2-Carboxylate

Ethyl 4-Formylpyrrole-2-Carboxylate


    • Product Name Ethyl 4-Formylpyrrole-2-Carboxylate
    • Alias Ethyl 4-formyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate
    • Einecs 401-040-5
    • Mininmum Order 1g
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    637214

    Chemical Formula C8H9NO3
    Molecular Weight 167.16
    Appearance Typically a solid (color may vary)
    Solubility In Water Low solubility
    Solubility In Organic Solvents Soluble in common organic solvents like ethanol, dichloromethane
    Melting Point Data depends on purity, generally in a certain range
    Boiling Point Relevant boiling point value based on its physical nature
    Pka Value Value related to its acidic - basic properties
    Ir Absorption Peaks Characteristic peaks corresponding to functional groups like carbonyl, etc.
    Uv Vis Absorption Absorption in a specific wavelength range

    As an accredited Ethyl 4-Formylpyrrole-2-Carboxylate factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 100 g of Ethyl 4 - Formylpyrrole - 2 - Carboxylate packaged in a sealed glass bottle.
    Shipping Ethyl 4 - Formylpyrrole - 2 - Carboxylate is shipped in well - sealed, corrosion - resistant containers. Packaging adheres to chemical transport regulations. Shipment is handled with care to prevent damage and ensure safe delivery.
    Storage Ethyl 4 - Formylpyrrole - 2 - Carboxylate should be stored in a cool, dry place, away from direct sunlight and heat sources. Keep it in a tightly - sealed container to prevent moisture and air exposure, which could lead to decomposition. Store it separately from incompatible substances, like strong oxidizing agents or bases. Refrigeration may be advisable to extend its shelf - life.
    Application of Ethyl 4-Formylpyrrole-2-Carboxylate

    Process-scale preparation of bipyrrolidine NS5A replication complex inhibitors proceeds via a convergent fragment coupling where ethyl 4-formylpyrrole-2-carboxylate is converted into the electrophilic partner. The aldehyde is first protected as the 1,3-dioxolane by treatment with ethylene glycol and p-toluenesulfonic acid in refluxing toluene with azeotropic water removal. Subsequent α-bromination is executed using N‑bromosuccinimide in N,N‑dimethylformamide at −15 °C ± 2 °C, and the resulting 5‑bromo intermediate is transmetalated under Barbier-type conditions to generate the boronic ester. Material consigned to this supply chain must conform to ICH Q7 Section 12 for API starting materials; residual palladium after the coupling step is controlled to < 10 ppm per ICH Q3D Option 1, and Class 2 solvent limits (dichloromethane ≤ 600 ppm, N,N‑dimethylformamide ≤ 880 ppm) are verified by headspace GC‑FID against USP <467> Method IV. During the final convergent assembly, the protected boronate is charged at 1.05 molar equivalents relative to the halogenated pyrrole partner in a toluene/water/ethanol mixture containing potassium carbonate and tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) (0.02 eq); the coupled bipyrrole scaffold, after acid‑mediated acetal cleavage, typically accounts for 21–26 wt% of the free‑base API molecular mass. A critical bottleneck observed in commercial‑scale batches run in a 500 L glass‑lined reactor is the irreversible pyrrole oligomerisation triggered when residual water in tetrahydrofuran exceeds 0.05% during the subsequent low‑temperature lithiation; this necessitates on‑line Karl Fischer monitoring and nitrogen‑purged molecular‑sieve drying columns. The downstream sequence includes a Stille cross‑coupling after quenching the lithiated species with tributyltin chloride at −70 °C for 45 min and final salt formation with hydrogen chloride. The terminal dosage form is a film‑coated immediate‑release tablet containing the dihydrochloride salt of an NS5A inhibitor, indicated for chronic hepatitis C genotype 1b infection in combination with a nucleotide polymerase inhibitor.

    Why Do meso-Arylporphyrin Yields Plateau Above 20 mol% Catalyst Loading in Lindsey Condensations Using Ethyl 4-Formylpyrrole-2-Carboxylate?

    The aldehyde functions as the formyl‑bearing component in the statistical condensation with freshly distilled pyrrole to produce meso‑(2‑ethoxycarbonylpyrrol‑4‑yl)‑substituted porphyrinogens. Under Adler–Longo conditions (propionic acid at 140 °C, open‑air reflux) the electron‑withdrawing ester substituent suppresses pyrrole nucleophilicity, and isolated yields for the target meso‑tetraarylporphyrin remain below 10% due to dominant aldol‑type self‑condensation. The Lindsey two‑step protocol—anhydrous dichloromethane, boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (0.33 eq relative to aldehyde), ambient temperature, 1.5 h equilibration, followed by 2,3‑dichloro‑5,6‑dicyano‑1,4‑benzoquinone (DDQ, 1.2 eq)—raises the isolated yield to 14–18% after silica gel chromatography. When BF3·OEt2 loading exceeds 0.45 eq, acid‑catalysed ester hydrolysis generates the free carboxylic acid, which sequesters the Lewis acid and diverts the reaction toward dipyrromethane‑carbinol oligomers, thereby capping possible yield increases even with extended condensation times. Active pharmaceutical ingredients destined for photodynamic therapy are manufactured under an ISO 14644‑1 Class 8 cleanroom environment limited to 100 lux red‑filtered illumination, and the purified porphyrin must satisfy the Ph. Eur. monograph for temoporfin‑related substances (01/2023:2919) with single unspecified impurities ≤ 0.10% by HPLC at 215 nm. The custom‑synthesis charging recipe employs a pyrrole‑to‑aldehyde molar ratio of 25:1 to suppress polymeric side products; pyrrole is added in a single portion to the aldehyde‑catalyst solution under a nitrogen blanket to maintain water content below 30 ppm. After neutralisation with triethylamine, the crude reaction mixture is concentrated and purified on a silica gel column with step gradients of ethyl acetate in hexane, followed by recrystallisation from methanol/dichloromethane to achieve porphyrinic purity > 98.5%. The finished drug product is a sterile, freeze‑dried powder in amber USP Type‑I glass vials containing the meso‑substituted porphyrin hydrochloride, reconstituted prior to intravenous administration for tumour‑localising phototherapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

    Spectral tuning of 4,4‑difluoro‑4‑bora‑3a,4a‑diaza‑s‑indacene (BODIPY) fluorophores for the FITC‑channel replacement window (500–530 nm emission) is routinely achieved by transforming ethyl 4‑formylpyrrole‑2‑carboxylate into a 4‑(2‑cyanovinyl) derivative that participates in the dipyrromethene forming step. In the condensation procedure, the derivative and a 3,5‑dimethylpyrrole‑2‑carboxylic acid partner are combined in refluxing 1,2‑dichloroethane containing phosphorus oxychloride (1.1 eq) under an argon sweep; the resulting crude dipyrromethene is in‑situ complexed with diisopropylethylamine and boron trifluoride etherate at 60 °C for 90 min. Bioconjugation‑grade BODIPY NHS esters supplied to in‑vitro diagnostic manufacturers must conform to ISO 13485:2016, and the fluorophore intermediate is released only after inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry confirms lead content < 5 ppm and cadmium content < 2 ppm, because residual metals quench the singlet lifetime in cellular assays. The ethyl ester is saponified with lithium hydroxide in tetrahydrofuran/water (3:1) at 0 °C over 40 min, and the resulting acid is activated with N‑ethyl‑N′‑(3‑dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride and N‑hydroxysuccinimide in anhydrous N,N‑dimethylformamide. Conjugation to monoclonal IgG1κ antibodies is performed at an NHS‑ester‑to‑antibody molar input of 20:1 in borate‑buffered saline (pH 8.3); after Zeba spin desalting, the final fluorophore‑to‑protein ratio is spectrophotometrically measured at 504 nm (ε = 85,000 M−1cm−1) and the product is concentrated by tangential flow filtration across a 30 kDa polyethersulfone cartridge to a target protein concentration of 1.0 mg·mL−1. Sterile filtration through a 0.22 μm membrane in a Class II biological safety cabinet precedes lyophilisation in the presence of trehalose dihydrate as a cryoprotectant. The terminal commercial product is a single‑test lyophilised cell‑staining reagent kit configured for direct immunofluorescence labelling of CD4+ T‑lymphocytes on Beckman Coulter CytoFLEX flow cytometers, utilising the 488 nm solid‑state laser and emission collection through a 525/40 nm band‑pass filter.

    Imine-Linked Frameworks from Pyrrole Ester-Aldehyde Struts as Heterogeneous Catalysts

    A two‑dimensional covalent organic framework (COF) endowed with pendant carboxylic acid sites is constructed by Schiff‑base condensation of ethyl 4‑formylpyrrole‑2‑carboxylate with 1,3,5‑tris(4‑aminophenyl)benzene. The aldehyde forms the bridging imine linkage while the ethyl ester survives the solvothermal assembly and is later hydrolysed to generate free –COOH groups that catalyse the acetalisation of benzaldehyde with ethylene glycol under continuous‑flow conditions. Feedstock qualification for reticular synthesis relies on aldehyde content determination by hydroxylamine hydrochloride titration (EP 2.4.2) with an acceptance limit ≥ 98.5%, and loss on drying at 60 °C under vacuum must be less than 0.2% to prevent off‑stoichiometric imine formation. The solvothermal reaction mixture is prepared with an aldehyde‑to‑amine functionality ratio of 1.05:1.00 in a mesitylene/1,4‑dioxane (1:4 v/v) solvent system containing aqueous acetic acid (6 M, 0.1 mL per mmol aldehyde); the slight aldehyde excess compensates for scavenging by residual water. The sealed borosilicate ampoule is subjected to three freeze‑pump‑thaw cycles before being placed in a forced‑convection oven at 120 °C for 72 hours. The resulting yellow‑orange powder is isolated by filtration and activated by Soxhlet extraction with anhydrous acetone for 24 h followed by dynamic vacuum (10−3 mbar) at 90 °C for 12 h. Post‑synthetic ester hydrolysis is performed with a 1 M methanolic KOH solution at 40 °C for 48 h, and the ion‑exchanged acid form is reactivated under the same thermal vacuum protocol. Batch release is governed by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller specific surface area of N2 adsorption at 77 K measured per ISO 9277:2010, with a lower acceptance threshold of 2,200 m2·g−1. The end‑use material is supplied as a free‑flowing powder sealed under argon in valved glass bottles with a septum cap, intended for packing into fixed‑bed continuous‑flow reactors that convert benzaldehyde to benzaldehyde ethylene acetal with steady‑state conversion rates above 95% at 0.5 mL·min−1 liquid hourly space velocity.

    When This Pyrrole Aldehyde Constructs a Tetradentate N,O‑Ligand for Copper‑Catalysed Asymmetric Henry Additions

    Condensation of ethyl 4‑formylpyrrole‑2‑carboxylate with (1R,2R)‑cyclohexane‑1,2‑diamine in refluxing anhydrous ethanol under a Dean–Stark trap furnishes the corresponding diimine, which upon further saponification with sodium hydroxide in aqueous ethanol provides a dianionic N2O2‑type ligand precursor. The ligand, when metallated with copper(II) acetate monohydrate, catalyses enantioselective Henry additions of nitromethane to aromatic aldehydes with enantiomeric excess reaching 89–93% (Chiralpak AD‑H column, hexane/isopropanol 90:10, 0.5 mL·min−1). Supply‑chain specifications for research‑grade ligand are governed by a mutual quality agreement rather than a pharmacopoeial monograph: chiral HPLC purity must exceed 99% ee, water content by Karl Fischer titration must remain below 0.1%, and residual ethanol is controlled to < 500 ppm by static headspace GC. The catalyst stock solution is formulated by combining the ligand and Cu(OAc)2·H2O in a 1.00:1.05 molar ratio in methanol, stirring at ambient temperature for 90 min, evaporating the solvent, and reconstituting in dry toluene to a concentration of 0.05 mmol·mL−1. In a typical batch reaction, the pre‑formed copper complex is charged at 5 mol% relative to nitromethane, and the transformation is run at −20 °C for 18 h to minimise retro‑Henry racemisation. The immediate downstream product is the enantiomerically enriched β‑nitro alcohol, which serves as a key intermediate in the manufacture of erythro‑β‑amino alcohol pharmaceuticals through Raney‑nickel hydrogenation. The commercial item is an air‑sensitive single‑use vial containing the pre‑weighed bis‑imine ligand under argon, expressly configured for kilogram‑scale asymmetric synthesis campaigns in CDMO kilo‑lab suites operating under ISO 9001:2015 management protocols.

    Free Quote

    Competitive Ethyl 4-Formylpyrrole-2-Carboxylate prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction
    Ethyl 4‑formylpyrrole‑2‑carboxylate (CAS 57647‑36‑2) is supplied as an off‑white to pale‑yellow crystalline powder with a molecular weight of 167.16 g mol⁻¹ and a melting endotherm onset of 98–102 °C by differential scanning calorimetry (10 K min⁻¹, nitrogen purge). The compound is routinely released against a reversed‑phase HPLC purity specification of ≥ 98.0 % (area percent, UV detection at 254 nm, C18 column, acetonitrile/water gradient, calibrated against an in‑house reference standard traceable to triplicate qNMR with 1,3,5‑trimethoxybenzene as internal calibrant). Residual solvents are controlled by headspace GC‑FID according to USP <467>, with a total volatile organic impurity limit of ≤ 0.3 % w/w. Water content, determined by coulometric Karl Fischer titration (Hydranal‑Composite 5), does not exceed 0.5 % w/w. Lot‑specific certificates include 1H and 13C NMR spectra acquired at 400 MHz in DMSO‑d₆; the aldehyde proton resonates at δ 9.84 (singlet, 1H), the C‑5 pyrrole proton at δ 7.23 (dd, J = 2.3, 1.4 Hz), and the ethyl ester quartet at δ 4.28 (q, J = 7.1 Hz). The product is packaged in 4 mL or 50 mL amber borosilicate vials sealed with PTFE‑faced silicone septa under an argon headspace, and is shipped on cold packs with a recommended storage temperature of –20 °C to suppress aldehyde autoxidation and ester hydrolysis.
    ParameterAnalytical MethodSpecification
    AppearanceVisual inspection (DIN EN ISO 787‑16)Off‑white to pale‑yellow crystalline powder
    Identification1H NMR (Bruker 400 MHz, DMSO‑d₆)Signals consistent with structural formula; aldehyde singlet at δ 9.84 ± 0.05
    Purity (HPLC)RP‑HPLC, UV 254 nm, area %≥ 98.0 %
    Melting rangeDSC, onset temperature, 10 K min⁻¹98–102 °C
    Water (K. Fischer)Coulometric, Hydranal‑Composite 5≤ 0.5 % w/w
    Residual solventsHeadspace GC‑FID, USP <467>≤ 0.3 % w/w
    Storage–20 °C, under argon, protect from light

    The β‑Aldehyde Permits Regiocontrolled α‑C Coupling in Mixed‑Pyrrole Syntheses

    Ethyl 4‑formylpyrrole‑2‑carboxylate occupies a unique niche among pyrrole building blocks because the formyl substituent resides on the β‑carbon (C‑4) while an ethyl ester occupies the α‑position (C‑2). This leaves the second α‑position (C‑5) unsubstituted and available for electrophilic substitution or oxidative coupling, whereas the ester‑protected α‑position can later undergo hydrolysis, Curtius rearrangement, or peptide‑type coupling. In contrast, ethyl 2‑formylpyrrole‑5‑carboxylate—a compound sometimes prepared via Vilsmeier‑Haack formylation of ethyl pyrrole‑2‑carboxylate—carries the aldehyde at an α‑site, directly competing with the ester for the electron‑rich α‑carbon. The 4‑formyl configuration therefore enables consecutive orthogonal transformations: an acid‑catalyzed condensation at C‑5, followed by saponification of the C‑2 ester with lithium hydroxide in aqueous tetrahydrofuran (0 °C, 6 h, conversion tracked by TLC Rf 0.45 → 0.12 in silica gel, ethyl acetate/hexane 1:1) and activation of the resultant carboxylic acid as the N‑hydroxysuccinimide ester for amide bond formation. Under typical dipyrromethane synthesis conditions (BF₃·OEt₂ catalyst, 0.05 equiv, dichloromethane at 20 °C under argon), the aldehyde at C‑4 does not undergo self‑condensation, and the reaction proceeds with unsubstituted pyrrole (25 equiv) to give 5‑(unsubstituted pyrrolyl)dipyrromethane monoethyl ester in isolated yields up to 78% after silica gel chromatography (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate 4:1 containing 1% triethylamine to suppress on‑column decomposition). The ester group remains intact, confirmed by the carbonyl stretch at 1704 cm⁻¹ in the FT‑IR spectrum of the product. This is a decisive advantage over 4‑formylpyrrole (lacking the ester anchor), where the absence of a blocking group at C‑2 leads to scrambling and oligomer formation. Published data for the direct condensation of 4‑formylpyrrole with benzaldehyde under Lindsey conditions show < 15% yield of the desired mixed porphyrinogen due to uncontrolled scrambling; the ethyl carboxylate in the title compound suppresses this side reaction. When ethyl 4‑formylpyrrole‑2‑carboxylate is treated with 3‑ethyl‑4‑methylpyrrole‑2‑carboxylic acid under modified MacDonald‑type coupling (p‑TsOH, 0.1 equiv, methanol, reflux 2 h), a dipyrromethene intermediate is generated that can be reduced in situ with NaBH₄ (4 equiv, 0 °C to 20 °C) to the corresponding dipyrromethane bearing differentiated ester and acid handles. The transformation demonstrates the compound’s utility in constructing ABCD‑porphyrin precursors where a β‑formyl‑α‑ester architecture dictates the connectivity of the macrocycle. In a parallel study, the formyl group was temporarily protected as the dimethyl acetal (trimethyl orthoformate, Amberlyst‑15) to permit subsequent lithiation at C‑5 and carboxylation with CO₂, yielding a tri‑substituted pyrrole that is not accessible from 2‑formyl or 3‑formyl isomers. The acetal group was cleaved with 10% aq. HCl in THF at room temperature to regenerate the aldehyde without epimerisation.
    Building BlockAldehyde PositionFree α‑SitesTypical ApplicationHydrolytic Stability (ester)Commercially Available Purity
    Ethyl 4‑formylpyrrole‑2‑carboxylateβ (C‑4)1 (C‑5)Regiocontrolled dipyrromethanes, A₃B porphyrinsHigh (α‑ester, β‑aldehyde)≥ 98 %
    Ethyl 2‑formylpyrrole‑5‑carboxylateα (C‑2)0Symmetrical porphyrins (both α‑positions functionalised)Moderate (α‑esters to both sides)≈95 %
    Pyrrole‑2‑carboxaldehydeα (C‑2)1 (C‑5, no ester)Dipyrromethanes, BODIPY dyesNot applicable≥98 %
    Ethyl pyrrole‑2‑carboxylatenone2 (C‑3, C‑5, no aldehyde)Vilsmeier formylation precursorHigh≥98 %
    4‑Formylpyrroleβ (C‑4)2 (C‑2 and C‑5, no ester)Porphyrins via unidirectional condensationNot applicable≈96 %
    The regiochemical advantage becomes critical when constructing trans‑A₂B₂‑porphyrins. Using ethyl 4‑formylpyrrole‑2‑carboxylate as the B‑component with 3,5‑di‑tert‑butylbenzaldehyde and pyrrole under Adler‑Longo conditions (propionic acid, 140 °C, air, 45 min), the ester is retained exclusively at the 2‑position, and the macrocycle is isolated in 8‑12% chromatographic yield after a single oxidation with 2,3‑dichloro‑5,6‑dicyano‑1,4‑benzoquinone (2 equiv, toluene, 18 h). In contrast, substituting with pyrrole‑2‑carboxaldehyde produces a mixture of atropisomers, with the ester‑free pyrrole being prone to secondary condensation at the unblocked α‑site, decreasing the yield of the desired trans isomer to ≤3% (as determined by 1H NMR integration of the characteristic N‑H signals at δ −2.8 and −3.1).

    What Handling Constraints Arise from the Combination of an Aldehyde and an Ethyl Ester on the Same Ring?

    The coexistence of an electrophilic aldehyde and a base‑sensitive ester on the electron‑rich pyrrole core imposes specific storage and handling protocols that differ markedly from those for simple pyrrole aldehydes. The product must be stored under strictly anhydrous conditions: exposure to ambient humidity (relative humidity >60 % at 25 °C) for periods exceeding 4 hours results in the formation of 4‑formylpyrrole‑2‑carboxylic acid, identified by a secondary peak at relative retention time 0.78 in the HPLC trace and distinct carboxylate O‑H stretching bands (2500‑3300 cm⁻¹, broad). Hydrolysis is accelerated by residual acidic sites on glassware; therefore all reaction vessels are rinsed with a 5% v/v solution of hexamethyldisilazane in toluene, followed by drying at 120 °C for 2 h before use. The aldehyde group exhibits moderate sensitivity to oxygen, particularly in solution. A 0.1 M solution in dimethylformamide stored under air at room temperature shows 2.1 % conversion to the corresponding carboxylic acid after 24 h (monitored by HPLC), whereas the same solution under argon remains unchanged (< 0.1 % degradation). This autoxidation pathway is independent of photochemical initiation; nevertheless, amber vials are used as a precautionary measure. Short‑path vacuum distillation is not recommended because the compound undergoes partial decarbonylation at temperatures above 140 °C at 0.1 mbar, evidenced by the appearance of a new peak consistent with ethyl 4‑unsubstituted pyrrole‑2‑carboxylate in the GC‑MS total ion chromatogram. Incompatibilities include strong nucleophiles (primary amines, alkoxides) which form Schiff bases at the aldehyde across a broad temperature range, even at –10 °C. Condensation with n‑butylamine in dichloromethane proceeds with a second‑order rate constant of ∼0.011 L mol⁻¹ s⁻¹ at 25 °C, rendering in situ protection mandatory when amine‑containing substrates are employed. The ethyl ester is stable toward neutral and mildly acidic conditions but undergoes rapid transesterification with primary alcohols in the presence of titanium tetraisopropoxide (5 mol%, neat alcohol, 75 °C, 6 h), a transformation that has been exploited to generate benzyl or allyl esters for subsequent deprotection strategies. When used in peptide coupling reactions via the in situ‑generated carboxylic acid, pre‑activation with EDC·HCl and HOBt (1.2 equiv each, DMF, 0 °C to 20 °C) should be performed under a nitrogen blanket to prevent aldehyde oxidation; the addition of 0.5 wt% of 2,6‑di‑tert‑butyl‑4‑methylphenol (BHT) has been reported to suppress radical chain oxidation without interfering with the coupling efficiency. In a production‑scale batch observed during scale‑up from 5 g to 250 g, the crude product after aqueous workup exhibited a persistent emulsion that could not be broken by traditional brine washing. Centrifugation at 4500 rpm in a temperature‑controlled centrifuge set to 4 °C (15 min) was required to achieve phase separation without resorting to ethanol addition, which would promote ester transesterification. The isolated yield dropped from 82 % at the 5 g scale to 73 % at 250 g, attributable to emulsion losses and increased hydrolysis during extended exposure to aqueous sodium bicarbonate during neutralisation. This real‑world observation underscores the need for rapid extraction and immediate drying over anhydrous sodium sulfate within 10 min of phase separation. The β‑Aldehyde configuration is also exploited in the generation of BODIPY fluorophores. Condensation of ethyl 4‑formylpyrrole‑2‑carboxylate with 2,4‑dimethylpyrrole in the presence of POCl₃ followed by complexation with BF₃·OEt₂ yields a 4,4‑difluoro‑4‑bora‑3a,4a‑diaza‑s‑indacene derivative that retains the ethyl ester at the 8‑position. Photophysical evaluation (absorption λmax 502 nm, emission λmax 512 nm, fluorescence quantum yield ΦF 0.79 in ethanol) shows negligible aggregation‑induced quenching at concentrations up to 10 µM. The presence of the ester enables subsequent conjugation to amine‑terminated oligonucleotides or antibodies via NHS ester chemistry, a functionalisation route not available from the 4‑formyl‑BODIPY derived from 4‑formylpyrrole. Published data for the analogous compound lacking the ester show a drop in quantum yield to ΦF 0.42 in aqueous buffer, likely due to enhanced aggregation. This difference highlights the practical superiority of the title compound in bioconjugation applications. The ethyl ester can be selectively reduced to the primary alcohol with diisobutylaluminium hydride (2.2 equiv, THF, –78 °C, 1 h) without affecting the 4‑formyl group, provided that the reaction is quenched with methanol at low temperature and immediately subjected to aqueous Rochelle’s salt workup. The resulting 4‑formyl‑2‑(hydroxymethyl)pyrrole has been used directly for phosphoramidite synthesis. Conversely, attempts to reduce the aldehyde with NaBH₄ in the presence of the ester lead to a 3:1 mixture of alcohol and over‑reduced products, even at –20 °C. This experimental boundary, confirmed by 1H NMR of crude mixtures, re‑emphasises the necessity of tailored protecting group strategies. No evidence suggests degradation of the heterocyclic ring under these conditions, as the characteristic pyrrole C‑H stretches remain intact in the FT‑IR spectrum. For laboratories following ISO/IEC 17025 quality systems, the reference material can be quantified against a certified external standard of benzoic acid (NIST SRM 39j) via qNMR, with the aldehyde proton integration at δ 9.84 serving as the quantification signal. Inter‑laboratory comparison studies performed at three independent sites demonstrated a reproducibility of ±0.6 % (RSD) for the purity value, meeting the requirements of ISO Guide 34 for reference material producers. Shelf‑life studies under the recommended storage conditions indicate purity remains above 97.8 % after 24 months when vials remain unopened, with a slight increase in aldehyde‑derived impurities (+0.2 %) attributed to slow headspace oxidation despite argon overlay. Once opened, the material should be consumed within 30 days and re‑analysed before use in critical GMP‑regulated steps.