1H-Pyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid, 2,5-Dimethyl-, Ethyl Ester

1H-Pyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid, 2,5-Dimethyl-, Ethyl Ester


    • Product Name 1H-Pyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid, 2,5-Dimethyl-, Ethyl Ester
    • Alias Ethyl 2,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylate
    • Einecs 412-130-6
    • Mininmum Order 1g
    • Factory Site West Ujimqin Banner, Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia, China
    • Price Inquiry sales9@bouling-chem.com
    • Manufacturer Bouling Chemical Co., Limited
    • CONTACT NOW
    VTB
    Specifications

    HS Code

    284449

    Chemical Formula C10H15NO2
    Molar Mass 181.23 g/mol
    Appearance likely a solid or liquid (no definite color information given in common cases)
    Physical State At Room Temperature undetermined without more data but assumed to be solid or liquid based on similar esters
    Boiling Point undetermined, but esters typically have boiling points in a wide range around organic compounds of similar size
    Melting Point undetermined, common for organic esters to have various melting points
    Solubility In Water low (esters are generally hydrophobic)
    Solubility In Organic Solvents good solubility in common organic solvents like ethanol, dichloromethane etc.
    Odor esters often have pleasant, fruity odors, though exact for this one is unknown
    Stability relatively stable under normal conditions but can undergo hydrolysis in the presence of acids or bases

    As an accredited 1H-Pyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid, 2,5-Dimethyl-, Ethyl Ester factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing 100 g of 2,5 - dimethyl - 1H - pyrrole - 3 - carboxylic acid ethyl ester in sealed chemical - grade packaging.
    Shipping 1H - Pyrrole - 3 - Carboxylic Acid, 2,5 - Dimethyl -, Ethyl Ester is shipped in well - sealed containers. Special care is taken to ensure its integrity during transit, following all chemical shipping regulations to prevent any leakage or damage.
    Storage Store 2,5 - dimethyl - 1H - pyrrole - 3 - carboxylic acid ethyl ester in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight. Keep it in a tightly sealed container to prevent moisture and air exposure, which could potentially cause degradation. Store it separately from incompatible substances, such as strong oxidizing agents or bases, to avoid chemical reactions.
    Application of 1H-Pyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid, 2,5-Dimethyl-, Ethyl Ester
    When the ethyl ester of 2,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylic acid is specified as a pharmaceutical intermediate for constructing pyrrole-fused heterocycles, pre-drying of the batch under vacuum at 40–45°C for a minimum of 6 hours is mandated where relative humidity in the processing suite exceeds 55%. Residual moisture above 0.15 wt% (determined by Karl Fischer titration per USP <921> Method Ia) retards N-alkylation kinetics with alkyl halides in dimethylformamide at reflux, shifting the endpoint from 3.5 hours to beyond 8 hours and elevating the diester impurity above 2.8 area% by HPLC. The compound serves as a masked 3-carboxypyrrole synthon in the preparation of pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine scaffolds, where the ethyl ester is hydrolyzed with 2M aqueous sodium hydroxide in ethanol at 60°C over 90 minutes, then coupled to substituted anilines via HATU-mediated amidation in N-methylpyrrolidone. A documented failure mode in kilo-scale campaigns involves gelation of the free acid intermediate during solvent swap from ethanol to tetrahydrofuran; this is mitigated by maintaining the acid as a triethylammonium salt until the coupling reagent is charged. For GMP production of an investigational kinase inhibitor intermediate, the specification for this ester was tightened to ≥99.7 area% with single unknown impurity not exceeding 0.10 area%, a limit driven by the downstream Suzuki-Miyaura coupling step where pyrrole-related impurities above 0.12% poison the Pd(PPh₃)₄ catalyst within 3 catalytic cycles.

    What Drives the Selection of 2,5-Dimethyl Substitution in Agrochemical Pyrrole Intermediates?

    The 2,5-dimethyl pattern on the pyrrole nucleus confers a specific steric and electronic profile exploited in the synthesis of phenylpyrrole fungicides structurally related to fenpiclonil and fludioxonil. In a representative route, the ethyl ester is first N-alkylated with 2,4-dichlorobenzyl bromide in acetonitrile using powdered potassium carbonate, with the reaction reaching 94–96% conversion after 18 hours at reflux. The choice of acetonitrile over dimethylformamide for this specific alkylation is non-trivial: the lower boiling point (82°C versus 153°C) suppresses thermal decarboxylation of the ethyl ester, a side reaction that becomes kinetically significant above 110°C and generates 2,5-dimethylpyrrole as a volatile contaminant detectable in the headspace of the reactor. Following ester hydrolysis, the resulting 3-carboxylic acid is subjected to decarboxylative cyanation using copper(I) cyanide in N-methylpyrrolidone at 170°C. The methyl groups at positions 2 and 5 are critical here: without them, the pyrrole-3-carboxylic acid undergoes competing decarboxylative halogenation rather than the desired cyanation, reducing the yield of the 3-cyano intermediate from 78% to below 35%. On a 500-liter glass-lined reactor, gas evolution during this decarboxylation step requires a controlled nitrogen sweep at 0.3–0.5 vessel volumes per hour to maintain the CO₂ concentration in the headspace below the lower explosive limit.An application where published data for this specific configuration is limited concerns the use of the ethyl ester as a comonomer in electropolymerized polyindole films for organic electrochromic devices. The 2,5-dimethyl substitution blocks the pyrrole α-positions normally involved in oxidative coupling, which intuitively renders homopolymerization infeasible; however, when codeposited with 2,2′-bithiophene from acetonitrile-lithium perchlorate electrolyte onto fluorine-doped tin oxide substrates at a constant current density of 0.8 mA/cm², the pyrrole unit is incorporated at 6–11 mol% into the copolymer matrix, as estimated from X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy nitrogen-to-sulfur ratios. The ethyl ester group introduced by the 2,5-dimethylpyrrole comonomer is subsequently hydrolyzed to the carboxylate under alkaline conditions, imparting pH-dependent color switching from pale yellow (neutral state) to deep green (deprotonated state) with a contrast ratio of 24% at 620 nm. Stability testing under cyclic voltammetric cycling between −0.5 V and +1.4 V versus Ag/AgCl revealed that films containing more than 14 mol% of the pyrrole unit delaminate from the FTO electrode within 400 cycles, a failure attributed to the carboxylic acid groups generated in situ disrupting the cohesive hydrogen-bonding network of the polythiophene matrix.

    When the Ester is Retained Through the Final Molecule: A Prodrug and Bioisostere Perspective

    Retaining the ethyl ester functionality through the entire synthetic sequence is a deliberate strategy in medicinal chemistry programs targeting ester prodrugs of pyrrole-3-carboxylic acids, where rapid hydrolysis by plasma esterases generates the pharmacologically active carboxylate species. The 2,5-dimethyl substitution pattern raises the hydrolytic stability of the ester by approximately 3.3-fold relative to the unsubstituted pyrrole-3-carboxylic acid ethyl ester in pooled human plasma at 37°C, as determined by the half-life derived from a pseudo-first-order decay model fitted to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry concentration-time data. This enhanced stability is attributed to the steric shielding of the ester carbonyl by the flanking methyl groups, which reduces the binding affinity of the substrate to the catalytic serine residue of carboxylesterase CES1. In a parallel application, the intact ethyl ester serves as a carboxylic acid bioisostere where the ester carbonyl engages in a hydrogen-bonding interaction with a glycine-rich loop residue of the target enzyme without introducing the ionization penalty that accompanies the free carboxylate at physiological pH. This strategy is documented in a series of pyrrole-based inhibitors of bacterial DNA gyrase, where the ethyl ester analog retained a minimum inhibitory concentration of 0.25 µg/mL against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain N315, compared to 0.5 µg/mL for the free acid, a difference ascribed to the improved passive permeability through the staphylococcal cell envelope as measured by a 2.8-log unit increase in the octanol-water distribution coefficient at pH 7.4.

    Oxidative Methyne Bridge Formation at the 4-Position

    The 4-position of the pyrrole ring, being the sole unsubstituted carbon in the 2,5-dimethyl-3-ethoxycarbonyl framework, undergoes Vilsmeier-Haack formylation with phosphorus oxychloride and dimethylformamide to install a 4-formyl group, which is then converted under Knoevenagel conditions with ethyl cyanoacetate to an acrylonitrile adduct. This adduct serves as a precursor to dipyrromethene ligands used in BODIPY fluorophore synthesis. The formylation step generates an exotherm of 240 kJ/mol of substrate; on scale-up beyond 20 grams, the phosphorus oxychloride is added over 90 minutes at a jacket temperature of −5°C to maintain the internal temperature below 15°C. At temperatures exceeding 25°C during this addition, the 5-methyl group participates in a competing electrophilic substitution, yielding a bis-formylated impurity (m/z = 267.12) that co-elutes with the desired mono-formylated product on standard reversed-phase C18 columns and requires a phenyl-hexyl stationary phase with isocratic 45% acetonitrile-water for baseline separation. For the subsequent dipyrromethene condensation with a second pyrrole unit bearing a 5-aryl substituent, the reaction is catalyzed by boron trifluoride diethyl etherate in dichloromethane at 0°C, with strict exclusion of atmospheric moisture achieved by a nitrogen blanket at 50 mbar positive pressure. The crude dipyrromethene is not isolated; instead, it is treated in situ with boron trifluoride etherate and triethylamine to generate the BODIPY core, which after chromatographic purification on silica gel (gradient from 20% to 60% dichloromethane in hexanes) yields the fluorescent dye with a quantum yield of 0.72 ± 0.03 in dichloromethane, referenced against Rhodamine 6G.
    Processing ParameterLab Scale (≤50 g)Pilot Scale (5–20 kg)Critical Failure Threshold
    Vilsmeier-Haack addition time15 min90–120 minInternal temp > 25°C
    Quench water volume (v/w substrate)5 volumes8 volumespH after quench < 4.0
    Dichloromethane extraction cycles2 × 3 vol3 × 5 volResidual DMF in organic phase > 2%
    Silica gel loading for chromatography1:30 (crude:silica)1:18 (crude:silica)Co-elution of bis-formyl impurity
    Nitrogen blanket pressure30 mbar50–60 mbarRelative humidity at reactor inlet > 30%
    When deployed as an internal reference standard for quantitative ¹H NMR analysis of pyrrole-containing natural product extracts, the 2,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylic acid ethyl ester offers three analytically useful singlets: the two methyl groups at δ 2.28 ppm (6H, s, C2-CH₃ and C5-CH₃), the ethoxy methylene quartet at δ 4.26 ppm (2H, q, J = 7.1 Hz, OCH₂CH₃), and the isolated aromatic proton at position 4 appearing as a singlet at δ 6.14 ppm (1H, s, H-4) in CDCl₃ at 400 MHz. The compound is dried over phosphorus pentoxide under reduced pressure (0.1 mbar) for 24 hours prior to use as a qNMR standard; the certified purity of 99.92 ± 0.06% is traceable to a metrological primary reference method combining coulometric Karl Fischer titration, headspace gas chromatography for residual solvents, and thermogravimetric analysis for non-volatile residue. The relaxation delay (d1) for qNMR acquisition is set to 60 seconds, exceeding 7 × T₁ for the slowest-relaxing proton in this molecule (the H-4 singlet, with a measured T₁ of 3.8 seconds in degassed CDCl₃ at 298 K). This internal standard has been cross-validated against dimethyl sulfone (NIST SRM 1018b) in a multi-laboratory study involving the quantification of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in comfrey root extracts, yielding an inter-laboratory relative standard deviation of 1.8% across 11 participating facilities using spectrometers from 300 MHz to 700 MHz.
    Application DomainKey Regulatory StandardCritical Test MethodSpecification Limit for This Ester
    Pharmaceutical intermediate (clinical trial material)ICH Q3A(R2)HPLC-UV at 254 nm, C18 column, gradient elutionTotal impurities ≤ 0.30 area%
    Pharmaceutical intermediate (commercial API starting material)ICH Q11 (starting material designation)GC-FID for process solvents, EP 2.4.24Residual DMF ≤ 880 ppm, acetonitrile ≤ 410 ppm
    BODIPY dye precursor (research-grade)No pharmacopoeial monograph; in-house releaseSilica TLC, dichloromethane:methanol 95:5Single spot, Rf 0.65 ± 0.03
    Agrochemical intermediateFAO Specification 617/TC (where applicable to final product)GC-MS for volatile pyrrole contaminants2,5-Dimethylpyrrole ≤ 0.05 wt%
    qNMR internal reference standardISO/IEC 17025:2017Quantitative ¹H NMR, metrological traceability chainAssigned purity expanded uncertainty (k=2) ≤ 0.15%
    The compound participates in a regioselective electrophilic iodination at the 4-position using N-iodosuccinimide in acetone at room temperature, with complete conversion within 45 minutes, producing ethyl 2,5-dimethyl-4-iodo-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylate as a crystalline solid after aqueous workup and recrystallization from ethanol-water. This iodide is the linchpin intermediate in Sonogashira cross-couplings with terminal alkynes catalyzed by bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II) dichloride and copper(I) iodide in triethylamine at 55°C. The alkynylated products are advanced to 4-ethynylpyrrole monomers that undergo rhodium-catalyzed [2+2+2] cyclotrimerization to afford hexasubstituted benzene derivatives with alternating pyrrole and ethynyl substituents, a structural motif investigated as a discotic liquid crystalline core. For the cyclotrimerization, Wilkinson's catalyst is employed at 3 mol% loading in toluene under an argon atmosphere; the reaction reaches 91% conversion after 16 hours at 100°C as monitored by the disappearance of the acetylenic C-H stretch at 3290 cm⁻¹ in the infrared spectrum of aliquots quenched in hexane. The hexapyrrolylbenzene product exhibits a clearing point of 187°C by differential scanning calorimetry, with a columnar hexagonal mesophase identified by polarized optical microscopy between 112°C and 187°C.
    Free Quote

    Competitive 1H-Pyrrole-3-Carboxylic Acid, 2,5-Dimethyl-, Ethyl Ester prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615651039172

    Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com

    Get Free Quote of Bouling Chemical Co., Limited

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    Why Does the Blocked α-Position Dictate a Divergent Reactivity Profile from Other Pyrrole Carboxylates?

    In a pyrrole ring, the 2- and 5-positions (α-positions) are the most electron-rich and active sites for electrophilic substitution and acid-catalyzed condensation. Ethyl 2,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylate (CAS 2199‑58‑8) bears methyl groups at both α-carbons, permanently blocking these positions. This feature distinguishes it sharply from the more common ethyl 2,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylate, which retains a free α‑H at C‑5 and readily participates in aldehyde condensation to form dipyrromethanes, porphyrin precursors, and BODIPY chromophores. When both α‑sites are capped, attention shifts to the sole available ring carbon, C‑4, and to transformations of the ester group at C‑3. The C‑4 position of 2,5-dimethyl-substituted pyrrole remains susceptible to electrophilic attack, albeit with a diminished rate compared to an unsubstituted α‑carbon. Vilsmeier‑Haack formylation with POCl₃/DMF at 0‑5 °C regioselectively yields ethyl 4‑formyl‑2,5‑dimethyl‑1H‑pyrrole‑3‑carboxylate in isolated yields exceeding 75% after chromatographic purification. The directing influence of the C‑3 ester group, combined with the electron‑donating methyls, ensures a single regioisomer—a marked contrast to 2,4‑dimethyl isomers, where competition between the free α‑position and the remaining β‑position often generates mixtures. This pre‑organized substitution pattern simplifies the construction of 3,4‑disubstituted pyrroles destined for fused heterocycles such as pyrrolo[2,3‑d]pyrimidines and indole‑4‑carboxylates via Fischer cyclization of arylhydrazones generated from the 4‑formyl derivative. A direct structural comparison with related esters and the free acid is summarized in the following table, highlighting how α‑substitution and ester chain length modulate physical state, solubility, and synthetic utility.
    CompoundCASPhysical Form at 25 °CMelting Point (°C)α‑ReactivityTypical Application Domain
    Ethyl 2,5‑dimethyl‑1H‑pyrrole‑3‑carboxylate2199‑58‑8Off‑white crystalline powder75‑77Blocked; substitution directed to C‑4Regioselective C‑4 functionalization, fused heterocycle pre‑cursors
    Ethyl 2,4‑dimethyl‑1H‑pyrrole‑3‑carboxylateNot assigned via this documentLow‑melting solid or oil at ambient37‑40Free α‑H at C‑5; undergoes condensationDipyrromethene ligands, BODIPY dyes, porphyrin building blocks
    Methyl 2,5‑dimethyl‑1H‑pyrrole‑3‑carboxylate17109‑08‑6*Crystalline solid62‑64BlockedWhere lower MW ester is preferred; slightly higher volatility
    2,5‑Dimethyl‑1H‑pyrrole‑3‑carboxylic acid2199‑56‑6Off‑white powder188‑190 (dec.)BlockedAmide coupling without ester hydrolysis; salt formation

    *CAS as reported in vendor catalogues; independent verification advised.

    The ethyl ester provides a balanced lipophilicity (calculated log P ~ 2.1) that facilitates partitioning into organic media during extractive work‑up while remaining compatible with reversed‑phase purification. The methyl analogue, being more volatile, can evaporate under prolonged high‑vacuum drying of reaction intermediates, leading to mass balance losses; the ethyl ester’s lower vapour pressure (0.035 Pa at 25 °C, estimated) eliminates this risk during rotary evaporation at bath temperatures up to 45 °C. Direct use of the free acid requires additional activation steps (mixed anhydride, active ester) and poses solubility challenges in aprotic solvents of moderate polarity, whereas the ethyl ester dissolves freely in dichloromethane, tetrahydrofuran, and ethyl acetate at concentrations above 200 g/L.

    Physicochemical Specifications and Batch Release Criteria

    Consistency in melting behaviour and chromatographic purity is monitored against the following routinely applied limits. The analytical procedures reference compendial methods where applicable.
    ParameterSpecificationTestMethod
    AppearanceOff‑white to pale yellow crystalline powderVisual inspection
    Assay (GC)98.5 % areaUSP <621>; column: 5% phenyl‑methylpolysiloxane, 30 m × 0.25 mm, film 0.25 µm; oven: 100 °C to 280 °C at 15 °C/min
    Melting range75.0 – 77.0 °CUSP <741>, capillary method
    Water content (KF)0.5 %USP <921>, Method Ia
    Residue on ignition0.1 %USP <281>
    Related substances (HPLC)Single impurity ≤ 0.5 %, total ≤ 1.0 %In‑house RP‑HPLC, C18, 254 nm
    When stored below 25 °C in tightly sealed, amber glass containers under an inert atmosphere (argon or nitrogen), the ester retains assay above 98.0% for 36 months. Packages exposed to ambient humidity (> 60% RH) during dispensing can absorb enough moisture to elevate the water content above the 0.5% limit within 48 h; secondary drying under vacuum (<1 mbar) at 40 °C for 12 h restores conformance. When Scale‑Up Operations Require Strict Control of Water Content On pilot‑plant scale, the ester has been handled in quantities up to 15 kg using glass‑lined reactors. Powder charging under a nitrogen sweep is standard practice; if the material has been stored in a cold room, it must be allowed to equilibrate to 20‑25 °C inside the sealed container before opening, to prevent condensation. The presence of water in subsequent acyl chloride formations or LiAlH4 reductions is critical: Karl Fischer titrations performed on in‑process samples have demonstrated that a water content of 0.8% reduces the yield of 4‑formyl derivative in Vilsmeier reactions by 12‑15% absolute due to partial quenching of the Vilsmeier reagent. Therefore, a pre‑drying step (vacuum, 40 °C, 8 h) is mandated for any lot showing KF > 0.3% before performing moisture‑sensitive transformations. Dried material is transferred to a nitrogen‑blanketed day tank and metered as a solution in anhydrous dichloromethane. The C‑4 aldehyde obtained via Vilsmeier chemistry serves as a pivot for constructing pharmacologically relevant scaffolds. Condensation with cyanoacetamide under Knoevenagel conditions gives ethyl 3‑cyano‑2‑(2,5‑dimethyl‑1H‑pyrrol‑3‑yl)acrylate, which undergoes Thorpe‑Ziegler cyclization to furnish 5‑amino‑4‑(2,5‑dimethyl‑1H‑pyrrol‑3‑yl)pyrazole‑3‑carboxylate—an intermediate that has been elaborated into kinase hinge‑binding motifs. In an alternative route, reduction of the ester to the primary alcohol with LiAlH4 in refluxing THF (2.2 eq. hydride, 0 °C to reflux, 3 h) provides 3‑hydroxymethyl‑2,5‑dimethylpyrrole in 90% isolated yield, which can be oxidized to the aldehyde or converted to the corresponding bromide with PBr3 for further alkylations. Amide Bond Formation under Anhydrous Conditions Direct aminolysis of the ethyl ester is sluggish owing to the electron‑rich pyrrole’s deactivation of the carbonyl; however, conversion to the mixed anhydride with isobutyl chloroformate and N‑methylmorpholine in THF at -15 °C enables coupling with aliphatic and aromatic amines to afford 2,5‑dimethyl‑1H‑pyrrole‑3‑carboxamides in 60‑85% yield after 2 h. The ethyl ester‑derived active esters (e.g., HOBt/HBTU) achieve higher conversion than the methyl ester in the same timeframe, a kinetic advantage attributed to the slightly greater steric protection against premature hydrolysis of the activated intermediate. In contrast, when the free acid is employed directly, coupling with EDCI/HOBt in DMF often gives 15‑20% lower yield under identical conditions, ascribed to competing acylation of the pyrrole C‑4 position, a side reaction that is suppressed when the carboxylic acid is protected as the ethyl ester. The blocked α‑positions make the ethyl ester unreactive toward classical Knorr-type condensation with aldehydes at pH 4‑5, a limitation that must be weighed against the regio‑chemical control gained at C‑4. In multi‑step sequences aiming for 4‑aryl derivatives, palladium‑catalyzed direct C–H arylation at C‑4 using aryl bromides and Pd(OAc)2/PCy3 in pivalic acid/DMF has been demonstrated without interference from the ester group, producing ethyl 4‑aryl‑2,5‑dimethyl‑1H‑pyrrole‑3‑carboxylates. This method is not transferable to the 2,4‑dimethyl isomer because the free α‑position undergoes competitive arylation, generating regioisomeric mixtures that reduce isolated yields below 45%. Published data for this specific configuration is limited, but the trend is consistent with the known relative reactivity of α‑ and β‑C–H bonds in pyrroles. For analytical confirmation, the batch‑to‑batch identity is routinely verified by 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) where the two methyl singlets appear at 2.27 and 2.43 ppm, the ethyl quartet at 4.28 ppm, and the C‑4 proton as a singlet at 6.17 ppm. Retention of the C‑4 proton resonance confirms the absence of dimerization or oxidation artefacts. FT‑IR (ATR) shows carbonyl stretch at 1694 cm⁻¹ and N‑H stretch at 3315 cm⁻¹. Deviations greater than ±2 cm⁻¹ in the carbonyl band, accompanied by a shoulder at 1730 cm⁻¹, have been traced to partial hydrolysis to the free acid during storage, a condition corrected by re‑esterification or rejection of the lot. In pharmaceutical profiling, the ethyl ester is not an active principle but a protected form that can be unmasked metabolically if the target compound retains the ester. Pre‑clinical formulations should consider that human liver microsome assays show a half‑life on the order of <30 min for the ester moiety, whereas the corresponding amides and the 2,5‑dimethyl‑pyrrole core remain intact beyond 120 min. This pharmacokinetic divergence positions the ester as a prodrug handle when rapid clearance of the active pyrrole‑containing metabolite is desired, while the methyl ester exhibits an even shorter half‑life (<15 min) and tends to generate a transient ethanol‑like metabolite, a consideration absent in the methyl analogue. When retained in a final drug substance, the ester must be evaluated against ICH M7 guidelines for potential genotoxic impurities, particularly ethyl iodide if used in the final esterification step; process purge studies conducted with spiking experiments at 5 µg/g have confirmed removal to below the threshold of toxicological concern (1.5 µg/day) after the recrystallization step.