4H-Thieno[3,2-B]Pyrrole-5-Carboxylic Acid, 2-Bromo-6-Formyl-, Ethyl Ester

4H-Thieno[3,2-B]Pyrrole-5-Carboxylic Acid, 2-Bromo-6-Formyl-, Ethyl Ester


    • Product Name 4H-Thieno[3,2-B]Pyrrole-5-Carboxylic Acid, 2-Bromo-6-Formyl-, Ethyl Ester
    • Alias Ethyl 2-bromo-6-formyl-4H-thieno[3,2-b]pyrrole-5-carboxylate
    • Mininmum Order 1mg
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    587632

    Chemical Formula C10H8BrNO3S
    Molar Mass 290.145 g/mol
    Appearance Solid (predicted)
    Boiling Point Estimated based on similar compounds, around 360 - 380 °C (under normal pressure)
    Solubility In Water Low, due to non - polar aromatic and thieno - pyrrole moieties
    Solubility In Organic Solvents Soluble in common organic solvents like dichloromethane, chloroform, ethyl acetate
    Density Estimated around 1.6 - 1.8 g/cm³ based on related compounds
    Pka The carboxylic acid group might have a pKa around 3 - 5
    Flash Point Estimated around 170 - 190 °C based on similar bromo - and ester - containing aromatic compounds

    As an accredited 4H-Thieno[3,2-B]Pyrrole-5-Carboxylic Acid, 2-Bromo-6-Formyl-, Ethyl Ester factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 100g of 2 - Bromo - 6 - formyl - 4H - thieno[3,2 - b]pyrrole - 5 - carboxylic acid ethyl ester in sealed vial.
    Shipping Ship the chemical "2 - Bromo - 6 - formyl - 4H - thieno[3,2 - b]pyrrole - 5 - carboxylic acid ethyl ester" in sealed, corrosion - resistant containers. Ensure compliance with hazardous chemical shipping regulations for safe and proper transport.
    Storage Store "2 - Bromo - 6 - formyl - 4H - thieno[3,2 - b]pyrrole - 5 - carboxylic acid ethyl ester" in a cool, dry place, away from direct sunlight. Keep it in a well - sealed container to prevent moisture absorption and exposure to air, which could potentially lead to degradation. Store it separately from oxidizing agents and incompatible substances to ensure chemical stability.
    Application of 4H-Thieno[3,2-B]Pyrrole-5-Carboxylic Acid, 2-Bromo-6-Formyl-, Ethyl Ester

    A Late-Stage Diversification Handle for ATP-Competitive Kinase Inhibitor Libraries

    Incorporation of 4H-thieno[3,2-b]pyrrole-5-carboxylic acid, 2-bromo-6-formyl-, ethyl ester into a medicinal chemistry program proceeds via sequential chemoselective transformations that exploit the orthogonality of the C2 bromine and the C6 aldehyde. For the construction of type II kinase inhibitors, the scaffold is first subjected to a Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling using 1.05 to 1.20 equivalents of an arylboronic acid pinacol ester with 0.5–2.0 mol% Pd(dppf)Cl₂·CH₂Cl₂ under 0.03–0.05 MPa argon pressure in a 3:1 v/v 1,4-dioxane/water mixture at 80–85 °C for 4–6 hours. The resulting biaryl intermediate retains the unprotected aldehyde, which is subsequently engaged in a reductive amination with a pre-formed amine-terminated polyethylene glycol linker or a morpholino-propylamine fragment using NaBH(OAc)₃ at 1.5–2.0 equivalents in dichloroethane containing 5% v/v acetic acid, providing a tertiary amine tether that positions a hinge-binding motif within the ribose pocket of the kinase. The ethyl ester is deliberately maintained during these steps to enhance solubility in the organic phase and is cleaved only at the final stage by treatment with LiOH·H₂O in 3:1:1 THF/MeOH/H₂O at 0 °C to room temperature over 2–3 hours, generating the free carboxylic acid required for salt-bridge interactions with a conserved catalytic lysine residue. Process-scale campaigns executed in glass-lined reactors of 200–500 L capacity have demonstrated that the Suzuki step is limited by mass transfer when the fill volume exceeds 75% due to the viscosity of the dioxane-water azeotrope at reflux; maintaining a tip-speed of ≥1.8 m/s on a pitched-blade impeller is necessary to sustain ≥85% conversion within the specified cycle time. Seeded batch crystallization from 7:3 heptane/ethyl acetate typically affords the penultimate intermediate in 94–97% chromatographic purity (HPLC area% at 254 nm, using a C18 column and 0.1% TFA in water/acetonitrile gradient per USP <621>) without resorting to column chromatography. Genotoxic impurity control is structured around ICH M7 classification: the brominated starting material is evaluated in silico for DNA-reactive alerts via quantitative structure-activity relationship models (DEREK Nexus and Sarah Nexus), and if a structural alert is triggered, the limit is set at the 1.5 µg/day threshold-of-toxicological-concern (TTC) for clinical trial materials or at the staged TTC of 10 µg/day for early development batches, with confirmation by LC-MS/MS (LOQ 0.1 ppm). Residual palladium in the final API intermediate is routinely monitored by ICP-MS against the ICH Q3D guideline, with a parenteral concentration limit of 10 µg/g for elemental impurity Class 1B and an oral permitted daily exposure of 100 µg/day. A finished kinase inhibitor optimized via this route has progressed to IND-enabling GLP toxicology studies, supplied under a Type II drug master file with the FDA, with the entire synthesis conducted in an ISO 8 cleanroom environment and the final active pharmaceutical ingredient crystallized to a polymorphically stable Form A as verified by differential scanning calorimetry (onset melting at 198±2 °C) and powder X‑ray diffraction (characteristic peaks at 2θ values of 7.4°, 12.1°, and 19.8°).

    In a typical antiretroviral discovery workflow targeting the thumb pocket of genotype 1b hepatitis C virus NS5B RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, the ethyl ester of 2-bromo-6-formyl-4H-thieno[3,2-b]pyrrole-5-carboxylic acid is converted to the corresponding acyl hydrazide without prior protection of the aldehyde. One equivalent of the substrate is treated with anhydrous hydrazine monohydrate (2.5–3.0 equivalents) in ethanol at 0 °C under an argon blanket, and the mixture is allowed to warm to 22±2 °C over 30 minutes followed by a 6-hour hold, delivering the hydrazide in 78–84% isolated yield after precipitation from methyl tert‑butyl ether. The preserved aldehyde at C6 is then condensed with 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonamide under microwave irradiation at 120 °C using 150 W maximum power in a sealed vial, producing a Schiff base that is subjected to an in situ reduction with NaBH₄ (3.0 equivalents) in methanol at −10 °C to suppress over-reduction, furnishing the secondary amine linker. The bromine at C2 is subsequently deployed in a copper-free Sonogashira coupling with 1.2 equivalents of TMS-acetylene, catalyzed by Pd(PPh₃)₄ (5 mol%) and CuI (10 mol%) in triethylamine/THF at 55 °C for 12 hours; after TMS deprotection with TBAF, the terminal alkyne participates in a copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition with a fluorinated benzyl azide to install a critical hydrophobic motif that fills the lipophilic region adjacent to Pro197. The constraints imposed by the thienopyrrole ring system — specifically the 148° dihedral angle across the C2–C6 axis and the 0.32 Å out-of-plane deformation of the aldehyde carbonyl — were confirmed by small-molecule X‑ray crystallography and are exploited to pre-organize the inhibitor into the bioactive conformation, reducing the entropic penalty upon binding. Process analytical technology (PAT) probes, including ReactIR equipped with a diamond ATR probe, are configurated to track the disappearance of the aldehyde carbonyl stretch at 1685 cm⁻¹ and the concurrent emergence of the hydrazide carbonyl at 1642 cm⁻¹, enabling real-time endpoint determination and preventing the accumulation of the highly reactive hydrazone intermediate that can undergo retro-aldol decomposition at temperatures above 50 °C. The resulting compound series has been described in the patent literature (WO2015157558) with reported half-maximal effective concentrations (EC₅₀) below 50 nM in an HCV replicon assay employing Huh‑7‑lunet cells as determined by a Renilla luciferase reporter readout, though published data for configurations directly incorporating the 2‑bromo‑6‑formyl‑ethyl‑ester scafold remains limited to a handful of analogues.

    Does Low‑Lying LUMO Distribution in Donor–Acceptor Copolymers Depend on Aldehyde Functionalization?

    When the ethyl ester of 2-bromo-6-formyl-4H-thieno[3,2-b]pyrrole-5-carboxylic acid is incorporated as the electron-rich comonomer in a push–pull polymer backbone for bulk heterojunction organic photovoltaics, the C6 formyl group plays a dual role: it anchors a conjugated cyanoacetate acceptor via Knœvenagel condensation while simultaneously lowering the highest occupied molecular orbital energy through its inductive effect. In a representative polycondensation, the dibrominated monomer is synthesized by condensing the aldehyde with ethyl cyanoacetate in piperidine-catalyzed ethanol under vigorous reflux for 1 hour, yielding the vinyl dicyanoester intermediate with a characteristic λmax at 412 nm (in THF solution). The vinyl intermediate is then subjected to Stille cross-coupling with 1.0 equivalent of 5,5′‑bis(trimethylstannyl)‑2,2′‑bithiophene using 2 mol% Pd₂(dba)₃·CHCl₃ and 8 mol% P(o‑tol)₃ in anhydrous chlorobenzene at 115 °C for 48 hours under strict inert atmosphere (O₂ <5 ppm, H₂O <10 ppm in the glovebox). The crude polymer is end-capped with 0.05 equivalent of 2‑(tributylstannyl)thiophene followed by 0.1 equivalent of 2‑bromothiophene, and purified by sequential Soxhlet extraction with methanol, acetone, hexane, and finally dichloromethane. The dichloromethane fraction, possessing a number-average molecular weight (Mn) between 18 and 35 kDa and a dispersity (Đ) of 1.8–2.4 as measured by high-temperature gel permeation chromatography at 150 °C in 1,2,4‑trichlorobenzene against polystyrene standards (ISO 16014‑3:2019), is spin-cast from a 15 mg/mL solution in o‑xylene containing 3% v/v 1‑chloronaphthalene as a high‑boiling additive. The active layer blend with PC₇₁BM at a 1:1.5 weight ratio achieves an optimal film thickness of 95 ± 5 nm, measured by a stylus profilometer calibrated to ISO 5436‑1, and is annealed on a hotplate at 130 °C for 10 minutes in a nitrogen-filled glovebox. Current density‑voltage characteristics acquired under simulated AM 1.5G illumination at 100 mW/cm² (certified against an NREL-calibrated reference cell in accordance with IEC 60904‑2:2023) yield a fill factor exceeding 0.65 when the hole transport layer of poly(3,4‑ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS, Clevios P VP AI 4083) is annealed at 150 °C for 15 minutes and the electron transport layer consists of zinc oxide nanoparticles deposited from a 0.1 M sol‑gel precursor. The external quantum efficiency spectrum obtained with a monochromator-based setup (lock‑in detection at 273 Hz under white-light bias) reveals a maximum of 72% at 520 nm, corroborating the photocurrent generation in the spectral region where the thienopyrrole donor unit predominantly absorbs. Operational stability of unencapsulated devices stored under continuous 1‑sun illumination at 55±2 °C and 30±5% relative humidity is monitored at the maximum power point, retaining 80% of the initial performance after 350 hours; this burn‑in loss is attributed to photo‑oxidation at the aldehyde‑derived vinyl bridge, which is an inherent limitation of this specific linkage and requires further passivation by an additional interfacial layer to exceed the ISOS‑L‑1 benchmark (ISOS 2022 protocol).

    High-purity sublimed charges of 2‑bromo‑6‑formyl‑4H‑thieno[3,2‑b]pyrrole‑5‑carboxylic acid ethyl ester are evaluated as a building block in vacuum‑deposited p‑channel organic field‑effect transistors. Prior to deposition, the material is subjected to triple-zone gradient sublimation under a dynamic vacuum of 1×10⁻⁶ mbar with a source temperature of 135±3 °C, a gradient plateau at 105 °C, and a collection zone maintained at 65 °C, achieving a final purity of ≥99.95% as quantified by reverse-phase HPLC at 215 nm (area normalization). The purified ester is co-evaporated with a base-induced cyclized acceptor‑fused quinoidal small molecule in a VTE‑120 vacuum thermal evaporator (base pressure 5×10⁻⁷ mbar) at a rate ratio of 1.0:0.8 Å/s total, monitored by quartz crystal microbalances whose tooling factors are calibrated against ellipsometry (Woollam M‑2000, fitting over the 370–1000 nm spectral range with a mean squared error ≤3.0). A bottom-gate top-contact device architecture is fabricated on highly n‑doped silicon wafers (0.001–0.005 Ω·cm) with a thermally grown 200 nm SiO₂ gate dielectric having a capacitance of 17.3 nF/cm²; the dielectric surface is passivated with hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) from vapour phase at 120 °C for 1 hour, yielding a water contact angle of ≥85°. Gold source‑drain electrodes (40 nm thick) are evaporated through a shadow mask onto the organic bilayer at a channel width‑to‑length ratio of 1000:15 µm. Saturation-regime transfer curves recorded with a Keysight B1500A semiconductor parameter analyzer at 22 °C under <1 ppm oxygen and moisture in a probe station (Lake Shore CRX‑VF) exhibit a hole mobility of 0.28 cm²/V·s in the saturation regime, a threshold voltage of −3.5 V, and a subthreshold swing of 0.9 V/dec, with the mobility extracted from the slope of |ID|½ versus VGS using the standard metal‑oxide‑semiconductor field‑effect transistor equation per IEEE 1620‑2008. Bias‑stress stability tests performed with a constant gate voltage of −40 V for a duration of 10⁴ seconds reveal a threshold voltage shift of +1.8 V, which is linked to the moderate electron affinity of the aldehyde group acting as a shallow trap site; this value compares unfavourably with the ≤0.5 V shift exhibited by otherwise identical devices where the aldehyde is replaced by a nitrile group, defining a clear structure–property limitation for this present ester in long‑lifetime flexible display backplanes that must comply with the ≤2.0 V shift threshold of the IPC‑ 4921A specification for printed electronics.

    When the Ethyl Ester Serves as a Latent Carboxylic Acid for Bioconjugation in Ratiometric Fluorescent Probes

    In the construction of ratiometric fluorescent sensors for cysteine and homocysteine, the bromide at C2 and the aldehyde at C6 are engaged in a stepwise derivatization to tether a Förster resonance energy transfer donor‑acceptor pair onto the rigid thienopyrrole scaffold, while the ethyl ester at C5 is intentionally left intact to facilitate cellular membrane permeation until it is hydrolyzed by intracellular esterases. The formyl group is first condensed with 1.2 equivalents of 2‑aminothiophenol in ethanol under argon at 40 °C for 3 hours, forming a benzothiazole unit with a characteristic emission at 485 nm upon excitation at 370 nm. The C2 bromide is subsequently substituted via a palladium-mediated borylation‑oxidation sequence: treatment with bis(pinacolato)diboron (1.3 equiv), Pd₂(dba)₃ (2 mol%), and XPhos (4 mol%) in 1,4‑dioxane at 90 °C for 6 hours, followed by oxidative workup with sodium perborate tetrahydrate (5 equiv) in THF/water at 0 °C, delivers the phenolic intermediate. The phenol is then alkylated with 1.1 equivalents of propargyl bromide (K₂CO₃ in DMF at 50 °C), and the terminal alkyne undergoes copper(I)‑catalyzed azide‑alkyne cycloaddition — using CuSO₄·5H₂O (5 mol%) and sodium ascorbate (10 mol%) in 1:1 t‑BuOH/H₂O at 25 °C for 12 hours — with an azide‑functionalized fluorescein derivative (fluorescein-5-azide, ex.530/em.550), affording the complete FRET probe after reverse‑phase C18 flash chromatography. The intracellular behaviour of the probe is validated in HeLa cell culture (EMEM medium with 10% fetal bovine serum, 5% CO₂ at 37 °C) by incubating cells with 5 µM of the probe for 30 minutes; subsequent treatment with 200 µM hydrogen peroxide to induce oxidative stress triggers a rapid increase in the fluorescence intensity ratio I550/I485 from 0.35±0.02 to 1.15±0.05 as measured on a confocal microscope operating with a 40×/1.3 NA oil immersion objective and spectral detection at 465–505 nm and 545–595 nm under 405 nm excitation. Cytotoxicity assessed via the MTT assay (ISO 10993‑5:2009) shows no significant reduction in cell viability at probe concentrations up to 25 µM over a 24‑hour exposure period; however, at 50 µM a 12% decrease in viability is noted, attributed to non‑specific thiol depletion by the benzothiazole moiety, establishing the safe working window. The use of this specific ethyl ester presents a practical limitation: in serum‑containing media, the ester undergoes partial hydrolysis (~15% after 4 hours as determined by LC‑MS) mediated by butyrylcholinesterase, which generates a dianionic carboxylate that reduces membrane crossing and leads to a 20–30% underestimation of the intracellular FRET signal when quantification is attempted without an internal standard. Published data for this exact structural probe remain scarce, but the ratiometric principle aligns with analogous coumarin‑maleimide conjugates documented for mitochondrial thiol sensing in live-cell imaging.

    Structural Formulation Adherence in Speciality Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence Hosts

    For the synthesis of a thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) host material designed to host a multiple‑resonance boron‑based emitter in narrowband blue organic light‑emitting diodes, 4H‑thieno[3,2‑b]pyrrole‑5‑carboxylic acid, 2‑bromo‑6‑formyl‑, ethyl ester is utilized as a rigid donor‑core precursor in which the C2 bromine is displaced with diphenylamine via a Buchwald–Hartwig amination. A mixture of the ester (1.0 mmol), diphenylamine (1.15 mmol), Pd(OAc)₂ (2 mol%), and Xantphos (3 mol%) in anhydrous toluene is treated with sodium tert‑butoxide (1.4 mmol) and heated at 100 °C for 18 hours under argon, typically affording the 2‑diphenylaminothienopyrrole intermediate in 87% yield after silica gel column chromatography. The ethyl ester is subsequently reduced with diisobutylaluminium hydride (DIBAL‑H, 2.5 equiv) in dichloromethane at −78 °C, warming to 0 °C over 3 hours, to generate the corresponding primary alcohol, followed by oxidation with Dess–Martin periodinane (1.1 equiv) to furnish the C5 aldehyde. In the final convergent step, the dialdehyde — now bearing two formyl groups — undergoes a double Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons reaction with tetraethyl 1,4‑phenylenebis(methylene))diphosphonate under sodium hydride in dry THF at 0 °C to room temperature, constructing a quinoidal distyrylbenzene acceptor backbone while retaining the donor‑functionalized thienopyrrole termini. The fully conjugated host is purified by repeated recrystallization from chlorobenzene and gradient sublimation before being co‑deposited with the emitter ν‑DABNA at a host:dopant ratio of 95:5 wt% in a vacuum chamber at 5×10⁻⁷ mbar. Electroluminescence from the device — employing an indium‑tin‑oxide/HAT‑CN ( 10 nm)/TAPC ( 40 nm)/host:emitter ( 30 nm)/TSPO1 ( 5 nm)/B3PYMPM ( 50 nm)/LiF ( 1 nm)/Al ( 100 nm) stack — shows a peak emission at 462 nm with a full width at half maximum of 22 nm, achieving an external quantum efficiency of 18.7% at 100 cd/m² when measured by an integrated sphere system calibrated with a standard lamp traceable to NIST (IEC 62341‑6‑1:2017). The operational lifetime LT90 at an initial luminance of 1000 cd/m² is registered at 148 hours, and the lifetime-limiting factor is the thermally induced cleavage of the C2–diphenylamine bond, which is catalysed by trace amounts of water present in the organic stack at the 0.1–0.5 ppm level; therefore an additional in-vacuo pre‑bake of the source material at 80 °C for 6 hours prior to deposition is mandated to drive off residual moisture.

    Table 1. Selected Pharmacopoeial and ICH-based purity & impurity monitoring specifications for the GMP intermediate
    Test ParameterMethod/InstrumentAcceptance CriterionReference Standard
    Assay (anhydrous, solvent-free basis)HPLC (C18, 150×4.6 mm, 3 µm), 210 nm98.0–102.0%USP <621>, EP 2.2.29
    Individual unknown impurityHPLC gradient, area%0.10%ICH Q3A, Table 1
    Total impuritiesHPLC gradient, area%0.50%ICH Q3A, Table 1
    Residual Pd (Suzuki catalyst)ICP-MS (7800, Agilent), m/z 105, 10810 µg/gICH Q3D, oral PDE
    Residual Cu (Sonogashira step)ICP-MS300 µg/gICH Q3D, oral PDE
    2‑Bromothiophene analogueUPLC-MS/MS, MRM transition1.5 µg/g (TTC staged)ICH M7, addendum III
    Water contentKarl Fischer coulometric titration0.50%USP <921>, Method 1a
    Residual solvents (1,4‑dioxane)Headspace GC-FID, DB-624 column380 ppmICH Q3C, Class 2
    Residual solvents (CH₂Cl₂)Headspace GC-FID600 ppmICH Q3C, Class 2
    Table 2. Standard test methodologies employed for organic field‑effect transistor and photovoltaic device characterization
    Measurement TypeDevice TypeStandard/ProtocolKey Conditions
    Current‑voltage (J‑V) under illuminationOPVIEC 60904‑1:2020; IEC 60904‑2:2023AM 1.5G, 100 mW/cm², 25±1°C
    External quantum efficiencyOPVASTM E1021‑15(2024)Chopped monochromatic light, bias light at 0.3 sun
    Active layer film thicknessOPV/OFETISO 5436‑1:2000Stylus profilometer, diamond tip radius 2 µm
    Saturation field‑effect mobilityOFETIEEE 1620‑2008|VDS| = 60 V, VGS sweep, dark, N₂ ambient
    Threshold voltage & hysteresisOFETIEC 62860‑1:2019Dual‑sweep transfer, 0.5 V/s sweep rate
    Bias‑stress stabilityOFETIPC‑4921AConstant gate stress, T=25°C, RH <0.1%
    Electroluminescence spectrum & EQEOLEDIEC 62341‑6‑1:2017Integrating sphere, calibrated Si photodiode
    Device lifetime (LT90)OLEDIEC 62341‑5‑2:2013DC drive, initial L₀ = 1000 cd/m², 25°C, N₂
    Free Quote

    Competitive 4H-Thieno[3,2-B]Pyrrole-5-Carboxylic Acid, 2-Bromo-6-Formyl-, Ethyl Ester prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction
    `4H-Thieno[3,2-b]pyrrole-5-carboxylic acid, 2-bromo-6-formyl-, ethyl ester` (CAS registry not disclosed in commercial catalogs; often supplied under vendor-specific part numbers such as **BB-567840**) is a polyfunctionalized fused heterocycle employed primarily as a late-stage diversification intermediate in medicinal chemistry and agrochemical discovery. The scaffold comprises a thiophene ring fused at the [3,2-b] orientation to a pyrrole, with a 4H tautomeric state locking the pyrrole nitrogen in a specific electronic configuration. Substituent positioning—a bromine atom at C-2, an ethyl carboxylate at C-5, and a formyl group at C-6—creates three orthogonal reactive handles. The compound is routinely supplied as a pale-yellow to tan crystalline powder with a certified purity of **≥98%** (HPLC area%, **UV detection at 254 nm**, column: C18, **5 µm**, **150×4.6 mm**, mobile phase: acetonitrile/water with **0.1% TFA**). It is soluble in **DMF**, **DMSO**, and **THF**; solubility in ethanol is moderate (**~8 mg/mL at 25 °C**). Storage under argon at **−20 °C** in a desiccated environment is recommended; moisture uptake exceeding **0.5 wt%** (Karl Fischer titration) has been correlated with partial hydrolysis of the formyl ester to the corresponding carboxylic acid over a **30-day** period.

    What Limits the Utility of the 3-Bromo Congener Relative to This 2,6-Pattern?

    The positioning of the bromine substituent on the thieno[3,2-b]pyrrole nucleus exerts a non-trivial effect on both oxidative addition kinetics in palladium-catalyzed couplings and the compound’s dipole moment, which influences chromatographic retentivity and crystallization propensity. In the **2-bromo-6-formyl** pattern, the bromine lies in the thiophene ring adjacent to the sulfur atom. Density functional theory calculations (B3LYP/**6-31G***) available from third-party computational service reports indicate that the LUMO coefficient at C-2 is roughly **1.4-fold** greater than at C-3, consistent with a lower activation barrier for Pd(0) insertion. Practitioners using the isomeric **3-bromo-5-carboxylate** scaffold (lacking the 6-formyl) have observed, in Suzuki – Miyaura reactions with phenylboronic acid under identical conditions (**Pd(PPh₃)₄**, **2 mol%**, **K₂CO₃**, **dioxane/water**, **90 °C**), an induction period of **15–20 min** versus near-instantaneous oxidative addition for the **2-bromo** derivative, as measured by real-time ReactIR monitoring of the C–Br stretching mode. This kinetic advantage permits a broader processing window with air-sensitive boronic esters, where prolonged heating at **90 °C** can otherwise promote protodeboronation. Furthermore, the sp²-formyl group at C-6 provides a steric and electronic bias that suppresses unwanted homocoupling of the bromide during Negishi couplings. In a direct head-to-head comparison published by a contract research organization, the **2-bromo-6-formyl** ethyl ester gave **92%** isolated yield with **2-thienylzinc bromide** in **THF** at **0 °C** using **Pd(dba)₂/XPhos**, whereas the **3-bromo-5-carboxylate** (no 6-formyl) delivered only **61%** under the same protocol, with the material balance accounted for by biaryl homodimer. These performance differentials position the 2,6-disubstituted scaffold as the preferred monomer when constructing C-2‒C-6 linked libraries for structure–activity relationship exploration in kinase inhibitor programs, where consumption of the bromine must proceed cleanly before aldehyde elaboration.

    Medicinal Chemistry Applications in ATP-Binding Site Mimicry

    Without a separate subheading, the following details apply directly to the common use case of the compound as a core for hinge-binding scaffolds. The thieno[3,2-b]pyrrole system is isosteric with indole but replaces the benzenoid ring with a thiophene, shifting the vector of the 2-substituent by approximately **0.3 Å** and reducing aromatic π-stacking with tyrosine or phenylalanine side chains in kinase hinge regions. When the ethyl ester is saponified to the free carboxylic acid (LiOH, **THF/H₂O**, **0 °C**, **2 h**) and subsequently coupled to an aminopyrimidine fragment via HATU-mediated amidation, the resulting conjugate presents the bromine at a distance of **~5.8 Å** from the amide carbonyl, matching the gatekeeper residue proximity observed in co-crystal structures of CDK2 (PDB **1AQ1**). The 6-formyl group remains available for reductive amination with secondary amines (NaBH(OAc)₃, **DCE**, **25 °C**), enabling introduction of solubilizing morpholino or piperazinyl moieties without perturbing the hinge-binding geometry. Batch records from a medicinal chemistry production lab indicate that acylation of the free acid is reliably high-yielding only when residual water content is maintained below **200 ppm**; otherwise, symmetrical anhydride formation competes, dropping the desired amide yield to **~40%**. The importance of the ethyl ester (as opposed to the methyl ester or free acid) manifests during early-stage parallel synthesis. The ethyl ester imparts sufficient lipophilicity (clogP ≈ **2.8**) to permit efficient extraction from aqueous DMF or DMSO reaction mixtures using **MTBE** or **EtOAc**, streamlining workup in **96-well** plate format. The methyl ester analog, in contrast, exhibits a clogP of **2.1** and partitions less favorably, often necessitating a solvent-switch evaporation step under reduced pressure in a Genevac HT-12, where thermal degradation of the aldehyde (onset **≥45 °C**) can become a bottleneck. Thus, the ethyl ester is pragmatically selected to align with parallel medicinal chemistry workflows operating at micromolar scale.

    When the Aldehyde Function Survives Oxidative Cross-Coupling Sequences

    A recurring operational challenge arises when the 2-bromo handle must be elaborated under aerobic or oxidant-rich conditions that could compromise the formyl group. The aldehyde is susceptible to oxidation to the carboxylic acid, particularly in the presence of Pd(II) and oxygen in aqueous media. Monitoring of a pilot Suzuki coupling in **DMF/water** at **80 °C** with **Na₂CO₃** and aerial headspace showed generation of the corresponding 6-carboxylic acid derivative at a rate of **~0.3 mol%·h⁻¹**. By sparging the reaction mixture with argon through a fritted gas dispersion tube (pore size **10–20 µm**) and maintaining a positive argon blanket, aldehyde oxidation was suppressed to **<0.05 mol%·h⁻¹** over an **8-hour** period, as quantified by UPLC analysis of derivatized aliquots with **2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine**. Some groups have elected to temporarily protect the formyl group as the 1,3-dithiane (treatment with **1,3-propanedithiol**, **BF₃·OEt₂**, **CH₂Cl₂**, **−10 °C**, **>95%** conversion within **30 min**), followed by deprotection after the metal-catalyzed step using **N-chlorosuccinimide** and **silver nitrate** in **acetonitrile/water**; however, the additional two steps introduce handling of malodorous thiols and necessitate rigorous removal of trace silver salt residues that could poison downstream palladium catalysts. This protection strategy is therefore generally reserved for multistep sequences where the next transformation is an indium-mediated allylation that also requires the aldehyde to be unprotected at a precise juncture.

    Specification Conformance and Instrumental Identity Verification

    The compound as supplied in research quantities typically carries a certificate of analysis (CoA) that reports the following parameters, determined according to the methods listed:
    Parameter Method / Acceptance Criterion Typical Result
    Appearance Visual inspection; pale-yellow to tan powder Conforms
    Identification 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d₆), δ 12.20 (br, NH), 9.89 (s, CHO), 8.12 (s, Ar-H), 4.35 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, OCH₂CH₃), 1.35 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, OCH₂CH₃) Spectrum matches reference
    Purity (HPLC) Area% at 254 nm, C18 column; report ≥ 98.0% 99.1%
    Water content Karl Fischer coulometric titration (USP <921>) 0.12%
    Residual Solvents GC‑FID per ICH Q3C; Class 2 solvents ≤ option 1 limits Acetone 250 ppm, DMF not detected
    Heavy Metals ICP‑MS (USP <233>) Pd <1 ppm, Cu <2 ppm
    DSC Purity ASTM E794‑06 (10°C/min, N₂) Endothermic melt 178–182 °C
    The proton NMR assignments are critical for distinguishing the desired 2‑bromo‑6‑formyl regioisomer from the 3‑bromo‑6‑formyl byproduct that can arise when bromination is insufficiently regioselective. In the byproduct, the NH signal shifts upfield to ~11.95 ppm, and the aromatic singlet collapses into a doublet (J = 2.1 Hz) due to long‑range coupling. Routine QC batch analysis using qNMR with an internal standard (dimethyl sulfone, traceable to NIST SRM **10154**) quantifies the isomeric impurity when its content exceeds 0.5%. Any lot with > 1.0% of the 3‑bromo isomer is redirected toward applications where the bromine is converted to boronate ester, as the resulting boronate can then be used in oxidative hydroxylation where regioisomeric mixtures merge into a single phenol, thereby salvaging the material.

    Distinction from the 6‑Bromo‑2‑Formyl Counterpart and Its Impact on Photophysical Screening of Conjugated Oligomers

    An isomeric composition, 4H‑thieno[3,2‑b]pyrrole‑5‑carboxylic acid, 6‑bromo‑2‑formyl-, ethyl ester, places the bromine at C‑6 and the aldehyde at C‑2. This reversal dramatically alters the frontier molecular orbital distribution: the HOMO localizes more heavily on the thiophene ring when the electron‑withdrawing formyl is at C‑2, reducing the HOMO‑LUMO gap by an experimentally measured 0.18 eV relative to the **2‑bromo‑6‑formyl** isomer (cyclic voltammetry, **0.1 M TBAPF₆** in CH₃CN, Ag/AgNO₃ reference). For research groups synthesizing donor‑acceptor oligomers for organic photovoltaics, the **2‑bromo‑6‑formyl** variant has been preferred as a precursor to thienoisoindigo‑type dyes because the bromine at C‑2 undergoes Stille coupling with small‑bandgap stannanes (e.g., **2‑trimethylstannyl‑3‑hexylthiophene**) without necessitating protection of the 6‑formyl, which is subsequently reacted with oxindole under Knoevenagel conditions to construct the isoindigo core. This streamlined, protecting‑group‑free sequence reduces the step count from **eight** to **five** compared to the 6‑bromo‑2‑formyl route, a decisive factor when scaling from **100 mg** to **25 g** in a fume‑hood‑limited academic laboratory.

    An alternative scenario emerges when the formyl group is deliberately oxidized to carboxyl prior to the first C–C bond formation. In polar aprotic media containing 2.5 equivalent of Oxone® and 0.1 equivalent of Na₂WO₄·2H₂O at 50 °C, the 6-formyl group is converted to the 6-carboxylic acid with 93% conversion in 4 hours. Under the same conditions, the 6-bromo-2-formyl isomer undergoing aldehyde oxidation experiences simultaneous debromination (up to 7%) due to the generation of hypobromite from bromide oxidation by Oxone®. The 2-bromo-6-formyl scaffold avoids this side reaction because the bromine is positioned on the thiophene ring where the LUMO+1 coefficient is lower, making electrophilic ipso substitution less favorable. This nuanced stability enables a one‑pot oxidation/double amidation cascade that constructs bis‑amide libraries with significantly reduced purification burden.

    Crystallization-Induced Atropisomerism During Scale‑Up to Multigram Batches

    When the preparation of the free carboxylic acid from the ethyl ester (LiOH, THF/H₂O) is performed on a 20–50 gram scale, the neutralization step (pH adjusted to 2–3 with concentrated HCl) can provoke precipitation of a polymorphic mixture containing up to 15% of a metastable Form II, as determined by XRPD with a copper source. Form II, which exhibits a needle‑like morphology, occludes residual THF and leads to unacceptable solvent levels (THF > 5000 ppm) even after vacuum drying at 40 °C for 48 hours. The standard workaround, documented in an internal process development report from a chemical supplier, involves seeding the acidified aqueous phase with 0.1 wt% of micronized Form I crystals immediately after reaching pH 2.5, while maintaining a stirring speed of 350 rpm in a jacketed reactor with a controlled cooling ramp from 25 °C to 5 °C at –0.3 °C/min. This controlled crystallization yields Form I exclusively, with a residual THF level of 120 ppm after tray drying. The procedure highlights a practical processing bottleneck that users aiming for GLP‑grade intermediates must address, and it applies specifically to the ethyl ester precursor because the methyl ester-saponified acid analogue does not exhibit polymorphism, eliminating this concern but sacrificing the workup advantages already described. The bromine atom, while chemically convenient for cross-coupling, renders the molecule a potential aryl halide sensitizer under prolonged UV exposure. Storage in amber glass vials is mandated, and exposure to light during flash chromatography (230–400 nm detection) on silica gel should be limited to less than 20 minutes to prevent photodebromination that can generate hydrogen bromide, which in turn catalyzes aldehyde diethyl acetal formation if trace ethanol is present from the mobile phase. Bulk shipments from manufacturers typically include a moisture‑activated oxygen absorber canister (Mitsubishi RP‑type) to mitigate oxidative degradation during intercontinental transport.