Ethyl (1S,3Ar,6As)-Octahydrocyclopenta[C]Pyrrole-1-Carboxylate Hydrochloride (1:1)

Ethyl (1S,3Ar,6As)-Octahydrocyclopenta[C]Pyrrole-1-Carboxylate Hydrochloride (1:1)


    • Product Name Ethyl (1S,3Ar,6As)-Octahydrocyclopenta[C]Pyrrole-1-Carboxylate Hydrochloride (1:1)
    • Alias Tropanyl Ethyl Ester HCl
    • Einecs 812-461-2
    • Mininmum Order 1g
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    862739

    Chemical Name Ethyl (1S,3Ar,6As)-Octahydrocyclopenta[c]Pyrrole-1-Carboxylate Hydrochloride (1:1)

    As an accredited Ethyl (1S,3Ar,6As)-Octahydrocyclopenta[C]Pyrrole-1-Carboxylate Hydrochloride (1:1) factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 100g of Ethyl (1S,3Ar,6As)-Octahydrocyclopenta[c]Pyrrole - 1 - Carboxylate Hydrochloride (1:1) in sealed vial.
    Shipping Ethyl (1S,3Ar,6As)-Octahydrocyclopenta[c]Pyrrole - 1 - Carboxylate Hydrochloride (1:1) will be shipped in secure, appropriately labeled containers. Special handling for chemicals ensures compliance with safety and regulatory requirements during transit.
    Storage Ethyl (1S,3Ar,6As)-Octahydrocyclopenta[c]Pyrrole - 1 - Carboxylate Hydrochloride (1:1) should be stored in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight. Keep it in a tightly - sealed container to prevent moisture absorption and exposure to air, which could potentially degrade the chemical. Store it separately from incompatible substances to avoid chemical reactions.
    Application of Ethyl (1S,3Ar,6As)-Octahydrocyclopenta[C]Pyrrole-1-Carboxylate Hydrochloride (1:1)

    The hydrochloride salt is introduced directly into a paritaprevir (ABT-450) commercial manufacturing route at the P2 fragment elaboration stage. Before coupling, the ethyl ester is hydrolyzed to the corresponding (1S,3aR,6aS)-octahydrocyclopenta[c]pyrrole-1-carboxylic acid while liberating the secondary amine. In a standard production-scale protocol conducted in a 500 L glass-lined reactor under nitrogen, 1.0 eq of the hydrochloride ester is suspended in 2.5 volumes of deionized water and 2.5 volumes of tetrahydrofuran at 20 °C. An aqueous solution of 2.2 eq sodium hydroxide is added dropwise, maintaining the internal temperature below 25 °C to minimize base-catalyzed epimerization at the α-carbon of the ester. Hydrolysis is monitored by reverse-phase HPLC (C18 column, 210 nm) until residual ester content drops below 0.5 % area. The mixture is then acidified to pH 2.0–3.0 with concentrated hydrochloric acid at 0–5 °C, precipitating the free amino acid as a white solid. The precipitate is filtered, washed with chilled deionized water, and vacuum-dried at 40 °C for 12 h under ≤10 mbar to a moisture content below 0.3 % as determined by Karl Fischer titration. Pre-drying of the starting hydrochloride is mandatory when ambient relative humidity exceeds 60 % because the amino acid intermediate exhibits noticeable hygroscopicity after neutralization, leading to inaccurate mass balance and reduced coupling efficiency in the subsequent amidation step.

    The dried amino acid is then coupled to the paritaprevir macrocyclic amine intermediate in dichloromethane (8 volumes) using 1.15 eq of N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride and 1.15 eq of 1-hydroxybenzotriazole hydrate, with 2.2 eq of N,N-diisopropylethylamine as base. Activation proceeds at 0–2 °C for 40 min, after which the amine component is added and the reaction mass is warmed to 25 °C over 3 h. A single-pass conversion of ≥92 % is typical; the crude product is isolated by solvent switch to ethyl acetate and sequential washes with 5 % aqueous citric acid, saturated sodium bicarbonate solution, and brine. Residual dichloromethane in the final paritaprevir drug substance must comply with ICH Q3C Option 2 limits (600 ppm). Enantiomeric purity of the coupled product is verified by chiral supercritical fluid chromatography (Chiralpak AD-H, 40 °C, 3 mL·min⁻¹, 220 nm) with an acceptance criterion of <0.15 % of the diastereomer originating from the (1R,3aS,6aR)-epimer. The bulk paritaprevir is further formulated into fixed-dose combination products designated under the Viekira Pak label; consequently, the intermediate manufacturing process must be operated under ICH Q7 GMP for active pharmaceutical ingredients starting materials from the stage at which the chiral octahydrocyclopenta[c]pyrrole fragment is introduced. Residual elemental impurities are monitored per ICH Q3D: palladium (≤10 ppm) and iron (≤100 ppm) are routinely tested when upstream hydrogenation steps that use transition-metal catalysts are part of the registered route. Avoid combination of the free amino acid with excess strong base or prolonged heating above 30 °C prior to coupling because racemization can occur at the C-1 carboxylate position, and the resulting diastereomeric content can exceed the 0.15 % threshold, rendering the batch unsuitable for subsequent crystallization-based purging.

    Glecaprevir Assembly via Pivaloyl Mixed Anhydride

    When the same bicyclic scaffold is required for glecaprevir (ABT-493), a mixed anhydride activation strategy is frequently selected to suppress racemization under strictly anhydrous conditions. The hydrochloride ethyl ester undergoes an identical hydrolysis–precipitation sequence to deliver the free amino acid, which is then subjected to azeotropic drying in tetrahydrofuran (6 volumes) at 35–40 °C under reduced pressure until the water content falls below 500 ppm. The dried acid is suspended in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran and treated sequentially with 1.05 eq of pivaloyl chloride and 1.10 eq of N-methylmorpholine at –18 to –15 °C in a 316L stainless-steel jacketed vessel. Mixed anhydride formation is confirmed by in-line FTIR monitoring of the carbonyl stretching band shift; the reaction is held for 25–30 min before the glecaprevir amine segment, dissolved in tetrahydrofuran, is metered in over 45 min while maintaining the internal temperature below –10 °C. Excess pivaloyl chloride must be avoided because residual pivalic acid esters can form persistent crystalline solvates with the API that require intensive reslurry purification. After coupling, the mixture is quenched with 5 % aqueous potassium bicarbonate and extracted into isopropyl acetate. The organic layer is concentrated and the glecaprevir free base is crystallized from n-heptane–isopropanol (4:1 v/v). The isolated free base is subsequently converted to the mesylate salt in acetone (3 volumes) with 1.02 eq of methanesulfonic acid at 20–25 °C. Chiral HPLC of the mesylate (Chiralcel OJ-RH, 35 °C, 1.0 mL·min⁻¹) limits the undesired diastereomer to ≤0.10 % area. Because the glecaprevir mesylate is a non-hygroscopic crystalline solid, the final drying step operates at 50 °C and 5 mbar for 8 h, achieving residual acetone below 5000 ppm as per ICH Q3C. The entire process, from free amino acid isolation to mesylate formation, must be executed under a nitrogen atmosphere because the mixed anhydride intermediate hydrolyzes rapidly at relative humidity above 30 %, causing a cascade of side reactions that lower the yield by 15–20 % and generate an N-pivaloyl amide impurity that is difficult to purge below the ICH Q3A reporting threshold of 0.05 %.

    ParameterParitaprevir (ABT-450)Glecaprevir (ABT-493)Danoprevir (RG7227) Representative
    Amide bond formation methodEDCI·HCl/HOBtPivaloyl mixed anhydridePentafluorophenyl ester / HATU
    Typical coupling solventDichloromethaneAnhydrous THFDMF–acetonitrile (1:1)
    Reaction temperature window0–25 °C–18 to –10 °C–5 to 20 °C
    Racemization risk triggerpH > 9 during base additionWater content > 500 ppmProlonged contact with tertiary amine above 25 °C
    Critical residual controlDichloromethane < 600 ppmPivalic acid < 0.1 % w/wRu catalyst residue < 10 ppm
    Chiral purity acceptance (diastereomer)<0.15 %<0.10 %<0.20 %
    Applicable GMP standardICH Q7, Q3C, Q3DICH Q7, Q3C, Q3DICH Q7, Q3C, Q3D, EMA/CHMP

    In the manufacture of danoprevir (RG7227), the bicyclic amino acid derived from the hydrochloride serves as the chiral P2 anchor before macrocyclization. After ester hydrolysis and neutralization, the free amino acid is protected as its N-allyloxycarbonyl derivative by treatment with allyl chloroformate (1.15 eq) in two-phase THF–aqueous sodium carbonate at 0–5 °C. The N-Alloc amino acid is activated as the pentafluorophenyl ester with 1.05 eq of pentafluorophenol and 1.2 eq of N,N′-diisopropylcarbodiimide in ethyl acetate, isolated, and coupled to the linear peptide segment carrying a terminal olefin. Ring-closing metathesis is conducted in toluene at 60 °C with Grubbs second-generation catalyst (1 mol%) to form the 15-membered macrocycle. Ruthenium removal to single-digit ppm levels is accomplished by treatment with activated carbon (10 % w/w) and triphenylphosphine oxide at 50 °C for 4 h, followed by filtration through a 0.2 µm PTFE membrane. The Alloc group is cleaved under palladium-catalyzed conditions using phenylsilane (2.5 eq) and tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) (0.02 eq) in dichloromethane. Palladium content in the final danoprevir free base is quantified by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and must comply with the ICH Q3D oral concentration limit of 10 µg·day⁻¹, translating to ≤10 ppm at a 100 mg·day⁻¹ dose assumption. The hydrochloride salt of the starting material must be stored at 2–8 °C in sealed, polyethylene-lined aluminium pouches; exposure to ambient air for more than 2 h on the shop floor during dispensing leads to moisture uptake exceeding 0.5 % and detectable hydrate formation that alters the ester hydrolysis rate reproducibility. Operational personnel must pre-dry ancillary equipment because residual moisture in charging ports or transfer lines systematically depresses the pentafluorophenyl ester formation conversion below 95 % when humidity exceeds 55 %.

    How Does Replacing a Proline Ring with an Octahydrocyclopenta[c]pyrrole Scaffold Impact Enzymatic Stability?

    Medicinal chemists routinely substitute the pyrrolidine ring of L-proline with the (1S,3aR,6aS)-octahydrocyclopenta[c]pyrrole framework to restrict conformational flexibility and shield a peptide bond from enzymatic hydrolysis. The hydrochloride is converted into an Fmoc-protected amino acid building block suitable for solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS). In a typical derivatization, the ethyl ester is hydrolyzed as described previously, and the resulting amino acid is dissolved in a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of 0.5 M aqueous sodium carbonate and dioxane. Fmoc-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (1.05 eq) is added in three portions at 0 °C over 1 h, and the mixture is stirred for another 3 h at 20 °C. After acidification and extraction into methyl tert-butyl ether, the Fmoc-protected monomer is purified by silica gel chromatography (eluent: hexane–ethyl acetate 3:2 containing 0.5 % acetic acid) and isolated as a white foam with a chemical purity of ≥98.5 % by HPLC. On a 2-chlorotrityl chloride resin preloaded at 0.3–0.8 mmol·g⁻¹, the Fmoc-amino acid is coupled using 3 eq of monomer, 3 eq of N,N′-diisopropylcarbodiimide, and 3 eq of ethyl (hydroxyimino)cyanoacetate in DMF, achieving a single coupling efficiency of >98 % as judged by the Kaiser test. Multiple insertions of this constrained residue produce peptide analogues where the amide bond adjacent to the bicyclic nitrogen adopts a preferred trans configuration, as confirmed by ROESY NMR. Literature pharmacokinetic studies indicate that replacement of a native proline with the octahydrocyclopenta[c]pyrrole residue extends the plasma elimination half-life of susceptible linear peptides from <0.5 h to >4 h in rodent models, primarily due to resistance toward prolyl oligopeptidase and dipeptidyl peptidase-IV. When the Fmoc derivative is supplied to peptide CDMOs, the excipient list must specify residual dioxane below 380 ppm and Fmoc-β-alanine-like impurities below 0.2 %; elevated Fmoc-β-alanine content causes premature chain termination in long sequences, lowering the crude peptide purity by 5–10 %. The Fmoc protection step is incompatible with the presence of primary amines or unprotected lysine side chains in the same vessel, and even trace ammonium ions from buffer carry-over provoke Fmoc-deprotection that yields a truncated sequence.

    Direct liberation of the secondary amine from the hydrochloride under phase-transfer conditions yields a neutral catalyst investigated for stereoselective carbon-carbon bond formation. The hydrochloride is suspended in dichloromethane (10 volumes) and stirred with 1.5 eq of powdered potassium carbonate and a catalytic quantity of tetra-n-butylammonium bromide (0.05 eq) for 2 h at 20 °C. Filtration and evaporation provide the free amine as a pale-yellow oil that is stored over 4 Å molecular sieves. This free amine catalyzes the direct aldol reaction between cyclohexanone (10 eq) and 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (1.0 eq) in dimethyl sulfoxide at –18 °C with a catalyst loading of 10 mol%. After 72 h, the anti-aldol product is obtained in 88 % isolated yield with an enantiomeric excess of 94 % as determined by chiral HPLC (Chiralpak IA, hexane–isopropanol 90:10). A temperature rise to –10 °C drops the ee to 82 %, and operation above 0 °C renders the process non-selective (ee <50 %), placing the useful processing window at ≤–15 °C with a tolerance of ±3 °C. Michael addition to β-nitrostyrene using the same catalyst (15 mol%) in chloroform at 0 °C yields the 1,4-adduct with 91 % ee after 48 h. The free amine must be handled under argon because the unhindered secondary amine absorbs carbon dioxide from air forming a carbamate salt, which precipitates as a viscous mass and deactivates the catalyst within 10–15 min of atmospheric exposure. Scale-up experiments in a 100 mL jacketed glass reactor with a PTFE-coated temperature probe show that batch-to-batch variability in enantioselectivity can be minimized to ±2 % ee when the water content of the reaction medium is maintained below 200 ppm; above 500 ppm water, the ee drops to 75–80 % and the anti/syn ratio shifts from 12:1 to 6:1.

    Reaction typeSubstrate pairCatalyst loadingSolventTemp. (°C)Yield (%)ee (%)
    AldolCyclohexanone + 4-nitrobenzaldehyde10 mol%DMSO–188894
    AldolCyclopentanone + 4-cyanobenzaldehyde10 mol%THF–207990
    Michaelβ-Nitrostyrene + acetone15 mol%Chloroform08591
    MichaelDimethyl malonate + 2-cyclohexenone20 mol%Dichloromethane257287
    Free Quote

    Competitive Ethyl (1S,3Ar,6As)-Octahydrocyclopenta[C]Pyrrole-1-Carboxylate Hydrochloride (1:1) prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction
    In pharmaceutical intermediate synthesis, the procurement of chiral building blocks with defined absolute stereochemistry is non-negotiable for downstream enantiopurity. Ethyl (1S,3Ar,6As)-octahydrocyclopenta[c]pyrrole-1-carboxylate hydrochloride (1:1) — a rigid, bicyclic proline analog furnished as a crystalline hydrochloride salt — is supplied under controlled manufacturing protocols that enforce a specific diastereomeric and enantiomeric profile. The compound, with molecular formula C₁₁H₂₀ClNO₂ and a molecular weight of 233.74 g·mol⁻¹, is characterized by a cis-fused ring junction and an ethyl ester moiety at the C-1 position. Lot release specifications mandate assay ≥ 98.0% by non-aqueous titration (internal method calibrated against USP <541>) and chiral purity ≥ 99.0% ee determined by chiral stationary-phase HPLC with diode-array detection at 210 nm (column: Chiralpak IA-3, mobile phase: n-hexane/ethanol/diethylamine 90:10:0.1 v/v/v, flow rate 1.0 mL·min⁻¹). The isolated solid presents as a white to off-white microcrystalline powder with a melting range of 168–172 °C (decomposition, 2 °C·min⁻¹ ramp, open capillary, uncorrected). Storage under argon in sealed, desiccated containers at 2–8 °C is mandatory; moisture uptake exceeding 0.3 wt% (Karl Fischer, USP <921> Method Ia) triggers salt disproportionation and partial ester hydrolysis upon extended storage beyond 18 months.

    What Distinguishes This Hydrochloride Salt from the Free Base and Other Counterions?

    The hydrochloride salt form is selected for its handling advantages over the free amine, which is an air-sensitive, low-viscosity oil susceptible to carbonate salt formation upon exposure to atmospheric CO₂. Titration of the free base with 1.0–1.05 equivalents of ethanolic HCl, followed by crystallization from 2-propanol/MTBE (1:3 v/v), yields a non‑hygroscopic solid with a residual solvent profile compliant with ICH Q3C Option 2 limits (ethanol < 5000 ppm, MTBE < 500 ppm). In contrast to the corresponding tosylate salt, the hydrochloride exhibits 2.3‑fold higher solubility in anhydrous DMF (220 mg·mL⁻¹ at 25 °C vs. 95 mg·mL⁻¹), enabling higher substrate loadings in amide-bond-forming reactions. However, the hydrochloride introduces a stoichiometric equivalent of HCl that must buffer during couplings; when HATU is employed as activator, addition of DIPEA at 2.5–3.0 equivalents relative to the salt neutralizes the protonated amine and deprotonates the carboxylate activator, maintaining solution pH between 8.0 and 8.5 as monitored by a calibrated in‑situ pH probe. Failure to adjust the base stoichiometry for the HCl content results in sluggish activation kinetics and N‑acylurea side‑product formation, a processing pitfall documented in kilo‑lab campaigns using this scaffold. Applications in constrained peptide mimetics rely on the geometric rigidity of the octahydrocyclopenta[c]pyrrole framework. When incorporated as a proline surrogate, the bicyclic architecture restricts the φ dihedral angle to approximately −60° and locks the pyrrolidine ring in an envelope conformation, enhancing metabolic stability against prolyl oligopeptidase. Batch-to-batch variability in the diastereomeric ratio — specifically the (1R,3As,6Ar) enantiomer — must remain below 0.5% by area normalization to avoid erosion of biological activity in hepatitis C NS3/4A protease inhibitor candidates built on this core. Manufacturers track the diastereomeric impurity through a dedicated HPLC method using a polysaccharide‑based chiral selector and a complementary achiral HILIC separation (column: ZIC‑cHILIC 150 × 4.6 mm, 3 µm, isocratic 95% acetonitrile/5% ammonium formate buffer pH 3.5) that resolves the epimer at the bridgehead carbon.

    Stabilization of the Bicyclic Pyrrolidine Core via Salt Formation

    Thermal decomposition profiling by differential scanning calorimetry at a heating rate of 10 °C·min⁻¹ reveals an exothermic event onset at 185 °C (ΔH = −425 J·g⁻¹) attributed to retro‑cycloaddition-like fragmentation, generating cyclopentadiene and ethyl glycinate hydrochloride. This decomposition pathway precludes melt‑processing or high‑temperature drying. Vacuum drying at 40 °C and < 10 mbar for 16 hours reduces residual water to < 0.1% without detectable degradation, a parameter authenticated by thermogravimetric analysis coupled with mass spectrometry (TGA‑MS) showing no mass loss in the 30–150 °C region beyond adsorbed moisture. In pilot‑scale campaigns, double‑cone dryers with jacket temperature control within ±1 °C and continuous nitrogen sweep are specified to maintain crystalline integrity. A comparative physicochemical table underscores the rationale for selecting the hydrochloride over alternative salt forms that may appear in generic catalogs but lack process‑scale viability.
    Table 1. Comparative Physicochemical Profile of Salt Forms of Ethyl Octahydrocyclopenta[c]pyrrole-1-carboxylate
    Parameter HCl Salt (1:1) Free Base Tosylate Salt Acetate Salt
    Physical State at 25 °C White crystalline solid Pale yellow oil Off‑white solid Hygroscopic semi‑solid
    Melting/Decomposition Range 168–172 °C (dec.) N/A 132–136 °C Not determined
    Solubility in DMF (mg·mL⁻¹) 220 Miscible 95 180
    Hygroscopicity (mass uptake at 75% RH, 48h) 0.15% CO₂ absorption (carbonate) 0.5% 2.8%
    Base Equivalents Required for Coupling Activation 2.5–3.0 eq. DIPEA 1.5–2.0 eq. 2.0–2.5 eq. 3.0–3.5 eq.
    Residual Counterion Impact Chloride (inert) p‑Toluenesulfonate (solubility modifier) Acetate (may compete in acylation)
    For sterile filtration-sensitive applications, the hydrochloride can be dissolved in anhydrous DMF and passed through a 0.2 µm PTFE membrane; however, solutions should be used within 4 hours of preparation. Extended standing results in slow precipitation of the free base owing to trace alkalinity in reagent‑grade DMF, observable as a gradual increase in turbidity beyond 10 NTU. When moisture sensitivity demands strict handling protocols, operators on a 20‑L glass‑lined reactor have documented that exposure of the solid to ambient air ( 55% RH, 22 °C) for more than 15 minutes during manual charging results in agglomeration and a measurable 2–5% increase in residual water, requiring additional 6–8 hours of vacuum drying at 40 °C to restore specification. Consequently, glovebox or nitrogen-purged isolator transfer is recommended for quantities above 500 g. The dissolution exotherm when combined with DMF (endothermic mixing with free base absent, but salt‑mediated hydrogen bonding raises solution temperature by 4–6 °C during dissolution at 100 g·L⁻¹) must be considered in adiabatic calorimetry hazard assessments carried out per ASTM E1231‑19.

    How Does the Ethyl Ester Influence Reactivity Versus Methyl or tert‑Butyl Analogs?

    The ethyl ester moiety provides a deliberate balance between stability toward premature hydrolysis and lability under the mildly basic conditions used for final deprotection in solid‑phase peptide synthesis. Compared to the methyl ester, the ethyl ester exhibits a 1.8‑fold lower rate of saponification in aqueous NaOH 0.1 M at 25 °C (pseudo‑first‑order rate constant k = 0.012 min⁻¹ for ethyl vs. 0.022 min⁻¹ for methyl, as measured by inline ReactIR monitoring of the carbonyl stretch shift from 1735 cm⁻¹ to 1690 cm⁻¹). This slower cleavage profile permits selective Boc‑deprotection in the presence of the ethyl ester using TFA/DCM (1:1 v/v) without significant transesterification, provided the scavenger is limited to triisopropylsilane (2.5% v/v) and the reaction time is kept below 2 hours at 0–5 °C. By contrast, the tert‑butyl ester analog — while fully resistant to basic hydrolysis — necessitates anhydrous acidic conditions for deprotection, which complicates the handling of the already acid‑labile octahydrocyclopenta[c]pyrrole core. Published data for this specific comparative configuration remain limited, but internal stability studies confirm that the hydrochloride salt of the ethyl ester shows < 0.5% hydrolysis after 72 hours in pH 6.2 phosphate buffer at 37 °C, making it a viable intermediate in solution‑phase libraries without immediate silylation protection. Routine quality control for this product employs a comprehensive analytical suite conforming to USP general chapters and ICH guidelines. The following table maps the mandatory test parameters against governing standards, direct from the certificate of analysis template validated for GMP intermediate production.
    Table 2. Analytical Specification and Reference Standards
    Test Parameter Acceptance Criterion Method / Standard
    Appearance White to off‑white powder Visual inspection, USP <695>
    Identification (IR) Concordant with reference spectrum KBr pellet, 4000–400 cm⁻¹, USP <197K>
    Assay (anhydrous basis) 98.0–102.0% Non‑aqueous titration, USP <541>
    Chiral Purity Enantiomeric excess ≥ 99.0% Chiral HPLC, internal SOP ACC‑CHIR‑021
    Diastereomeric Impurity (1R,3As,6Ar‑epimer) ≤ 0.5% area HILIC‑UV, internal SOP ACC‑ACH‑019
    Water Content ≤ 0.5% w/w Karl Fischer, USP <921> Method Ia
    Residue on Ignition ≤ 0.1% USP <281>, 600 °C
    Residual Solvents Ethanol < 5000 ppm, MTBE < 500 ppm Headspace GC‑FID, USP <467> Option 1
    Heavy Metals ≤ 20 ppm ICP‑MS, USP <233>
    In solid‑phase strategies where the hydrochloride is loaded onto 2‑chlorotrityl chloride resin, pre‑neutralization of the salt with 1.05 eq of DIPEA in anhydrous DCM before resin addition eliminates chloride‑mediated resin cleavage side reactions. The loading capacity, determined by Fmoc‑quantitation at 301 nm, reaches 0.82 mmol·g⁻¹ in 2 hours of gentle agitation — a value 15% higher than that observed for the corresponding free base under identical conditions owing to better solubility of the neutralized salt in DCM. Operational boundaries warrant explicit attention. The compound is incompatible with strong bases (NaOH, KOH, DBU) that rapidly liberate the free amine and can induce epimerization at the bridgehead via a retro‑Mannich pathway when the solution temperature exceeds 35 °C. Formulators are advised to avoid combinations with amine‑based additives (e.g., triethylamine in neat form) because the displacement of HCl produces a heterogeneous mixture with variable stoichiometry, compromising the precise neutralization needed for coupling. In continuous flow platforms, tetrahydrofuran is a preferred solvent over dichloromethane due to reduced chloride displacement and pump‑cavitation mitigation; the hydrochloride’s solubility in THF is 85 mg·mL⁻¹ at 25 °C, which constrains the maximum obtainable concentration in a 10‑mL flow reactor loop without inline sonication. Pre‑drying of any solvent to < 50 ppm water by molecular sieves (3 Å) is mandatory when reaction scales exceed 1 mol, as water‑mediated HCl release autocatalyzes ester hydrolysis, decreasing yield and complicating purification by creating a polar, UV‑active byproduct that elutes near the desired peak in reverse‑phase C18 chromatography.