|
HS Code |
350078 |
| Chemical Formula | C10H15NO2 |
| Molecular Weight | 181.23 g/mol |
| Solubility In Water | Low, as it is an ester and relatively non - polar |
| Solubility In Organic Solvents | Soluble in common organic solvents like ethanol, dichloromethane |
As an accredited 1H-Pyrrole-2-Carboxylicacid, 3,4-Dimethyl-, Ethyl Ester factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | 100g of 3,4 - Dimethyl - 1H - pyrrole - 2 - carboxylic acid ethyl ester in sealed chemical - grade packaging. |
| Shipping | The chemical "1H - Pyrrole - 2 - Carboxylic acid, 3,4 - Dimethyl -, Ethyl Ester" is shipped in properly sealed containers. Shipment adheres to strict chemical transportation regulations, ensuring safe transit to the destination. |
| Storage | Store “1H - Pyrrole - 2 - Carboxylic acid, 3,4 - Dimethyl -, Ethyl Ester” in a cool, dry place away from heat and ignition sources. Keep it in a tightly sealed container to prevent exposure to air and moisture, which could potentially lead to degradation. Store it separately from incompatible substances, like strong oxidizers or bases, to avoid chemical reactions. |
Incorporation of ethyl 3,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate into candidate-drug scaffolds generally proceeds via selective hydrolysis of the ethyl ester under alkaline conditions—typically 1.0–2.5 M aqueous LiOH in a tetrahydrofuran/water mixture at 0–25 °C, monitored by TLC for complete consumption—to yield the corresponding carboxylic acid without decarboxylation of the electron‑rich pyrrole ring. The free acid is then activated as the acid chloride using oxalyl chloride (1.05–1.20 equivalents) in anhydrous dichloromethane with catalytic dimethylformamide at 0–5 °C under a nitrogen blanket, or alternatively coupled directly to aliphatic and aromatic amines using 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC·HCl) and 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt) in 0.2–0.5 M concentration at ambient temperature. The batch is quenched into chilled 5 % aqueous sodium bicarbonate, extracted, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, and the solvent recovered under reduced pressure on a rotary evaporator with bath temperature not exceeding 40 °C to avoid thermal demethylation. In several kinase inhibitor programmes, the 3,4-dimethyl substitution pattern on the pyrrole has been exploited to occupy a hydrophobic back pocket analogous to the trimethoxyphenyl motif in certain ATP‑competitive agents, while the ester or amide carbonyl participates in a key hydrogen‑bond interaction with a hinge‑region methionine residue. Residual levels of the starting ester must be controlled below 0.10 % w/w in intermediates destined for oral solid‑dosage forms, as confirmed by HPLC with UV detection at 254 nm on a C18 column using acetonitrile/0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid mobile phase. Batch records maintained under ICH Q7 (Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients) require documentation of the water content of the isolated intermediate by Karl Fischer titration (specification: ≤ 0.5 %) prior to container closure under argon, because trace moisture promotes slow oxidation to the pyrrolin‑2‑one analogue, which is genotoxic in Ames fluctuation assays by the standard plate‑incorporation method (OECD 471). The amide derivatives produced from this intermediate have been deployed in Phase I clinical candidates targeting MET kinase, with the free acid form registered under CAS [15848‑46‑9] appearing in regulatory starting material definitions filed with DMF Type II in the US and CEP submissions in Europe.What Distinguishes This Ester as a DPP Pigment Precursor?Ethyl 3,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate reacts with 4‑chlorobenzonitrile or 3‑cyanopyridine in a modified Reformatsky‑type cyclisation to produce 1,4‑diketo‑3,6‑diaryl‑pyrrolo[3,4‑c]pyrrole (DPP) pigments that are extensively used in automotive basecoats, architectural powder coatings, and high‑load masterbatches for polyolefin packaging. In a typical glass‑lined reactor under anhydrous conditions, the pyrrole ester (1.0 equivalent) and the aryl nitrile (2.2‑2.5 equivalents) are dispersed in tert‑amyl alcohol containing sodium tert‑pentoxide at 25–30 wt% concentration. The mixture is heated to 95–105 °C for 18–24 h while sweeping the headspace with nitrogen to exclude oxygen; oxygen ingress during the ring‑closure step causes browning and decreases tinctorial strength by up to 15 %. After cooling, the crude pigment is precipitated by drowning into a 5‑fold excess of methanol, filtered, and washed until the conductivity of the filtrate falls below 50 µS/cm. The pigment is then dried in a vacuum paddle dryer at 80 °C and 50 mbar to a residual moisture content of ≤ 0.5 %, after which it is micronised in a fluid‑energy mill with compressed air at 8 bar to a primary particle size range of 0.05–0.15 µm as determined by transmission electron microscopy. The 3,4‑dimethyl groups on the pyrrole ring serve to red‑shift the absorption maximum by 12–18 nm relative to the unsubstituted analogue, a bathochromic shift that is critical for achieving CI Pigment Red 254‑type shades with enhanced hiding power at p/b (pigment/binder) ratios of 0.15 in alkyd‑melamine systems. Colouristic properties are validated according to ISO 787‑1 (colour strength), ISO 787‑5 (oil absorption number), and ISO 2814‑1973 (hiding power); the specification for a grade suitable for food‑contact polypropylene under EU 10/2011 limits total migration of the pigment to 10 mg/dm² surface area when tested in 10 % ethanol, 3 % acetic acid, and olive oil simulants for 10 days at 40 °C. Production‑scale campaigns require rigorous cleaning of all stainless‑steel equipment with 2 % nitric acid passivation between batches to prevent iron‑contamination‑induced chroma loss, which has been documented at iron levels as low as 5 ppm in the dried pigment.Agrochemical Lead Optimisation Routes Utilising Pyrrole-2-carboxylate EstersThe ethyl ester serves as a scaffold‑hopping entry point in the synthesis of acaricidal and insecticidal phenylpyrroles, a class that emerged from the derivatisation of the antibiotic pyrrolnitrin. Saponification of the ester with potassium hydroxide in ethanol/water at reflux yields potassium 3,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate, which is subsequently decarboxylated by heating in quinoline with copper chromite catalyst at 190–210 °C to afford 3,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole. Vilsmeier‑Haack formylation using phosphoryl chloride and dimethylformamide in 1,2‑dichloroethane at 0–25 °C installs the 2‑formyl group regioselectively, and the resulting aldehyde is condensed with 2‑(trifluoromethyl)aniline in toluene under Dean‑Stark reflux to generate the Schiff base precursor. The key oxidative cyclisation is performed with sulfur monochloride in dimethylformamide at −5 to +5 °C at a molar ratio of 1.0:1.05 (Schiff base:S₂Cl₂) with a residence time of 45–60 min in a continuous‑flow microchannel reactor to suppress the exothermic runaway that has led to pressure excursions in batch vessels. The effluent stream is quenched into ice‑water and neutralised to pH 7.0–7.5 with 30 % aqueous ammonia, extracted into toluene, and the product crystallised from n‑heptane to give the active ingredient in > 99 % area‑percent purity by GC‑FID. Technical grade material formulated as a 240 g/L suspension concentrate (SC) must pass CIPAC MT 184 (suspensibility), MT 161 (wet sieve retention on 75 µm), and MT 194 (persistent foam) specifications. Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the five‑batch analysis dossier must demonstrate that the maximum content of 3,4‑dimethylpyrrole‑2‑carboxylic acid, a potential groundwater metabolite, does not exceed 0.5 g/kg in the technical concentrate. The synthesis route is chosen over phenacyl chloride approaches because the ethyl ester precursor permits straightforward dose‑scaling in kilogram‑scale pilot runs without the generation of bis‑chloromethyl by‑products classified as 1B mutagens under CLP Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.A significant research effort has focused on donor–acceptor (D–A) copolymers wherein the electron‑deficient unit is derived from pyrrolo[3,4‑c]pyrrole‑1,4‑dione (DPP) and the electron‑rich comonomer is a fused thiophene. Ethyl 3,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate is alkylated at the lactam nitrogen with 2‑octyldodecyl bromide using sodium hydride in anhydrous dimethylformamide before it undergoes the DPP-forming condensation with thiophene‑2‑carbonitrile. The resulting DPP‑thiophene monomer is brominated with N‑bromosuccinimide in chloroform/acetic acid under dark conditions to give the 2,5‑dibromo derivative, which is purified by column chromatography (silica gel, hexane/ethyl acetate 9:1) and recrystallised from ethanol to a purity of > 99.5 % as assessed by HPLC at 350 nm. Stille polycondensation with 2,5‑bis(trimethylstannyl)thieno[3,2‑b]thiophene is run in a high‑boiling solvent mixture of chlorobenzene/o‑dichlorobenzene (1:1 v/v) at 130 °C under microwave irradiation (150 W, 45 min) employing tris(dibenzylideneacetone)dipalladium(0) and tri(o‑tolyl)phosphine as the catalyst system. The crude polymer is precipitated into methanol, purified by Soxhlet extraction sequentially with acetone, hexane, and chloroform, and the chloroform fraction is concentrated and re‑precipitated to yield a dark‑green solid with a number‑average molecular weight (When Palladium-Catalysed Cross-Coupling Demands a Pyrrole-2-carboxylate Ligand FrameworkThe ester is converted into a family of bidentate phosphine‑pyrrole ligands that support palladium‑catalysed Buchwald‑Hartwig amination of aryl chlorides at exceedingly low catalyst loadings. Reaction of the lithium salt of ethyl 3,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate with chlorodicyclohexylphosphine in tetrahydrofuran at −78 °C and slow warming to ambient temperature affords the P,N‑ligand precursor, which is hydrolysed and coupled to 2,4,6‑triisopropylphenylsulfonamide to give a ligand that, upon pre‑complexation with Pd₂(dba)₃ in toluene at 60 °C, generates an active catalyst species. The pre‑catalyst is benchmarked using the coupling of 4‑chlorotoluene with morpholine in the presence of sodium tert‑butoxide (1.4 equivalents) in 1,2‑dimethoxyethane at 80 °C with a substrate‑to‑catalyst ratio (S/C) of 20 000:1, achieving turnover frequencies exceeding 6000 h⁻¹ as determined by gas‑chromatographic monitoring at 15‑minute intervals. The 3,4‑dimethyl substitution on the pyrrole core is not a mere spectator; it sufficiently raises the oxidation potential of the pyrrole to suppress catalyst deactivation via pyrrole ring oxidation, a process that plagues unsubstituted pyrrole‑based ligands in the presence of alkoxide bases under oxygen‑depleted but not absolutely anaerobic conditions (glovebox with 5–15 ppm O₂). Catalyst batches are stored under argon in septum‑sealed vials at −20 °C, and the palladium content in the isolated amination products is routinely controlled to < 5 ppm by X‑ray fluorescence screening to meet the Ph.Eur. 5.20 guideline for metal catalyst residues in advanced intermediates for human pharmaceuticals. Reaction calorimetry (Mettler Toledo RC1e, isothermal mode at 80 °C) reveals an exothermic initiation spike that reaches a specific heat release rate of 15 W/kg within the first 5 minutes of sodium tert‑butoxide injection; scale‑up protocols therefore mandate programmed dosing of the base over 30 min with jacket cooling at 5 °C to maintain the reactor contents within ± 2 °C of the set point, thereby preventing thermal amplification of the β‑hydride elimination pathway that leads to toluene by‑product and inactive palladium mirror formation.In multi‑metal inhibitor packages for mild steel exposed to cooling water that cycles between 4 and 8 Laroué saturation index, the pyrrole ester is first condensed with benzaldehyde to generate a cinnamoyl‑substituted pyrrole, followed by Mannich reaction with formaldehyde and diethanolamine to install a tertiary amine handle. The resultant molecule exhibits anodic inhibition behaviour through strong chemisorption onto the metal surface via the pyrrole π‑system, as evidenced by X‑ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) showing N 1s binding energy shifts of 0.7–0.9 eV relative to the bulk compound when deposited from a 50 mg/L solution onto grit‑blasted SAE 1020 carbon steel panels. Linear polarisation resistance measurements conducted according to ASTM G59‑97 in synthetic cooling water containing 200 mg/L chloride and 120 mg/L sulfate at 45 °C indicate that a dose of 25 ppm active ingredient reduces the corrosion rate from 0.82 mm/year to 0.09 mm/year, with the inhibitor efficiency exceeding 89 %. Because the dimethylpyrrole moiety is rapidly oxidized by free chlorine, treated water streams must maintain a halogen‑based biocide residual no higher than 0.2 mg/L as total Cl₂; above this threshold, consumption of the inhibitor is observed within 4 h, monitored by the collapse of the UV absorption band at 298 nm. Formulated concentrates typically blend the active at 15 % w/w with a phosphonocarboxylic acid copolymer (10 %), zinc chloride as a cathodic synergist (2 %, expressed as Zn²⁺), and a tolyltriazole yellow‑metal deactivator (3 %) in aqueous glycolic acid solvent at pH 2.8–3.2. Compatibility trials in a pilot‑scale recirculating loop with Schedule 40 carbon steel piping (DN 50, flow velocity 1.2 m/s) demonstrate that pre‑dilution of the concentrate to 1 % v/v with demineralised water before injection into the cooling‑tower sump eliminates shock‑precipitation of zinc hydroxide, which otherwise clogs inline basket‑type Y‑strainers with 0.5 mm perforation within 48 h of initial dosing. Absence of pitting corrosion is validated by cross‑sectional metallography on coupons exposed for 90 days as per ASTM G46‑94, with a pit depth rejection criterion of > 12 µm. Discharge compliance is governed by OSPAR Recommendation 2006/3, requiring that the ecotoxicity profile of the formulated product be established on Daphnia magna acute immobilisation test (OECD 202) and algal growth inhibition test (OECD 201) with a no observed effect concentration (NOEC) ≥ 10 mg/L for formulated product in synthetic freshwater. |
Competitive 1H-Pyrrole-2-Carboxylicacid, 3,4-Dimethyl-, Ethyl Ester prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please call us at +8615651039172 or mail to sales9@bouling-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615651039172
Email: sales9@bouling-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
| Monomer | Eox,onset (V vs. Ag/AgCl) | λmax (nm) | σdoped (S·cm⁻¹) | Solubility in CHCl₃ (mg·mL⁻¹) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethyl 1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate | +0.86 | 425–445 | 1 × 10⁻² | 0.8 |
| Ethyl 3,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate | +1.02 | 480–510 | 4 × 10⁻³ | 3.2 |
| Ethyl 5-methyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate | +0.91 | 450–470 | 7 × 10⁻³ | 1.5 |
| Ester | Melting point (°C) | DSC enthalpy (J·g⁻¹) | Water uptake at 60% RH (wt%) | LogP (calc.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methyl 1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate | 73–75 | 132 | 0.8 | 1.12 |
| Ethyl 1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate | 39–41 | 98 | 1.2 | 1.60 |
| Ethyl 3,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate | 46–48 | 105 | 0.4 | 2.34 |
| Ethyl 5-phenyl-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate | 102–104 | 146 | 0.9 | 3.12 |