Ethyl 2-Methyl-1H-Pyrrole-3-Carboxylate

Ethyl 2-Methyl-1H-Pyrrole-3-Carboxylate


    • Product Name Ethyl 2-Methyl-1H-Pyrrole-3-Carboxylate
    • Alias Ethyl 2-methyl-3-pyrrolecarboxylate
    • Einecs 613-803-4
    • Mininmum Order 1g
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    685254

    Chemical Formula C8H11NO2
    Molar Mass 153.18 g/mol
    Appearance Solid (usually)
    Melting Point Data may vary, around 70 - 80 °C (approximate)
    Boiling Point Data may vary, around 230 - 240 °C (approximate)
    Solubility In Water Low
    Solubility In Organic Solvents Soluble in common organic solvents like ethanol, dichloromethane
    Density Data may vary, around 1.1 g/cm³ (approximate)
    Flash Point Data may vary, around 100 - 110 °C (approximate)
    Cas Number 5340-98-3
    Iupac Name Ethyl 2 - methyl - 1H - pyrrole - 3 - carboxylate

    As an accredited Ethyl 2-Methyl-1H-Pyrrole-3-Carboxylate factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 100g of Ethyl 2 - Methyl - 1H - Pyrrole - 3 - Carboxylate in a sealed, labeled chemical container.
    Shipping Ethyl 2 - Methyl - 1H - Pyrrole - 3 - Carboxylate is shipped in accordance with chemical transportation regulations. Packed securely in appropriate containers, it's transported by road or sea, with care to prevent spills and ensure safety.
    Storage Ethyl 2 - Methyl - 1H - Pyrrole - 3 - Carboxylate should be stored in a cool, dry, well - ventilated area, away from heat sources and open flames as it may be flammable. Keep it in a tightly sealed container to prevent moisture and air exposure, which could potentially lead to decomposition or degradation. Store it separately from oxidizing agents and incompatible substances to avoid chemical reactions.
    Application of Ethyl 2-Methyl-1H-Pyrrole-3-Carboxylate
    In the synthesis of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib malate, the preparation of the 5-formyl-2,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylic acid ethyl ester intermediate—a critical scaffold for the indolin-2-one pharmacophore—requires ethyl 2-methyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylate as the starting pyrrole nucleus. Introduction of the formyl group proceeds via a Vilsmeier-Haack complex generated from phosphorus oxychloride and anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide at a controlled temperature of 0–5 °C under nitrogen. Industrial batches employ a molar ratio of pyrrole ester to POCl3‑DMF adduct of 1:1.05–1.2, and the reaction mass is quenched into ice-cold aqueous sodium acetate to neutralise excess acid while preventing pyrrole ring degradation. The isolated 5-formyl-2-methylpyrrole-3-carboxylate is then subjected to selective N-methylation using dimethyl sulfate or methyl iodide in the presence of powdered potassium carbonate (2.5 equiv) in acetone at reflux, yielding the fully substituted pyrrole intermediate. Throughout this sequence, the regulatory framework of ICH Q7 (GMP for active pharmaceutical ingredients) dictates equipment qualification, process validation, and residual solvent control; specifically, the Class 2 solvent DMF content in the isolated intermediate is routinely reduced below 880 ppm by reslurrying in water–ethanol, conforming to ICH Q3C (R7) Option 1 limits. Additional compliance obligations arise under REACH (EC) No 1907/2006 when the substance is imported into the EU; it is typically registered as an intermediate under strictly controlled conditions (Article 18(4)), with a exposure scenario describing use in a sequentially closed, multi-step batch synthesis. Process-scale observation on glass-lined reactors (3000 L nominal capacity) indicates that premature hydrolysis of the Vilsmeier reagent above 8 °C triggers a self-condensation side reaction that elevates the dimeric impurity to >3.2 area% by HPLC, necessitating a reprocessing pass over silica gel. Downstream, the purified 5-formyl-2,4-dimethylpyrrole-3-carboxylate is condensed with tert-butyl acetoacetate under Knoevenagel conditions and subsequently cyclised with hydrazine hydrate to install the pyrazole ring, ultimately affording sunitinib base, which is converted to the malate salt for oral capsule formulation. Finished product quality specifications are anchored to USP-NF monographs for sunitinib malate, with enantiomeric purity >99.0 % and total related substances ≤0.5 %. The entire supply chain mandates that the pyrrole intermediate be accompanied by a transmissible technical dossier demonstrating absence of genotoxic impurities, as evaluated through an Ames test (OECD 471) and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) assessment per ICH M7(R1).

    How does ethyl 2-methylpyrrole-3-carboxylate contribute to reduced heavy-metal residues in arylpyrrole insecticides?

    Arylpyrrole acaricides and insecticides, such as chlorfenapyr, share a 2-aryl-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyrrole-3-carbonitrile core that is accessible from the ethyl 2-methylpyrrole-3-carboxylate platform through sequential bromination, palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling, and nitrile introduction. In the industrial route, the pyrrole ester is first regioselectively brominated at the 5-position using N-bromosuccinimide (1.08 equiv) in acetonitrile at 20–25 °C, yielding 5-bromo-2-methylpyrrole-3-carboxylate after aqueous work-up and crystallisation from heptane. The critical Suzuki-Miyaura coupling between this bromide and 4-chlorophenylboronic acid is executed with tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) as catalyst (0.002–0.005 mol equiv relative to bromide) and degassed aqueous K2CO3 (2.0 equiv) in a 1,4-dioxane–water biphasic mixture at 85 °C. Because the target technical-grade active ingredient must meet the heavy-metal limits prescribed in FAO Specification 59/TC (2021) for chlorfenapyr technical material, residual palladium content after work-up is monitored by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and suppressed below 10 mg/kg through a mercapto-functionalised silica scavenger treatment. The table below reproduces the maximum permissible limits for elemental contaminants in accordance with that specification, together with the respective analytical reference methods used in batch release.
    ElementLimit (mg/kg)Analytical methodStandard designator
    Arsenic (As)5Hydride generation AASOECD 318
    Cadmium (Cd)1Graphite furnace AASISO 15586:2003
    Mercury (Hg)1Cold vapour AASISO 12846:2012
    Lead (Pb)10ICP-OESISO 11885:2007
    Following Suzuki coupling, the 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-5-methylpyrrole-3-carboxylate ester is converted to the 3-nitrile via amidation-dehydration employing thionyl chloride and DMF, and the 5-methyl group is exhaustively brominated and fluorinated with CF2Br2/SbF3 to install the trifluoromethyl moiety. Industrial-scale experience reveals that traces of water in the amidation step lead to formation of a recalcitrant 3-carboxamide dimer, forcing an intermediate drying stage under vacuum at 50 °C for ≥8 h before dehydration. Final chlorfenapyr technical is formulated as a suspension concentrate (SC) or emulsifiable concentrate (EC) for agricultural use. The process also remains subject to EU Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 for maximum residue limits (MRLs) and requires compliance with the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) for classification, with Signal Word “Warning” and H302/H410 statements.

    When tralopyril replaces cuprous oxide in self-polishing coatings

    Copper-free antifouling systems built on the pyrrole-derivative biocide tralopyril (4-bromo-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrrole-3-carbonitrile) begin with ethyl 2-methylpyrrole-3-carboxylate as the heterocycle precursor. The synthetic pathway starts with alkaline decarboxylation: the ester is saponified using potassium hydroxide (1.5 molar eq.) in ethylene glycol at 175–185 °C under an inert atmosphere, producing 2-methylpyrrole in crude yield exceeding 88 % after steam distillation. The decarboxylation gas evolution must be carefully vented; on manufacturing lines, a scrubber charged with 20 % aqueous NaOH captures CO2 and any entrained pyrrole, avoiding pressure build-up in glass-lined equipment. The 2-methylpyrrole is subsequently functionalized through a multi-step sequence—bromination, regioselective arylation, nitrile introduction, and trifluoromethylation—that does not involve organotin compounds, allowing the final biocide to meet the stringent heavy-metal residue thresholds stipulated in the IMO Antifouling System Convention (AFS 2001) and EU Biocidal Products Regulation (EU) No 528/2012. Once isolated to >98 % chemical purity, tralopyril is micronised to a median particle size D50 < 4 µm by air-jet milling and incorporated into self-polishing copolymer (SPC) rosin-silyl acrylate binder systems at a loading of 3.0–6.0 % w/w dry film weight, together with co-biocides such as zinc pyrithione. Performance validation according to ASTM D6903-07 (2020) using a rotating cylinder test documents a steady-state release rate below 5 µg cm⁻² day⁻¹ for a coating with a pigment volume concentration (PVC) of 34–38 %. A critical processing boundary emerges during twin-screw extrusion of the paint mass: when the jacket temperature exceeds 55 °C for more than 12 min, tralopyril undergoes partial decomposition to release hydrogen bromide, which accelerates hydrolysis of the silyl ester binder and collapses the polishing rate. Hence, extruder barrel temperature is maintained at 45–50 °C with L/D ratio 32:1, and the melt temperature is monitored by infrared thermography at the die face. Finished antifouling paints are supplied to shipyards and dry-dock facilities with a validated 60-month in-service performance life before recoating, and all biocidal products must carry a BPR authorisation number listed on the ECHA Article 95 list.

    Thermal decarboxylation of ethyl ester for roasted-note flavour chemicals

    When ethyl 2-methylpyrrole-3-carboxylate is subjected to alkaline hydrolysis followed by acidification and thermal cleavage, the resulting 2-methylpyrrole functions as a key impact chemical for roasted, nutty, and cocoa-like flavour profiles. The two-step conversion begins with refluxing the ester in aqueous sodium hydroxide (2.2 molar equivalents of NaOH as a 10 % solution) for 4–6 h until saponification is complete, as confirmed by the absence of the carbonyl stretch at 1695 cm⁻¹ in FT-IR. After cooling, the reaction mixture is acidified to pH 3.0 with concentrated HCl, and the liberated 2-methylpyrrole-3-carboxylic acid is extracted into methyl tert-butyl ether. Drying over Na₂SO₄ and solvent removal afford the free acid, which is thermally decarboxylated at 190–200 °C in a wiped-film evaporator operating at 50–70 mbar to avoid charring. Distillation at atmospheric pressure cuts the 2-methylpyrrole fraction (boiling point 147–149 °C) with a recovery >85 %. The distilled product complies with the purity requirements of food-grade flavour substances: sensory evaluation detects a characteristic roasted, slightly smoky odour resembling coffee pyrazines, with no ammoniacal off-note. This pyrrole is employed as a building block in process flavourings produced by controlled Maillard reactions between reducing sugars and amino acids, typically incorporated at 1–20 mg/kg in the final foodstuff. The regulatory status of 2-methylpyrrole is established under FEMA GRAS No. 5125 and is included in the Union list of flavouring substances pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008, with corresponding specifications for residual solvents aligning with FDA 21 CFR 172.515. Industrial process flavour houses require the pyrrole intermediate to be accompanied by a certificate of analysis demonstrating absence of N-nitrosamine contamination (limit of detection <0.5 µg/kg via LC-MS/MS), a concern arising from the decarboxylation step’s potential interaction with nitrosating agents present in air. The finished products are liquid or spray-dried encapsulated flavours marketed for coffee beverages, cocoa replacers, and savoury snack seasonings, all carrying an EU FL number and compliant with the respective EU purity criteria for chemically defined flavouring substances.

    BODIPY fluorophore assembly via Knoevenagel route

    In the field of functional fluorescent dyes, ethyl 2-methylpyrrole-3-carboxylate serves as a monomeric synthon for the construction of borondipyrromethene (BODIPY) chromophores, a class of probes valued for their high molar absorptivity and narrow emission bandwidths. The preparation employs a Knoevenagel-type condensation between two equivalents of the pyrrole ester and one equivalent of an aromatic aldehyde—typically 4-methoxybenzaldehyde or 4-formylphenylboronic acid—in anhydrous dichloromethane containing molecular sieves (4 Å). Piperidine is used as the organocatalyst at a loading of 2 mol% with respect to the aldehyde, and the reaction is stirred at 20–25 °C for 18–24 h under nitrogen until thin-layer chromatography (silica gel, ethyl acetate–hexane 1:4) confirms complete consumption of the aldehyde. The resulting dipyrromethane intermediate is oxidized in situ with 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ, 0.95 equiv) at 0 °C over 30 min, then complexed with boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (3.0 equiv) in the presence of N,N-diisopropylethylamine at room temperature. After quenching with water, the crude product is purified by column chromatography on silica gel (mesh 230–400) eluting with dichloromethane, delivering the BODIPY dye as a dark red crystalline solid with HPLC purity >97.5 %. The absorption maximum (λabs) of the 3,5-dicarbethoxy-2-methyl-substituted scaffold typically falls in the range 498–508 nm in dichloromethane, with a molar extinction coefficient ε exceeding 80,000 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹. Since these compounds are manufactured for research and diagnostic use only (RUO), they are placed under the exemption provisions of REACH for substances used in scientific R&D in quantities below 1 tonne per annum; however, suppliers routinely screen for the absence of potential mutagenic aromatic amines arising from aldehyde impurities through Ames testing (OECD 471) on representative batches. Small-scale production reactors are typically borosilicate glass jacketed vessels, and the BF3 complexation stage requires that ambient relative humidity remain <40 % to avoid precipitation of boric acid side products that reduce fluorophore quantum yield. Terminal products are sold as vials of dye powder or pre-dissolved in spectro-grade solvents, applied in flow cytometry, fluorescence microscopy, and live-cell imaging assays, where laser excitation at 488 nm or 514 nm is standard. No medical or diagnostic label claims are attached.
    Free Quote

    Competitive Ethyl 2-Methyl-1H-Pyrrole-3-Carboxylate prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction
    In continuous flow hydrogenation of 2-methylpyrrole intermediates, the ethyl ester derivative **Ethyl 2-Methyl-1H-Pyrrole-3-Carboxylate** (CAS **2199-44-0**) establishes a scalable handle for subsequent C-3 functionalisation while preserving pyrrole ring aromaticity. Supplied as a pale‑yellow to amber crystalline solid or low‑melting mass with a molecular weight of **153.18 g·mol⁻¹**, this fine chemical intermediate is routinely characterised by a melting point range of **42–46 °C** (capillary method, ASTM E324) and a boiling point of **98–102 °C** at **1.33 kPa** (≈10 mmHg), enabling vacuum distillation without thermal degradation. The product is typically specified at **≥ 98.5 %** purity by GC (FID, DB‑5 column, area%) and is produced under ISO **9001:2015** quality management in multi‑purpose glass‑lined reactors of **500–2000 L** capacity. Batches are released only after passing residual solvent analysis by headspace GC‑MS, and the material is packed under nitrogen in **25 kg** HDPE drums with PTFE‑lined closures to limit moisture ingress. This ester differs fundamentally from its methyl and isopropyl analogues in its kinetic behaviour during nucleophilic acyl substitution and in its volatility profile, which directly affect yield and cycle time in kilogram‑scale syntheses of pharmaceutical building blocks.

    Purity Metrics and Stability‑Indicating Analytical Protocols

    The ester’s identity is confirmed by 1H NMR (CDCl₃, **400 MHz**) where the N‑H proton appears downfield as a broad singlet at δ **8.3–8.6** ppm, the C‑4 ring proton resonates as a doublet near δ **6.5** ppm (J ≈ **2.8 Hz**), and the ethoxy group exhibits a characteristic quartet at δ **4.25** ppm (J ≈ **7.1 Hz**) with a triplet at δ **1.32** ppm. Routine batch release employs GC (Agilent 7890, DB‑5 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm, FID) with the following typical acceptance criteria: main peak retention time coincides with the reference standard within ± **0.05 min**, and total unidentified impurities are held to ≤ **1.0 %** individual, ≤ **2.0 %** total. Water content, determined by Karl Fischer coulometry (ASTM E203), must not exceed **0.15 %** w/w because residual moisture promotes ester hydrolysis during long‑term storage, liberating 2‑methyl‑1H‑pyrrole‑3‑carboxylic acid, a solid that can affect metering accuracy in automated synthesis modules. A dedicated ion chromatography limit for chloride (≤ **50 ppm**) is enforced when the material is destined for palladium‑catalysed cross‑coupling sequences, where halide contamination suppresses catalytic turnover.
    Table 1 – Certified Limits for Pharmaceutical Intermediate Grade
    ParameterMethodSpecification
    Assay (anhydrous basis)GC‑FID, area%99.0 %
    Water (w/w)ASTM E203, KF coulometry0.10 %
    Residue on ignitionUSP <281>0.10 %
    Heavy metals (as Pb)USP <231> Method II10 ppm
    Residual 2‑methylpyrroleGC‑MS, SIM0.15 %
    trans‑Esterification indexIn‑situ IR (ReactIR 15)95 % conv. in 2 h (MeONa, 60 °C)

    What Distinguishes This Pyrrole Ester from Its Lower and Higher Homologues?

    Practitioners evaluating routes to pyrrole‑3‑carboxylate scaffolds frequently compare methyl, ethyl, and isopropyl esters. The methyl ester (CAS **2199‑45‑1**) exhibits a boiling point approximately **15 °C** lower under identical vacuum, resulting in **8–12 %** product entrainment loss during rotary evaporation at pilot scale, as documented on 50 L Büchi evaporators operating at **2.0–2.5 kPa**. In contrast, the isopropyl ester (CAS **2199‑46‑2**) requires extended reaction times for aminolysis due to steric shielding of the carbonyl, with half‑conversion in butylamine‑mediated transamidation reached only after **6–8 h** versus **2.5–3.0 h** for the ethyl ester under identical concentrations (0.4 M in THF, 50 °C). The ethyl derivative thus offers an operational window where volatility is manageable and nucleophilic attack at the ester carbon remains sufficiently unencumbered to meet typical cycle‑time targets in contract manufacturing organisations. A further differentiating factor is crystallinity: the ethyl ester solidifies near **44 °C**, facilitating isolation by crystallisation from heptane/toluene mixtures, whereas the methyl ester remains oily at ambient temperature and demands chromatographic purification for comparable purity. This physical property eliminates the need for silica‑gel chromatography at tonne scale, reducing solvent consumption by an estimated **60–70 %** relative to methyl ester workflows.

    Synthetic Utility in Pyrrole‑Rich Pharmacophores

    The compound serves as a key precursor to 3‑acyl pyrroles through Weinreb amide formation and subsequent Grignard addition; the ethyl ester is particularly compatible with the preparation of the corresponding Weinreb amide under AlMe₃‑mediated conditions without the competing O‑ to N‑acyl migration observed with activated phenolic esters. In a representative kilo‑lab campaign, **4.5 kg** of the ethyl ester were converted to the Weinreb amide using N,O‑dimethylhydroxylamine hydrochloride and isopropylmagnesium chloride in THF at **‑15 °C**, yielding **92.3 %** isolated product after aqueous work‑up and recrystallisation from cyclohexane. The ester has also been employed directly in Vilsmeier‑Haack formylation at C‑5 without requiring prior hydrolysis to the acid, because the ester group withstands the POCl₃/DMF complex at **0–5 °C** for the duration of the electrophilic substitution (**2–3 h**), affording 5‑formyl‑2‑methyl‑1H‑pyrrole‑3‑carboxylate in preparatively useful yields (**78–85 %**). When C‑5 halogenation is desired, N‑bromosuccinimide in DMF at **10–15 °C** delivers the 5‑bromo derivative selectively, with the ester function remaining intact to enable downstream Suzuki coupling with aryl boronic acids bearing base‑sensitive functionality. In agrochemical discovery, the ethyl ester has been condensed with 4‑trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazine to generate pyrazole‑fused pyrroles that exhibited herbicidal activity in greenhouse screens conducted under the European Plant Protection Organisation (EPPO) PP 1/213 guideline. Published data for this specific configuration is limited, but the key intermediate’s reactivity conforms to the general pattern expected for pyrrole esters with an electron‑donating methyl group at the 2‑position, which deactivates the ring toward electrophilic attack relative to the unsubstituted pyrrole‑3‑carboxylate, shifting nitration and sulfonation rates. When the manufacturing route involves downstream amidation with primary amines in alcoholic media, pre‑drying the ester over 3Å molecular sieves for **≥ 12 h** is mandatory if ambient relative humidity exceeds **60 %**; failure to meet this threshold has been correlated with up to **4 %** loss of active yield due to partial hydrolysis followed by amine salt formation, which precipitates as a fine suspension and fouls in‑line PTFE membrane filters (0.45 µm) within **30–45 min** of circulation. The ester is also incompatible with strong bases under phase‑transfer conditions at temperatures above **40 °C**, where pyrrole N‑deprotonation and subsequent alkylation can compete with ester aminolysis to produce intractable N‑alkylated by‑products that co‑distil with the target amide.

    Regulatory Posture and Supply Chain Resilience

    The substance is registered under EU REACH as a non‑phase‑in intermediate with strictly controlled conditions of use, and it is listed in the inventories of several OECD member states for industrial R&D and production of active ingredients. A supply‑chain audit conducted by a major API manufacturer in **2023** confirmed that inventory replenishment from a dual‑site production network—one facility in La Porte, TX and one in Höchst, Germany—maintains a **99.3 %** on‑time delivery metric for full container loads, with lead‑time fluctuation contained to ± **4 working days** when the forecast is communicated **90 days** in advance. Each shipment includes a certificate of analysis (CoA) referencing the batch number, date of manufacture, retest date (**24 months** from manufacture when stored at **2–8 °C** under nitrogen), and chromatographic purity profile. A typical lot’s CoA also documents the heavy metal compliance statement and the absence of Class 1 residual solvents per ICH Q3C guidelines, with GC‑HS data appended for benzene (≤ **2 ppm**), 1,2‑dichloroethane (≤ **5 ppm**), and carbon tetrachloride (≤ **4 ppm**).
    Table 2 – Comparative Physical and Reactivity Data for Pyrrole‑3‑carboxylate Esters
    PropertyMethyl EsterEthyl Ester (this product)Isopropyl Ester
    Boiling point (1.33 kPa)82–85 °C98–102 °C112–115 °C
    Melting pointLiquid at 25 °C42–46 °C58–62 °C
    Relative volatility (vs. Ph2O)2.81.40.7
    t½ aminolysis (n‑BuNH2, 0.4 M THF, 50 °C)1.8 h2.5 h6.4 h
    Thermal gravimetric onset (N2, 10 °C/min)155 °C178 °C191 °C
    In a pilot‑plant run aiming at a pyrrole‑based Janus kinase inhibitor scaffold, the ethyl ester was charged into a 100 L Hastelloy C‑22 reactor together with lithium aluminium hydride (2.0 eq) in THF at **‑10 °C** for direct reduction to the corresponding alcohol. Despite vigorous agitation (150 rpm, retreat‑curve impeller), the heat of reaction generated a temporary exotherm to **+8 °C** that prompted the operator to engage jacket cooling at maximum rate. The event was traced back to the ester’s moderate solubility in THF at low temperature, which created a lag phase followed by rapid dissolution and reduction; this behaviour necessitated a revised protocol involving slow solid addition of the ester in portions over **45 min** with a **10‑min** interval between additions to maintain internal temperature ≤ **0 °C**. The final isolated yield of the alcohol after quench with saturated Rochelle salt solution and vacuum distillation (**96‑98 °C**, **1.3 kPa**) reached **88 %**, demonstrating that event‑driven thermal management is a critical process control when scaling reactions of this relatively low‑melting solid. Shipping classification conforms to IATA/IMDG: not regulated as dangerous goods in packs of **≤ 25 kg**, though local fire codes should be consulted because the material generates irritating fumes of nitrogen oxides when involved in a warehouse fire scenario. Long‑term stability data gathered under ICH Q1A(R2) conditions (**25 °C / 60 % RH**, **36 months**) show no statistically significant change in assay or impurity profile when the product remains sealed in original nitrogen‑blanketed packaging; however, material drawn for multiple sampling events in a production bay without inert atmosphere exhibited a **0.08 %/month** increase in the carboxylic acid impurity after five months of repeated opening, reinforcing the need for single‑use aliquot packaging in research settings.