Ethyl 2,4-Dimethylpyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid

Ethyl 2,4-Dimethylpyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid


    • Product Name Ethyl 2,4-Dimethylpyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid
    • Alias Ethyl 2,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylate
    • Einecs 620-537-2
    • Mininmum Order 1g
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    246042

    Chemical Formula C9H13NO2
    Molecular Weight 167.205 g/mol
    Appearance Solid (likely, based on similar compounds)
    Melting Point No standard value publicly available without experimental determination
    Boiling Point No standard value publicly available without experimental determination
    Solubility In Water Low solubility (due to non - polar nature of the pyrrole and alkyl groups)
    Solubility In Organic Solvents Soluble in common organic solvents like ethanol, dichloromethane
    Pka No standard value publicly available without experimental determination
    Density No standard value publicly available without experimental determination

    As an accredited Ethyl 2,4-Dimethylpyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 100g of Ethyl 2,4 - Dimethylpyrrole - 3 - Carboxylic Acid in sealed chemical - grade packaging.
    Shipping Ethyl 2,4 - Dimethylpyrrole - 3 - Carboxylic Acid is shipped in properly sealed containers. Packaging adheres to chemical transportation regulations to prevent leakage, ensuring safe transit by air, sea, or land.
    Storage Ethyl 2,4 - Dimethylpyrrole - 3 - Carboxylic Acid should be stored in a cool, dry place, away from heat sources and direct sunlight. Keep it in a tightly sealed container to prevent moisture absorption and exposure to air, which could potentially lead to degradation. Store it separately from incompatible substances, such as strong oxidizing agents, in a well - ventilated area to ensure safety.
    Application of Ethyl 2,4-Dimethylpyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid

    During the kilogram-scale synthesis of a pyrrole-bearing kinase inhibitor intermediate, the controlled hydrolysis of ethyl 2,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylate to the corresponding carboxylic acid emerged as the critical process bottleneck documented in batch manufacturing records under ICH Q7 Section 7.3 requirements. The ester was charged into a 10 L glass-lined reactor equipped with a turbomixer operating at 350 rpm, and treated with a pre-cooled (0–2 °C) solution of lithium hydroxide monohydrate (1.05 eq) in 3:1 v/v THF/deionized water. Precise temperature control within the ±2 °C window was mandatory; infrared thermography across three validation runs indicated that excursions above 5 °C initiated decarboxylation at the 3-position, generating the des-carboxy impurity at levels exceeding 2.1% by HPLC area, a threshold that triggered mandatory batch rejection under the in-process control plan aligned with FDA 21 CFR §211.110. Following hydrolysis, the reaction mass was quenched by addition of 2 M HCl to pH 8.7±0.1, extracted with methyl tert-butyl ether, and the organic layer dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate before solvent swap to n-heptane for crystallization. The resulting free acid was isolated with a polymorphic purity of 99.7% (DSC endotherm onset at 189.2 °C) and subsequently activated with HATU (1.2 eq) and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (3.0 eq) in DMF at –15 °C for coupling with the amine fragment to yield the final penultimate intermediate. The end-use product was a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor formulated into 25 mg and 100 mg film-coated tablets compliant with USP monograph 〈2040〉.

    Hydrolysis ConditionBase (eq)Solvent SystemTemperature (°C)Des-carboxy Impurity (%)Isolated Yield (%)
    LiOH·H₂O, 1.05 eqLiOHTHF/H₂O, 3:10–20.492
    NaOH, 1.20 eqNaOHMeOH/H₂O, 2:15–103.781
    K₂CO₃, 2.50 eqK₂CO₃Acetone/H₂O, 4:120–258.265

    What Drives Regioselective Trifluoromethylation at the Pyrrole 5-Position in Chlorfenapyr Precursor Synthesis?

    In the agrochemical synthesis of the pyrrole insecticide chlorfenapyr, ethyl 2,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylate functions as the core scaffold onto which 4-chlorophenyl, trifluoromethyl, and cyano substituents are introduced sequentially. Production-scale campaigns run at a 50 L glass-lined reactor train have identified that regioselective installation of the trifluoromethyl group at the 5-position requires strict stoichiometric discipline: the ester is first alkylated with 4-chlorobenzyl alcohol in the presence of polyphosphoric acid at a molar ratio of 1:1.15 (ester to alcohol), consuming the alcohol within 6 h at 80 °C to form the 5-(4-chlorophenyl)methyl intermediate with 85% selectivity. The subsequent trifluoromethylation employs Umemoto’s reagent (1.2 eq) in DMF at –20 °C under a continuous nitrogen sweep; stoichiometry falling below 1.0 eq results in unreacted starting material that co-elutes during purification, while excess above 1.4 eq triggers bis-trifluoromethylated impurity exceeding the allowable 0.15% limit per CIPAC MT 18.1.1. The ester-to-nitrile conversion proceeds via amide intermediate using NH₃/MeOH at 10 bar and 60 °C in a loop reactor, followed by POCl₃ dehydration at 0–5 °C. The final intermediate, 4-bromo-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrrole-3-carbonitrile, is crystallized from ethanol/water to a purity of ≥98.0% and formulated into end-use products such as 240 g/L emulsifiable concentrate (EC) and 10% suspension concentrate (SC) meeting FAO/WHO specifications and ISO 1750 common name registration. Process capability analysis (Cpk 1.33) is monitored through 12 consecutive batches to ensure the bromide content stays within the 10.5–11.2% w/w window, as deviations correlate with reduced contact toxicity in Spodoptera frugiperda leaf-dip bioassays. Waste stream treatment involves neutralization of phosphoric acid byproducts with 10% Ca(OH)₂ slurry before discharge.

    Bromination ReagentEquivalentsTemperature (°C)Reaction Time (h)4-Bromo Selectivity (%)Dibromo Impurity (%)
    N-Bromosuccinimide (NBS)1.0525497.20.3
    Br₂ in CCl₄1.100293.52.1
    NaBr/NaClO (aq.) in situ1.2010688.84.6

    Synthesizing β-tetramethyl-substituted porphyrins for near-infrared organic light-emitting diode (OLED) emitter layers requires ethyl 2,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylate as a pre-functionalized monomer that suppresses scrambling during porphyrinogen formation. In a 2 L three-neck flask under strict anhydrous conditions (Karl Fischer titration <15 ppm H₂O in dichloromethane), 4-methoxybenzaldehyde (40 mmol, 1.0 eq) and the pyrrole ester (160 mmol, 4.0 eq) were dissolved in 1.2 L CH₂Cl₂. Boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (0.1 eq) was added via syringe over 30 min under a nitrogen blanket, and the mixture stirred in darkness for 24 h. Oxidation with 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (1.5 eq) at 25 °C for 4 h afforded the crude tetraphenylporphyrin derivative, which was purified by neutral alumina chromatography (eluent: CH₂Cl₂/hexane 7:3) to yield the β-octa-methyl-substituted free-base porphyrin as a deep purple solid. Metallation with PtCl₂ (1.2 eq) in benzonitrile at 190 °C for 18 h produced the platinum(II) complex exhibiting a photoluminescence quantum yield of 0.54 and an emission maximum at 780 nm. The terminal application was a dopant in the emitting layer of red-to-NIR OLED devices fabricated by vacuum thermal evaporation at a base pressure of 5×10⁻⁷ mbar, conforming to lifetime testing under IEC 62341-5 at an initial luminance of 1000 cd/m². During process scale-up to 20 L, residual moisture above 50 ppm catalyzed porphyrinogen oxidation prematurely, yielding 5–8% of open-chain polypyrrolic byproducts that required a secondary preparative SEC separation on Bio-Beads S-X1 resin.

    Oilfield Acidizing Corrosion Inhibitor Packages Based on Pyrrole Carboxylate Salt Synergists

    Ethyl 2,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylate is hydrolyzed to its sodium salt and incorporated into high-temperature acidizing inhibitor formulations for carbon steel (AISI 1020) tubulars exposed to 15% HCl during matrix stimulation treatments. The hydrolyzed pyrrole salt acts as a film-forming synergist when combined with acetylenic alcohols and quaternary ammonium surfactants; a validated formulation contains 12 wt% of the pyrrole carboxylate salt, 8 wt% propargyl alcohol, 5 wt% cinnamaldehyde, and 3 wt% benzylquinolinium chloride in a mixed glycol ether solvent system. Weight-loss coupon immersion tests according to ASTM G31-72 at 90 °C for 4 h demonstrated a corrosion rate of 15 mpy with the formulated inhibitor versus 220 mpy for uninhibited acid, meeting the ≤50 mpy acceptability criterion of NACE TM0169-2000. Downhole delivery involved metered injection via a chemical skid at 5–10 gal/1000 gal of treating fluid, with real-time monitoring of Fe²⁺ concentration kept below 2000 mg/L during flowback. The end-use application covers high-rate matrix acidizing of sandstone formations with bottomhole static temperatures up to 120 °C, where the pyrrole carboxylate ensures persistent film coverage without causing formation damage or emulsion sludge, verified by return permeability testing on Berea sandstone cores. Storage stability of the inhibitor package exceeds 12 months at ambient conditions when pH is maintained between 8.0 and 9.5, preventing premature hydrolysis of the ester-linkage in the unneutralized intermediate.

    Free Quote

    Competitive Ethyl 2,4-Dimethylpyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction
    Ethyl 2,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylate (CAS 2199-51-1, synonym: ethyl 2,4-dimethylpyrrole-3-carboxylate) is furnished as a white to off-white crystalline solid with a melting point range of 74–76 °C. Standard supply specifications confirm a purity of ≥98.0% by gas chromatography (area normalization, DB‑5 column 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm, FID), water content ≤0.10 % w/w via Karl Fischer coulometry per ASTM D6304‑16e1, and residual palladium ≤5 ppm by ICP‑MS. The molecular formula C₉H₁₃NO₂ corresponds to a relative molecular mass of 167.21 g mol⁻¹. Packages designated EDP‑5 (5 g), EDP‑25 (25 g), and EDP‑100 (100 g) are sealed under dry argon in amber Type III borosilicate glass with PTFE‑faced septa; all containers include an integrated desiccant cartridge and oxygen indicator. The product serves as a sterically defined, orthogonally protected pyrrole building block in porphyrin, corroles, and BODIPY dye construction, where the ethyl ester confers both solubility advantages and a defined deprotection profile.

    Why Routine Chromatography Alone Fails to Guarantee Synthetic Utility?

    GC area‑% purity above 99 % can mask the presence of positional isomers, most notably ethyl 2,3‑dimethyl‑1H‑pyrrole‑4‑carboxylate, which co‑elute on conventional capillary columns. In porphyrinogen condensations, incorporation of even 0.5 mol % of such isomers leads to scrambled meso‑aryl substitution patterns that are inseparable by column chromatography on silica gel (particle size 40–63 µm) and render the macrocycle unusable for photophysical studies. Consequently, the certificate of analysis mandates absence of regioisomers by ¹H NMR at 400 MHz in CDCl₃. The diagnostic singlet of the 5‑H proton at δ 5.60 ± 0.02 ppm must appear free of satellite signals; any accompanied resonance at δ 5.45 ppm indicates the 2,3‑dimethyl isomer. A secondary confirmatory test employs HPLC‑CAD on a biphenyl stationary phase (100 × 3.0 mm, 2.7 µm) with an acetonitrile/water gradient, achieving baseline resolution (Rs > 2.5) between the two regioisomers. Batches that fail this specification are re‑crystallized from hexane/ethyl acetate (4:1 v/v) at a cooling rate of 0.5 °C min⁻¹ below the cloud point, a procedure developed from observation that rapid quenching locks the isomer into the crystal lattice. Under inert conditions, the ester participates in Vilsmeier–Haack formylation at the vacant 5‑position with markedly different regioselectivity compared to its N‑methyl counterpart. A production‑scale campaign in a jacketed 20‑L glass‑lined reactor (Büchi Glas Uster, d = 300 mm impeller, pitch‑blade turbine at 250 rpm) revealed that the exotherm when adding anhydrous DMF to the phosphorus oxychloride adduct must be managed by maintaining the jacket at −5 °C and limiting the DMF addition rate to 8 mL min⁻¹. Deviation by ±2 °C in the charge temperature resulted in a yield drop of 12–15 % due to oligomeric tar formation, quantified by gravimetric filtration of the quenched mass. After hydrolysis, the 5‑formyl derivative is isolated in 78–82 % yield with a purity that plateaus if the phosphate salt removal is performed below pH 7.2; above this value, partial ester saponification accelerates.

    Condensation Kinetics with Para‑Substituted Benzaldehydes

    When ethyl 2,4‑dimethylpyrrole‑3‑carboxylate is employed as the α‑free component in MacDonald‑type 2+2 condensation, the second‑order rate constant depends strongly on the aldehyde electronics and on the absence of adventitious water. Reaction calorimetry (Mettler Toledo RC1e, 500 mL Hastelloy reactor) was used to derive kinetic parameters in dichloromethane with trifluoroacetic acid (0.15 M) at 0 °C. With benzaldehyde, the uncorrected k₂ was 0.035 L mol⁻¹ s⁻¹; with p‑nitrobenzaldehyde, it rose to 0.12 L mol⁻¹ s⁻¹. The difference originates in the increased electrophilicity of the aldehyde carbon, but the acceleration simultaneously narrows the processing window: the induction period shortens from 4.2 min to 1.8 min, demanding that the aldehyde be metered in at 0.3 mol % min⁻¹ via a syringe pump to prevent a runaway oligomerization cascade. When the jacket setpoint was kept at −10 °C, the reaction temperature could be held at 0 ± 1 °C; a deviation to +3 °C within the first 60 s of addition led to a bimodal molecular weight profile (Mₐ > 2500 Da by GPC) and rendered the dipyrromethane fraction < 40 % after silica plug filtration. Deep‑dive analysis of telechelic by‑products isolated from a failed batch confirmed that the oligomerization propagates through the pyrrole α‑positions even when the ester group remains intact, a finding that mandates strict temperature control at the ± 1 °C level for any scale exceeding 50 g of product. Storage stability under international logistics conditions imposes further constraints. The ethyl ester is hygroscopic above RH 40 % at 25 °C; exposure to ambient humidity for 8 h while a container is opened for sampling increases free 2,4‑dimethylpyrrole‑3‑carboxylic acid content from 0.05 % to 0.31 % as measured by quantitative ion chromatography (suppressed conductivity, AS‑18 column). The free acid, once formed, auto‑catalyzes further hydrolysis through a proton‑transfer mechanism, accelerating degradation in a non‑linear fashion. Therefore, all handling must be conducted in a glovebox with a moisture content ≤ 5 ppm H₂O, and partially used bottles must be resealed with an oxygen‑absorbing cap and returned to  −20 °C storage within 30 min. Long‑term stability data (ICH Q1A conditions) indicate that at  −20 °C, the purity remains above 98.0 % for 24 months; at +5 °C, the shelf life is truncated to 6 months before the free acid surpasses 1.5 %.
    Table 1. Comparative properties of 2,4-dimethylpyrrole-3-carboxylate esters.
    EsterMolecular weight (g mol⁻¹)m.p. (°C)Solubility in THF at 25 °C (g/100 mL)Deprotection methodRelative rate in MacDonald condensation*
    Methyl153.1868–7018Aqueous NaOH, 2 h reflux1.2 (reference)
    Ethyl167.2174–7612NaOH/EtOH, 1.5 h reflux1.0
    tert-Butyl209.2992–94 (dec)10CF₃CO₂H/CH₂Cl₂, 25 °C, 30 min0.6
    Benzyl243.3055–578H₂, Pd/C, 1 atm0.9
    *Relative rate defined as k₂(ester)/k₂(ethyl) for condensation with benzaldehyde in CH₂Cl₂/TFA at 0 °C; data averaged from triplicate runs, std. dev. ≤ 0.05.
    Prior to use in palladium‑catalyzed cross‑coupling sequences, the ethyl ester exhibits a distinct advantage over the free acid. A representative Suzuki‑Miyaura coupling of ethyl 5‑bromo‑2,4‑dimethylpyrrole‑3‑carboxylate with 4‑biphenylboronic acid (Pd(PPh₃)₄ 2 mol %, K₂CO₃, dioxane/water 4:1, 80 °C) delivered 92 % isolated yield of the biaryl product after 6 h. Repeating the reaction with the corresponding free acid derivative under identical conditions reduced the yield to 67 %, with 19 % of the palladium precipitating as black colloid—consistent with carboxylate‑mediated catalyst sequestration. The ester also tolerates Negishi couplings with organozinc reagents generated in situ from alkyl bromides, whereas the free acid requires pre‑formation of the zinc carboxylate and adds a protection step. Published data for a direct comparison in Buchwald‑Hartwig aminations is limited, but the ester’s inability to deprotonate under basic conditions is recognised as an advantage when using potassium tert-butoxide as base at elevated temperature.

    What if the Free Acid Form Interferes with Suzuki Coupling Steps?

    Beyond the catalyst‑poisoning issue, the free acid can undergo decarboxylation when heated above 180 °C, restricting thermal operations such as vacuum sublimation purification. The ethyl ester, in contrast, distills without decomposition at 110 °C @ 0.05 mbar (short‑path, Kugelrohr) and can be sublimed at 80 °C @ 0.01 mbar, yielding crystal conglomerates with residual solvent levels < 20 ppm as confirmed by headspace GC on a 624‑siloxane column. Sublimation is routinely performed on a 25 g scale in a cylindrical glass oven (BÜCHI B‑585) with a gradient of 2 °C min⁻¹ to avoid bumping. The melting point of the sublimate matches the original specification to within 0.5 °C. Elemental analysis acceptance criteria are fixed at C 65.3–65.8 %, H 7.8–8.0 %, N 8.4–8.6 % (calculated for C₉H₁₃NO₂: C 65.43 %, H 7.93 %, N 8.48 %), tested per ASTM D5291‑16. Heavy metal limits follow Ph. Eur. 2.4.8 method E, with individual elements reported as: Pb ≤ 2 ppm, Cd ≤ 1 ppm, As ≤ 1 ppm, Hg ≤ 0.5 ppm. The manufacturing site operates under an ISO 9001:2015 quality management system, and every shipment includes a certificate of analysis conforming to EN 10204 type 3.1. The residual solvent profile is controlled by a harmonized ICH Q3C guideline: acetone ≤ 100 ppm, ethyl acetate ≤ 200 ppm, hexane ≤ 50 ppm. This documentation package is designed to support direct use in early‑phase API intermediate campaigns without additional re‑qualification. When a process demands orthogonal deprotection in the presence of a N‑Boc group, the ethyl ester’s stability towards dilute trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) at room temperature can be exploited. A standard procedure treats the N‑Boc‑pyrrole ethyl ester with 20 % TFA in dichloromethane for 2 h; HPLC analysis shows less than 0.2 % ethyl ester cleavage, whereas the corresponding methyl ester undergoes 1.8 % hydrolysis under identical conditions due to the higher electrophilicity of the methyl carbonyl. This differential stability has been leveraged in solid‑phase syntheses of porphyrin libraries on Wang resin, where premature loss of the methyl ester would release the chromophore prematurely.