5-(2-Fluorophenyl)-1H-Pyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester

5-(2-Fluorophenyl)-1H-Pyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester


    • Product Name 5-(2-Fluorophenyl)-1H-Pyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester
    • Alias ethyl 5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylate
    • Mininmum Order 1g
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    765791

    Chemical Formula C13H12FNO2
    Molecular Weight 233.24
    Appearance Solid (usually)
    Physical State At Room Temperature Solid
    Solubility In Water Low solubility
    Solubility In Organic Solvents Soluble in common organic solvents like dichloromethane, chloroform

    As an accredited 5-(2-Fluorophenyl)-1H-Pyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 500g of 5-(2 - Fluorophenyl)-1H - Pyrrole - 3 - Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester in sealed chemical - grade bags.
    Shipping 5-(2 - Fluorophenyl)-1H - Pyrrole - 3 - Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester is shipped in well - sealed, appropriately labeled containers. Packaging safeguards the chemical from damage and leakage during transit, following strict hazardous materials shipping regulations.
    Storage Store 5-(2 - Fluorophenyl)-1H - Pyrrole-3 - Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester in a cool, dry place away from heat sources and direct sunlight. Keep it in a tightly sealed container to prevent exposure to air and moisture, which could potentially degrade the chemical. Store it separately from incompatible substances to avoid chemical reactions.
    Application of 5-(2-Fluorophenyl)-1H-Pyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester

    In a multi-kilogram campaign targeting a selective VEGFR-2/PDGFRβ bispecific inhibitor, 5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylic acid ethyl ester is employed not as a peripheral synthon but as the central pyrrole core that engages the DFG-out conformation of the kinase hinge region. The ester is first saponified to the carboxylic acid using LiOH·H₂O (1.2 eq.) in THF/water (3:1 vol) at 0–5 °C over 4 h, a protocol selected over NaOH to avoid competitive N-deprotonation of the pyrrole nitrogen that leads to oligomeric by-products, a failure mode documented across multiple production batches on a 500 L enamel-lined jacketed reactor equipped with a retreat-curve impeller. Following acidification and isolation, the acid is converted to the corresponding acid chloride with oxalyl chloride (1.5 eq.) and catalytic DMF (0.02 eq.) in dichloromethane at −5 °C, then quenched into a solution of the elaborated aniline in the presence of N-methylmorpholine (2.5 eq.) to regenerate the free amine. The amide coupling stream is held at 0 °C for 1 h and then warmed to 20 °C over 2 h, achieving a crude assay yield of 91–93% by HPLC. Critical process parameters (CPP) identified during process qualification include the moisture content of the acid chloride solution (specification ≤ 200 ppm) and the hold time of the acid chloride prior to amidation (< 30 min), as the acyl chloride slowly undergoes ring-dechlorination at the pyrrole 2-position under acidic conditions, generating a des-fluoro-phenyl impurity tracked at RRT 0.82. Regulatory conduct complies with ICH Q7, Chapter 11 (process validation) and the starting-material designation principles of ICH Q11, with the isolated intermediate filed under a Type II DMF. The final API, a bis-arylamide fumarate salt, demonstrates IC₅₀ 3.8 nM against VEGFR-2 kinase domains when the pyrrole-3-carboxamide moiety remains unsubstituted at N1, confirming that the ethyl ester precursor is not merely a cost-saving surrogate but a deliberate protection strategy to preserve N1-H during downstream Suzuki diversification.

    What Modifications Enable SDHI Fungicide Lead Optimization?

    The ethyl ester serves as a precursor to 5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylic acid amides that mimic the pharmacophore of succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors (SDHI) active against Botrytis cinerea and Zymoseptoria tritici. The ester is reacted with aqueous methylamine (40% w/w, 2.5 eq.) in ethanol under reflux (78 °C) for 12 h; after vacuum distillation of the solvent, the resulting N-methylamide is crystallized from isopropanol/water (7:3) to yield off-white needles with a melting point of 164–166 °C and purity 99.2% by qNMR. Foliar rainfastness trials have shown that a formulation containing the N-cyclopropyl analog exhibits EC₅₀ 0.45 μg/mL against SDH isolated from B. cinerea, but soil column leaching studies (OECD 312) revealed a Koc of 1450 L/kg, indicating very low mobility, a finding that triggered a 10-month chronic Daphnia magna reproduction assessment under OECD 211. Registration-grade technical material is isolated by spray drying a 20% aqueous slurry of the active ingredient with an inlet temperature of 180 °C to achieve a moisture content ≤ 1.5%, followed by air-jet milling to a volume median diameter D[v,0.5] of 3.5–4.0 μm. The formulated product, a water-dispersible granule (WG) containing 50% w/w active, incorporates a naphthalenesulfonate dispersant (6%) and a lignosulfonate binder (4%), and is manufactured on a high-shear mixer-granulator before fluid-bed drying at 55 °C. Compliance encompasses FAO Specification 59/WG (March 2021 revision) for physical stability, EPA 40 CFR Part 158 data requirements for biochemical pesticides, and the analytical enforcement methods listed in SANCO/3030/99 rev.5 for EU residue definition. Scale-up batches exceeding 100 kg have identified an exothermic decomposition onset at 225 °C via differential scanning calorimetry, necessitating an upper temperature limit for micronization of 40 °C to prevent autocatalytic runaway.

    Vacuum-Deposited Hole-Transporting Layers: Fluorine-Induced HOMO Stabilization

    When the ethyl ester is elaborated via Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling with 4-(diphenylamino)phenylboronic acid pinacol ester (1.05 eq.), Pd(PPh₃)₄ (0.04 eq.), and K₂CO₃ (3.0 eq.) in toluene/ethanol/water (5:1:1) at 85 °C for 18 h, the resultant D-π-A triarylamine-pyrrole adduct possesses a HOMO of −5.38 eV (measured by AC-2 photoelectron spectroscopy in air) and a triplet energy of 2.71 eV. In a bottom-emission OLED stack with ITO/MoO₃ (10 nm)/hole-transport layer (40 nm)/emissive layer (30 nm)/TPBi (60 nm)/LiF/Al, the material doped into 4,4′-bis(N-carbazolyl)-1,1′-biphenyl (CBP) at a concentration of 10 wt% delivers a current efficiency of 72.3 cd/A and external quantum efficiency 22.4% at a luminance of 1000 cd/m². The processing window is severely confined: elevating the doping ratio above 15 wt% induces a 40% drop in photoluminescence quantum yield due to excimer formation, while concentrations below 6 wt% result in incomplete energy transfer from the host and a shoulder emission at 430 nm originating from CBP. Deposition is performed in an Angstrom Engineering EvoVac system with a base pressure of 5×10⁻⁷ Torr; the source temperature for the pyrrole dopant is held at 285–295 °C, and the rate is locked at 0.5–0.8 Å/s using a quartz crystal monitor calibrated against a spectroscopic ellipsometry step-height standard. Post-deposition encapsulation is completed with a UV-epoxy and getter-attached glass lid inside a nitrogen glovebox (H₂O < 0.1 ppm). The device conforms to IEC 62368-1:2023 for audio/video electronic safety, EU RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU (the pyrrole fluorination ensures no intentionally added brominated flame retardants), and the material purity is verified by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for transition metals, with specifications for Pd and Cu residual content at ≤ 5 ppm and ≤ 2 ppm, respectively, to prevent luminescence quenching.

    In the fabrication of polymer dots (Pdots) for two-photon fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (2P-FLIM) at 800 nm excitation, the ester is reduced with LiAlH₄ (1.1 eq.) in anhydrous THF at 0–5 °C to give 5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1H-pyrrole-3-methanol, which is subsequently converted to a methacrylate-terminated monomer using methacryloyl chloride (1.2 eq.) in the presence of triethylamine. The functionalized monomer is copolymerized with styrene and acrylic acid (15 mol% of the fluorescent pyrrole unit) via mini-emulsion polymerization in a high-pressure homogenizer (Microfluidizer M-110P, 15,000 psi, three passes), using sodium dodecyl sulfate (2 mM) and hexadecane (0.5 wt%) as co-stabilizer. The resulting Pdots exhibit a hydrodynamic diameter of 28 ± 4 nm (dynamic light scattering, Zetasizer Ultra) and a peak emission at 520 nm with a quantum yield of 0.68 in PBS buffer. Processing pitfalls include aggregation above 40 °C during the solvent evaporation step, which is mitigated by a controlled nitrogen purge at 25 °C and a rotary evaporator bath temperature maintained at ≤ 30 °C. Pdot dispersions intended for in vitro live-cell uptake studies must pass the endotoxin limit (< 0.5 EU/mL) per ISO 10993-11:2017 and are sterile-filtered through a 0.22 μm PVDF membrane. The Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH, EC 1907/2006) dossier for the monomer intermediate includes a registered tonnage band of 1–10 tonnes/year and a CSR covering life-cycle stages at an activated-sludge sewage treatment plant. The terminal product type is a ready-to-use colloidal dispersion packaged in amber vials under argon, labeled for research use only but prepared under a quality system aligned with ISO 13485:2016 for laboratory-scale diagnostics.

    Why Does the Ethyl Ester Function as a System Suitability Standard for HPLC Method Development?

    Quantitative trace analysis of the parent acid and the des-fluoro impurity in drug substance release testing relies on the labeled ethyl ester as a resolution standard due to its retention time proximity to the main peak (tR 12.3 min vs. 11.8 min for the acid on a Waters XBridge C18 column, 150 × 4.6 mm, 3.5 μm, with mobile phase acetonitrile/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid 60:40 at 1.0 mL/min). The system suitability solution is prepared at a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL in diluent, and a 10 μL injection must produce a resolution factor Rs ≥ 2.5 between the ester and the acid, and a tailing factor T ≤ 1.8 at 10% peak height, satisfying Ph. Eur. monograph 2.2.46 chromatographic separation techniques. The standard is purified by preparative HPLC on a 50 mm diameter column to a certified purity of 99.8% (area normalization, 210 nm) and is accompanied by a certificate of analysis reporting mass balance with water content by Karl Fischer titration (< 0.1%), residual solvents tested per USP <467>, and identity confirmed via 1H, 13C, 19F NMR and high-resolution mass spectrometry (ESI+, m/z 248.0845 [M+H]+, Δ <1.5 ppm). Method validation follows ICH Q2(R1) guidelines for linearity (r² ≥ 0.999 over 0.05–0.15 mg/mL), accuracy (recovery 98–102%), and intermediate precision (RSD ≤ 2.0% across six independent runs). The absence of a commercial reference standard from any pharmacopoeia forces reliance on this calibrated in-house primary standard, which is prepared in accordance with ISO 17025:2017, Section 7.2.1.4 for metrological traceability via quantitative NMR against certified benzoic acid. Terminal product is a freeze-dried, vacuum-sealed 100 mg vial intended for use within the quality control laboratory.

    Radical copolymerization of styrene with a methacryloyl-ester derivative of the pyrrole alcohol introduces a fluorescent repeat unit that remains covalently anchored in the polymer backbone, eliminating migration-based blooming phenomena observed with low-molecular-weight additives in polyolefin films. The grafting monomer is synthesized from the ethanolamine-derived amide and methacrylic anhydride; it is incorporated into the polystyrene chain at a loading of 2–5 mol% during a suspension polymerization conducted in a 100 L Pfaudler vessel with a water-to-monomer ratio of 3:1, using poly(vinyl alcohol) (0.5% w/w to water) as suspending agent and azobisisobutyronitrile (0.3 mol%) as initiator at 80 °C. The resulting beads possess a weight-average molecular weight of 180 kDa (GPC-MALS) and a glass transition temperature raised by 7 °C (Tg 108 °C vs. 101 °C for polystyrene homopolymer) as measured by differential scanning calorimetry at 10 K/min. Pelletization on a Coperion ZSK-26 twin-screw extruder with L/D 40 requires processing temperatures of 170–190–210–220 °C across zones 1–4 and a screw speed of 300 rpm; the die pressure must be maintained below 35 bar to avoid shear-induced degradation of the pyrrole chromophore, which is evidenced by a yellowing index (YI D1925) increase of 2.5 units when residence time exceeds 120 s. Compliance with REACH, Annex XVII, and migration testing under EU 10/2011 for food contact materials is verified via total organic carbon analysis after 10-day simulant D (3% acetic acid) exposure at 40 °C, yielding migration values ≤ 0.05 mg/kg. The product is an internally dyed polystyrene masterbatch (20% active in GPPS carrier) destined for injection-molding thick-section optical lenses, where the fluorinated pyrrole unit provides intrinsic blue fluorescence without additional colorant. The reported shift in emission maximum from 515 nm (in THF solution) to 528 nm (in the solid matrix) is attributed to energy transfer to excimer-like traps when the pyrrole repeat-unit fraction exceeds 4 mol%, defining the upper formulation limit.

    Key process parameters across application segments
    SegmentReaction typeTemperature (°C)Medium / solventCritical quality attribute
    VEGFR-2 inhibitor amidationAcid chloride-amine−5 (acid chloride formation), 0–20 (coupling)CH₂Cl₂, THFDes-fluoro impurity ≤ 0.05 area%
    SDHI methylamide synthesisDirect aminolysis78 (reflux)EtOH, aq. MeNH₂Melting point 164–166 °C
    OLED hole-transporter couplingSuzuki-Miyaura85Toluene/EtOH/H₂OPd ≤ 5 ppm
    Pdots mini-emulsion polymerizationFree-radical25–30Water/SDS/hexadecaneDiameter ≤ 35 nm, PDI 0.08
    HPLC suitability standardPreparative chromatography23–25 (column temp)ACN/H₂OPurity ≥ 99.8%
    Free Quote

    Competitive 5-(2-Fluorophenyl)-1H-Pyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid Ethyl Ester prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    Designated Catalog No. FP-0392 in multiple compound management inventories, 5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylic acid ethyl ester (IUPAC: ethyl 5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylate) is a heterocyclic building block supplied as an off-white to pale-yellow crystalline powder with a molecular formula of C₁₃H₁₂FNO₂ and a formula weight of 233.24 g·mol⁻¹. The substance is characterized by a single fluorine substituent at the ortho position of the pendant phenyl ring, which modulates both the electronic environment of the pyrrole core and the compound’s lipophilicity without introducing the steric bulk of chloro or bromo analogues. Identity confirmation is performed by ¹H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d₆) where the pyrrole NH proton appears as a broad singlet near δ 11.5–11.8, the ethyl ester methylene quartet integrates at δ 4.25–4.30, and the aromatic protons from the fluorophenyl ring produce a characteristic multiplet pattern between δ 7.25–7.75. High-resolution mass spectrometry (ESI‑TOF) yields an [M+H]⁺ ion at m/z 234.0924 (calculated 234.0925 for C₁₃H₁₃FNO₂+), with an observed mass accuracy routinely below 3 ppm when calibrated against sodium formate clusters prior to each acquisition sequence. The compound is packaged under argon in amber borosilicate vials sealed with PTFE-lined caps to limit photodegradation and moisture ingress during transport.

    Purity Certification and Residual Solvent Benchmarking

    Purity is quantified by reversed-phase HPLC with UV detection at 254 nm, employing a Phenomenex Luna C18(2) column (5 µm, 250 × 4.6 mm) thermostatted to 30°C. The mobile phase consists of acetonitrile and water containing 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid, delivered in a 60:40 isocratic regime at a flow rate of 1.0 mL·min⁻¹. Under these conditions, the main peak elutes at a retention time of approximately 8.7 min, and integration by area normalization returns a chromatographic purity typically ≥98.0%. Any single impurity eluting after the solvent front is controlled to ≤0.5%. The response factor linearity has been verified across the range 0.01–2.0 mg·mL⁻¹ (R² >0.999), and the detection limit for the parent compound is 0.003 mg·mL⁻¹.

    Residual process solvents are monitored by headspace gas chromatography coupled with flame ionization detection (HS‑GC‑FID) following dissolution of the substance in dimethyl sulfoxide. The specification aligns with ICH Q3C Option 1 limits: methanol ≤3000 ppm, ethyl acetate ≤5000 ppm, tetrahydrofuran ≤720 ppm, and dichloromethane ≤600 ppm. Water content, determined by coulometric Karl Fischer titration (ASTM E203‑16) using Hydranal‑Coulomat AG reagent, is maintained ≤0.5% to suppress ester hydrolysis during extended storage.

    Routine handling in a research laboratory does not require a glovebox, but storage at 2–8°C in tightly sealed containers under an inert atmosphere of argon or dry nitrogen is recommended. Exposure to ambient humidity above 60% RH for periods exceeding 48 hours can promote measurable hydrolysis of the ethyl ester, increasing free acid content by 0.3–0.7% per week as monitored by HPLC. When the compound is removed from cold storage, the container should be allowed to equilibrate to room temperature before opening to minimize condensation on the internal walls of the vial.

    How Does the Ethyl Ester Influence Amide Bond Formation Yields?

    In medicinal chemistry programs targeting the pyrrole-3-carboxamide pharmacophore, the ethyl ester serves as a masked carboxylic acid that can be directly transformed into the corresponding amide via aminolysis. Unlike the methyl ester, which can generate methanol as a by‑product and thereby introduce a competing transesterification pathway when used with methanol‑containing co‑solvents, the ethyl ester yields ethanol, which is less prone to re‑attack the amide carbonyl under basic conditions. Aminolysis using primary aliphatic amines (e.g., cyclopropylamine, 1.5 equiv) in ethanol at 60°C with 2.0 equiv of triethylamine typically reaches >85% conversion after 18 h, whereas the methyl ester analogue achieves comparable conversion but requires chromatographic removal of a persistent 3–5% methyl amide impurity generated through ester‑amide exchange. The tert‑butyl ester derivative, while resistant to nucleophilic attack under basic aminolysis, necessitates acidic deprotection (TFA/DCM) that can protonate the pyrrole ring and initiate oligomerization if the reaction is not quenched with aqueous bicarbonate within 30 min. Therefore, the ethyl ester presents an intermediate reactivity profile that balances conversion efficiency with by‑product control.

    Metal Content and Palladium Scavenging Considerations

    When the ethyl ester is employed as a substrate in Suzuki–Miyaura cross‑coupling reactions intended to elaborate the fluorophenyl ring, residual palladium becomes a critical quality attribute. Elemental impurity analysis performed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP‑MS) after microwave‑assisted acid digestion quantifies palladium routinely at ≤5 ppm, with iron and zinc each ≤10 ppm, meeting the oral Permitted Daily Exposure thresholds of ICH Q3D guidance for Class 1 metals. The ortho‑fluorine substituent does not undergo oxidative addition under standard Pd(PPh₃)₄‑catalyzed conditions (Na₂CO₃, DME:H₂O 3:1, 80°C), thereby directing cross‑coupling exclusively to a bromide or iodide installed at the para position of the phenyl ring. To maintain the low palladium specification, the crude product following cross‑coupling is treated with a trimercaptotriazine-functionalized silica scavenger (e.g., SiliaMetS TMT) for 2 h at 50°C prior to filtration and crystallization from ethanol/water, which reduces palladium from typical post‑reaction levels of 200–500 ppm to below the 5 ppm release limit.

    When the Free Acid Is Required: Hydrolysis Protocol and Stability Boundaries

    Saponification to 5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylic acid is accomplished with lithium hydroxide monohydrate (3.0 equiv) in a THF:H₂O mixture (3:1 v/v) at 40°C. Under these conditions, conversion exceeds 99% after 6 h as determined by TLC (silica gel 60 F₂₅₄, hexane:ethyl acetate 2:1, Rf ester = 0.55, Rf acid = baseline). The free acid precipitates upon acidification to pH 2–3 with 1 M aqueous HCl and can be collected by filtration, washed with cold water, and dried under vacuum at 45°C. Notably, the acid is prone to decarboxylation when heated above 185°C in the solid state, evolving CO₂ and forming 2-(2-fluorophenyl)-1H-pyrrole as the primary degradation product; differential scanning calorimetry (DSC, 10 K·min⁻¹ ramp under N₂) reveals an endothermic onset at 192°C corresponding to this event, which limits its utility in melt‑phase reactions. The ethyl ester, by contrast, exhibits a sharp melting endotherm at 86–89°C without decomposition, making it compatible with solvent‑free melt condensations.

    Table 1: Comparative Physicochemical Data for 5-(2-Fluorophenyl)-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylate Derivatives
    Property Ethyl Ester (FP‑0392) Methyl Ester Free Acid
    Molecular weight (g·mol⁻¹) 233.24 219.21 205.18
    Melting range (°C) 86–89 98–101 decarboxylation onset 192
    HPLC retention time (min) 8.7 7.3 4.9
    Log P (shake-flask, pH 7.4) 3.2 2.8 2.1
    Aqueous solubility (µg·mL⁻¹, pH 6.8) 45 78 210 (as sodium salt)

    The ortho‑fluorine substitution distinguishes this scaffold from the corresponding 3‑chlorophenyl, 4‑fluorophenyl, and unsubstituted phenyl pyrrole-3‑carboxylates predominantly by its impact on metabolic stability in microsomal assays. Published data from human liver microsome incubations (pooled mixed‑gender, 0.5 mg·mL⁻¹ protein, NADPH regeneration system) indicate that the 2‑fluorophenyl congener exhibits a half‑life roughly 2.3‑fold longer than the 4‑fluorophenyl isomer, attributed to a steric shielding of the pyrrole C‑2 position from cytochrome P450‑mediated oxidation. This property has been exploited in lead optimization campaigns for mGluR5 negative allosteric modulators and glycogen synthase kinase‑3β (GSK‑3β) inhibitors, where the ethyl ester is employed as a late‑stage intermediate that preserves the acid masking group until the final synthetic step, thereby reducing the number of protection/deprotection sequences and improving overall yield.

    Specification Limits and Batch Release Documentation

    Table 2: Certificate of Analysis Summary for FP‑0392
    Test Parameter Method Acceptance Criterion
    Appearance Visual inspection Off‑white to pale‑yellow powder
    Identification (¹H NMR) USP ⟨761 Spectrum conforms to reference standard
    Purity (HPLC, 254 nm) In‑house SOP LC‑019 ≥98.0% area
    Water (Karl Fischer) ASTM E203‑16 ≤0.5%
    Residual palladium ICP‑MS (USP ⟨233⟩) ≤5 ppm
    Residual solvents HS‑GC‑FID (ICH Q3C) Per individual monographs
    Assay (Q‑NMR vs. maleic acid) Bruker Avance Neo 400 MHz ≥95.0% w/w

    Incompatibilities have been documented with strong oxidisers such as potassium permanganate and with Lewis acids that can coordinate the pyrrole nitrogen and trigger ring-opening polymerization when the mixture is heated above 100°C. Blending with amine‑based reagents without prior dilution in an aprotic solvent has caused exotherms exceeding 25 K·min⁻¹ in reaction calorimetry (Mettler Toledo RC1, 200 mL Hastelloy vessel), attributed to rapid aminolysis. Therefore, the solid should never be combined neat with primary amines; a 0.5 M solution of the ester in THF or acetonitrile pre‑cooled to 5°C is added dropwise to the amine to maintain the internal temperature below 30°C. Under these controlled conditions, no pressure excursion or delayed thermal event is observed. Long‑term stability studies under ICH Q1A conditions (25°C/60% RH and 40°C/75% RH) indicate a re‑test period of 24 months when stored in the original unopened container.